skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2788608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utilizing Text Mining on Online Medical Forums to Predict Label Change due to Adverse Drug Reactions

Published:10 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an end-to-end text mining methodology for relation extraction of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from medical forums on the Web. Our methodology is novel in that it combines three major characteristics: (i) an underlying concept of using a head-driven phrase structure grammar (HPSG) based parser; (ii) domain-specific relation patterns, the acquisition of which is done primarily using unsupervised methods applied to a large, unlabeled text corpus; and (iii) automated post-processing algorithms for enhancing the set of extracted relations. We empirically demonstrate the ability of our proposed approach to predict ADRs prior to their reporting by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Put differently, we put our approach to a predictive test by demonstrating that our methodology can credibly point to ADRs that were not uncovered in clinical trials for evaluating new drugs that come to market but were only reported later on by the FDA as a label change.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1779.mp4

mp4

226.5 MB

References

  1. M. Banko, O. Etzioni, and T. Center. The tradeoffs between open and traditional relation extraction. In ACL, volume 8, pages 28--36. Citeseer, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Benton, L. Ungar, S. Hill, S. Hennessy, J. Mao, A. Chung, C. E. Leonard, and J. H. Holmes. Identifying potential adverse effects using the web: A new approach to medical hypothesis generation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(6):989--996, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. W. Chee, R. Berlin, and B. Schatz. Predicting adverse drug events from personal health messages. 2011:217--226, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. W. Church and P. Hanks. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):22--29, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Feldman, M. Fresko, J. Goldenberg, O. Netzer, and L. H. Ungar. Extracting product comparisons from discussion boards. In International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pages 469--474, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Feldman, M. Fresko, J. Goldenberg, O. Netzer, and L. H. Ungar. Using text mining to analyze user forums. In International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), pages 1--5, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. N. Glance, M. Hurst, K. Nigam, M. Siegler, R. Stockton, and T. Tomokiyo. Analyzing online discussion for marketing intelligence. In Special Interest Tracks and Posters of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1172--1173, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Glance, M. Hurst, K. Nigam, M. Siegler, R. Stockton, and T. Tomokiyo. Deriving marketing intelligence from online discussion. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, pages 419--428, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Hariharan and T. Ramkumar. Mining product reviews in web forums. In Information Retrieval Methods for Multidisciplinary Applications, pages 78--94. IGI Global, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. Leaman, L. Wojtulewicz, R. Sullivan, A. Skariah, J. Yang, and G. Gonzalez. Towards internet-age pharmacovigilance: Extracting adverse drug reactions from user posts to health-related social networks. In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, pages 117--125, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Y. Lee and E. T. Bradlow. Automated marketing research using online customer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5):881--894, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. X. Liu and H. Chen. Azdrugminer: An information extraction system for mining patient-reported adverse drug events in online patient forums. In Smart Health, pages 134--150. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. O. Netzer, R. Feldman, J. Goldenberg, and M. Fresko. Mine your own business: Market-structure surveillance through text mining. Marketing Science, 31(3):521--543, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Nikfarjam and G. H. Gonzalez. Pattern mining for extraction of mentions of adverse drug reactions from user comments. In American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium Proceedings 2011, pages 1019--1026. American Medical Informatics Association, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Patki, A. Sarker, P. Pimpalkhute, A. Nikfarjam, R. Ginn, K. O'Connor, K. Smith, and G. Gonzalez. Mining adverse drug reaction signals from social media: Going beyond extraction. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISBM), pages 9--16, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. B. Rozenfeld and R. Feldman. Unsupervised lexicon acquisition for hpsg-based relation extraction. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1890--1895, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. I. Segura-Bedmar, S. de la Pena, and P. Martínez. Extracting drug indications and adverse drug reactions from spanish health social media. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, pages 98--106, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. D. Turney and M. L. Littman. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 21(4):315--346, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Wang, H. Lin, D. Ferguson, and C. Zhai. Sideeffectptm: An unsupervised topic model to mine adverse drug reactions from health forums. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. W. White, N. P. Tatonetti, N. H. Shah, R. B. Altman, and E. Horvitz. Web-scale pharmacovigilance: Listening to signals from the crowd. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), 20(3):404--408, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. C. Yang, L. Jiang, H. Yang, and X. Tang. Detecting signals of adverse drug reactions from health consumer contributed content in social media. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Health Informatics, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. C. C. Yang, H. Yang, L. Jiang, and M. Zhang. Social media mining for drug safety signal detection. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Workshop on Smart Health and Wellbeing (SHB), pages 33--40, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Utilizing Text Mining on Online Medical Forums to Predict Label Change due to Adverse Drug Reactions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
        August 2015
        2378 pages
        ISBN:9781450336642
        DOI:10.1145/2783258

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 August 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate160of819submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader