skip to main content
research-article

CoEx: A Novel Profiling-Based Algorithm/Architecture Co-Exploration for ASIP Design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 May 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Application-Specific Instruction Set Processors (ASIPs) provide the adequate performance/efficiency tradeoff for their particular application domain. Nevertheless, their design methodologies have stagnated during the past decade and are still based on a series of manual and time-consuming iterative steps. Furthermore, there exists a productivity gap between the point where an application is given as the target for processor customization and the time a customized architecture is available. Therefore, new tools are required that reduce the number of design iterations and bridge the aforementioned productivity gap. This can be achieved by (1) profiling technologies that, by adapting to the designer’s needs, help to gain insight into application specifications, and (2) prearchitectural design technologies that give early yet accurate feedback on the impact of algorithmic/architectural design decisions. The first requirement is addressed in this article by proposing the multigrained profiling approach, which identifies the profiling needs at each step of ASIP design and lets the designer tailor the level of detail for application inspection. CoEx, a practical implementation of the approach, is also introduced. The second requirement is addressed by creating a prearchitectural estimation engine. This engine couples CoEx reports for an application with an abstract processor model and generates an estimate of the achievable performance. Both CoEx and the performance estimation engine are respectively evaluated for instrumentation-induced execution overhead and accuracy. Finally, the development of an ASIP architecture for an augmented reality computer vision application is presented. The ASIP achieves a gain of six times compared to the original application performance, after being developed in only 2 days.

References

  1. Christian Bachmann, Andreas Genser, Jos Hulzink, Mladen Berekovic, and Christian Steger. 2009. A low-power ASIP for IEEE 802.15.4a ultra-wideband impulse radio baseband processing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE’09). European Design and Automation Association, Belgium, 1614--1619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jeronimo Castrillon-Mazo. 2013. Programming Heterogeneous MPSoCs: Tool Flows to Close the Software Productivity Gap. Ph.D. Dissertation. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Clang. 2007. Clang: A C Language Family Frontend for LLVM. Retrieved September 27, 2013, from http://clang.llvm.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. EEMBC. 2013. The Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.eembc.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Free Software Foundation Inc. 2013. Gcov - A Test Coverage Program. Retrieved September 27, 2013, from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlo Galuzzi and Koen Bertels. 2011. The instruction-set extension problem: A survey. ACM Trans. Reconfigurable Technol. Syst. 4, 2, Article 18 (May 2011), 28 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1968502.1968509 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lei Gao, Jia Huang, Jianjiang Ceng, Rainer Leupers, Gerd Ascheid, and Heinrich Meyr. 2009. TotalProf: A fast and accurate retargetable source code profiler. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS’09). 305--314. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1629435.1629477 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Susan L. Graham, Peter B. Kessler, and Marshall K. McKusick. 2004. Gprof: A call graph execution profiler. SIGPLAN Not. 39, 4 (April 2004), 49--57. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/989393.989401 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lifeng He, Yuyan Chao, Kenji Suzuki, and Kesheng Wu. 2009. Fast connected-component labeling. Pattern Recognit. 42, 9 (2009), 1977--1987. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2008.10.013 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Yonghyun Hwang, Samar Abdi, and Daniel Gajski. 2008. Cycle-approximate retargetable performance estimation at the transaction level. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE’08). 3--8. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1403375.1403380 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paolo Ienne and Rainer Leupers. 2006. Customizable Embedded Processors: Design Technologies and Applications. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Infi. 2010. Marker Detection for Augmented Reality Applications. (2010). Retrieved September 27, 2013, from http://www.infi.nl/blog/view/id/56/Marker_Detection_for_Augmented_Reality_Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lech Jówiak, Nadia Nedjah, and Miguel Figueroa. 2010. Modern development methods and tools for embedded reconfigurable systems: A survey. Integr. VLSI J. 43, 1 (Jan. 2010), 1--33. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vlsi.2009.06.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kingshuk Karuri and Rainer Leupers. 2011. Application Analysis Tools for ASIP Design: Application Profiling and Instruction-set Customization. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rainer Kolisch and Snke Hartmann. 1999. Heuristic algorithms for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem: Classification and computational analysis. In Project Scheduling, Jan Weglarz (Ed.). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 14. Springer, 147--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jari Kreku, Kari Tiensyrj, Andreas Wieferink, and Bart Vanthournout. 2012. ASIP exploration and design. In Scalable Multi-core Architectures, Dimitrios Soudris and Axel Jantsch (Eds.). Springer, New York, 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chris Lattner and Vikram Adve. 2004. LLVM: A compilation framework for lifelong program analysis & transformation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization: Feedback-Directed and Runtime Optimization (CGO’04). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 75--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nicholas Nethercote and Julian Seward. 2007. Valgrind: A framework for heavyweight dynamic binary instrumentation. SIGPLAN Not. 42, 6 (June 2007), 89--100. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1273442.1250746 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Timo Stripf, Oliver Oey, Thomas Bruckschlögl, Ralf König, Michael Hübner, Jürgen Becker, Gerard K. Rauwerda, Kim Sunesen, Nikolaos Kavvadias, Grigoris Dimitroulakos, Kostas Masselos, Dimitrios Kritharidis, Nikolaos Mitas, George Goulas, Panayiotis Alefragis, Nikolaos S. Voros, Steven Derrien, Daniel Menard, Olivier Sentieys, Diana Göhringer, and Thomas Perschke. 2012. A flexible approach for compiling scilab to reconfigurable multi-core embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 7th International Workshop on Reconfigurable Communication-Centric Systems-on-Chip (ReCoSoC’12). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fei Sun, Srivaths Ravi, Anand Raghunathan, and Niraj K. Jha. 2002. Synthesis of custom processors based on extensible platforms. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD’02). ACM, New York, NY, 641--648. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/774572.774667 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Synopsys Inc. 2013. Synopsys Processor Designer. Retrieved September 27, 2013, from http://www.synopsys.com/Systems/BlockDesign/ProcessorDev/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Vojin Živojnović, Juan M. Velarde, Christian Schläger, and Heinrich Meyr. 1994. DSPSTONE: A DSP-oriented benchmarking methodology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Technology (ICSPAT’94). Dallas, TX, USA. Miller Freeman, 715--720.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. CoEx: A Novel Profiling-Based Algorithm/Architecture Co-Exploration for ASIP Design

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
          ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems  Volume 8, Issue 3
          May 2015
          153 pages
          ISSN:1936-7406
          EISSN:1936-7414
          DOI:10.1145/2770880
          • Editor:
          • Steve Wilton
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 May 2015
          • Accepted: 1 May 2014
          • Revised: 1 February 2014
          • Received: 1 October 2013
          Published in trets Volume 8, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader