skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702176acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Contesting the City: Enacting the Political Through Digitally Supported Urban Walks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a method for the situated discovery and articulation of issues at the intersection between the politics of place making and city planning. We describe the construction and use of designed tools, such as historical political archives; counterfactual maps; and cards to invite situated dialogue between the social and institutional practices and mechanisms that produce our cities. Grounded in an account of the political as vernacular and embodied, our analysis advance understandings on the politics of design, and on the complex interrelationship between places and political spaces. We outline how HCI can adopt methods and develop sensitivities to support democratic practices and publics envisioning their urban futures.

References

  1. Aoki, P.M., Honicky, R.J., Mainwaring, A., et al. A Vehicle for Research?: Using Street Sweepers to Explore the Landscape of Environmental Community Action. In Proc. of CHI '09, ACM (2009), 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bidwell, N., Syia, M., Marsden, G., et al. Walking and the social life of solar charging in rural africa. ACM TOCHI, (2008), 20, 4, 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., and Hillgren, P.A. Participatory design and "democratizing innovation". In Proc. PDC 2010, ACM (2010), 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boyte, H.,C., Everyday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Using thematic analysis in reaserch, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3(2), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Casey, E.,S., How to get from space to place in a farily short stretch of time, in Senses of Place, Santa FE:School of American Research Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Crivellaro, C., Comber, R., Bowers, J., Wright,P., Olivier,P., A Pool of Dreams: Facebook, Politics and the Emergence of a Social Movement, In Proc.CHI'14, ACM Press (2014), 3573--3582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. DiSalvo, C. Adversarial Design (Design Thinking, Design Theory). The MIT Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Di Salvo, C., Nourbakhsh,I., Holstius, D., Neighborhood Network Project: A case Study of Critical Engagement and Creative Expression Through Participatory Design. In Proc. of CHI'10, ACM Press (2010), 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Salvo, C, Lukens, J., Lodato, T., Jenkins, T., Kim, T., Making Public Things: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. In Proc. CHI'14, ACM Press (2014), 2397--2406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dearden, A. and Light, A. Designing for e-Social Action An Application Taxonomy. In Proc. Design Reaserch Society Conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. De Certeau, M., The practice of everyday life, Berkeley University of California Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dourish, P. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics, In Proc. DIS 2010, ACM(2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dourish, P., Mainwaring, D, S., Ubicomp's Colonial Impulse, In Proc.Ubicomp'12, ACM (2012), 133--144 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Farias, I., The Politics of Urban Assemblages, City, 2011, 15(3), 365--374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fowler, A. Biekart, K., (eds) Civic Driven Change: Civic Imagination in Action, The Hague Institute of Social Studies, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison, S., Dourish, P., Re-place-ing space: The Role of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems, In Proc. CSCW '96, ACM Press (1996), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hauser, G., McClellan, E., D., Vernacular Rhetoric and Social Movements: performances of resistance in the rhetoric of the everyday, in McKenzie Stevens, S., Malesh, P., Active Voices: Composing a Rhetoric of Social Movements, Suny Press, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, D., The Condition of Postmodernity, WileyBlackwell, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Holland, R., Vail, J., The art of social movement: cultural opportunity, mobilisation and framing in the early formation of the Amber Collectives, Poetics, 2012, 40, 22--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lee, J., Ingold, T., Fieldwork on Foot: Perceiving, Perceiving, Routing, Socializing, in Collins, P., Coleman, S., (eds) Locating the Field, Space, Place and Context in Anthropology, Oxford: Berg, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lentini, L., Decortis, F., Space and Places: When Interacting with and in Physical Space Becomes a meaningful Experience, Personal Ubiquitous Comput, 2010, 14, 407--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Light, A., Democratizing Technology: Making Transformations using designing, Performance and Props, In Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press, (2011), 2239--2242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Light, A., The Politics of Representing Culture in Ubiquitous Media: Challenging National Cultural Norms by Studying a Map with Indian and British Users, Personal Ubiquitous Comput, 2011, 15:585--596 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Le Dantec, C., Di Salvo, K., Infrastructing and the formation of publics in participatory Design, Social Studies of Science, 2013, 43(2), 241--264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Le Dantec, C., Participation and Publics: Supporting Community Engagement. In Proc. CHI'12, ACM Press (2012), 1351--1360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Le Dantec, C., The Right Way to Make Smart City, http://goo.gl/Y9tNDr, retrieved on 05.22.14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lukens, J., Di Salvo, C., Speculative Design and Technological Fluency, MIT Press, 2012, 3(4), 23--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuznetsov, S., Odom, W., Moulder, V., et al. HCI , Politics and the city?: engaging with urban grassroots movements for reflection and action. Ext. Abtracts CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 2409--2412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kuznetsov, S., Paulos, E., and Gross, M. WallBots: interactive wall-crawling robots in the hands of public artists and political activists. In Proc. DIS 2010, ACM Press (2010), 208--217 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Markussen, T., The Disruptive Aesthetic of Design Activism: Enacting Design between Arts and Politics, DesignIssue, 2013, 29, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Olander, S., Lenskjold,T.,U., Yndigegn, Foverskov,M., Mobilising for Community Building and Everyday Innovation, Interactions, 2011, 18(4), 28--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Paulos,E., Jenkins, T., Urban Probes: Encountering our Emergent Urban Athmosphere. In Proc. CHI'05, ACM Press (2005), 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Paulos, E., Citizen Science: Enabling Participatory Urbanism, in Foth, M., Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of The Real Time City, IGI Global, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Pink, S., Mackley, L.,K., Mitchell, V., et al. Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI, ACM TOCHI, 2008, 20, 4, 25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ratto, M., Boler, M., DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, The MIT Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Rodriguez-Amat, R.J., Brantner, C., Space and Place matters: a tool for the analysis of geolocated and mapped protests, New Media and Society, 2014, 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sadler S., The Situationist City, MIT Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanders, E., B., N., Stappers, P.J., Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Co-Design, CoDesign, 2014, 10(1), 5--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Self, W., Walking is Political, The Guardian, retrieved on 03.14, http://goo.gl/X44FbbGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Suchman, L., Human Machine Reconfigurations Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, 2000 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wright, P., McCarthy, J., Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users and Communities in Dialogue, Morgan and Claypool, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Contesting the City: Enacting the Political Through Digitally Supported Urban Walks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader