skip to main content
research-article

Exploring the Subexponential Complexity of Completion Problems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 August 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Let F be a family of graphs. In the F-Completion problem, we are given an n-vertex graph G and an integer k as input, and asked whether at most k edges can be added to G so that the resulting graph does not contain a graph from F as an induced subgraph. It was shown recently that two special cases of F-Completion, namely, (i) the problem of completing into a chordal graph known as Minimum Fill-in (SIAM J. Comput. 2013), which corresponds to the case of F={C4, C5, C6, …}, and (ii) the problem of completing into a split graph (Algorithmica 2015), that is, the case of F={C4, 2K2, C5}, are solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(√klogk)nO(1). The exploration of this phenomenon is the main motivation for our research on F-Completion.

In this article, we prove that completions into several well-studied classes of graphs without long induced cycles and paths also admit parameterized subexponential time algorithms by showing that:

—The problem Trivially Perfect Completion, which is F-Completion for F={C4, P4}, a cycle and a path on four vertices, is solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(√klogk)nO(1).

—The problems known in the literature as Pseudosplit Completion, the case in which F{2K2, C4}, and Threshold Completion, in which F=2K2, P4, C4}, are also solvable in time 2O(√klogk)nO}(1).

We complement our algorithms for F-Completion with the following lower bounds:

—For F={2K2}, F= {C4}, F={Po4}, and F={2K2, P4}, F-Completion cannot be solved in time 2o(k)nO(1) unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails.

Our upper and lower bounds provide a complete picture of the subexponential parameterized complexity of F-Completion problems for any F ⊆ {2K2, C4, P4}.

References

  1. Noga Alon, Daniel Lokshtanov, and Saket Saurabh. 2009. Fast fast. In Proceedings of the 36th Colloquium of Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5555. Springer, Berlin, 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ivan Bliznets, Fedor V. Fomin, Marcin Pilipczuk, and Michał Pilipczuk. 2014a. A subexponential parameterized algorithm for interval completion. CoRR abs/1402.3473.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ivan Bliznets, Fedor V. Fomin, Marcin Pilipczuk, and Michał Pilipczuk. 2014b. A subexponential parameterized algorithm for proper interval completion. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8737. Springer, Berlin, 173--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hans L. Bodlaender. 1998. A partial k-Arboretum of graphs with bounded treewidth. Theoretical Computer Science 209, 1--2, 1--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andreas Brandstädt, Van Bang Le, and Jeremy P. Spinrad. 1999. Graph Classes. A Survey. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Pablo Burzyn, Flavia Bonomo, and Guillermo Durán. 2006. NP-Completeness results for edge modification problems. Discrete Applied Mathematics 154, 13, 1824--1844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Leizhen Cai. 1996. Fixed-parameter tractability of graph modification problems for hereditary properties. Information Processing Letters 58, 4, 171--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Leizhen Cai and Yufei Cai. 2015. Incompressibility of H-Free edge modification problems. Algorithmica 71, 3, 731--757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Erik D. Demaine, Fedor V. Fomin, Mohammadtaghi Hajiaghayi, and Dimitrios M. Thilikos. 2005. Subexponential parameterized algorithms on bounded-genus graphs and H-minor-free graphs. Journal of the ACM 52, 6, 866--893. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pål Grønås Drange, Fedor V. Fomin, Michał Pilipczuk, and Yngve Villanger. 2014. Exploring subexponential parameterized complexity of completion problems. In Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS) (LIPIcs), Vol. 25. Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 288--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pål Grønås Drange and Michał Pilipczuk. 2015. A polynomial kernel for trivially perfect editing. In European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), N. Bansal and I. Finocchi (Eds.). LNCS 9294, Springer, Heidelberg, 424--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jörg Flum and Martin Grohe. 2006. Parameterized Complexity Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fedor V. Fomin, Stefan Kratsch, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk, and Yngve Villanger. 2014. Tight bounds for parameterized complexity of cluster editing with a small number of clusters. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 80, 7, 1430--1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fedor V. Fomin and Yngve Villanger. 2013. Subexponential parameterized algorithm for minimum fill-in. SIAM Journal on Computing 42, 6, 2197--2216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Esha Ghosh, Sudeshna Kolay, Mrinal Kumar, Pranabendu Misra, Fahad Panolan, Ashutosh Rai, and M. S. Ramanujan. 2015. Faster parameterized algorithms for deletion to split graphs. Algorithmica 71, 4, 989--1006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Martin Charles Golumbic. 1980. Algorithmic Graph Theory and Perfect Graphs. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sylvain Guillemot, Frédéric Havet, Christophe Paul, and Anthony Perez. 2013. On the (non-)existence of polynomial kernels for Pl-free edge modification problems. Algorithmica 65, 4, 900--926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jiong Guo. 2007. Problem kernels for NP-complete edge deletion problems: Split and related graphs. In Algorithms and Computation, 18th International Symposium (ISAAC). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4835. Springer, Berlin, 915--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Russell Impagliazzo, Ramamohan Paturi, and Francis Zane. 2001. Which problems have strongly exponential complexity? Journal of Computer and System Sciences 63, 4, 512--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yan Jing-Ho, Chen Jer-Jeong, and Gerard J. Chang. 1996. Quasi-threshold graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics 69, 3, 247--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Haim Kaplan and Ron Shamir. 1996. Pathwidth, bandwidth, and completion problems to proper interval graphs with small cliques. SIAM Journal on Computing 25, 3, 540--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Haim Kaplan, Ron Shamir, and Robert E. Tarjan. 1999. Tractability of parameterized completion problems on chordal, strongly chordal, and proper interval graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing 28, 5, 1906--1922. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Christian Komusiewicz and Johannes Uhlmann. 2012. Cluster editing with locally bounded modifications. Discrete Applied Mathematics 160, 15, 2259--2270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stefan Kratsch and Magnus Wahlström. 2013. Two edge modification problems without polynomial kernels. Discrete Optimization 10, 3, 193--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Frédéric Maffray and Myriam Preissmann. 1994. Linear recognition of pseudo-split graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics 52, 3, 307--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nadimpalli V. R. Mahadev and Uri N. Peled. 1995. Threshold Graphs and Related Topics. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 56. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Federico Mancini. 2008. Graph Modification Problems Related to Graph Classes. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Assaf Natanzon, Ron Shamir, and Roded Sharan. 2000. A polynomial approximation algorithm for the minimum fill-in problem. SIAM Journal on Computing 30, 1067--1079. Issue 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jaroslav Nešetřil and Patrice Ossona de Mendez. 2012. Sparsity -- Graphs, Structures, and Algorithms. Algorithms and combinatorics, Vol. 28. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yngve Villanger, Pinar Heggernes, Christophe Paul, and Jan Arne Telle. 2009. Interval completion is fixed parameter tractable. SIAM Journal on Computing 38, 5, 2007--2020. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mihalis Yannakakis. 1981a. Computing the minimum fill-in is NP-complete. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods 2, 1, 77--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Mihalis Yannakakis. 1981b. Edge-deletion problems. SIAM Journal on Computing 10, 2, 297--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Subexponential Complexity of Completion Problems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
      ACM Transactions on Computation Theory  Volume 7, Issue 4
      September 2015
      110 pages
      ISSN:1942-3454
      EISSN:1942-3462
      DOI:10.1145/2818749
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 August 2015
      • Revised: 1 June 2015
      • Accepted: 1 June 2015
      • Received: 1 April 2014
      Published in toct Volume 7, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader