skip to main content
10.5555/832284.835491acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaspdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Automatic Synthesis of CMOS Operational Amplifiers: A Fuzzy Optimization Approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 January 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a method for optimizing and automating the components and transistor sizing for CMOS operational amplifiers (op-amps). The optimization approaches used for the synthesis of analog circuits are found to be very much rigid in terms of capturing human intentions. In this work, we have observed that with the use of fuzzy membership functions, human intentions for expressing wide variety of requirements, e.g., minimize power, maximize gain, etc., which are often conflicting in nature, can be captured effectively in order to formulate the objective function. For each of the performance specifications of a given topology, a membership function is assigned to measure the degree of fulfillment of the objectives and the constraints. A number of objectives are optimized simultaneously by assigning weights to each of them representing their relative importance, and then by clustering together to form the objective function that is solved by an optimization algorithm. We have considered the channel length modulation parameter for the computation of DC bias point and small signal parameters. The design results obtained from our optimization algorithm showed an excellent match with those obtained from SPICE simulation for a number of op-amp topologies.

References

  1. 1. L. A. Zadeh, "Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision process," IEEE Trans. System, Man and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-3, pp. 28-44. January 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2. M. Fares and B. Kaminska, "FPAD: A fuzzy nonlinear programming approach to analog circuit design," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 785-793, July 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3. B. Martin, "Automation comes to analog," IEEE Spectrum, pp. 70-75, June 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4. M. Ismail and J. Franca, Introduction to Analog VLSI Design Automation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5. L. R. Carley and R. A. Rutenbar, "How to automate analog IC design," IEEE Spectrum, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 26-30, August 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6. J. H. Huijsing, R. J. Plassche, and W. Sansen, Analog Circuit Design, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7. R. Harjani, R. A. Rutenbar, and L. R. Carley, "OASYS: A framework for analog circuit synthesis," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 680-691, June 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8. F. El-Turkey and E. E. Perry, "BLADES: An artificial intelligence approach to analog circuit design," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1247-1265, December 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9. M. R. Degrauwe, O. Nys, and H. J. Oguey, "IDAC: An interactive design tool for analog CMOS circuits," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-22, no. 6, pp. 1106-1116, December 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10. H. Y. Koh, C. H. Sequin, and P. R. Gray, "OPASYN: A compiler for CMOS operational amplifiers," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 113-125, February 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11. H. Odonera, H. Kanbara, and K. Tamaru, "Operational-amplifier compilation with performance optimization," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 466-473, April 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12. G. G. E. Gielen, H. C. C. Walscharts, and W. M. C Sansen, "Analog circuit design optimization based on symbolic simulation and simulated annealing," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-25, no. 3, pp. 707-713, June 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13. G. G. E. Gielen, H. C. C. Walscharts, and W. M. C. Sansen, "ISSAC: A symbolic simulator for analog integrated circuits," IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-24, no. 6, pp. 1587-1596, December 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14. C. Toumazou and C. A. Makris, "Analog IC design automation: Part I - Automated circuit generation: New concepts and methods," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 218-238, February 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15. W. Nye, D. C. Riley, A. Sangiovanni, and A. L. Tits, "DELIGHT. SPICE: An optimization-based system for the design of integrated circuits," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 501-519, April 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16. J. M. Shyu and A. Sangiovanni-Vincetelli, "ECSTASY: A new environment for IC design optimization," in Proc. IEEE Inter. Conf. Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), pp. 484-487, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17. J. C. Lai, J. S. Kueng, H. J. Chen, and F. J. Fermandez, "ADOPT-A CAD tool for analog circuit design," IEEE Circ. Devices, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 29-30, March 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18. E. S. Ochotta, R. A. Rutenbar, and L. R. Carley, "Synthesis of high performance analog circuits in ASTRX/OBLX," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 273-293, March 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19. J. P. Harvey, M. I. Elmasry, and B. Leung, "STAIC: An interactive framework for synthesizing CMOS and BiCMOS analog circuits," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1402-1417, November 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20. A. Torralba, J. Chavez, and L. G. Franquelo, "FASY: A fuzzy logic based tool for analog synthesis," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 785-793, July 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21. P. Mandal and V. Viswanathan, "A new approach for CMOS Op-Amp Synthesis," 12th International Conference on VLSI Design, pp. 189-194, January 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22. P. C. Maulik, L. R. Carley, and D. J. Allstot, "Sizing of cell level analog circuits using constrained optimization techniques," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-28, no. 3, pp. 233-241, March 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23. M. Hensherson, S. P. Boyd, and T. H. Lee, "Optimal design of CMOS op-amp via geometric programming," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1-21, January 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24. P. R. Gray and R. G. Meyer, Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25. K. R. Laker and W. M. C. Sansen, Design of Analog Integrated Circuits and Systems, McGraw-Hill, New Jersey, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26. P. E. Allen and D. Holberg, CMOS Analog Circuit Design, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, To be published.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Automatic Synthesis of CMOS Operational Amplifiers: A Fuzzy Optimization Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASP-DAC '02: Proceedings of the 2002 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
      January 2002
      753 pages
      ISBN:0769514413

      Copyright © Copyright (c) 2002 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Publisher

      IEEE Computer Society

      United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 January 2002

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate466of1,454submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      ASPDAC '25

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader