skip to main content
10.1145/2839462.2839472acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modifying Gesture Elicitation: Do Kinaesthetic Priming and Increased Production Reduce Legacy Bias?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

A common issue in gesture elicitation studies is that participants are influenced by interaction with digital products, imitating touchscreen gestures or WIMP icons. In our study, we adapted and experimentally tested two of Morris' et al.'s suggestions for reducing legacy bias: increased production of gestures and covert kinaesthetic priming. Our findings indicate that the practical effectiveness of these strategies might be limited, given we only found medium effect sizes and a wide variance between participants that overshadows any effects. Our work contributes to reflection on, and indirectly, by experimentally testing potential variations, to future improvements of the gesture elicitation method.

References

  1. Leonardo Angelini, Francesco Carrino, Stefano Carrino, Maurizio Caon, Omar Abou Khaled, Jürgen Baumgartner, Andreas Sonderegger, Denis Lalanne, and Elena Mugellini. 2014. Gesturing on the Steering Wheel: a User-elicited taxonomy. In Proceedings of AutomotiveUI '14. ACM, NY, Article 31, 1-8, DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667414 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John A. Bargh, Mark Chen, and Lara Burrows, L. 1996. Automaticity of social behavior. JPSP Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 71 No. 2 (1996): 230--244Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lawrence W. Barsalou, Paula M. Niedenthal, Aron K. Barbey, and Jennifer A. Ruppert. 2003. Social embodiment. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 43, Brian H. Ross (eds). Academic Press / Elsevier, 43--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Francesco Cafaro, Leilah Lyons, Raymond Kang, Josh Radinsky, Jessica Roberts, and Kristen Vogt. 2014. Framed guessability: using embodied allegories to increase user agreement on gesture sets. In Proceedings of TEI '14. ACM, NY, 197-204. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540944 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. David B. Centerbar, and G.L. Clore. 2006. Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science 17, 1, 22--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Laila Craighero, Luciano Fadiga, Giacomo Rizzolatti, and Carlo Umiltá, C. 1998. Visuomotor Priming. Visual Cognition, 5 (1/2), 109--125Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ming Ki Chong, and Hans W. Gellersen. 2013. How groups of users associate wireless devices. In Proceedings of CHI '13. ACM, NY, 1559-1568. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466207 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nele Dael, Marcello Mortillaro, and Klaus Scherer, 2012. Emotion Expression in Body Action and Posture. Emotion 12, 5 1085-1101. doi: 10.1037/a0025737Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tanja Döring, Dagmar Kern, Paul Marshall, Max Pfeiffer, Johannes Schöning, Volker Gruhn, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2011. Gestural Interaction on the Steering Wheel -- Reducing the Visual Demand. In Proceedings of CHI'11, ACM NY, 483-492, DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Karl Duncker, 1945. On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58:270, 1--113Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Niels Henze, Andreas Löcken, Susanne Boll, Tobias Hesselmann, and Martin Pielot. 2010. Free-Hand Gestures for Music Playback: Deriving Gestures with a User-Centered Process. In Proceedings of MUM'10, ACM NY, Article 16, 10 pages, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1899475.1899491 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. David Kirsh, D. 2011. Creative Cognition in Choreography. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conference on Computational Creativity, http://iccc11.cua.uam.mx/proceedings/the_cognitive/kirsh_iccc11.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Christian Kray, Daniel Nesbitt, John Dawson, and Michael Rohs. 2010. User-defined gestures for connecting mobile phones, public displays, and tabletops. In Proceedings of MobileHCI'10. ACM, NY, 239-248, DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851640 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Byron Lahey, Audrey Girouard, Winslow Burleson, and Roel Vertegaal. 2011. PaperPhone: Understanding the Use of Bend Gestures in Mobile Devices with Flexible Electronic Paper Displays. In Proceedings of CHI'11, ACM NY. 1303-1312. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979136 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Roman Liepelt, and M. Brass. 2010. Top-Down Modulation of MotorPriming by Belief About Animacy. Experimental Psychology Vol. 57(3): 221--227. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mark Micire, Munjal Desai, Amanda Courtemanche, Katherine M. Tsui, and Holly A. Yanco. 2009. Analysis of Natural Gestures for Controlling Robot Teams on Multi-Touch Tabletop Surfaces. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS'09), ACM NY, 41-48. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1731903.1731912 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Meredith Ringel Morris. 2012 Web on the wall: Insights from a multimodal interaction elicitation study. In Proceedings of ITS'12. ACM NY. 95-104. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2396636.2396651 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Meredith Ringel Morris, Andreea Danielescu, Steven Drucker, Danyel Fisher, Bongshin Lee, m. c. schraefel, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2014. Reducing legacy bias in gesture elicitation studies. ACM interactions 21, 3 (May 2014): 40--45. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2591689 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nacenta, M., Kamber, Y., Quiang, Y., Kristensson, P.O. Memorability of Pre-Designed and User-defined Gesture Sets. Proc. of CHI'13, ACM 2013. 1099--1108 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nielsen, M., Störring, M., Moeslund, T.B., Graunum, E. A Procedure for Developing Intuitive and Ergonomic Gestures Interfaces for HCI. Proc. of Int. Gesture Workshop 2003, Springer LNAI, 409--420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Chris North, Tim Dwyer, Bongshin Lee, Danyel Fisher, Petra Isenberg, George Robertson, and Kori Inkpen. 2009. Understanding multi-touch manipulation for surface computing. In Proceedings of Interact'09, Part II. Springer. 236-249. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_31 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jaime Ruiz, Yang Li, and Edward Lank. 2011. User Defined Motion Gestures for Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of CHI'11, ACM NY. 197-206. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978971 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jaime Ruiz and Daniel Vogel. 2015. Soft-Constraints to Reduce Legacy and Performance Bias to Elicit Whole-body Gestures with Low Arm Fatigue. In Proceedings of CHI '15. ACM NY, 3347-3350. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702583 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Giovanni Maria Troiano, Esben Warming Pedersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2014. User-Defined Gestures for Elastic, Deformable Displays. In Proceedings of AVI'14, ACM NY, 1-8. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2598153.2598184 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Dirk Wentura, and Juliane Degner. 2010. Practical Guide to Sequential Priming and Related Tasks. In Handbook of implicit cognition, B. Gawronski, B. K. Payne (eds.) New York: the Guilford Press, 95--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Htet Htet Aung, Brandon Rothrock, and Brad A. Myers. 2005. Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts, ACM NY 1869-1872. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057043 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. User-Defined Gestures for Surface Computing. In Proceedings of CHI'09. ACM 2009, 1083-1092. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518866 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modifying Gesture Elicitation: Do Kinaesthetic Priming and Increased Production Reduce Legacy Bias?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      February 2016
      820 pages
      ISBN:9781450335829
      DOI:10.1145/2839462

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate45of178submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader