Antonio De Nicola
Michele Missikoff
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
UPON Lite focuses on users, typically domain experts without ontology expertise, minimizing the role of ontology engineers.
- Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., and Ives, Z. DBpedia: A nucleus for a Web of open data. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Semantic Web Conference and Second Asian Semantic Web Conference (Busan, Korea, Nov. 11--15). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2007, 722--735. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Barbagallo, A., De Nicola, A., and Missikoff, M. eGovernment ontologies: Social participation in building and evolution. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Honolulu, HI, Jan. 5--8). IEEE Computer Society, 2010, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burton-Jones, A., Storey V.C., Sugumaran, V., and Ahluwalia P. A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55, 1 (Oct. 2005), 84--102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chimienti, M., Dassisti, M., De Nicola, A., and Missikoff M. Evaluation of ontology building methodologies: A method based on balanced scorecards. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, J.L.G. Dietz, Ed. (Madeira, Portugal, Oct. 6--8). INSTICC Press, 2009, 141--146.Google Scholar
- D'Antonio, F., Missikoff, M., and Taglino, F. Formalizing the OPAL eBusiness ontology design patterns with OWL. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications (Madeira, Portugal, Mar. 27--30). Springer, London, U.K., 2007, 345--356.Google Scholar
- Debruyne, C., Tran, T.-K., and Meersman, R. Grounding ontologies with social processes and natural language. Journal on Data Semantics 2, 2-3 (June 2013), 89--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M., and Navigli, R. A software engineering approach to ontology building. Information Systems 34, 2 (Apr. 2009), 258--275. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., and Juristo, N. Methontology: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium Series (Stanford, CA, Mar. 24--26). AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1997, 33-40.Google Scholar
- Keet, C.M. and Artale, A. Representing and reasoning over taxonomy of part-whole relationships. Applied Ontology 3, 1-2 (Jan. 2008), 91--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McGuinness, D.L. and van Harmelen, F. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation. W3C, Cambridge, MA, 2003; http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/Google Scholar
- Noy, N.F. and McGuinness, D.L. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2001; http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Parveen, A., Habib, A., and Sarwar, S. Scope and limitation of electronic voting system. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing 2, 5 (May 2013), 123--128.Google Scholar
- Pink, D.H. Folksonomy. New York Times (Dec. 11, 2005); http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/magazine/11ideas1-21.html?_r=0Google Scholar
- Sclano, F. and Velardi, P. TermExtractor: A Web application to learn the common terminology of interest groups and research communities. In Proceedings of the Seventh Terminology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (Sophia Antipolis, France, Oct. 8--9). Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 2007, 85--94.Google Scholar
- Spyns, P., Tang, Y., and Meersman, R. An ontology engineering methodology for DOGMA. Applied Ontology 3, 1-2 (Jan. 2008), 13--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., and Fernández-López, M. The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering. In Ontology Engineering in a Networked World. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2012, 9--34.Google Scholar
- Sugumaran, V. and Storey, V.C. The role of domain ontologies in database design: An ontology management and conceptual modeling environment. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 31, 3 (Sept. 2006), 1064--1094. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sure, Y., Staab, S., and Studer, R. On-To-Knowledge Methodology (OTKM). In Handbook on Ontologies, S. Staab and R. Studer, Eds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2004, 117--132.Google Scholar
- Tempich, C., Simperl, E., Luczak, M., Studer, R., and Pinto, H.S. Argumentation-based ontology engineering. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 6 (Nov.-Dec. 2007), 52--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Damme, C., Hepp, M., and Siorpaes, K. FolksOntology: An integrated approach for turning folksonomies into ontologies. In Proceedings of the Workshop Bridging the Gap Between Semantic Web and Web 2.0 of the Fourth European Semantic Web Conference (Innsbruck, Austria, June 7), 2007, 57--70.Google Scholar
- Velardi, P., Cucchiarelli, A., and Petit M. A taxonomy learning method and its application to characterize a scientific Web community. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19, 2 (Feb. 2007), 180--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Universal Business Language; https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/Google Scholar
- AlchemyAPI; http://www.alchemyapi.com/Google Scholar
- Open Calais; http://www.opencalais.com/Google Scholar
- WordNet; http://wordnet.princeton.edu/Google Scholar
- EuroVoc; http://eurovoc.europa.eu/Google Scholar
- Anzo; http://www.cambridgesemantics.com/Google Scholar
- Protégé; http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MappingMasterGoogle Scholar
- RacerPro; http://franz.com/agraph/racer/Google Scholar
- Pellet; http://clarkparsia.com/pellet/Google Scholar
- FaCT++; http://owl.man.ac.uk/factplusplus/Google Scholar
- Google Docs; https://docs.google.com/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A lightweight methodology for rapid ontology engineering
Recommendations
A lightweight ontology repository
AAMAS '03: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systemsMulti-agent systems rely on shared ontologies to enable unambiguous communication between agents. An ontology defines the terms or vocabularies used within messages encoded using an agent communication language (ACL). In order for ontologies to be ...
Heavyweight ontology engineering
OTM'06: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: AWeSOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET - Volume Part IAn heavyweight ontology is a lightweight ontology (i.e. an ontology simply based on a hierarchy of concepts and a hierarchy of relations) enriched with axioms used to fix the semantic interpretation of concepts and relations Such an ontology can be a ...
An ontology engineering methodology for DOGMA
Ontological Foundations of Conceptual ModellingAlthough ontologies occupy a central place in the Semantic Web and related research domains, there are currently not many fully fledged ontology engineering methodologies available. In this paper, we want to present an integrated methodology for ...
Comments