skip to main content
research-article

Fiction as an Introduction to Computer Science Research

Published:01 March 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The undergraduate computer science curriculum is generally focused on skills and tools; most students are not exposed to much research in the field, and do not learn how to navigate the research literature. We describe how fiction reviews (and specifically science fiction) are used as a gateway to research reviews. Students learn a little about current or recent research on a topic that stirs their imagination, and learn how to search for, read critically, and compare technical papers on a topic related to their chosen science fiction book, movie, or TV show.

References

  1. AAAI. 2011. AI topics: Science fiction: Views of the future involving AI. http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/AITopics/ScienceFiction. (Last accessed 2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Anderson and S. L. Anderson. 2007. Machine ethics: Creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Mag. 28, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. I. Asimov. 1950. I, Robot. Gnome Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. A. Bates. 2011. AC 2011-1669: AI & sciFi: Teaching writing, history, technology, literature and ethics. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. C. Bean. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Bowring and M. Tambe. 2009. Bridging the gap: Introducing agents and multiagent systems to undergraduate students. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Educational Uses of Multi-Agent Systems (EDUMAS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. L. Boyer. 1997. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. J. Bryson. 2010. Robots should be slaves: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions, Y. Wilks Ed., 63--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Cameron. 1986. Aliens. Director, James Cameron.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. L. Colbeck. 1998. Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. J. Higher Edu. 69, 6, 647--671.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Computing Research Association. 2008--2009. Taulbee Survey. (Last accessed 10/2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. P. Cross and M. H. Steadman. 1996. Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. G. Davis. 2009. Tools for Teaching 2nd Ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. C. F. de Winter and D. Dodou. 2010. Five-point Likert items: T test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 15, 11, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. R. Delaney. 1966. Babel-17. Ace.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. S. Dils. 1987. Science fiction and the future, Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute. http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1987/2/87.02.04.x.html. (Last accessed 1987)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. T. Dirks. 2010. Robots in film: A complete illustrated history of robots in the movies. http://www.filmsite.org/robotsinfilm.html. (Last accessed 2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Fancher and D. W. Peoples. 1982. Blade Runner. Director, Ridley Scott, based on a novel by Philip K. Dick.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. A. Fleming, E. F. Bazen, and M. E. Wetzstein. 2005. Measuring the impact of externalities on The College of Agriculture. Teaching evaluations. J. Agricultural Appl. Econ. 37, 3, 635--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Garvey. 2010. Writing in an upper-level CS course. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’10). ACM, New York, 209--213f. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Goldsmith. 2012a. CS 463 AI in fiction. http://www.cs.uky.edu/~goldsmit/TOCE/books.html. (Last accessed 3/2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Goldsmith. 2012b. CS 463 Project proposals. http://www.cs.uky.edu/~goldsmit/TOCE/proposals.html. (Last accessed 3/2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Goldsmith. 2012c. CS 463 projects. http://www.cs.uky.edu/~goldsmit/TOCE/projects.html. (Last accessed 3/2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Goldsmith and N. Mattei. 2011. Science fiction as an introduction to ai research. In Proceedings of the 2nd AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. T. Guerin and D. Michler. 2011. Analysis of undergraduate teaching evaluations in computer science. In Proceedings of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. G. Haworth and C. F. Conrad. 1995. Curricular Transformations: Traditional and emerging voices in the academy. In Revisioning Curriculum in Higher Education, J. G. Haworth and C. F. Conrad Eds., Simon & Schuster, 191--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. R. A. Heinlein. 1950. Waldo & Magic, Inc. Doubleday Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. E. Hoffman, T. Dansdill, and D. S. Herscovici. 2006. Bridging writing to learn and writing in the discipline in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’06). 117--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D. Jones and N. Parker. 2009. Moon. Director, Duncan Jones.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. Kagan. 1988. Hellspark. Tor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. S. Kubrik and A. C. Clarke. 1968. 2001: A Space Odyssey. Director, Stanley Kubrik.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Lawrence, L. Giles, K. Bollacker, and I. Councill. 2005. CITESEER. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/citeseer.html. (Last accessed 2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. P. Lin, K. Abney, and G. A. Bekey. 2012. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. H. W. Marsh and L. A. Roche. 1997. Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. Amer. Psychol. 52, 11, 1187--1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. A. McGovern and J. Fager. 2007. Creating significant learning experiences in introductory artificial intelligence. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 39, 1, 39--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. W. J. McKeachie. 1997. Student ratings: The validity of use. Amer. Psychol. 52, 11, 1218--1225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. S. H. McLeod and M. Soven. 1992. Writing Across the Curriculum. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. P. Mihail, B. Rubin, and J. Goldsmith. 2014. Online discussions: Improving education in CS?. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. B. Motz. 2010. Cognitive science movie index. https://www.indiana.edu/~cogfilms/. (Last accessed 2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. D. O’Bannon and M. Tejada-Flores. 1995. Screamers. Director, Christian Duguay, based on short story “Second Variety” by Philip K. Dick.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. W. G. Perry. 1980. Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In The Modern American College, A. W. Chickering and Associates Eds., Josey Bass, 76--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. L. H. Pesante. 1991. Integrating writing into computer science courses. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’91). 205--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. R. Rucker. 2003. The Hacker and the Ants: Version 2.0. Four Walls Eight Windows.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. M. Sahami. 2008. Using AI to motivate greater participation in computer science. AAAI Spring Symposium. Tech. rep. SSS08, AAAI Spring Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. R. J. Sawyer. 2002. AI and Sci-Fi: My, Oh, My! In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Canadian Conference on Intelligent Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. J. Slonczewski. 2009. Daughter of Elysium - An Elysium Cycle Novel. Phoenix Pick.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. N. Stephenson. 1992. Snowcrash. Bantum Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. H. M. Walker. 1998. Writing within the computer science curriculum. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 30, 2, 24--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. I. Watson. 2003. The aims of artificial intelligence: A science fiction view. IEEE Intell. Syst. 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. D. Weikle. 2013. Two concrete examples of upper-level writing assignments in an algorithms course. J. Comput. Sci. Colleges 28, 3, 14--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Wikipedia. 2013a. Artificial intelligence in fiction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_in_fiction. (Last accessed 3/2013)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Wikipedia. 2013b. List of fictional computers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_computers. (Last accessed 3/2013)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Wikipedia. 2013c. List of fictional robots and androids. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_robots_and_androids. (Last accessed 3/2013)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fiction as an Introduction to Computer Science Research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
      ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 14, Issue 1
      March 2014
      98 pages
      EISSN:1946-6226
      DOI:10.1145/2600089
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 March 2014
      • Accepted: 1 November 2013
      • Revised: 1 October 2013
      • Received: 1 April 2013
      Published in toce Volume 14, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader