skip to main content
research-article

A Generic Holonic Control Architecture for Heterogeneous Multiscale and Multiobjective Smart Microgrids

Published:09 June 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Designing the control infrastructure of future “smart” power grids is a challenging task. Future grids will integrate a wide variety of heterogeneous producers and consumers that are unpredictable and operate at various scales. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) solutions will have to control these in order to attain global objectives at the macrolevel, while also considering private interests at the microlevel. This article proposes a generic holonic architecture to help the development of ICT control systems that meet these requirements. We show how this architecture can integrate heterogeneous control designs, including state-of-the-art smart grid solutions. To illustrate the applicability and utility of this generic architecture, we exemplify its use via a concrete proof-of-concept implementation for a holonic controller, which integrates two types of control solutions and manages a multiscale, multiobjective grid simulator in several scenarios. We believe that the proposed contribution is essential for helping to understand, to reason about, and to develop the “smart” side of future power grids.

References

  1. F. Allerding, B. Becker, and H. Schmeck. 2011. Decentralised energy management for smart homes. In Organic Computing a Paradigm Shift for Complex Systems, C. Müller-Schloer, H. Schmeck, and T. Ungerer (Eds.). Autonomic Systems, Vol. 1. Springer, Basel, 605--607.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Allerding and H. Schmeck. 2011. Organic smart home: Architecture for energy management in intelligent buildings. In Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Organic Computing (OC’11). 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Anders, C. Hinrichs, F. Siefert, P. Behrmann, W. Reif, and M. Sonnenschein. 2012. On the influence of inter-agent variation on multi-agent algorithms solving a dynamic task allocation problem under uncertainty. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (IEEE SASO’12). 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Beal, J. Berliner, and K. Hunter. 2012. Fast precise distributed control for energy demand management. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (IEEE SASO’12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Becker et al. 2010. Decentralized energy-management to control smart-home architectures. In ARCS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5974. Springer, Berlin, 150--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Cabri, L. Ferrari, and F. Zambonelli. 2004. Role-based approaches for engineering interactions in large-scale multi-agent systems. In Software Engineering for Multi-Agent Systems II, C. Lucena, A. Garcia, A. Romanovsky, J. Castro, and P. Alencar (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2940. Springer, Berlin, 243--263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Callaway and I. Hiskens. 2011. Achieving controllability of electric loads. Proceedings of the IEEE 99, 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Cheng. 2012. Architecture and principles of smart grids for distributed power generation and demand side management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Cossentino, S. Galland, N. Gaud, V. Hilaire, and A. Koukam. 2010. An organisational approach to engineer emergence within holarchies. International Journal of Agent Oriented Software Engineering 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. FIPA. 2014. Homepage. Retrieved from http://www.fipa.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Fischer. 1999. Holonic multiagent systems—Theory and applications. In Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Pedro Barahona and Jos J. Alferes (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1695. Springer, Berlin, 34--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Frey, A. Diaconescu, and I. Demeure. 2012. Architectural integration patterns for autonomic management systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on the Engineering of Autonomic & Autonomous Systems (EASe’’12).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Frey, A. Diaconescu, D. Menga, and I. Demeure. 2013a. A holonic control architecture for a heterogeneous multi-objective micro smart grid. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO’13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Frey, A. Diaconescu, D. Menga, and I. Demeure. 2013b. Towards a reference model for multi-goal, highly-distributed and dynamic autonomic systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Garlan and M. Shaw. 1994. An Introduction to Software Architecture. Technical Report. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. N. Jaleeli, L. S. VanSlyck, D. N. Ewart, L. H. Fink, and A. G. Hoffmann. 1992. Understanding automatic generation control. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 7, 3 (Aug. 1992), 1106--1122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess. 2003. The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36 (Jan. 2003), 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H.-M. Kim, W. Wei, and T. Kinoshita. 2011. A new modified CNP for autonomous microgrid operation based on multiagent system. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology 6-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Koestler. 1967. The Ghost in the Machine. Hutchinson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. K. Kok, C. J. Warmer, and I. G. Kamphuis. 2005. PowerMatcher: Multiagent control in the electricity infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’05). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Lässig, B. Satzger, and O. Kramer. 2011. Hierarchically structured energy markets as novel smart grid control approach. In KI 2011: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7006, Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Li, G. Poulton, and G. James. 2010. Coordination of distributed energy resource agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24, 5, 351--380. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2010.481483 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Marnay and G. Venkataramanan. 2006. Microgrids in the evolving electricity generation and delivery infrastructure. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. L. Mathieu and D. S. Callaway. 2012. State estimation and control of heterogeneous thermostatically controlled loads for load following. In Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'12). 2002--2011. DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2012.545 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. D. J. McArthur, E. M. Davidson, V. M. Catterson, A. L. Dimeas, N. D. Hatziargyriou, F. Ponci, and T. Funabashi. 2007. Multi-agent systems for power engineering applications 2014;Part I: Concepts, approaches, and technical challenges. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 22, 4, 1743--1752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A.-H. Mohsenian-Rad et al. 2010. Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 1, 3, 320--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. E. Negeri, N. Baken, and M. Popov. 2013. Holonic architecture of the smart grid. Scientific Research. Retreived from www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?paperID=32188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Negrete-Pincetic and S. Meyn. 2011. Intelligence by design for the entropic grid. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. NiceGrid. 2013. Home page. Retrieved from http://www.nicegrid.fr/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. L. Nolle, K. C. P. Wong, and A. A. Hopgood. 2002. DARBS: A distributed blackboard system. In Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVIII, Max Bramer, Frans Coenen, and Alun Preece (Eds.). Springer, London, 161--170. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0119-2_13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. G. Jagers op Akkerhuis. 2010. The Operator Hierarchy, a Chain of Closures Linking Matter, Life and Artificial Intelligence. Ph.D. dissertation. Wageningen University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M. J. Osborne. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. F. Ounnar, A. Naamane, P. Pujo, and N. M’Sirdi. 2013. Intelligent control of renewable holonic energy systems. Energy Procedia 42, 0, 465--472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. M. Pipattanasomporn, M. Kuzlu, and S. Rahman. 2012. An algorithm for intelligent home energy management and demand response analysis. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S. D. Ramchurn, P. Vytelingum, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings. 2012. Putting the ‘smarts’ into the smart grid: A grand challenge for artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM 55-4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. S. Rodriguez, N. Gaud, V. Hilaire, S. Galland, and A. Koukam. 2006. An analysis and design concept for self-organization in holonic multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Systems—Revised and Invited Papers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4335. Springer, 15--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. S. A. Rodriguez. 2005. From analysis to Design of Holonic Multi-Agent Systems: A Framework, Methodological Guidelines and Applications. Ph.D. dissertation. Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard and Université de Franche-Compté.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. A. Sage and C. Cuppan. 2001. On the systems engineering and management of systems and federations of systems. Information-Knowledge-Systems Management Journal 2, 4 (2001), 325--345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. A. Schiendorfer, J.-P. Steghöfer, and W. Reif. 2014. Synthesis and abstraction of constraint models for hierarchical resource allocation problems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART) 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. H. Schmeck and L. Karg. 2010. E-energyPaving the way for an internet of energy (Auf dem Weg zum Internet der Energie). it - Information Technology 52, 2, 55--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Smart Grid Coordination Group SGAM. 2012. Smart Grid Reference Architecture. Retrieved July 28, 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/gas_electricity/smartgrids/doc/xpert_group1_ reference_architecture.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. H. A. Simon. 1962. The architecture of complexity. In Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. H. A. Simon. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial (1st ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. J.-P. Steghöfer, P. Behrmann, G. Anders, F. Siefert, and W. Reif. 2013. HiSPADA: Self-organising hierarchies for large-scale multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems, 71--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. A. K. Thomas and R. Devanathan. 2011. Energy efficient dynamic multi-level hierarchical clustering technique for network discovery in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2011 3rd International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT’11). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. A. Toffler. 1980. The Third Wave. Black Rose Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. S. Tomforde and C. Müller-Schloer. 2014. Incremental design of adaptive systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 6, 2 (March 2014), 179--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. M. Ulieru, R. W. Brennan, and S. Walker. 2002. The holonic enterprise: A model for Internet-enabled global manufacturing supply chain and workflow management. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 13, 8 (2002), 538--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. P. Valckenaers, H. Van Brussel, and T. Holvoet. 2008. Fundamentals of holonic systems and their implications for self-adaptive and self-organizing systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 2nd IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops. IEEE Computer Science, 168--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. M. Vinyals, V. Robu, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings. 2014. Prediction-of-use games: A cooperative game theory approach to sustainable energy tariffs. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 829--836. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. H. F. Wedde, S. Lehnhoff, C. Rehtanz, and O. Krause. 2008. Bottom-up self-organization of unpredictable demand and supply under decentralized power management. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO’08). 74--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. D. Weyns, R. Haesevoets, A. Helleboogh, T. Holvoet, and W. Joosen. 2010. The MACODO middleware for context-driven dynamic agent organizations. ACM Transactions on Autonomousand Adaptive Systems 5, 1, Article 3 (Feb. 2010), 28 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. F. Zambonelli, N. R. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. 2003. Developing multiagent systems: The gaia methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 12, 3 (July 2003), 317--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Generic Holonic Control Architecture for Heterogeneous Multiscale and Multiobjective Smart Microgrids

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
      ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems  Volume 10, Issue 2
      June 2015
      175 pages
      ISSN:1556-4665
      EISSN:1556-4703
      DOI:10.1145/2790463
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 June 2015
      • Accepted: 1 December 2014
      • Revised: 1 October 2014
      • Received: 1 February 2014
      Published in taas Volume 10, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader