skip to main content
10.1145/571985.571993acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 October 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the sense of touch as a channel for communicating with miniature handheld devices. We embedded a PDA with a TouchEngineTM --- a thin, miniature lower-power tactile actuator that we have designed specifically to use in mobile interfaces (Figure 1). Unlike previous tactile actuators, the TouchEngine is a universal tactile display that can produce a wide variety of tactile feelings from simple clicks to complex vibrotactile patterns. Using the TouchEngine, we began exploring the design space of interactive tactile feedback for handheld computers. Here, we investigated only a subset of this space: using touch as the ambient, background channel of interaction. We proposed a general approach to design such tactile interfaces and described several implemented prototypes. Finally, our user studies demonstrated 22% faster task completion when we enhanced handheld tilting interfaces with tactile feedback.

References

  1. Design innovations yearbook 2000. 2000, Design-Zentrum Nordrhein Westfallen, Verlagpp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Akamatsu, M., S. Sato, A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1994. 40(3): p. 443-453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Annaswamy, A.M., M.A. Srinivasan, The role of compliant fingerpads in grasping and manipulation: Identification and control, in Essays on Mathematical Robotics: The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications., J. Baillieul and S. Sastry, Editors. 1998, Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Apelle, S., Haptic perception of form: activity and stimulus attributes, in The psychology of touch, M. Heller and W. Schiff, Editors. 1991, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ. p. 169-188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, J., Rock'n'Scroll is here to stay. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 2000(2): p. 40-45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Billinghurst, M., J. Bowskill, N. Dyer, J. Morphett. An evaluation of wearable information spaces. in VRAIS'98. 1998: IEEE p. 20-27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brooks, F.P., Jr., Ming-Ouh-Young, J.J. Batter, P.J. Killpatrick. Project GROPE-Haptic Displays for Scientific Visualization. in SIGGRAPH'90. 1990: p. 177-185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Burdea, G., Force and touch feedback for virtual reality. 1996, John Wiley and Sons. 339 pp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Buttolo, P., B. Hannaford. Pen-based force display for precision manipulation in virtual environments. in VRAIS. 1995: IEEE p. 217-224. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Buxton, B. Integrating the periphery and context: a new taxonomy of telematics. in Graphics Interfaces. 1995 p. 239-246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cholewiak, R., A. Collins, Sensory and physiological bases of touch, in The psychology of touch, M. Heller and W. Schiff, Ed. 1991, Lawrence Erlbaum. p. 23-60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cholewiak, R., C. Sherrick, A computer-controlled matrix system for presentation to skin of complex spatiotemporal pattern. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1981. 13(5): p. 667-673.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fitzmaurice, G., H. Ishii, W. Buxton. Bricks: Laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. in CHI'95. 1995: ACM p. 442-449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Fitzmaurice, G., S. Zhai, M. Chignell, Virtual reality for palmtop computers. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1993. 11(3): p. 197-218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fitzmaurice, G.W., Situated information spaces and spatially aware palmtop computers. Communication of the ACM, 1993. 36(7): p. 38-49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fukumoto, M., S. Toshiaki. ActiveClick: Tactile Feedback for Touch Panels. in CHI'2001, Extended Abstracts. 2001: ACM p. 121-122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gault, R., Progress in experiments on tactual interpretation of oral speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1925(14): p. 155-159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Geldard, F., Adventures in tactile literacy. American Psychologist, 1957. 12: p. 115-124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Geldard, F., Some neglected possibilities for communication. Science, 1960. 131(3413): p. 1583-1588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Gemperle, F., N. Ota, D. Siewiorek. Design of the wearbale tactile display. in ISWC. 2001: IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gescheider, G., et al., The effects of a surround on the vibrotactile thresholds. Sensory Process, 1978. 2(2): p. 99-115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Grob, B., Basic electronics. 8 ed. 1997, McGrow-Hill. 1010 pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, B., et al. Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! ?? exploration of manipulative user interfaces. in CHI'98. 1998: ACM p. 17-24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hinckley, K., R. Pausch, J. Gobble, N. Kassell. Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization. in CHI'94. 1994: ACM p. 452-458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hinckley, K., J. Pierce, M. Sinclair, E. Horvitz. Sensing Techniques for Mobile Interaction. in UIST'2000. 2000: ACM p. 91-100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hughes, R., A. Forrest. Perceptualisation using a tactile mouse. in Visualization'96. 1996: IEEE p. 181-188. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ishii, H., B. Ullmer Tangible bits towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. in CHI97. 1997: ACM p. 234-241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kajimoto, H., N. Kawakami, T. Maeda, S. Tachi. Electrocutaneous display as an interface to a virtual tactile world. in VR'2001. 2001: IEEE p. 289-290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kristoffersen, S., F. Ljungberg. "Making place" to make IT work: empirical explorations of HCI for mobile CSCW. in SIGGROUP'99. 1999: ACM p. 276-285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. MacKenzie, S., A. Oniszczak. A Comparison of three selection techniques for touchpads. in CHI'98. 1998: ACM p. 336-343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Miller, T., R. Zeleznik. The design of 3D haptic widgets. in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. 1999: ACM p. 97-102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Minsky, M., et al. Feeling and seeing: issues in force display. in I3D. 1990: ACM p. 235-241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Pascoe, J., N. Ryan, D. Morse, Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2000. 7(3): p. 417-437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pedersen, E., T. Sokoler. AROMA: abstract representation of presence supporting mutual awareness. in CHI. 1997: ACM p. 51-58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Poupyrev, I., et al., Developing a generic augmented-reality interface, IEEE Computer. 2002. p. 44-49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Rekimoto, J. Tilting operations for small screen interfaces. in UIST'96. 1996: ACM p. 167-168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sawhney, N., C. Schmandt. Nomadic Radio: Scalable and contextual notification for wearable audio messaging. in CHI'99. 1999: ACM p. 96-103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Sherrick, C., Vibrotactile pattern perception: some findings and applications, in The Psychology of Touch, M. Heller and W. Schiff, Editors. 1991, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 189-217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan, H., A. Pentland. Tactual displays for wearable computing. in ISWC97. 1997: IEEE p. 84-89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Uchino, K., Piezoelectric Actuators and Ultrasonic Motors. 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 349 pp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              UIST '02: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
              October 2002
              247 pages
              ISBN:1581134886
              DOI:10.1145/571985

              Copyright © 2002 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 27 October 2002

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

              Upcoming Conference

              UIST '24

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader