Saijing Zheng
John M. Carroll
ABSTRACT
The Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) have experienced rapid development. However, high dropout rate has become a salient issue. Many studies have attempted to understand this phenomenon; other have explored mechanisms for enhancing retention. For instance, social media has been used to improve student engagement and retention. However there is a lack of (1) empirical studies of social media use and engagement compared to embedded MOOC forums; and (2) rationales for social media use from both instructors' and students' perspectives. We addressed these open issues through the collection and analysis of real usage data from three MOOC forums and their associated social media (i.e., Facebook) groups as well as conducting interviews of instructors and students. We found that students show higher engagement and retention in social media than in MOOC forums, and identified both instructors' and students' perspectives that lead to the results. We discuss design implications for future MOOC platforms.
- Adamopoulos, P. 2013. What Makes a Great MOOC? An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Student Retention in Online Courses, In Proc. ICIS.Google Scholar
- Brown, J.S. and Duguid. P. 2000. Mysteries of the region: knowledge dynamics in Silicon Valley. The silicon valley edge. 16--45.Google Scholar
- Carlos, A., Pérez, C. M. and Muñoz, M. 2013 Analysing the impact of built-in and external social tools in aMOOC on educational technologies. In Scaling up learning for sustained impact, 5--18.Google Scholar
- Clow, C. 2013. Moocs and the Funnel of Participation, In Proc. LAK.pages 185--189. L@S 2016 Flipped Session - Outside the MOOC April 25-26, 2016, Edinburgh, UK Google ScholarDigital Library
- Conrad, D. 2005. Building and maintaining community in cohort-based online learning. Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 1--20.Google Scholar
- Dahlstrom, E. D., Brooks, C., and Bichsel, J. 2014. The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR, September 2014.Google Scholar
- Nada, Dabbagh, and Anastasia Kitsantas. 2012. Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education 15, no. 1. 3--8.Google Scholar
- Downes. S. S. 2010. Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge, Collective intelligence and e-learning (2), 1- 26.Google Scholar
- Du, H., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J. M. and Ganoe, G. 2009. I felt like a contributing member of the class: Increasing class participation with Class Commons, In Proc. GROUP, 233--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. 2007. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Incorporated.Google Scholar
- Khalil, H. and Ebner. M. 2013. Interaction Possibilities in MOOCs-How Do They Actually Happen. In International Conference on Higher Education Development, pp. 1--24.Google Scholar
- Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C. and Schneider, E. 2013. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proc LAK.170--179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kizilcec R. F. and Schneider, E. 2015. Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM TOCHI, 22(2), 6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kop, R. Fournier, P., Sui, J., and Mak, F. 2011. A pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(7), 74--93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lave, J and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press,Google Scholar
- Johnson, R. D., Hornik, S., & Salas, E. 2008. An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5), 356--369. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucas, M. and Moreira, A. 2009. Bridging formal and informal learning-A case study on students' perceptions of the use of social networking tools. InLearning in the synergy of multiple disciplines. 325--337.Google Scholar
- Means, B. Bakia, M., and Murphy, R. 2014. Learning Online : What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richardson, J.C. and Swan, K. 2003. Examing social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction.Google Scholar
- Robinson, K. 2005. How Creativity, Education and the Arts Shape a Modern Economy.Google Scholar
- Salomon, G. 1993. No distribution without individuals' cognition: A dynamic interactional view. Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations. 111--138Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 1996. Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational leadership 54(3). 6--10.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. L., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R. and Gabelnick, F. 2009 Learning communities: Reforming undergraduate education.Google Scholar
- Zheng, S. Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C. and Carroll, J. M. 2015. Understanding Student Motivation, Behaviors and Perceptions in MOOCs, In Proc CSCW. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saijing Zheng, Mary Beth Rosson, Patrick C. Shih and John M. Carroll. 2015. Designing Massive Open Online Courses as Interactive Places for Collaborative Learning. In Proc LAS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zheng, S., Wisniewski, P., Rosson, M.B. and Carroll, J. M 2016 Ask the Instructors: Motivation and Challenges of Teaching Massive Open Online Courses, In Proc CSCW, In Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. 2014. How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112--126Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joksimovic, S., Dowell, N., Skrypnyk, O., Kovanovic, V., Gasevic, D., Dawson, S., & Graesser, A. C. 2015. How do you connect?: analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs. In Proc LAK. 64- 68. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T. Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. 2001. Assessing social presence in asynchronous, textbased computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51--70.Google Scholar
- Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., Archer, W. 2001. Assessing Teaching presence in a Computer Conference Environment. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 5(2), 1--17.Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. 1999. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2), 87--105Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Role of Social Media in MOOCs: How to Use Social Media to Enhance Student Retention
Recommendations
Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook
The rapid adoption of social media technologies has resulted in a fundamental shift in the way communication and collaboration take place. As staff and students use social media technologies in their personal lives, it is important to explore how social ...
A Preliminary Look at MOOC-associated Facebook Groups: Prevalence, Geographic Representation, and Homophily
L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ ScaleAlthough xMOOCs are not designed to directly engage students via social media platforms, some students in these courses join MOOC-associated Facebook groups. This study explores the prevalence of Facebook groups associated with courses from MITx and ...
Social Media as Social Transition Machinery
Social media, and people's online self-presentations and social networks, add complexity to people's experiences managing changing identities during life transitions. I use gender transition as a case study to understand how people experience liminality ...
Comments