skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858505acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Designing Speculative Civics

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

As human computer interaction design research continues to expand domains, civics is emerging as an important subject through which to explore how computation shapes our public lives. In this paper we present and reflect upon a series of research through design (RtD) projects that investigate speculative civic contexts. From this, we identify and discuss tactics that can be employed in RtD projects: RtD as Representations of Systems Yet-to-Come, RtD as Prototyping Systems and RtD as Use of a System. Then we identify and discuss thematic interpretations of civics that emerged through our designs: Mediated Civics, Computed Civics, and Proxied Civics. This work contributes to discourses of speculative design, research through design, and those of civics in human computer interaction design research.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p4979-disalvo.mp4

mp4

269.3 MB

References

  1. Eric Ambinder and David M. Jennings. 2013. The Resilient Social Network: Occupy Sandy and Supestorm Sandy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "Critical" About Critical Design? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3297-3306. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2093-2102. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702400 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. David M. Berry. Critical Theory and the Digital. Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved September 24, 2015 from http://www.bloomsbury.com/us/critical-theoryand-the-digital-9781441166395Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Julian Bleeker. 2009. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction. Retrieved February 15, 2013 from http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/designfiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-andfiction/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ian Bogost. 2012. Alien Phenomenology or, What it's Like to Be a Thing. University of MN Press, Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. John Bowers. 2012. The Logic of Annotated Portfolios: Communicating the Value of "Research Through Design." Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, 68-77. http://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317968 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jed R. Brubaker. 2014. The Afterlife of Digital Identity. CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 343-346. http://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559964 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn S. Dombrowski, Anita M. Gilbert, Nafiri Kusumakaulika, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2014. Stewarding a Legacy: Responsibilities and Relationships in the Management of Post-mortem Data. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 4157- 4166. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557059 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, ACM, 424-433. http://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Peter Cook (ed.). 1999. Archigram. Princeton Architectural Press, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mike Crang and Stephen Graham. 2007. SENTIENT CITIES Ambient intelligence and the politics of urban space. Information, Communication & Society 10, 6: 789-817. http://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701750991Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Christopher A Le Dantec, Mariam Asad, Aditi Misra, and Kari E Watkins. 2015. Planning with Crowdsourced Data: Rhetoric and Representation in Transportation Planning. CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM Request Permissions, 1717-1727. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Christopher A. Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the Gate: Gaining Access, Building Rapport, and Co-Constructing Community-Based Research. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1348-1358. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675147 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. John Dewey. 2012. The Public and its Problems: An essay in political inquiry. Penn States Press, Philadelphia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Carl Francis DiSalvo. 2009. Design and the Construction of Publics. Design Issues 25, 1: 48-63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Carl DiSalvo and Tom Jenkins. 2015. Drones for Foraging. 2nd Conference on Research Though Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Carl DiSalvo, Jonathan Lukens, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making Public Things: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Anthony Dunne. 2006. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2014. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts?; London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Keller Easterling. 2014. Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. Verso Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pelle Ehn. 1988. Playing the Language-games of Design and Use-on Skill and Participation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGOIS and IEEECS TC-OA 1988 Conference on Office Information Systems, ACM, 142-157. http://doi.org/10.1145/45410.45426 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, IN University, 92-101. Retrieved February 12, 2013 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1795234.1795248 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Daniel Fallman. 2003. Design-oriented humancomputer interaction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 225-232. http://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642652 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gabriele Ferri, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Stephanie Louraine. 2014. Analyzing Critical Designs: Categories, Distinctions, and Canons of Exemplars. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, 355-364. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598588 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sarah Fox and Christopher Le Dantec. 2014. Community Historians: Scaffolding Community Engagement Through Culture and Heritage. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, 785-794. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598563 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. William Gaver. 2011. Making Spaces: How Design Workbooks Work. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1551-1560. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979169 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 937-946. http://doi.org/10.1145/2208516.2208538 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 233-240. http://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Adam Greenfield. 2006. Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. New Riders Publishing, Berkeley, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1176-1190. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675152 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Maarten Hajer. 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 36, 2: 175-195. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Joachim Halse, Eva Brandt, Brendon Clark, and Binder (eds.). 2010. Rehearsing the Future. Danish Design School Press, Copenhagen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Conor Linehan, Ben J. Kirman, Stuart Reeves, et al. 2014. Alternate Endings: Using Fiction to Explore Design Futures. CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 45-48. http://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2560472 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jonathan Lukens. 2013. DIY Infrastructure and the Scope of Design Practice. Design Issues 29, 3: 14-27. http://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00218Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Noortje Marres. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Harold G Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2012. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. William Odom. 2015. Understanding Long-Term Interactions with a Slow Technology: An Investigation of Experiences with FutureMe. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 575-584. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702221 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. William Odom, Abi Sellen, Richard Harper, and Eno Thereska. 2012. Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 781-790. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207789 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. Designing for Dynamic Family Structures: Divorced Families and Interactive Systems. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, 151-160. http://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858199 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Placelessness, Spacelessness, and Formlessness: Experiential Qualities of Virtual Possessions. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, 985-994. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598577 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. James Pierce, Phoebe Sengers, Tad Hirsch, Tom Jenkins, William Gaver, and Carl DiSalvo. 2015. Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2083-2092. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702438 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Steven Poole. 2014. The truth about smart cities: "In the end, they will destroy democracy." The Guardian. Retrieved September 15, 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/dec/17/truthsmart-city-destroy-democracy-urban-thinkersbuzzphraseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. M. T. Stauffer. 2002. Utopian Reflections, Reflected Utopias: Urban Designs by Archizoom and Superstudio. AA Files: 23-36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Joshua Tanenbaum. 2014. Design Fictional Interactions: Why HCI Should Care About Stories. interactions 21, 5: 22-23. http://doi.org/10.1145/2648414 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Cameron Tonkinwise. 2015. Just Design. Medium. Retrieved September 24, 2015 from https://medium.com/@camerontw/just-designb1f97cb3996fGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. 2012. How to Transform a City: Lessons from the IBM Smarter Cities Challenge. Retrieved from http://asmarterplanet.com/files/2012/08/SmarterCities-WhitePaper_031412b1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Open City - Civic apps built with open data. Retrieved from http://opencityapps.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing Speculative Civics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader