skip to main content
10.1145/2465506.2466576acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A term rewriting system for the calculus of moving surfaces

Published:26 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The calculus of moving surfaces (CMS) is an analytic framework that extends the tensor calculus to deforming manifolds. We have applied the CMS to a number of boundary variation problems using a Term Rewrite System (TRS). The TRS is used to convert the initial CMS expression into a form that can be evaluated. The CMS produces expressions that are true for all coordinate spaces. This makes it very powerful but applications remain limited by a rapid growth in the size of expressions. We have extended results on existing problems to orders that had been previously intractable. In this paper, we describe our TRS and our method for evaluating CMS expressions on a specific coordinate system. Our work has already provided new insight into problems of current interest to researchers in the CMS.

References

  1. L. B. Buchberger and K. R. Loos. Algebraic simplification. Computing, Suppl., 4:11--43, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Bachmair and D. A. Plaisted. Termination orderings for associative-commutative rewrite systems. J. Symbolic Computation, 1:329--349, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Boady, P. Grinfeld, and J. Johnson. Laplace eigenvalues on the ellipse and the symbolic calculus of moving surfaces. In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Boady, P. Grinfeld, and J. Johnson. Boundary variation of poisson's equation: a model problem for symbolic calculus of moving surfaces. Int. J. Math. Comp. Sci., 6(2), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. J. Christopherson, K. A. Malik, D. R. Matravers, and K. Nakamura. Comparing two different formulations of metric cosmological perturbation theory. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28(22):225024, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Clavel, F. Durán, S. Eker, P. Lincoln, N. Martí-Oliet, J. Meseguer, and C. Talcott. The maude 2.0 system. Proc. Rewriting Techniques and Applications, pages 76--87, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Grinfeld. Hadamard's formula inside and out. J. Opt. Theory and Appl., 146(3):654--690, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Grinfeld. Hamiltonian dynamic equations for fluid films. Stud. Appl. Math., 125:223--264, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Grinfeld. A variable thickness model for fluid films under large displacements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:137802, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Grinfeld and G. Strang. Laplace eigenvalues on polygons. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 48:1121--1133, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Grinfeld and G. Strang. Laplace eigenvalues on regular polygons: A series in 1/N. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 385(1):135--149, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Grinfeld and J. Wisdom. A way to compute the gravitational potential for near-spherical geometries. Quart. Appl. Math., 64(2):229--252, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Y. V. Gusev. Heat kernel expansion in the covariant perturbation theory. Nuclear Physics B, 807(3):566--590, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. H. Howards, M. Hutchings, and F. Morgan. The isoperimetric problem on surfaces. The American Mathematical Monthly, 106(5):pp. 430--439, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G. Huet. Confluent reductions: Abstract properties and applications to term rewriting systems. J. Assoc. Comp. Mach., 27:797--821, 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. Huet and D. C. Oppen. Equations and rewrite rules -- a survey. Technical report, Stanford University, Jan 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Joseph. Parameter and domain dependence of eigenvalues of elliptic partial differential equations. 24(5):325--361, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J.-P. Jouannaud and H. Kirchner. Completion of a set of rules modulo a set of equations. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages, POPL '84, pages 83--92, New York, NY, USA, 1984. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Katz and G. I. Livshits. Superpotentials from variational derivatives rather than lagrangians in relativistic theories of gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25(17):175024, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. Knuth and P. Bendix. Simple word problems in universal algebras. Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, pages 263--297, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. Levi-Civita. The Absolute Differential Calculus (Calculus of Tensors). Dover Publications, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. C.-H. L. Lin, M.-H. Lo, and Y.-C. Tsai. Shape Energy of Fluid Membranes --Analytic Expressions for the Fourth-Order Variation of the Bending Energy--. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 109:591--618, Apr. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. T. Málek and V. Pravda. Kerra-schild spacetimes with an (a)ds background. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28(12):125011, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Maple User Manual, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. M. Maran-Garca. xperm: fast index canonicalization for tensor computer algebra. Computer Physics Communications, 179(8):597--603, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. MathTensor Inc. Mathtensor -- tensor analysis for mathematica. http://smc.vnet.net/MathTensor.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. McConnell. Applications of Tensor Analysis. Dover Publications, New York, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. K. Peeters. Cadabra: reference guide and tutorial. http://cadabra.phi-sci.com/cadabra.pdf, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. F. Steinwachs and A. Y. Kamenshchik. One-loop divergences for gravity nonminimally coupled to a multiplet of scalar fields: Calculation in the jordan frame. i. the main results. Physical Review D, 84(2):024026, July 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. J. Synge and A. Schild. Tensor Calculus. Dover Publications, Inc., 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. T. Thomas. Concepts from Tensor Analysis And Differential Geometry. Academic Press, New York, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL. Wolfram Mathematica 9 Documentation Center, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A term rewriting system for the calculus of moving surfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISSAC '13: Proceedings of the 38th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation
      June 2013
      400 pages
      ISBN:9781450320597
      DOI:10.1145/2465506

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate395of838submissions,47%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader