skip to main content
10.1145/378239.378245acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Future performance challenges in nanometer design

Published:22 June 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We highlight several fundamental challenges to designing high-performance integrated circuits in nanometer-scale technologies (i.e. draRita Glover, EDA Today, L.C.wn feature sizes < 100 nm). Dynamic power scaling trends lead to major packaging problems. To alleviate these concerns, tMarc Halpernhermal monitoring and feedback mechanisms can limit worst-case dissipation and reduce costs. Furthermore, a flexible multi-Vdd + multi-Vth + re-sizing approach is advocated to leverage the inherent properties of ultra-small MOSFETs and limit both dynamic and static power. Alternative global signaling strategies such as differential and low-swing drivers are recommended in order to curb the power requirements of cross-chip communication. Finally, potential power delivery challenges are addressed with respect to ITRS packaging predictions.

References

  1. 1.http://public.itrs.net, ITRS, 2000 update.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Y. Cao, et al., "New paradigm of predictive MOSFET and interconnect modeling for early circuit simulation," Proc. CICC, pp. 201-204, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Personal communication, Pin Su &amp; Charles Kuo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.R. Viswanath, et al., "Thermal performance challenges from silicon to systems," Intel Technology Journal, 3 rd quarter, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.I. Aller, et al., "CMOS circuit technology for sub-ambient temperature operation," Proc. ISSCC, pp. 214-215, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.D. Brooks and M. Martonosi, "Dynamic thermal management for highperformance microprocessors," Proc. High-Performance Comp. Arch., 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.S.H. Gunther, et al., "Managing the impact of increasing microprocessor power consumption," Intel Technology Journal, 1 st quarter, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.M.K. Gowan, et al., "Power considerations in the design of the Alpha 21264 microprocessor," Proc. DAC, pp. 726-731, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.D. Sylvester and K. Keutzer, "Getting to the bottom of deep submicron II: A global wiring paradigm," Proc. ISPD, pp. 193-201, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.R. Ho, K. Mai, H. Kapadia, and M. Horowitz, "Interconnect scaling implications for CAD," Proc. ICCAD, pp. 425-429, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.R. McInerney, et al, "Methodology for repeater insertion in the Itanium microprocessor," Proc. ISPD, pp. 99-104, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.H. Zhang, et al., "Low-swing on-chip signaling techniques: effectiveness and robustness," IEEE Trans. VLSI Systems, pp. 264-272, Jun. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Y. Massoud, et al., "Differential signaling in crosstalk avoidance strategies for physical synthesis," Proc. TAU, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.D.G. Chinnery and K. Keutzer, "Closing the gap between ASIC and custom: an ASIC perspective," Proc. DAC, pp. 637-641, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.W.J. Dally and A. Chang, "The role of custom design in ASIC chips," Proc. DAC, pp. 643-647, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.IBM SA-27E ASIC standard cell datasheet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.P. Hurat, "Beyond physical synthesis," SNUG Europe 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.K. Usami, et al., "Automated low-power technique exploiting multiple supply voltages applied to a media processor," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 463-472, Mar. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.M. Takahashi, et al., "A 60-mW MPEG4 video codec using clustered voltage scaling with variable supply-voltage scheme," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1772-1780, Nov. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.K. Usami and M. Horowitz, "Cluster voltage scaling technique for low power design," Proc. ISLPED, pp. 3-8, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.C. Akrout, et al, "A 480MHz RISC microprocessor in a 0.12..m Leff CMOS technology with copper interconnects," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1609- 1616, Nov. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.S. Sirichotiyakul, et al., "Standby power minimization through simultaneous threshold voltage and circuit sizing," Proc. DAC, pp. 436-441, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.S. Borkar, "Design challenges of technology scaling," IEEE Micro, pp. 23-29, Jul-Aug 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.R. Chau, et al., "30nm physical gate length CMOS transistors with 1.0ps NMOS and 1.7ps PMOS gate delays," Proc. IEDM, pp. 45-48, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.S. Song, et al., "CMOS device scaling beyond 100nm," Proc. IEDM, pp. 235- 238, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.H. Wakabayashi, et al., "45-nm gate length CMOS technology and beyond using steep halo," Proc. IEDM, pp. 49-52, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.M.Mehrotra, et al., "A 1.2V, sub-0.09~m gate length CMOS technology," Proc. IEDM, pp. 419-422, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.I.Y. Yang, et al., "Sub-60nm physical gate length SOI CMOS," Proc. IEDM, pp. 431-434, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.A. Ono, et al., "A 70nm gate length CMOS technology with 1.0V operation," VLSI Symp. Tech., pp. 14-15, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.M. Rodder, et al., "A scaled 1.8V, 0.18~m gate length CMOS technology: device design and reliability considerations," Proc IEDM, pp. 415-418, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.L. Su, et al, "A high-performance 0.08~m CMOS," VLSI Symp. Tech., pp. 12- 13, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.K. Chen and C. Hu, "Performance and Vdd scaling in deep submicrometer CMOS," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1586-1589, Oct. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.C. Hu, "Device and technology impact on low power electronics," in Low Power Design Methodologies, ed. Jan Rabaey, Kluwer, pp. 21-35, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.S. Mutoh, et al., "1V Multi-Threshold CMOS DSP with an efficient power management technique for mobile phone application", Proc. ISSCC, pp. 168- 169, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.J.T. Kao and A.P. Chandrakasan, "Dual-threshold voltage techniques for lowpower digital circuits," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1009-1018, Jul. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.T. Kuroda, et al., "A 0.9V, 150MHz, 10mW, 4mm 2 , 2-DCT core processor with variable VT scheme," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1770-1778, Nov. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.H. Kawaguchi, et al., "A CMOS scheme for 0.5V supply voltage with picoampere standby current," Proc. ISSCC, pp. 192-193, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.M.C. Johnson, et al., "Leakage control with efficient use of transistor stacks in single threshold CMOS," Proc. DAC, pp. 442-445, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. 39.L. Wei, et al., "Design and optimization of dual-threshold circuits for lowvoltage low-power applications," IEEE T. VLSI Sys, pp. 16-24, Mar. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. 40.S. Tyagi, et al., "A 130nm generation logic technology featuring 70nm transistors, dual-Vt transistors and 6 layers of Cu interconnects," Proc. IEDM, pp. 567- 570, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. 41.http://www-device.eecs.berkeley.edu/~dennis/BACPAC, see also: http://vlsicad.cs.ucla.edu/GSRC/GTXGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.J.M. Musicer and J. Rabaey, "MOS current mode logic for low power, low noise CORDIC computation in mixed-signal environments," Proc. ISLPED, pp. 102- 107, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Future performance challenges in nanometer design

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DAC '01: Proceedings of the 38th annual Design Automation Conference
          June 2001
          863 pages
          ISBN:1581132972
          DOI:10.1145/378239

          Copyright © 2001 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 June 2001

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

          Upcoming Conference

          DAC '24
          61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
          June 23 - 27, 2024
          San Francisco , CA , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader