Cell-graphs: image-driven modeling of structure-function relationship

Abstract

Cell-graph construction methods are best served when physics-driven and data-driven paradigms are joined.

References

1. Acar, E. and Yener, B. Unsupervised multiway data analysis: A literature survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21, 1 (2009), 6--20.
2. Albert, R., Schindewolf, T., Baumann, I. and Harms, H. Three-dimensional image processing for morphometric analysis of epithelium sections. Cytometry (1992); 13:759--765.
3. Bilgin, C.C. et al. Quantification of three-dimensional cell-mediated collagen remodeling using graph theory. PloS One 5, 9 (2010), e12783.
4. Bilgin, C.C., Bullough, P., Plopper, G.E., and Yener B. ECM-aware cell-graph mining for bone tissue modeling and classification. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 20, 3 (May 2010), 416--438.
5. Bilgin, C., Demir, C., Nagi, C. and Yener, B. Cell-graph mining for breast tissue modeling and analysis. In Proc. of IEEE EMBC (2007).
6. Bilgin, C.C., Ray, S., Baydil, B., Daley, W.P., Larsen, M. and Yener, B. Multiscale feature analysis of salivary gland branching morphogenesis. PLoS One 7, 3 (2012).
7. Car, R. and Parrinello, M. Unified approach for molecular dynamics and density-functional theory. Physical Review Letters 55, 22 (1985), 2471--2474.
8. Chung, F.R.K. Spectral graph theory. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, American Mathematical Society 92 (1997). Providence, RI.
9. Davies J. Branching Morphogenesis. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
10. de Lathauwer, de Moor, L.B. and Vandewalle, J. A multilinear singular value decomposition. SIAM J. Matrix Analysis and Apps 21, 4 (2000), 1253--1278.
11. Demir C., Gultekin, S.H. and Yener, B. Augmented cell-graphs for automated cancer diagnosis. Bioinformatics (Suppl 2) 21, (2005), ii7--ii12.
12. Demir C., Gultekin, S.H. and Yener, B. Learning the topological properties of brain tumors. IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2, 3 (2005), 262--270.
13. Dhulekar, N., Oztan, B. and Yener B. Model coupling for predicting a developmental patterning process. In Proc. of SPIE 2016.
14. Eden, M. A two-dimensional growth process. In 4^th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (1961), 223--239.
15. Einstein, A.J., Wu, H.S., Sanchez, M. and Gil, J. Fractal characterization of chromatin appearance for diagnosis in breast cytology. Journal of Pathology 185, 4 (1998), 366--381.
16. Esgiar, A.N., Naguib, R.N.G, Sharif, B.S, Bennett, M.K, Murray, A. Fractal analysis in the detection of colonic cancer images. IEEE Trans. Information Technology in Biomedicine 6, 1 (2002), 54--58.
17. Frangi, A.F., Niessen, W.J., Vincken, K.L., Viergever, M.A. Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1998), 130--137.
18. Galloway M.M. Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. (1975) 4:172--179.
19. Gerdes et. Al. Highly multiplexed single-cell analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cancer tissue. PNAS 110, 29 (2013), 11982--11987.
20. Gunduz, C., Yener, B., and Gultekin, S.H. The cell graphs of cancer. Bioinformatics 20 (2004), i145--i151.
21. Gurcan, M.N., Boucheron, L., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N. and Yener, B. Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review. 2009.
22. Haralick R.M. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. In Proc. of IEEE. 67, 5 (1979), 786--804.
23. Hladuvka, J., Konig, A. and Groller, E. Exploiting eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix for volume decimation. In Proceeding of the 9th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization, and Computer Vision (2001), 124--129.
24. Hsu, C. and Lin, C. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks 13, 2 (2002), 415--425.
25. Jaromczyk J.W. and Toussaint G.T. (1992). Relative neighborhood graphs and their relatives. In Proc. IEEE 80 (1992), 1502--1517.
26. Keenan S.J., Diamond, J., McCluggage, W.G., Bharucha, H. Thompson, D., Bartels, B.H. and Hamilton, P.W. An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J. Pathol. 192, 3 (2000), 351--362.
27. Li, G., Semerci, M., Yener, B. and Zaki, M.J. Effective graph classification based on topological and label attributes. ASA Data Science J. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 5, 4 (2012), 265--283.
28. McKeen-Polizzotti, L. et al. Quantitative metric profiles capture three-dimensional temporospatial architecture to discriminate cellular functional states. BMC Medical Imaging 11.1 (2011), 1.
29. Meijering, E. Cell segmentation: 50 years down the road. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 29, 5 (Sept. 2012), 140--145.
30. Meineke, F., Potten, C. and Loeffler, M. Cell migration and organization in the intestinal crypt using a latticefree model. Cell Proliferation 34 (2001), 253--266.
31. Metzger, R., Klein, O., Martin, G. and Krasnow M. The branching programme of mouse lung development. Nature 453 (2008), 745--750.
32. Murray, J.D. and Oster, G.F. Generation of biological pattern and form. Math Med Biol. 1 (1984), 51--75.
33. Oster, G.F., Murray, J.D., and Harris, A.K. Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis. J. Embryol Exp Morphol 78 (1983), 83--125.
34. Oztan, B., Kong, H., Gürcan, M.N. and Yener, B. Follicular lymphoma grading using cell-graphs and multi-scale feature analysis. SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 831516--831516.
35. Oztan, B., Shubert, K.R., Bjornsson, C.S., Plopper, G.E. and Yener, B. Biologically-driven cell-graphs for breast tissue grading. In Proceedings of IEEE 10^th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (Apr. 2013), 137--140.
36. Plopper, G., Larsen, M. and Yener, B. Image-enhanced Systems Biology: A Multiscale, Multidimensional Approach to Modeling and Controlling Stem Cell Function in Computational Biology of Embryonic Stem Cells. Ming Zhan, ed. Bentham Science Publishers, 2012, 71--87.
37. Raymond, E., Raphael, M., Grimaud, M., Vincent, L., Binet, J.L., Meyer, F. Germinal center analysis with the tools of mathematical morphology on graphs. Cytometry 14 (1993), 848--861.
38. Rejniak, K.A. An immersed boundary framework for modeling the growth of individual cells: An application to early tumour development. J. Theor Biol 247, 1 (2007), 186--204.
39. Srivathsan, A., Menshykau, D., Michos, O. and Iber, D. Dynamic image-based modelling of kidney branching morphogenesis. Computational Methods in Systems Biology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8130 (2013), 106--119. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
40. Street W.N., Wolberg, W.H. and Mangasarian, O.L. Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. IS&T/SPIE 1993 International Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology. San Jose, CA, 1905:861--870.
41. Turing A.M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 237, 641 (1952). 37--72.
42. Weyn, B. et al. Computer-assisted differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma based on syntactic structure analysis. Cytometry (1999), 35:23--29.
43. Wiltgen M., Gerger, A. and Smolle, J. Tissue counter analysis of healthy common nevi and malignant melanoma. Int J Med Inform. 69(1), 17--28, 2003.
44. Xing, F. and Yang, L. Robust nucleus/cell detection and segmentation in digital pathology and microscopy images: A comprehensive review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. (Jan. 6, 2016).
45. Yener, B., Dhulekar, N., Ray, S., Yuan, D., Oztan, B., Baskaran, A. and Larsen, M. Prediction of growth factor dependent cleft formation during branching morphogenesis using a dynamic graph-based growth model. IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Life and medical sciences

    • Bioinformatics

    • Systems biology

• Hardware

  • Emerging technologies

    • Biology-related information processing

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing and business

      • Employment issues