skip to main content
opinion
Free Access

Life after MOOCs

Published:28 September 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Online science education needs a new revolution.

References

  1. Anderson, J.R. et al. R. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1995), 167--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bloom, B. The 2-Sigma problem: The Search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 6 (1984), 4--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Compeau, P.E.C. and Pevzner, P.A. Bioinformatics Algorithms: An Active Learning Approach, Second ed. Active Learning Publishers, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuseo, J. The empirical case against large class size: adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. The Journal of Faculty Development 21, (2007), 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Karsenti, T. MOOCS: What the research says. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education 10 (2013), 23--37; http://bit.ly/1MPd8lH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mazoue, J.G. Five myths about MOOCs. Educause Reviews (Sept.--Oct. 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller, B.N. and Ranum, D.L. Beyond PDF and ePub: Toward an interactive textbook. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, (2012), 150--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Trithemius, J. De Laude Scriptorum (In Praise of Scribes). Klaus Arnold, Ed., Roland Behrendt. Tr. Colorado Press, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Vardi, M. Will MOOCs destroy academia? Commun. ACM 11, 5 (Nov. 2012), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Life after MOOCs

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          Chaim M Scheff

          "Life after MOOCs" (massive online open courses) insightfully reviews MAIT (a next leap in automated "cost-driven" education), which is much (much (much)) bigger than "common core." MAIT includes countless "automated individualized assessment, interactivity, adaptability, and modularity" aspects. Now, briefly, some old "copy/paste" education technologies: instructors' chalk (stone) wrote on black slate (stone) boards; students used graphite/clay pencils on cellulose paper, but thought about what to copy; printed books transformed manual copying into manufactured products, so curricula became bibliographies; and 1960 brings programmed logic for automatic teaching operations (PLATO), a computerized pedagogical system interactively teaching numerous subjects and "including text overlaying graphics, contextual assessment of free text answers, depending on the inclusion of keywords, and feedback designed to respond to alternative answers" (very MAIT-like). So today, MOOCs on Internet media (with sort-of limitless memory, bandwidth, and computation space) hybridize into MAIT. Awkwardly, what PLATO was to good old books, MAIT is to good old MOOCs, but books, MOOCs, and basic teaching problems remain. How do students learn layers of basic facts and skills while simultaneously thinking/exploring ideas, their proofs, refutations, transformations, convolutions, innovations, and substitutions__?__ As a teacher, I see every student as a living combination of typical, special needs, and genius; each one has skills, disabilities, and unique insights. The teacher's Wizard of Oz (MAIT) dilemma is discovering "the man behind the curtain"; educating "there is a box," yet inspiring students to think "out of the box." Thus, ambivalently (like the authors) expect "Life after (new PLATO box) MAIT." Online Computing Reviews Service

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Communications of the ACM
            Communications of the ACM  Volume 58, Issue 10
            October 2015
            87 pages
            ISSN:0001-0782
            EISSN:1557-7317
            DOI:10.1145/2830674
            • Editor:
            • Moshe Y. Vardi
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2015 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 September 2015

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • opinion
            • Popular
            • Un-reviewed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format