skip to main content
research-article

Multiway Spectral Partitioning and Higher-Order Cheeger Inequalities

Published:17 December 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A basic fact in spectral graph theory is that the number of connected components in an undirected graph is equal to the multiplicity of the eigenvalue zero in the Laplacian matrix of the graph. In particular, the graph is disconnected if and only if there are at least two eigenvalues equal to zero. Cheeger's inequality and its variants provide an approximate version of the latter fact; they state that a graph has a sparse cut if and only if there are at least two eigenvalues that are close to zero.

It has been conjectured that an analogous characterization holds for higher multiplicities: There are k eigenvalues close to zero if and only if the vertex set can be partitioned into k subsets, each defining a sparse cut. We resolve this conjecture positively. Our result provides a theoretical justification for clustering algorithms that use the bottom k eigenvectors to embed the vertices into Rk, and then apply geometric considerations to the embedding.

We also show that these techniques yield a nearly optimal quantitative connection between the expansion of sets of size ≈ n/k and λk, the kth smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian, where n is the number of vertices. In particular, we show that in every graph there are at least k/2 disjoint sets (one of which will have size at most 2n/k), each having expansion at most O(√λk log k). Louis, Raghavendra, Tetali, and Vempala have independently proved a slightly weaker version of this last result. The √log k bound is tight, up to constant factors, for the “noisy hypercube” graphs.

References

  1. N. Alon. 1986. Eigenvalues and expanders. Combinatorica 62 (1986), 83--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Noga Alon and Nabil Kahale. 1997. A spectral technique for coloring random 3-colorable graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 26 (1997), 1733--1748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Alon and V. Milman. 1985. Isoperimetric inequalities for graphs, and superconcentrators. J. Combinat. Theory, Ser. B 38, 1 (1985), 73--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sanjeev Arora, Boaz Barak, and David Steurer. 2010. Subexponential algorithms for unique games and related problems. In Proceedings of FOCS. IEEE Computer Society, 563--572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bengt Aspvall and John R. Gilbert. 1984. Graph coloring using eigenvalue decomposition. SIAM J. Algeb. Disc. Meth. 5, 4 (1984), 526--538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Boaz Barak, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Aram W. Harrow, Jonathan A. Kelner, David Steurer, and Yuan Zhou. 2012. Hypercontractivity, sum-of-squares proofs, and their applications. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, 307--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. William Beckner. 1975. Inequalities in Fourier analysis. Ann. of Math. (2) 102, 1 (1975), 159--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Punyashloka Biswal, James R. Lee, and Satish Rao. 2008. Eigenvalue bounds, spectral partitioning, and metrical deformations via flows. J. ACM 57, 3, (2008), 751--760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Aline Bonami. 1970. Étude des coefficients de Fourier des fonctions de Lp(G). Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 20, fasc. 2 (1970), 335--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. 30, 1--7, (1998), 107--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Charikar, C. Chekuri, A. Goel, and S. Guha. 1998a. Rounding via trees: Deterministic approximation algorithms for group Steiner trees and k-median. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, 114--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Moses Charikar, Chandra Chekuri, Ashish Goel, Sudipto Guha, and Serge A. Plotkin. 1998b. Approximating a finite metric by a small number of tree metrics. In Proceedings of FOCS. IEEE Computer Society, 379--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. R. K. Chung. 1996. Laplacians of graphs and Cheeger's inequalities. In Combinatorics, Paul Erdős Is Eighty, Vol. 2 (Keszthely, 1993). Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., Vol. 2. János Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 157--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan R. K. Chung. 1997. Spectral Graph Theory. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 92. (Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Amir Daneshgar, Ramin Javadi, and Laurent Miclo. 2012. On nodal domains and higher-order Cheeger inequalities of finite reversible Markov processes. Stochas. Process. Their Applicat. 122, 4 (2012), 1748--1776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Fakcharoenphol and K. Talwar. 2003. An improved decomposition theorem for graphs excluding a fixed minor. In Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2764, Springer, 36--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Anupam Gupta, Robert Krauthgamer, and James R. Lee. 2003. Bounded geometries, fractals, and low-distortion embeddings. In Proceedings of FOCS. IEEE Computer Society, 534--543. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Kelner, J. R. Lee, G. Price, and S.-H. Teng. 2011. Metric uniformization and spectral bounds for graphs. Geom. Funct. Anal. 21, 5 (2011), 1117--1143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jonathan A. Kelner, Lorenzo Orecchia, Aaron Sidford, and Zeyuan Allen Zhu. 2013. A simple, combinatorial algorithm for solving SDD systems in nearly-linear time. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, 911--920. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Philip N. Klein, Serge A. Plotkin, and Satish Rao. 1993. Excluded minors, network decomposition, and multicommodity flow. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, 682--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jon M. Kleinberg. 1999. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM 46, 2 (1999), 668--677. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ioannis Koutis, Gary L. Miller, and Richard Peng. 2011. A nearly-m log n time solver for SDD linear systems. In Proceedings of FOCS. IEEE Computer Society, 590--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Michel Ledoux and Michel Talagrand. 2011. Probability in Banach Spaces: Isoperimetry and Processes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Reprint of the 1991 edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James R. Lee and Assaf Naor. 2005. Extending Lipschitz functions via random metric partitions. Invent. Math. 160, 1 (2005), 59--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. R. Lee and A. Sidiropoulos. 2010. Genus and the geometry of the cut graph. In Proceedings of SODA. SIAM, 193--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Anand Louis, Prasad Raghavendra, Prasad Tetali, and Santosh Vempala. 2011. Algorithmic extensions of Cheeger's inequality to higher eigenvalues and partitions. In Proceedings of APPROX-RANDOM. Springer, 315--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Anand Louis, Prasad Raghavendra, Prasad Tetali, and Santosh Vempala. 2012. Many sparse cuts via higher eigenvalues. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, 1131--1140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Matoušek. 2002. Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 212, Springer-Verlag, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Laurent Miclo. 2008. On eigenfunctions of Markov processes on trees. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 142, 3--4 (2008), 561--594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Laurent Miclo. 2013. On hyperboundedness and spectrum of Markov operators. Preprint.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Andrew Ng, Michael Jordan, and Yair Weiss. 2002. On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. In Proceedings of NIPS. MIT Press, 849--856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryan O'Donnell and David Witmer. 2012. Improved small-set expansion from higher eigenvalues. arXiv:1204.4688.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shayan Oveis Gharan and Luca Trevisan. 2012. Approximating the expansion profile and almost optimal local graph clustering. In Proceedings of FOCS. IEEE Computer Society, 187--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Prasad Raghavendra and David Steurer. 2010. Graph expansion and the unique games conjecture. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, New York, 755--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Prasad Raghavendra, David Steurer, and Prasad Tetali. 2010. Approximations for the isoperimetric and spectral profile of graphs and related parameters. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, 631--640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jianbo Shi and Jitendra Malik. 2000. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22, 8 (2000), 888--905. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Barry Simon and Raphael Høegh-Krohn. 1972. Hypercontractive semigroups and two dimensional self-coupled Bose fields. J. Function. Anal. 9 (1972), 121--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Alistair J. Sinclair and Mark R. Jerrum. 1989. Approximative counting, uniform generation and rapidly mixing Markov chains. Inf. Computat. 82, 1, (1989), 93--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng. 2004. Nearly-linear time algorithms for graph partitioning, graph sparsification, and solving linear systems. In Proceedings of STOC. ACM, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. David Steurer. 2010. On the complexity of unique games and graph expansion. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. David A. Tolliver and Gary L. Miller. 2006. Graph partitioning by spectral rounding: Applications in image segmentation and clustering. In Proceedings of CVPR. IEEE Computer Society, 1053--1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Deepak Verma and Marina Meila. 2003. Comparison of spectral clustering methods. Tech. Rep. UW-CSE-03-05-01. Department of Computer Science, University of Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2013. Lx = b. Found. Trends Theoret. Comput. Sci. 8, 1--2 (2013), 1--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Multiway Spectral Partitioning and Higher-Order Cheeger Inequalities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal of the ACM
        Journal of the ACM  Volume 61, Issue 6
        November 2014
        285 pages
        ISSN:0004-5411
        EISSN:1557-735X
        DOI:10.1145/2700084
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 December 2014
        • Accepted: 1 August 2014
        • Revised: 1 June 2014
        • Received: 1 June 2012
        Published in jacm Volume 61, Issue 6

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader