skip to main content
research-article

Calibrating a wide-area camera network with non-overlapping views using mobile devices

Published:31 January 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In a wide-area camera network, cameras are often placed such that their views do not overlap. Collaborative tasks such as tracking and activity analysis still require discovering the network topology including the extrinsic calibration of the cameras. This work addresses the problem of calibrating a fixed camera in a wide-area camera network in a global coordinate system so that the results can be shared across calibrations. We achieve this by using commonly available mobile devices such as smartphones. At least one mobile device takes images that overlap with a fixed camera's view and records the GPS position and 3D orientation of the device when an image is captured. These sensor measurements (including the image, GPS position, and device orientation) are fused in order to calibrate the fixed camera. This article derives a novel maximum likelihood estimation formulation for finding the most probable location and orientation of a fixed camera. This formulation is solved in a distributed manner using a consensus algorithm. We evaluate the efficacy of the proposed methodology with several simulated and real-world datasets.

References

  1. Hamid K. Aghajan and Andrea Cavallaro. 2009. Multi-Camera Networks: Principles and Applications 1st Ed. Academic Press, Waltham, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. J. Davison. 2003. Real-time simultaneous localisation and mapping with a single camera. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 1403--1410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. John C. Gower and Garmt B. Dijksterhuis. 2004. Procrustes Problems. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Asaad Hakeem, R. Vezzani, Mubarak Shah, and R. Cucchiara. 2006. Estimating geospatial trajectory of a moving camera. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Vol. 2. IEEE, 82--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman. 2000. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. James Hays and Alexei A. Efros. 2008. IM2GPS: Estimating geographic information from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nathan Jacobs, Scott Satkin, Nathaniel Roman, Richard Speyer, and Robert Pless. 2007. Geolocating static cameras. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hideyuki Kume, Takafumi Taketomi, Tomokazu Sato, and Naokazu Yokoya. 2010. Extrinsic camera parameter estimation using video images and GPS considering GPS positioning accuracy. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 3923--3926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Maxime Lhuillier. 2011. Fusion of GPS and structure-from-motion using constrained bundle adjustments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 3025--3032. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. David G. Lowe. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60, 2, 91--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yi Ma, Jana Kosecka, and Shankar Sastry. 2001. Optimization criteria and geometric algorithms for motion and structure estimation. Int. J. Comput. Vision 44, 3, 219--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel Martinec and Tomas Pajdla. 2006. 3D Reconstruction by gluing pair-wise euclidean reconstructions, or “how to achieve a good reconstruction from bad images.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission (3DPVT'06). IEEE, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bogdan C. Matei, Harpreet S. Sawhney, and Supun Samarasekera. 2011. Vehicle tracking across nonoverlapping cameras using joint kinematic and appearance features. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 3465--3472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Pollefeys, D. Nistér, et al. 2008. Detailed real-time urban 3d reconstruction from video. Int. J. Comput. Vision 78, 2, 143--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Srikumar Ramalingam, Sofien Bouaziz, Peter Sturm, and Matthew Brand. 2009. Geolocalization using skylines from omni-images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Search in 3D and Video. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Duncan Robertson and Roberto Cipolla. 2004. An image-based system for urban navigation. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. BMVA, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan, Ashok Veeraraghavan, and Rama Chellappa. 2008. Object detection, tracking and recognition for multiple smart cameras. Proc. IEEE 96, 10, 1606--1624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. David Schleicher, L. M. Bergasa, Manuel Ocaña, Rafael Barea, and Elena López. 2009. Real-time hierarchical GPS aided visual SLAM on urban environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'09). IEEE, 4381--4386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Noah Snavely, Steven M. Seitz, and Richard Szeliski. 2007. Modeling the world from internet photo collections. Int. J. Comput. Vision 80, 2, 189--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Richard Szeliski. 2005. Where am I?: ICCV 2005 Computer Vision Contest. http://research.microsoft.com/iccv2005/Contest/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Roberto Tron and René Vidal. 2009. Distributed image-based 3-D localization of camera sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. W. Wang and Hung Tat Tsui. 2000. A SVD decomposition of essential matrix with eight solutions for the relative positions of two perspective cameras. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 362--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yuji Yokochi, Sei Ikeda, Tomokazu Sato, and Naokazu Yokoya. 2006. Extrinsic camera parameter estimation based on feature tracking and GPS data. In Proceedings of the 7th Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 369--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wei Zhang and Jana Kosecka. 2006. Image based localization in urban environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Calibrating a wide-area camera network with non-overlapping views using mobile devices

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
        ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 10, Issue 2
        January 2014
        609 pages
        ISSN:1550-4859
        EISSN:1550-4867
        DOI:10.1145/2575808
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 January 2014
        • Accepted: 1 January 2013
        • Revised: 1 October 2012
        • Received: 1 April 2012
        Published in tosn Volume 10, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader