skip to main content
Equations and rewrite rules: a surveyJanuary 1980
1980 Technical Report
Publisher:
  • Stanford University
  • 408 Panama Mall, Suite 217
  • Stanford
  • CA
  • United States
Published:01 January 1980
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

Equations occur frequently in mathematics, logic and computer science. In this paper, we survey the main results concerning equations, and the methods available for reasoning about them and computing with them. The survey is self-contained and unified, using traditional abstract algebra. Reasoning about equations may involve deciding if an equation follows from a given set of equations (axioms), or if an equation is true in a given theory. When used in this manner, equations state properties that hold between objects. Equations may also be used as definitions; this use is well known in computer science: programs written in applicative languages, abstract interpreter definitions, and algebraic data type definitions are clearly of this nature. When these equations are regarded as oriented "rewrite rules," we may actually use them to compute. In addition to covering these topics, we discuss the problem of "solving" equations (the "unification" problem), the problem of proving termination of sets of rewrite rules, and the decidability and complexity of word problems and of combinations of equational theories. We restrict ourselves to first-order equations, and do not treat equations which define non-terminating computations or recent work on rewrite rules applied to equational congruence classes.

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Groce A, Holmes J and Kellar K One test to rule them all Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, (1-11)
  2. ACM
    Aoto T and Stratulat S Decision Procedures for Proving Inductive Theorems without Induction Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, (237-248)
  3. ACM
    Boady M, Grinfeld P and Johnson J A term rewriting system for the calculus of moving surfaces Proceedings of the 38th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, (69-76)
  4. Verma R (2019). Complexity of Normal Form Properties and Reductions for Term Rewriting Problems Complexity of Normal Form Properties and Reductions for Term Rewriting Problems, Fundamenta Informaticae, 92:1-2, (145-168), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.
  5. Roy P, Bouchard B, Bouzouane A and Giroux S (2018). A hybrid plan recognition model for Alzheimer's patients: Interleaved-erroneous dilemma, Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, 7:4, (375-397), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.
  6. Verma R (2019). Complexity of Normal Form Properties and Reductions for Term Rewriting Problems Complexity of Normal Form Properties and Reductions for Term Rewriting Problems, Fundamenta Informaticae, 92:1-2, (145-168), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009.
  7. Pérez Velasco P and de Lara J (2019). Using Matrix Graph Grammars for the Analysis of Behavioural Specifications, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS), 206, (133-152), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008.
  8. ACM
    Bouchard B, Bouzouane A and Giroux S A smart home agent for plan recognition Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, (320-322)
  9. Hutter D (1997). Coloring Terms to Control Equational Reasoning, Journal of Automated Reasoning, 18:3, (399-442), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1997.
  10. Rönn S (1996). Invariants and closures in the theory of rewrite systems, Formal Aspects of Computing, 8:4, (463-478), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1996.
  11. ACM
    Nakagawa A and Futatsugi K Stepwise refinement process with modularity Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Software engineering, (166-177)
  12. Nakagawa A, Futatsugi K and Tomura S Algebraic specification of Macintosh's Quickdraw using OBJ2 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Software engineering, (334-343)
  13. Giegerich R (1988). Composition and evaluation of attribute coupled grammars, Acta Informatica, 25:4, (355-423), Online publication date: 1-May-1988.
  14. ACM
    Futatsugi K, Goguen J, Jouannaud J and Meseguer J Principles of OBJ2 Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages, (52-66)
  15. ACM
    Thiel J Stop losing sleep over incomplete data type specifications Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages, (76-82)
  16. ACM
    Givler J and Kieburtz R Schema recognition for program transformations Proceedings of the 1984 ACM Symposium on LISP and functional programming, (74-84)
  17. Futatsugi K and Okada K A hierarchical structuring method for functional software systems Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Software engineering, (393-402)
  18. ACM
    Remy J and Veloso P (1981). An economical method for comparing data type specifications, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 16:5, (39-42), Online publication date: 1-May-1981.
Contributors
  • INRIA Rocquencourt
  • Stanford University

Recommendations