skip to main content
research-article

Walking and the social life of solar charging in rural africa

Published:17 September 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We consider practices that sustain social and physical environments beyond those dominating sustainable HCI discourse. We describe links between walking, sociality, and using resources in a case study of community-based, solar, cellphone charging in villages in South Africa's Eastern Cape. Like 360 million rural Africans, inhabitants of these villages are poor and, like 25% and 92% of the world, respectively, do not have domestic electricity or own motor vehicles. We describe nine practices in using the charging stations we deployed. We recorded 700 people using the stations, over a year, some regularly. We suggest that the way we frame practices limits insights about them, and consider various routines in using and sharing local resources to discover relations that might also feature in charging. Specifically, walking interconnects routines in using, storing, sharing and sustaining resources, and contributes to knowing, feeling, wanting and avoiding as well as to different aspects of sociality, social order and perspectives on sustainability. Along the way, bodies acquire literacies that make certain relationalities legible. Our study shows we cannot assert what sustainable practice means a priori and, further, that detaching practices from bodies and their paths limits solutions, at least in rural Africa. Thus, we advocate a more “alongly” integrated approach to data about practices.

References

  1. Adey, P. 2008. Airports, mobility and the calculative architecture of affective control, Geoforum 391, 438--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. African Innovation Fund. 2012. www.africaninnovation.org/newsviews/news/article/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=40&cHash=ce8740098e7086fc6a4f3744b9f1470b.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, J., Oulasvirta, A., and Brewster, S. The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 143--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Best, M., Smyth, T. N., Etherton, J., and Wornyo, E. Uses of mobile phones in post-conflict Liberia. Inf. Tech. Int. Develop. 6, 2, 91--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bidwell, N. J. 2009. Anchoring design to rural ways of doing and saying. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5726, 686--699. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bidwell, N. J. 2010. Ubuntu in the network: Humanness in social capital in rural South Africa. Interactions 17, 2, 68--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bidwell, N. J. and Browning, D. 2010. Pursuing genius loci: interaction design and natural places. Personal Ubiq. Comput. 14, 1, 15--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bidwell, N. J., Lalmas, M., Marsden, G., et al. 2011a. Please call ME.N.U.4EVER: Designing for ‘Callback’ in rural Africa. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Internationalisation of Products and Systems. 117--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bidwell, N. J., Reitmaier, T., Marsden, G., and Hansen, S. 2010. Designing with mobile digital storytelling in rural Africa. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1593--1602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bidwell, N. J., Reitmaier, T., Rey-Moreno, C., Rorro, Z., Siya, M., and Dlutu, B. 2013. Timely relations in Rural Africa. In Proceedings of the IFIP 12th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (WG 9:4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bidwell, N. J. and Siya, M. 2013. Situating Asynchronous Audio in Rural Africa. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8119, 36--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bidwell, N. J., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Koch Kapuire, G., and Rehm, M. 2011b. Pushing personhood into place: situating media in the transfer of rural knowledge in Africa. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Studies 69, 10, 618--631. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Birtchnell, T. 2012. Elites, elements and events: practice theory and scale. J. Transport Geography 24, 497--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Bohannon, R. W. 2007. Number of pedometer-assessed steps taken per day by adults: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physical Therapy 87, 12, 1642--1650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Brereton, M. and Ghelawat, S. 2010. Designing for participation in local social ridesharing networks: Grass roots prototyping of IT systems. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. 199--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Brynjarsdóttir, H. and Sengers, P. 2009. Ubicomp from the edge of the North Atlantic: Lessons from fishing. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Buschcer, M. and Urry, J. 2009. Mobile methods and the empirical. Euro. J. Social Theory 12, 1, 99--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Cocks, M. L., Dodd, T., and Vetter, S. 2012. ‘God is my forest’—Xhosa cultural values provide untapped opportunities for conservation. S. Afr. J. Sci. 108, 5/6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Cresswell, T. 2010. Towards a politics of mobility. Environ. Plan. D: Society Space, 28, 1, 17--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E., and Fussell, S. 2009. It's not all about “green”: Energy use in low-income communities. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 255--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Dourish, P. and Mainwaring, S. D. 2012. Ubicomp's Colonial Impiulse. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 133--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Dourish, P. 2001. Where the Action Is. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dourish, P. 2006. Re-space-ing place: “Place” and “space” ten years on. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 200--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Dourish, P. and Bell, G. 2011. Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. August/Birkhauser.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Frohlich, D., Robinson, S., Eglinton, K., Jones, M., and Vartiainen, E. 2012. Creative cameraphone use in rural developing regions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Gill, S. P., Rhythmic Synchrony and Mediated Interaction: towards a framework of rhythm in embodied interaction. AI & Society 27, 111--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hui, A. 2012. Things in motion, things in practices: how mobile practice networks facilitate the travel and use of leisure objects. J. Consumer Culture, 12, 2, 195--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ifad. 2011. Rural poverty report 2011, International Fund for Agricultural Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ingold, T. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ingold, T. and Lee, J. V. 2006. Ways of Walking. Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. E. 201. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Klemmer, S., Hartmann, B., and Takayam, L. 2006. How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 140--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Lee, J. and Ingold, T. 2006. Fieldwork on foot: perceiving, routing, socializing. In Locating the Field Space, Place and Context in Anthropology, 67--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Levine, R. 1997. A Geography of Time: The Temporal Misadventures of a Social Psychologist, or How Every Culture Keeps Time Just a Little Bit Differently. Basic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Marcus, G. E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Ann. Rev. Anthropology 24, 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Marsden, G. 2008. Toward empowered design. IEEE Computer 41, 6, 42--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mccarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as Experience. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Merritt, S. and Bardzell, S. 2011. Postcolonial language and culture theory for HCI4D. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. 1675--1680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Oksanen-Särelä, K. and Timonen, P. 2004. Making sense of walking practice—the case of Nordic walking. EASST Session S 106 “The significance of socio-technical relations in the production and reproduction of normalised behaviour.”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Euro. J. Social Theory 5, 2, 243--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Reitmaier, T., Bidwell, N. J., Siya, M., Marsden, G., and Tucker, W. D. 2012. Communicating in designing an asynchronous oral repository for rural African communities. In Proceedings of the Conference of IST-Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Sengers, P. 2011. What I learned on Change Islands: Reflections on IT and pace of life. Interactions 182, 40--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality. Berg Publishers, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Shove, E. and Pantzar, M. 2005. Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. J. Consumer Culture 51, 43--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Statistics South Africa. 2010. http://www.statssa.gov.za/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Stengers, I. 2000. The Invention of Modern Science. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Strengers, Y. 2008. Smart metering demand management programs: challenging the comfort and cleanliness habitus of households. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI'08). 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Strengers, Y. 2011. Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy feedback. J. Consumer Culture 11, 3, 319--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Tacchi, J., Slater, D., and Lewis, P. 2003. Evaluating community based media initiatives: an ethnographic action research approach. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Information Technology for Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor, A. 2011. Out there. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 685--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Tucker, W. D., Blake, E. H., Marsden, G., Pearson, M., and Westerveld, R. 2007. Reflection on three years of rural wireless Internet Protocol communication. In Proceedings of the Southern African Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference. 452--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Watkins, T. and Tacchi, J. 2008. Finding a voice through content creation. In Participatory Content Creation for Development: Principles and Practices, 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Winther, T. 2012. Electricity theft as a relational issue: a comparative look at Zanzibar, Tanzania, and the Sunderban Islands, India. Energy for Sustainable Development 161, 111--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. World Bank. 2010. Poverty: Statistics and Indicators. http://web.worldbank.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Wyche, S. and Murphy, L. L. 2012. “Dead China-make” phones off the grid: investigating and designing for mobile phone use in rural Africa. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 186--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Walking and the social life of solar charging in rural africa

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 20, Issue 4
      Special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI
      September 2013
      156 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/2509404
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 September 2013
      • Accepted: 1 June 2013
      • Revised: 1 October 2012
      • Received: 1 April 2012
      Published in tochi Volume 20, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader