skip to main content
research-article

The Unique Games Conjecture, Integrality Gap for Cut Problems and Embeddability of Negative-Type Metrics into ℓ1

Published:02 March 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this article, we disprove a conjecture of Goemans and Linial; namely, that every negative type metric embeds into ℓ1 with constant distortion. We show that for an arbitrarily small constant δ > 0, for all large enough n, there is an n-point negative type metric which requires distortion at least (log log n)1/6-δ to embed into ℓ1. Surprisingly, our construction is inspired by the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), establishing a previously unsuspected connection between probabilistically checkable proof systems (PCPs) and the theory of metric embeddings. We first prove that the UGC implies a super-constant hardness result for the (nonuniform) SPARSESTCUT problem. Though this hardness result relies on the UGC, we demonstrate, nevertheless, that the corresponding PCP reduction can be used to construct an “integrality gap instance” for SPARSESTCUT. Towards this, we first construct an integrality gap instance for a natural SDP relaxation of UNIQUEGAMES. Then we “simulate” the PCP reduction and “translate” the integrality gap instance of UNIQUEGAMES to an integrality gap instance of SPARSESTCUT. This enables us to prove a (log log n)1/6-δ integrality gap for SPARSESTCUT, which is known to be equivalent to the metric embedding lower bound.

References

  1. Amit Agarwal, Moses Charikar, Konstantin Makarychev, and Yury Makarychev. 2005. O(√ log n) approximation algorithms for min-UnCut, min-2CNF deletion, and directed cut problems. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. 573--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sanjeev Arora, Boaz Barak, and David Steurer. 2010. Subexponential algorithms for unique games and related problems. In Proceedings of FOCS. 563--572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sanjeev Arora, Eli Berger, Elad Hazan, Guy Kindler, and Muli Safra. 2005. On non-approximability for quadratic programs. In Proceedings of FOCS. 206--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sanjeev Arora, Subhash Khot, Alexandra Kolla, David Steurer, Madhur Tulsiani, and Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2008. Unique games on expanding constraint graphs are easy. In Proceedings of STOC. 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sanjeev Arora, James R. Lee, and Assaf Naor. 2007. Fréchet embeddings of negative type metrics. Disc. Computat. Geom. 38, 4, 726--739. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sanjeev Arora, Satish Rao, and Umesh V. Vazirani. 2009. Expander flows, geometric embeddings and graph partitioning. J. ACM 56, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yonatan Aumann and Yuval Rabani. 1998. An O(log k) approximate min-cut max-flow theorem and approximation algorithm. SIAM J. Comput. 27, 1, 291--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tim Austin, Assaf Naor, and Alain Valette. 2010. The Euclidean distortion of the lamplighter group. Disc. Computat. Geom. 44, 1, 55--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Boaz Barak, Parikshit Gopalan, Johan Håstad, Raghu Meka, Prasad Raghavendra, and David Steurer. 2012. Making the long code shorter. In Proceedings of FOCS. 370--379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mihir Bellare, Oded Goldreich, and Madhu Sudan. 1998. Free bits, PCPs, and non-approximability -- towards tight results. In SIAM J. Comput. 422--431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jean Bourgain. 1985. On Lipschitz embeddings of finite metric spaces in Hilbert space. Israel J. Math. 52, 46--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jean Bourgain. 2002. On the distribution of the Fourier spectrum of Boolean functions. Isr. J. Math. 131, 269--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Shuchi Chawla, Anupam Gupta, and Harald Räcke. 2008. Embeddings of negative-type metrics and an improved approximation to generalized sparsest cut. ACM Trans. Algor. 4, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shuchi Chawla, Robert Krauthgamer, Ravi Kumar, Yuval Rabani, and D. Sivakumar. 2006. On the hardness of approximating multicut and sparsest-cut. Computat. Complex. 15, 2, 94--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jeff Cheeger and Bruce Kleiner. 2010. Differentiating maps into L1, and the geometry of BV functions. Ann. Math. 171, 1347--1385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jeff Cheeger, Bruce Kleiner, and Assaf Naor. 2009. A (log n)Ω(1) integrality gap for the sparsest cut SDP. In Proceedings of FOCS. 555--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nikhil R. Devanur, Subhash Khot, Rishi Saket, and Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2006. Integrality gaps for sparsest cut and minimum linear arrangement problems. In Proceedings of STOC. 537--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Deza and Monique Laurent. 1997. Geometry of Cuts and Metrics. Springer-Verlag, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Peter Enflo. 1969. On the non-existence of uniform homeomorphism between Lp spaces. Arkiv. Mat. 8, 103--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Uriel Feige, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, and James R. Lee. 2008. Improved approximation algorithms for minimum weight vertex separators. SIAM J. Comput. 38, 2, 629--657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Uriel Feige and László Lovász. 2002. Two-prover one-round proof systems, their power and their problems. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. 733--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Uriel Feige and Gideon Schechtman. 2002. On the optimality of the random hyperplane rounding technique for MAX CUT. Random Struct. Algor. 20, 3, 403--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Michel X. Goemans. 1997. Semidefinite programming in combinatorial optimization. Math. Program. 79, 143--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Michel X. Goemans and David P. Williamson. 1995. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. J. ACM 42, 6, 1115--1145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jeff Kahn, Gil Kalai, and Nathan Linial. 1988. The influence of variables on Boolean functions (extended abstract). In Proceedings of FOCS. 68--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Daniel M. Kane and Raghu Meka. 2013. A PRG for Lipschitz functions of polynomials with applications to sparsest cut. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. George Karakostas. 2009. A better approximation ratio for the vertex cover problem. ACM Trans. Algor. 5, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Subhash Khot. 2002. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. 767--775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Subhash Khot and Assaf Naor. 2006. Nonembeddability theorems via Fourier analysis. Math. Ann. 334, 4, 821--852. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00208-005-0745-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Subhash Khot and Ryan O'Donnell. 2009. SDP gaps and UGC-hardness for Max-Cut-Gain. Theory Comput. 5, 1, 83--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Subhash Khot and Rishi Saket. 2009. SDP integrality gaps with local ℓ1-embeddability. In Proceedings of FOCS. 565--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Subhash Khot and Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2005. The unique games conjecture, integrality gap for cut problems and embeddability of negative type metrics into ℓ1. In Proceedings of FOCS. 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Robert Krauthgamer and Yuval Rabani. 2009. Improved lower bounds for embeddings into L1. SIAM J. Comput. 38, 6, 2487--2498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. James R. Lee and Assaf Naor. 2006. Lp metrics on the Heisenberg group and the Goemans-Linial conjecture. In Proceedings of FOCS. 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Frank Thomson Leighton and Satish Rao. 1999. Multicommodity max-flow min-cut theorems and their use in designing approximation algorithms. J. ACM 46, 6, 787--832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Nathan Linial. 2002. Finite metric spaces: Combinatorics, geometry and algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. 573--586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Nathan Linial, Eran London, and Yuri Rabinovich. 1995. The geometry of graphs and some of its algorithmic applications. Combinatorica 15, 2, 215--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jiri Matousek. 2002. Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 212. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Assaf Naor, Yuval Rabani, and Alistair Sinclair. 2005. Quasisymmetric embeddings, the observable diameter, and expansion properties of graphs. J. Funct. Anal. 227, 2, 273--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. R. O'Donnell. 2004. Computational aspects of noise sensitivity. Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Prasad Raghavendra. 2008. Optimal algorithms and inapproximability results for every CSP? In Proceedings of STOC. 245--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Prasad Raghavendra and David Steurer. 2009. Integrality gaps for strong SDP relaxations of UNIQUE GAMES. In Proceedings of FOCS. 575--585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Prasad Raghavendra and David Steurer. 2010. Graph expansion and the unique games conjecture. In Proceedings of STOC. 755--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Gideon Schechtman. 2003. Handbook of the Geometry of Banach Spaces. Vol. 2, North Holland, Chapter Concentration results and applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2013. Lx = b. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science. Vol. 8, 1--2, 1--141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0400000054.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Unique Games Conjecture, Integrality Gap for Cut Problems and Embeddability of Negative-Type Metrics into ℓ1

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Journal of the ACM
      Journal of the ACM  Volume 62, Issue 1
      February 2015
      264 pages
      ISSN:0004-5411
      EISSN:1557-735X
      DOI:10.1145/2742144
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 March 2015
      • Accepted: 1 February 2014
      • Revised: 1 July 2013
      • Received: 1 January 2006
      Published in jacm Volume 62, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader