skip to main content
research-article

Understanding latent interactions in online social networks

Published:01 November 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Popular online social networks (OSNs) like Facebook and Twitter are changing the way users communicate and interact with the Internet. A deep understanding of user interactions in OSNs can provide important insights into questions of human social behavior and into the design of social platforms and applications. However, recent studies have shown that a majority of user interactions on OSNs are latent interactions, that is, passive actions, such as profile browsing, that cannot be observed by traditional measurement techniques.

In this article, we seek a deeper understanding of both active and latent user interactions in OSNs. For quantifiable data on latent user interactions, we perform a detailed measurement study on Renren, the largest OSN in China with more than 220 million users to date. All friendship links in Renren are public, allowing us to exhaustively crawl a connected graph component of 42 million users and 1.66 billion social links in 2009. Renren also keeps detailed, publicly viewable visitor logs for each user profile. We capture detailed histories of profile visits over a period of 90 days for users in the Peking University Renren network and use statistics of profile visits to study issues of user profile popularity, reciprocity of profile visits, and the impact of content updates on user popularity. We find that latent interactions are much more prevalent and frequent than active events, are nonreciprocal in nature, and that profile popularity is correlated with page views of content rather than with quantity of content updates. Finally, we construct latent interaction graphs as models of user browsing behavior and compare their structural properties, evolution, community structure, and mixing times against those of both active interaction graphs and social graphs.

References

  1. Ahn, Y.-Y., Han, S., Kwak, H., Moon, S. B., and Jeong, H. 2007. Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Benevenuto, F., Rodrigues, T., Cha, M., and Almeida, V. 2009. Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. 2010. Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cao, Q., Sirivianos, M., Yang, X., and Pregueiro, T. 2012. Aiding the detection of fake accounts in large scale social online services. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., and Gummadi, K. 2010. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cha, M., Mislove, A., and Gummadi, K. 2009. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chen, W., Wang, Y., and Yang, S. 2009. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chun, H., Kwak, H., Eom, Y. H., Ahn, Y.-Y., Moon, S. B., and Jeong, H. 2008. Comparison of online social relations in volume vs interaction: A case study of cyworld. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., and Newman, M. E. J. 2007. Power-law distributions in empirical data. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Danezis, G. and Mittal, P. 2009. Sybilinfer: Detecting sybil nodes using social networks. Tech. rep. MSR-TR-2009-6. Microsoft.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortunato, S. 2010. Community detection in graphs. Physics Rep. 486, 75--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fu, F., Liu, L., and Wang, L. 2008. Empirical analysis of online social networks in the age of Web 2.0. Physica A 387, 2--3, 675--684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gannes, L. 2010. When social replaces search, what can you do to monetize? GigaOM. http://gigaom.com/2010/03/24/when-social-replaces-search-what-can-you-do-to-mouetize/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao, H., Hu, J., Wilson, C., Li, Z., Chen, Y., and Zhao, B. Y. 2010. Detecting and characterizing social spam campaigns. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Garriss, S., Kaminsky, M., Freedman, M. J., Karp, B., Mazires, D., and Yu, H. 2006. Re: Reliable email. In Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Grier, C., Thomas, K., Paxson, V., and Zhang, M. 2010. @spam: The underground on 140 characters or less. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 27--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gruhl, D., Guha, R., Liben-Nowell, D., and Tomkins, A. 2004. Information diffusion through blogspace. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Huang, L. and Xia, Z. 2009. Measuring user prestige and interaction preference on social network site. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ACIS-ICIS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. L. 2007. Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th Web KDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis (WebKDD/SNA-KDD'07). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jiang, J., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Huang, P., Sha, W., Dai, Y., and Zhao, B. Y. 2010. Understanding latent interactions in online social networks. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J. M., and Tardos, E. 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kirkpatrick, M. 2009. Social networking now more popular than email, report finds. ReadWrite. http://readwrite.com/2009/03/09/socia_networking_now_more_popular_than_email#awesm-∼ogyunfdzg+Ovjb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., and Moon, S. B. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., and Steinfield, C. 2007. A familiar face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lehmann, E. L. and D'Abrera, H. J. M. 1998. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Leskovec, J. and Horvitz, E. 2008. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Leskovec, J., Lang, K. J., and Mahoney, M. W. 2010. Empirical comparison of algorithms for network community detection. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Milgram, S. 1967. The small world problem. Psychol. Today 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mislove, A., Koppula, H. S., Gummadi, K. P., Druschel, P., and Bhattacharjee, B. 2008. Growth of the flickr social network. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networking (WOSN). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, P. K., Druschel, P., and Bhattacharjee, B. 2007. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mohaisen, A., Yun, A., and Kim, Y. 2010. Measuring the mixing time of social graphs. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Schneider, F., Feldmann, A., Krishnamurthy, B., and Willinger, W. 2009. Understanding online social network usage from a network perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Thomas, K., Grier, C., Paxson, V., and Song, D. 2011. Suspended accounts in retrospect: An analysis of Twitter spam. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tran, N., Min, B., Li, J., and Subramanian, L. 2009. Sybil-resilient online content voting. In Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Symposium on Networked Design and Implementation. 15--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Valafar, M., Rejaie, R., and Willinger, W. 2009. Beyond friendship graphs: A study of user interactions in flickr. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networking (WOSN). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M., and Gummadi, K. P. 2009. On the evolution of user interaction in facebook. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networking (WOSN). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Viswanath, B., Post, A., Gummadi, K. P., and Mislove, A. 2010. An analysis of social network-based Sybil defenses. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Application, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications. 363--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wang, G., Wilson, C., Zhao, X., Zhu, Y., Mohanlal, M., Zheng, H., and Zhao, B. Y. 2012. Serf and turf: Crowdturfing for fun and profit. In Proceedings of the World Wide Wed Conference (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K. P. N., and Zhao, B. Y. 2009. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Yang, Z., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Gao, T., Zhao, B. Y., and Dai, Y. 2011. Uncovering social network Sybils in the wild. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Yarow, J. 2010. Facebook was more popular in the U.S. than Google last week. BusinessInsider.com. http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-was-more-popular-in-the-us-than-google-last-week-2010-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu, H., Gibbons, P. B., Kaminsky, M., and Xiao, F. 2008. SybilLimit: A near-optimal social network defense against Sybil attacks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 3--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Yu, H., Kaminsky, M., Gibbons, P. B., and Flaxman, A. 2006. Sybilguard: Defending against Sybil attacks via social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding latent interactions in online social networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on the Web
          ACM Transactions on the Web  Volume 7, Issue 4
          October 2013
          220 pages
          ISSN:1559-1131
          EISSN:1559-114X
          DOI:10.1145/2540635
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 November 2013
          • Accepted: 1 July 2013
          • Revised: 1 March 2012
          • Received: 1 June 2011
          Published in tweb Volume 7, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader