skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Participatory Design and Participatory Research: An HCI Case Study with Young Forced Migrants

Published:06 February 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Participatory design (PD) in HCI has been successfully applied to vulnerable groups, but further research is still needed on forced migrants. We report on a month-long case study with a group of about 25 young forced migrants (YFMs), where we applied and adapted strategies from PD and participatory research (PR). We gained insights into the benefits and drawbacks of combining PD and PR concepts in this particular scenario. The PD+PR approach supported intercultural collaborations between YFMs and young members of the host community. It also enabled communication across language barriers by using visual and “didactic reduction” resources. On a theoretical level, the experiences we gained allowed us to reflect on the role of “safe spaces” for participation and the need for further discussing it in PD. Our results can benefit researchers who take part in technology-related participatory processes with YFMs.

References

  1. Konstantin Aal, George Yerousis, Kai Schubert, Dominik Hornung, Oliver Stickel, and Volker Wulf. 2014. Come in palestine: Adapting a german computer club concept to a palestinian refugee camp. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Collaboration Across Boundaries: Culture, Distance and Technology (CABS’14). ACM, New York, NY, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rikke Aarhus, Erik Gronvall, and Morten Kyng. 2010. Challenges in participation. In Proceedings of the 4th International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Asam Almohamed. 2016. Designing for the marginalized: A step towards understanding the lives of refugees and asylum seekers. In Proceedings in Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’16). ACM, New York, NY, 165--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Antonio Díaz Andrade and Bill Doolin. 2016. Information and communication technology and the social inclusion of refugees. MIS Quarterly 40, 2 (June 2016), 405--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sherry R. Arnstein. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, 4 (1969), 216--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. BAMF. 2015. The distribution of asylum applicants. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.bamf.de/EN/Migration/AsylFluechtlinge/Asylverfahren/Verteilung/verteilung-node.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenniffer Baranoff, Israel R. Gonzales, Jay Liu, Heidi Yang, and Jimin Zheng. 2015. Lantern: Empowering refugees through community-generated guidance using near field communication. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’15). Vol. 2, ACM, 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Thomas Basten, Dominik Conrad, and Dirk Felzmann. 2013. Didaktische rekonstruktion. In Wörterbuch der Geographiedidaktik. Begriffe von A-Z, Dieter Böhn und Gabriele Obermaier (Ed.), Westermann, 52--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadi BenEzer and Roger Zetter. 2014. Searching for directions: Conceptual and methodological challenges in researching refugee journeys. Journal of Refugee Studies 28, 3 (2014), 297--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jarg Bergold and Stefan Thomas. 2012. Partizipative forschungsmethoden: Ein methodischer ansatz in bewegung. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung 13, 1 (2012), 33. 1438-5627http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lykke Bertel, Dorte Rasmussen, and Ellen Christiansen. 2013. Robots for real: Developing a participatory design framework for implementing educational robots in real-world learning environments. In Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’13). Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.), Springer Berlin, 437--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. Participatory design and ‘democratizing innovation’. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC’10). ACM, New York, NY, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: Working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign 8, 2--3 (June 2012), 127--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Susanne Bødker. 1987. Through the interface - A human activity approach to user interface design. DAIMI Report Series 16, 224 (1987), 161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Susanne Bødker. 1996. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human-Computer Interaction 11, 3 (1996), 215--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Susanne Bødker. 2002. Staging a professional participatory design practice - Moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI’02). ACM, New York, NY, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Susanne Bødker. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI’06). ACM, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-wave HCI, 10 years later - Participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 5 (2015), 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Deana Brown and Rebecca E Grinter. 2016. Designing for transient use: A human-in-the-loop translation platform for refugees. In Proceedings of the 33th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 321--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Matthew Brunwasser. 2015. A 21st-Century Migrant’s Essentials: Food, Shelter, Smartphone. (25 August 2015). Retrieved March 10, 2016 from https://nyti.ms/2jCY568.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Souleymane Camara and Jose Abdelnour-Nocera. 2013. Revealing the socio-technical context of design settings: Toward participatory is design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29, 4 (2013), 289--307. International Journal of Human-Computer InteractionGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rebecca Campbell, Tracy Sefl, Sharon Wasco, and Courtney Ahrens. 2004. Doing community research without a community: Creating safe space for rape survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology 33, 3--4 (2004), 252--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. John M. Carroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 2013. Wild at home: The neighborhood as a living laboratory for HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 3 (July 2013), 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. David Coghlan and Mary Brydon-Miller (Eds.). 2014. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. SAGE, Los Angeles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ransford Danso. 2002. From ‘there’ to ‘here’: An investigation of the initial settlement experiences of Ethiopian and Somali refugees in Toronto. GeoJournal 56, 1 (2002), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Christopher Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2 (April 2013), 241--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Christopher Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the gate: Gaining access, building rapport, and co-constructing community-based research. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’15). ACM, New York, NY, 1348--1358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Elizabeth A. Davis. 2000. Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education 22, 8 (2000), 819--837.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’99). ACM, New York, NY, 592--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour 8 Information Technology 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Allison Druin, Ben Bederson, Angela Boltman, Adrian Miura, Debby Knotts-Callahan, and Mark Platt. 1998. Children as our technology design partners. In The Design of Children’s Technology: How We Design, What We Design and Why, Allison Druin (Ed.). Morgan Kauffmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Eurostat. 2016. Asylum Statistics. (April 2016). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Karen E. Fisher, Ann Peterson Bishop, Philip Fawcett, and Lassana Magassa. 2013. InfoMe at teen design days: A multi-disciplinary, design thinking approach to community development. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development (ICTD’13). Vol. 2, ACM, 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Karen E Fisher, Ann Peterson Bishop, Lassana Magassa, and Phil Fawcett. 2014. Action: Codesigning interactive technology with immigrant teens. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’14). ACM, New York, NY, 345--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Karen E. Fisher and Katya Yefimova. 2016. ‘Future’s butterflies:’ Co-designing ICT wayfaring technology with refugee Syrian youth. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’16). ACM, New York, NY, 25--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Karen E. Fisher, Katya Yefimova, and Ann P. Bishop. 2016. Adapting design thinking and cultural probes to the experiences of immigrant youth: Uncovering the roles of visual media and music in ICT wayfaring. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’16). ACM, New York, NY, 859--871. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Gerald Futschek. 2013. Extreme didactic reduction in computational thinking education. Learning While We Are Connected 3 (2013), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nathan Gale, Reginald G. Golledge, William C. Halperin, and Helen Couclelis. 1990. Exploring spatial familiarity. The Professional Geographer 42, 3 (August 1990), 299--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Joan Greenbaum. 1991. Towards participatory design: The head and the heart revisited. DAIMI Report Series 20, 374 (December 1991), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Joan Greenbaum. 1993. A design of one’s own: Towards participatory design in the united states. In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Susan Groundwater-Smith, Sue Dockett, and Dorothy Bottrell. 2014. Participatory Research with Children and Young People. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim Halskov and Nicolai Brodersen. 2015. The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002--2012. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (February 2015), 81--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Gillian Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3 (February 2011), 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. M. G. Hernandez, S. Casanova, C. Suarez-Orozco, and C. L. Saetermoe. 2013. Doing no harm and getting it right: Guidelines for ethical research with immigrant communities. In New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, M. G. Hernandez, J. Nguyen, C. L. Saetermoe, and C. Suarez-Orozco (Eds.). Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Chapter 4, Issue 141, 43--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Harald Holone and Jo Herstad. 2013. Three tensions in participatory design for inclusion. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 2901--2906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Matthew Horton, Janet Read, Emanuela Mazzone, Sim Gavin, and Daniel Fitton. 2012. School friendly participatory research activities with children. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’12). ACM, New York, NY, 2099--2104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Juan Pablo Hourcade. 2017. Participatory design with children in the autism spectrum: Access, participation, personalization, and sustainability. In Participatory Design for Learning, Betsy DiSalvo, Carl DiSalvo, Jason Yip, and Elizabeth Bonsignore (Eds.). Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Sofia Hussain. 2010. Empowering marginalized children in developing countries through participatory design processes. CoDesign 6, 2 (2010), 99--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Susan J. Elliott and Joan Gillie. 1998. Moving experiences: A qualitative analysis of health and migration. Health 8 Place 4, 4 (1998), 327--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Suhas Govind Joshi and Tone Bratteteig. 2016. Designing for prolonged mastery. on involving old people in participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 28, 1 (2016), 3--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Anu Kankainen, Kirsikka Vaajakallio, Vesa Kantola, and Tuuli Mattelmäki. 2012. Storytelling group a co-design method for service design. Behaviour 8 Information Technology 31, 3 (2012), 221--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Mary Anne Kennan, Annemaree Lloyd, Asim Qayyum, and Kim Thompson. 2011. Settling in: The relationship between information and social inclusion. Australian Academic 8 Research Libraries 42, 3 (2011), 191--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Finn Kensing and Kim Halskov Madsen. 1992. Generating visions: Future workshops and metaphorical design. In Design at Work, Joan Greenbaum and Morten Kyng (Eds.). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 155--168. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=125470.125433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Finn Kensing and Andreas Munk-Madsen. 1993. PD: Structure in the toolbox. Communications of the ACM 36, 6 (June 1993), 78--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Nadia Kutscher and Lisa-Marie Kreß. 2016. ‘Internet is the same like food’-- An empirical study on the use of digital media by unaccompanied minor refugees in Germany. Transnational Social Review 1674 (June 2016), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Morten Kyng. 1996. Users and computers - A contextual approach to design of computer artifacts. DAIMI Report Series 25, 507 (1996), 7--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Caitríona Ní Laoire. 2015. Making space for ambiguity: The value of multiple and participatory methods in researching diasporic youth identities. Identities 23, 4 (2015), 470--484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research Methods In Human-Computer Interaction (1st. ed.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Annemaree Lloyd, Mary Anne Kennan, Kim Thompson, Asim Qayyum, and David Bawden. 2013. Connecting with new information landscapes: Information literacy practices of refugees. Journal of Documentation 69, 2 (2013), 121--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Sofia Lundmark. 2016. Connecting with New Information Landscapes: Information Literacy Practices of Refugees. Ph.D. Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. R. Mahalingam and V. C. Rabelo. 2013. Theoretical, methodological, and ethical challenges to the study of immigrants: Perils and possibilities. In Frameworks and Ethics for Research with Immigrants. New directions for Child and Adolescent Development, M. G. Hernandez, J. Nguyen, C. L. Saetermoe, and C. Suarez-Orozco (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chapter 3, Issue 141, 25--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Kerstin Mayrberger. 2012. Partizipatives lernen mit dem social web gestalten: Zum widerspruch einer, verordneten partizipation. Medienpädagogik 21 (12 January 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Michael J. Muller and Allison Druin. 2012. Participatory design: The third space in human-computer interaction. In Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications (3rd. ed.), Julie A. Jacko (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1125--1154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Michael J. Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Communications of the ACM 36, 6 (June 1993), 24--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Maggie Neill. 2008. Transnational refugees: The transformative role of art. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9, 2 (May 2008), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Maggie Neill and Ramaswami Harindranath. 2006. Theorising narratives of exile and belonging: The importance of biography and ethno-mimesis in ‘understanding’ asylum. Qualitative Sociology Review 2, 1 (2006), 39--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Valerie Nesset and Andrew Large. 2004. Children in the information technology design process: A review of theories and their applications. Library &Information Science Research 26, 2 (March 2004), 140--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. J. Nguyen, M. G. Hernandez, and C. Suarez-Orozco. 2013. An ethical frame for research with immigrant families. In New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, M. G. Hernandez, J. Nguyen, C. L. Saetermoe, and C. Suarez-Orozco (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chapter 1, Issue 141, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Forced Migration Organization. 2012. What is Forced Migration? (12 June 2012). Retrieved from http://www.forcedmigration.org/about/whatisfm/what-is-forced-migration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Elizabeth R. Peterson and Kevin A. Barron. 2006. A sticky methodology: Using sticky notes to help facilitate focus groups. In Description and Explanation in Educational and Social Research, B. Kozuh, R. Kahn, A. Kozlowska, and P. Krope (Eds.). UCLA Press, 89--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Elizabeth R. Peterson and Kevin A. Barron. 2007. How to get focus groups talking: New ideas that will stick. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 6, 3 (2007), 140--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Elena Ponzoni. 2015. Windows of understanding: Broadening access to knowledge production through participatory action research. Qualitative Research 16, 5 (2015), 557--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Kim Halskov, Liesbeth Huybrechts, John Vines, Eva Eriksson, and Helena Karasti. 2015. Unfolding participation. what do we mean by participation conceptually and in practice. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1 (2015), 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Robert Schweitzer, Fritha Melville, Zachary Steel, and Philippe Lacherez. 2006. Trauma, post-migration living difficulties, and social support as predictors of psychological adjustment in resettled Sudanese refugees. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40, 2 (2006), 179--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Vered Slonim-nevo. 2015. Risk factors associated with culture shock among asylum seekers from darfur. Journal of Refugee Studies 29, 1 (2015), 117--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Barry N. Stein. 1981. The refugee experience: Defining the parameters of a field of study. International Migration Review 15, 1 (January 1981), 320--330.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Lucy Suchman. 2002. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 2 (2002), 91--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. R. Talhouk, T. Bartindale, K. Montague, S. Mesmar, C. Akik, A. Ghassani, M. Najem, H. Ghattas, P. Olivier, and M. Balaam. 2017. Implications of synchronous IVR radio on Syrian refugee health and community dynamics. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (CT’17). ACM, New York, NY, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. R. Talhouk, S. Ishtiaque, V. Wulf, C. Crivallero, V. Vlachokyriakos, and P. Olivier. 2015. Refugees and HCI SIG: The role of HCI in responding to the refugee crisis. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’15). ACM, New York, NY, 1073--1076. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. R. Talhouk, S. Mesmar, A. Thieme, M. Balaam, P. Olivier, C. Akik, and H. Ghattas. 2016. Syrian refugees and digital health in lebanon. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 331--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Annet Te Lindert, Hubert Korzilius, Fons J. R. Van de Vijver, Sjaak Kroon, and Judit Arends-Tóth. 2008. Perceived discrimination and acculturation among Iranian refugees in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 32, 6 (2008), 578--588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. UNECE. 2012. Learning for the future: Competences in Education for Sustainable Development. Technical Report. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Strategy for Education for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/ESD_Publications/Competences_Publication.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. UNESCO. 2017. Migrant | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. UNHCR. 1951. Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. Technical Report. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. UNHCR. 2017. Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2016. Technical Report. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. http://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2016/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Tuck Wah Leong, John McCarthy, Ole Sejer Iversen, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Invited SIG - Participation and HCI: Why involve people in design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2012 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 1217--1220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Ann Light, and Peter Wright. 2015. The beginnings, middles and endings of participatory research in HCI: An introduction to the special issue on perspectives on participation. International Journal Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 77--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation: On how we involve people in design. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 429--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Hella von Unger. 2012. Participatory health research: Who participates in what? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research FQS 13, 1 (January 2012), Article 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Hella von Unger. 2014. Partizipative Forschung. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Greg Walsh, Allison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, Elizabeth Foss, Evan Golub, Leshell Hatley, Elzabeth Bonsignore, and Sonia Franckel. 2010. Layered elaboration: A new technique for co-design with children. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1237--1240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Greg Walsh, Elizabeth Foss, Jason Yip, and Allison Druin. 2013. FACIT PD: A framework for analysis and creation of intergenerational techniques for participatory design. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 2893--2902. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Peter Westoby. 2008. Developing a community-development approach through engaging resettling southern Sudanese refugees within Australia. Community Development Journal 43, 4 (2008), 483--495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Michael T. Wright, Hella von Unger, and Martina Block. 2010. Partizipation der zielgruppe in der gesundheitsförderung und prävention. Partizipative Qualitätsentwicklung in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention (2010), 35--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Ying Xu, Carleen Maitland, and Brian Tomaszewski. 2015. Promoting participatory community building in refugee camps with mapping technology. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD’15). ACM, New York, NY, Article 67, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. George Yerousis, Konstantin Aal, Thomas von Rekowski, David W. Randall, Markus Rohde, and Volker Wulf. 2015. Computer-enabled project spaces: Connecting with palestinian refugees across camp boundaries. In Proceedings of the 33th Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’15). ACM, New York, NY, 3749--3758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Participatory Design and Participatory Research: An HCI Case Study with Young Forced Migrants

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
          ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 25, Issue 1
          Special Issue on Reimagining Participatory Design
          February 2018
          162 pages
          ISSN:1073-0516
          EISSN:1557-7325
          DOI:10.1145/3183791
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 February 2018
          • Revised: 1 September 2017
          • Accepted: 1 September 2017
          • Received: 1 January 2017
          Published in tochi Volume 25, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader