skip to main content
research-article

The ROV 3D Project: Deep-Sea Underwater Survey Using Photogrammetry: Applications for Underwater Archaeology

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 August 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this article, we present an approach for a deep-sea survey based on photogrammetry using a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV). A hybrid technique gives us real-time results, sufficient for piloting the ROV from the surface vessel and ensuring a uniform coverage of the site, as well as recording high-definition images using an onboard computer that will later provide a survey with millimetric precision. The measurements are made without any contact and are noninvasive. The time required on-site is minimal and corresponds to the time needed by the ROV to cover the zone. With the photos taken at a frame rate synchronized at 10Hz, the ROV required 2 hours to perform the experiment presented in this article: the survey of the Roman shipwreck Cap Bénat 4, at a depth of 328m. The approach presented in this work was developed in the scope of the ROV 3D project. This project, financed by the Fond Unique Interministériel (FUI) for 3 years, brings together two industrial partners and a research laboratory. Companie Maritime d’Expertise (COMEX) coordinated this project.

References

  1. G. F. Bass. 1970. Archaeology Under Water. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G. F. Bass and D. Rosencrantz. 1973. L’utilisation des submersibles pour les recherches et la cartographie photogrammétrique sous-marine. Paper presented at the L’archéologie subaquatique, une discipline naissante, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. O. Buchsenschutz. 2007. Images et relevés archéologiques, de la preuve à la démonstration. Paper presented at the 132e congrès national des sociétés historiques et scientifiques, Arles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Chapman, K. Bale, and P. Drap. 2008. Exploring underwater sites: Virtual submarine allows access to Europe's shipwrecks. Journal of Ocean Technology 3, 4, 36--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. B. Ciani, E. K. Hunter, C. B. Dowling, and D. H. Brunk. 1971. Seafloor surveying by divers. Journal of the Surveying and Mapping Division 97, 2, 149--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Drap and L. Long. 2001. Towards a digital excavation data management system: The “Grand Ribaud F” Estruscan deep-water wreck. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage. 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Drap, D. Merad, J.-M. Boï, A. Mahiddine, D. Peloso, B. Chemisky, E. Seguin, F. Alcala, and O. Bianchimani. 2014. Underwater multimodal survey: Merging optical and acoustic data. In Underwater Seascapes: From Geographical to Ecological Perspectives O. Musard, L. Le Dû-Blayo, P. Francour, J.-P. Beurier, E. Feunteun, and L. Talassinos (Eds.), (Vol. XVII). Springer-Verlag, 221--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Drap, D. Merad, J. Seinturier, A. Mahiddine, Peloso Daniela, J.-M. Boï, L. Long, B. Chemisky, and J. Garrabou. 2013. Underwater photogrammetry for archaeology and marine biology: 40 years of experience in Marseille, France. In Proceedings of the Digital Heritage International Congress, Vol. 1. 97--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. W. Faig. 1979. Photogrammetric surveys of underwater objects. In Proceedings of the Coastal Mapping Symposium. 183--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. Foley and D. Mindell. 2002. Precision survey and archaeological methodology in deep water. Journal of the Hellenic Institute of Marine Archaeology 6, 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Y. Furukawa and J. Ponce. 2010. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32, 8, 1362--1376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Gracias, P. Ridao, R. Garcia, J. Escartin, M. L’Hour, F. Cibecchini, et al. (2013, June). Mapping the Moon: Using a lightweight AUV to survey the site of the 17th century ship “La Lune.” In Proceedings of the 2013 MTS/EEEI OCEANS Conference. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. C. Harris. 1979. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. London, England, Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Hesnard. 1989. L’épave Grand Ribaud D. Les apports de la photogrammétrie sous-marine. Le courrier du CNRS, archéologie en France métropolitaine 73, 66--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Hoehle. 1971. Reconstruction of the underwater object. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 37, 9, 948--954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Johannessen and F. Prytz. 2005. Underwater metrology: Exploiting old techniques for underwater surveying and metrology. Hydro International 9, 10, 22--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. L’Hour and L. Long. 1983. Direction des recherches archéologiques sous-marines. Catalogue d’exposition au cloître St-Trophime, Arles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. L’Hour and L. Long. 1985. Archéologie sous-marine des côtes de France, Vingt ans de recherche. Catalogue de l’exposition du château des Ducs de Bretagne, Nantes, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. L’Hour, L. Long, and E. Rieth. 1989. Le Mauritius, La mémoire engloutie. Casterman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. B. Liou. 1973. Recherches archéologiques sous-marines. Gallia 31, 2, 571--608.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. L. Long. 1986. The Wreck of Carry-le-Rouet: an evidence about stone-sea-transport at the end of the second century or at the beginning of the first century BC. Beneath the Waters of time.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. L. Long. 1988. The ancient wreck of Carry-le-Rouet: Evidence of sea transport of stone in the 2nd or 1st century B.C. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Underwater Archaeology. 22--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Long. 1989. L’épave antique Cap Bénat 4. Expertise archéologique d’un talus d’amphores à grande profondeur. Cahiers d’archéologie Subaquatique 6, 99--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. L. Long. 1995. Les archéologues au bras de fer, Nouvelle approche de l’archéologie en eau profonde. Protection du patrimoine archéologique sous-marin en Méditerranée, 100 sites historiques d’intérêt commun méditerranéen, documents techniques V, A.M.P.H.I. 14--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. L. Long and H. G. Delauze. 1996. Marseille, L’épave Sud-Caveaux 1, Une nouvelle expérience en matière d’archéologie sous-marine profonde. Bilan Scientifique du Drassm 1996, 84--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Long and P. Drap. 2010. Au large de Marseille, L’épave Port-Miou C. Bilan Scientifique du DRASSM 2010, 80--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. L. Long, P. Drap, L.-F. Gantes, and M. Rival. 2001. L’épave Grand Ribaud F, Rapport Scientifique Intermédiaire Année 2001. Bilan scientifique du DRASSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. L. Long and A. Illouze. 2002. La Lune, un vaisseau de Louis XIV perdu en 1664 au large de Toulon. Historique du naufrage et photogramm´etrie de l’´epave par 90m de fond. Cahiers d’Archéologie Subaquatique 14, 167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Lourakis and A. Argyros. 2009. SBA: A software package for generic sparse bundle adjustment. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 36, 1, Article No. 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. Mahiddine, D. Merad, P. Drap, and J.-M. Boï. (2014). Partial 3D-object retrieval using level curves. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition. 77--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. C. Monroy. 2010. A Digital Library Approach to the Reconstruction of Ancient Sunken Ships. Texas A&M University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. C. Negrel and J. P. Clerc. 1973. Relevé photogrammétrique d’une coque du bas-Empire: (Epave B--Pointe de la Luque) étude d’une méthode simplifiée nécessitant moins de matériel que sur les expériences déjà réalisées notamment en France sur l’épave Planier III et à la Madrague de Giens. Cahiers d’Archéologie subaquatique, II.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. J. A. Parker. 1992. Ancient Shipwrecks of the Mediterranean and the Roman Provinces (Vol. 580). Oxford: BAR International Series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. O. Pizarro, R. Eustice, and H. Singh. 2009. Large area 3-D reconstructions from underwater optical surveys. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 34, 2, 150--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. J. Pollio. 1968. Application of Underwater Photogrammetry. Naval Oceanographic Office.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. J. Pollio. 1971. Underwater mapping with photography and SONAR. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 37, 9, 955--968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. P. Pomey. 1985. Perspectives d’avenir pour l’archéologie sous-marine: L’archéologie en eau profonde. Deuxième Journées d’Etude sur la Plongée Scientifique, Bulletin de l’institut Océanographique de Monaco. 59--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. E. Rieth. 1979. Découverte d’une épave antique. Archéologia, 136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. C. Santamaria. 1975. L’épave A du Cap Dramont (Saint-Raphaël), fouilles 1971--1974. Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise 7, 185--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. H. Singh, C. Roman, O. Pizarro, R. Eustice, and A. Can. 2007. Towards high resolution imaging from underwater vehicles. International Journal of Robotics Research 26, 1, 55--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. N. Sünderhauf, K. Konolidge, S. Lacroix, and P. Protzel. 2005. Visual odometry using sparse bundle adjustment on an autonomous outdoor vehicle. In Autonome Mobile Systeme 2005. Informatik aktuell. Springer, 157--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. A. Tchernia and P. Pomey. 1990. Besoins en techologie de l’archéologie sous-marine. Paper presented at the Colloque ISM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. A. Tchernia, P. Pomey, and A. Hesnard. 1978. L’épave romaine de La Madrague de Giens (Var). Supplément à Gallia N°. 34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. B. Triggs, P. F. McLauchlan, R. I. Hartley, and A. W. Fitzgibbon. 2000. Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis. In Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1883. Springer, 298--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. UNESCO. 2001. Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage. Retrieved June 21, 2015, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001260/126065e.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. J. Xue and X. Su. 2012. A new approach for the bundle adjustment problem with fixed constraints in stereo vision. Optik: International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 123, 21, 1923--1927.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The ROV 3D Project: Deep-Sea Underwater Survey Using Photogrammetry: Applications for Underwater Archaeology

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
          Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 8, Issue 4
          August 2015
          102 pages
          ISSN:1556-4673
          EISSN:1556-4711
          DOI:10.1145/2815168
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          © 2015 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 August 2015
          • Accepted: 1 April 2015
          • Revised: 1 March 2015
          • Received: 1 December 2014
          Published in jocch Volume 8, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader