skip to main content
10.1145/3305366.3328091acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
course

Path guiding in production

Published:28 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Path guiding is a family of adaptive variance reduction techniques in physically-based rendering, which includes methods for sampling both direct and indirect illumination, surfaces and volumes but also for sampling optimal path lengths and making splitting decisions. Since adoption of path tracing as a de facto standard in the VFX industry several years ago, there has been an increased interest in producing high-quality images with low amount of Monte Carlo samples per pixel. Path guiding, which has received attention in the research community in the past few years, has proven to be useful for this task and therefore has been adopted by Weta Digital. Recently, it has also been implemented in the Walt Disney Animation Studios' Hyperion and Pixar's Renderman. The goal of this course is to share our practical experience with path guiding in production and to provide self-contained overview of recently published techniques and to discuss their pros and cons. We also take audience through theoretical background of various path guiding methods which are mostly based on machine learning - used to adapt sampling distributons based on observed samples - and zero-variance random walk theory - used as a framework for combining different sampling decisions in an optimal way. At the end of our course we discuss open problems and invite researchers to further develop path guiding in their future work.

References

  1. Benedikt Bitterli, Srinath Ravichandran, Thomas Müller, Magnus Wrenninge, Jan Novák, Steve Marschner, and Wojciech Jarosz. 2018. A radiative transfer framework for non-exponential media. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia) 37, 6 (nov 2018), 225:1--225:17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tian Qi Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David Duvenaud. 2018. Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. arXiv: 1806.07366 (June 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chin-Wei Huang, David Krueger, Alexandre Lacoste, and Aaron C. Courville. 2018. Neural Autoregressive Flows. arXiv:1804.00779 (April 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pavel Izmailov, Dmitrii Podoprikhin, Timur Garipov, Dmitry P. Vetrov, and Andrew Gordon Wilson. 2018. Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalization. arXiv:1803.05407 (March 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander Keller, Matthijs Van Keirsbilck, and Xiaodong Yang. 2019. Structural Sparsity: Speeding Up Training and Inference of Neural Networks by Linear Algorithms. In GTC Talks. https://on-demand-gtc.gputechconf.com/gtcnew/sessionview.php?sessionName=s9389-structural+sparsity%3a+speeding+up+training+and+inference+of+neural+networks+by+linear+algorithmsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Petr Vévoda, Ivo Kondapaneni, and Jaroslav Křivánek. 2018. Bayesian online regression for adaptive direct illumination sampling. 37, 4 (Aug. 2018), 125:1--125:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '19: ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Courses
    July 2019
    3772 pages
    ISBN:9781450363075
    DOI:10.1145/3305366

    Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 July 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • course

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGGRAPH '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader