skip to main content
research-article

Using Health-Consumer-Contributed Data to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions by Association Mining with Temporal Analysis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 July 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Since adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a significant health problem all over the world, ADR detection has become an important research topic in drug safety surveillance. As many potential ADRs cannot be detected though premarketing review, drug safety currently depends heavily on postmarketing surveillance. Particularly, current postmarketing surveillance in the United States primarily relies on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). However, the effectiveness of such spontaneous reporting systems for ADR detection is not as good as expected because of the extremely high underreporting ratio of ADRs. Moreover, it often takes the FDA years to complete the whole process of collecting reports, investigating cases, and releasing alerts. Given the prosperity of social media, many online health communities are publicly available for health consumers to share and discuss any healthcare experience such as ADRs they are suffering. Such health-consumer-contributed content is timely and informative, but this data source still remains untapped for postmarketing drug safety surveillance. In this study, we propose to use (1) association mining to identify the relations between a drug and an ADR and (2) temporal analysis to detect drug safety signals at the early stage. We collect data from MedHelp and use the FDA's alerts and information of drug labeling revision as the gold standard to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach. The experiment results show that health-related social media is a promising source for ADR detection, and our proposed techniques are effective to identify early ADR signals.

References

  1. R. Agrawal, T. Imieliński, and A. Swami. 1993. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Record. ACM, 207--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. M. Ale and G. H. Rossi. 2000. An approach to discovering temporal association rules. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing-Volume 1. ACM, 294--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. W.-H. Au and K. C. C. Chan. 2005. Mining changes in association rules: A fuzzy approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 149, 1 (2005), 87--104. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2004.07.018 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Benton, J. H. Holmes, S. Hill, A. Chung, and L. Ungar. 2012. medpie: An information extraction package for medical message board posts. Bioinformatics 28, 5 (2012), 743--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Benton, L. Ungar, S. Hill, S. Hennessy, J. Mao, A. Chung, and J. H. Holmes. 2011. Identifying potential adverse effects using the web: A new approach to medical hypothesis generation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 44, 6 (2011), 989. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Boettcher. 2011. Contrast and change mining. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1, 3 (2011), 215--230. doi:10.1002/widm.27Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Cami, A. Arnold, S. Manzi, and B. Reis. 2011. Predicting adverse drug events using pharmacological network models. Science Translational Medicine 3, 114 (2011), 1--11. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002774Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. B. W. Chee, R. Berlin, and B. Schatz. 2011. Predicting adverse drug events from personal health messages. In Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium. 217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. X. Chen and I. Petrounias. 1998. A framework for temporal data mining. In Proceedings of the Database and Expert Systems Applications. Springer, 796--805. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. DuMouchel. 1999. Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables, with an application to the FDA spontaneous reporting system. American Statistician 53, 3 (1999), 177--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. I. R. Edwards and J. K. Aronson. 2000. Adverse drug reactions: Definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 356, 9237 (2000), 1255--1259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. J. W. Evans, P. C. Waller, and S. Davis. 2001. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 10, 6 (2001), 483--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Fox and M. Duggan. 2013. Health Online 2013. Retrieved 5/20/2013, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. F. Gharib, H. Nassar, M. Taha, and A. Abraham. 2010. An efficient algorithm for incremental mining of temporal association rules. Data & Knowledge Engineering 69, 8 (2010), 800--815. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Han, M. Kamber, and J. Pei. 2006. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Hauben. 2004. Early postmarketing drug safety surveillance: Data mining points to consider. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38, 10 (2004), 1625--1630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. L. Hazell and S. A. W. Shakir. 2006. Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review, Vol. 29, pp. 385--385. New Zealand: Adis International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. M. Hochberg, S. J. Reisinger, R. K. Pearson, D. J. O'Hara, and K. Hall. 2007. Using data mining to predict safety actions from FDA adverse event reporting system data. Drug Information Journal 41, 5 (2007), 633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. C. Hofer-Dueckelmann, E. Prinz, W. Beindl, J. Szymanski, G. Fellhofer, M. Pichler, and J. Schuler. 2011. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with hospital admissions - elderly female patients are at highest risk. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 49, 10 (2011), 577--586. doi:10.5414/cp201514Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Y. Ji, Y. Hao, P. Dews, A. Mansour, J. Tran, R. E. Miller, and R. M. Massanari. 2011. A potential causal association mining algorithm for screening adverse drug reactions in postmarketing surveillance. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 15, 3 (2011), 428--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Ji, R. M. Massanari, J. Ager, J. Yen, R. E. Miller, and H. Ying. 2007. A fuzzy logic-based computational recognition-primed decision model. Information Sciences 177, 20 (2007), 4338--4353. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.026 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Y. Ji, H. Ying, P. Dews, M. S. Farber, A. Mansour, J. Tran, and R. M. Massanari. 2010. A fuzzy recognition-primed decision model-based causal association mining algorithm for detecting adverse drug reactions in postmarketing surveillance. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Jiang and C. Yang. 2013. Using co-occurrence analysis to expand consumer health vocabularies from social media data. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, September 8--11, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. L. Jiang, C. C. Yang, and J. Li. 2013. Discovering consumer health expressions from consumer-contributed content. In Proceedings of the Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. Springer, 164--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Jin, J. Chen, H. He, C. Kelman, D. McAullay, and C. M. O'Keefe. 2010. Signaling potential adverse drug reactions from administrative health databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22, 6 (2010), 839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Jin, J. Chen, H. He, G. J. Williams, C. Kelman, and C. M. O'Keefe. 2008. Mining unexpected temporal associations: Applications in detecting adverse drug reactions. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 12, 4 (2008), 488--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. C. Kongkaew, P. R. Noyce, and D. M. Ashcroft. 2008. Hospital admissions associated with adverse drug reactions: A systematic review of prospective observational studies. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 42, 7 (2008), 1017--1025. doi:10.1345/aph.1L037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Kotsiantis and D. Kanellopoulos. 2006. Association rules mining: A recent overview. GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering 32, 1 (2006), 71--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. K. Kubota, D. Koide, and T. Hirai. 2004. Comparison of data mining methodologies using Japanese spontaneous reports. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 13, 6 (2004), 387--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. K. L. Lanctot and C. A. Naranjo. 1994. Computer-assisted evaluation of adverse events using a Bayesian-approach. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 34, 2 (1994), 142--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. J. Lazarou, B. H. Pomeranz, and P. N. Corey. 1998. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 279, 15 (1998), 1200--1205. doi:10.1001/jama.279.15.1200Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. R. Leaman, L. Wojtulewicz, R. Sullivan, A. Skariah, J. Yang, and G. Gonzalez. 2010. Towards Internet-age pharmacovigilance: Extracting adverse drug reactions from user posts to health-related social networks. Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing. ACL, 117--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. C.-H. Lee, C.-R. Lin, and M.-S. Chen. 2001. On mining general temporal association rules in a publication database. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'01). IEEE, 337--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. W.-J. Lee and S.-J. Lee. 2004. Discovery of fuzzy temporal association rules. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 34, 6 (2004), 2330--2342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Y. Li, P. Ning, X. S. Wang, and S. Jajodia. 2003. Discovering calendar-based temporal association rules. Data & Knowledge Engineering 44, 2 (2003), 193--218. doi:10.1016/s0169-023x(02)00135-0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. W.-Y. Lin, H.-Y. Li, J.-W. Du, W.-Y. Feng, C.-F. Lo, and V.-W. Soo. 2012. iADRs: Towards online adverse drug reaction analysis. SpringerPlus 1, 1 (2012), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. M. Lindquist, I. R. Edwards, A. Bate, H. Fucik, A. M. Nunes, and M. Stahl. 1999. From association to alert - A revised approach to international signal analysis. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 1 (1999), 15--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. X. Liu and H. Chen. 2013. AZDrugMiner: An information extraction system for mining patient-reported adverse drug events in online patient forums. Smart Health. Springer, 134--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Med Help. (1994, Last Updated 6/20/2011). Medical information, forums and communities: About us. Retrieved 1/29/2014, from http://www.medhelp.org/aboutus.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. A. Nikfarjam and G. H. Gonzalez. 2011. Pattern mining for extraction of mentions of adverse drug reactions from user comments. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2011. 1019--1026.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Y. Pouliot, A. P. Chiang, and A. J. Butte. 2011. Predicting adverse drug reactions using publicly available PubChem bioassay data. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 90, 1 (2011), 90--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. J. F. Roddick and M. Spiliopoulou. 2002. A survey of temporal knowledge discovery paradigms and methods. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 14, 4 (2002), 750--767. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. K. Shanmugapriya, D. Shanmugapriya, H. S. Parveen, and V. Niranjani. 2011. N-Unexpected temporal association rule for diagnosing adverse drug reaction from health database. International Proceedings of Computer Science and Information Technology (IPCSIT'11). 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. A. Szarfman, J. M. Tonning, and P. M. Doraiswamy. 2004. Pharmacovigilancein the 21st century: New systematic tools for an old problem. Pharmacotherapy 24, (2004), 1099--1104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. E. P. van Puijenbroek, A. C. G. Egberts, R. H. B. Meyboom, and H. G. M. Leufkens. 1999. Signalling possible drug--drug interactions in a spontaneous reporting system: Delay of withdrawal bleeding during concomitant use of oral contraceptives and itraconazole. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 47, (1999), 689--693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. H. Wactlar, M. Pavel, and W. Barkis. 2011. Can computer science save healthcare? IEEE Intelligent Systems 26, 5 (2011), 79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. X. Wang, G. Hripcsak, M. Markatou, and C. Friedman. 2009. Active computerized pharmacovigilance using natural language processing, statistics, and electronic health records: A feasibility study. JAMIA: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16, 3 (2009), 328--337. doi:10.1197/jamia.M3028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. R. W. White, N. P. Tatonetti, N. H. Shah, R. B. Altman, and E. Horvitz. 2013. Web-scale pharmacovigilance: listening to signals from the crowd. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20, 3 (2013), 404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. E. Winarko and J. F. Roddick. 2007. ARMADA--an algorithm for discovering richer relative temporal association rules from interval-based data. Data & Knowledge Engineering 63, 1 (2007), 76--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. A. J. J. Wood. 2000. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and clopidogrel—A need for new approaches to drug safety. New England Journal of Medicine 342, 24 (2000), 1824--1826. doi:10.1056/nejm200006153422410Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. C. C. Yang, L. Jiang, H. Yang, and X. Tang. 2012. Detecting signals of adverse drug reactions from health consumer contributed content in social media. Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Health Informatics, Beijing, August 12, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. C. C. Yang, H. Yang, L. Jiang, and M. Zhang. 2012. Social media mining for drug safety signal detection. Proceedings of ACM CIKM International Workshop on Smart Health and Wellbeing, Maui, Hawaii, October 29, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Q. Zeng, S. Kogan, N. Ash, R. A. Greenes, and A. A. Boxwala. 2002. Characteristics of consumer terminology for health information retrieval. Methods of Information in Medicine 41, 4 (2002), 289--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Q. Zeng, S. Kogan, N. Ash, and R. A. Greenes. 2001. Patient and clinician vocabulary: How different are they? Studies in Health Technology Information (2001), 399--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Q. T. Zeng and T. Tse. 2006. Exploring and developing consumer health vocabularies. JAMIA: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13, 1 (2006), 24--29. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1761Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Q. T. Zeng, T. Tse, J. Crowell, G. Divita, L. Roth, and A. C. Browne. 2005. Identifying consumer-friendly display (CFD) names for health concepts. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (2005), 859--863.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Q. T. Zeng, T. Tse, G. Divita, A. Keselman, J. Crowell, and A. C. Browne. 2006. Exploring lexical forms: First-generation consumer health vocabularies. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (2006), 1155--1155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using Health-Consumer-Contributed Data to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions by Association Mining with Temporal Analysis

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
              ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 6, Issue 4
              Regular Papers and Special Section on Intelligent Healthcare Informatics
              August 2015
              419 pages
              ISSN:2157-6904
              EISSN:2157-6912
              DOI:10.1145/2801030
              • Editor:
              • Yu Zheng
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2015 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 13 July 2015
              • Revised: 1 September 2014
              • Accepted: 1 September 2014
              • Received: 1 October 2013
              Published in tist Volume 6, Issue 4

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader