skip to main content
10.1145/365024.365337acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Visual information foraging in a focus + context visualization

Published:01 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Eye tracking studies of the Hyperbolic Tree browser [10] suggest that visual search in focus+context displays is highly affected by information scent (i.e., local cues, such as text summaries, used to assess and navigate toward distal information sources). When users detected a strong information scent, they were able to reach their goal faster with the Hyperbolic Tree browser than with a conventional browser. When users detected a weak scent or no scent, users exhibited less efficient search of areas with a high density of visual items. In order to interpret these results we present an integration of the CODE Theory of Visual Attention (CTVA) with information foraging theory. Development of the CTVA-foraging theory could lead to deeper analysis of interaction with visual displays of content, such as the World Wide Web or information visualizations.

References

  1. 1.Anderson, J.R. and P.L. Pirolli, Spread of activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1984. 10: p. 791-798.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Card, S.K., J.D. Mackinlay, and B. Schneiderman, Information visualization: Using vision to think. 1999, San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Drury, C.G. and M.R. Clement, The effect of area, density, and number of background characters on visual search. Human Factors, 1978. 20: p. 597-602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Furnas, G.W. Effective view navigation. in Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '97. 1997. Atlanta, GA: Association for Computing Machinery. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Lamping, J. and R. Rao. Laying out and visualizing large trees using a hyperbolic space. in UIST '94. 1994. Marina del Rey: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Logan, G.D., The CODE theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 1996. 103: p. 603-649.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Pirolli, P. Computational models of information scentfollowing in a very large browsable text collection. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '97. 1997. Atlanta, GA: Association for Computing Machinery. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Pirolli, P. and S. Card, The evolutionary ecology of information foraging, . 1997, Xerox PARC: Palo Alto, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Pirolli, P. and S.K. Card, Information foraging. Psychological Review, 1999. 106: p. 643-675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Pirolli, P., S.K. Card, and M.M.Van Der Wege. The effect of information scent on searching information visualizations of large tree structures. in Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2000. 2000. Palermo, Italy: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Resnikoff, H.L., The illusion of reality. 1989, New York: Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Ware, C., Information visualization: Perception for design. 1999, San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Wolfe, J.M., What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 1998. 9: p. 33-39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Zelinsky, G.J., et al., Eye movements reveal the spatiotemproal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 1997. 8: p. 448-453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Visual information foraging in a focus + context visualization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        March 2001
        559 pages
        ISBN:1581133278
        DOI:10.1145/365024

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 March 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '01 Paper Acceptance Rate69of352submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader