skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979932acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Programming on the move: design lessons from IPRO

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer programming is often a stationary, solitary task; such tasks do not work well for most novices. This work describes the IPRO project that uses our 'Programming Standing Up' framework (PSU) to reframe programming as a mobile, social game. IPRO is a programming and simulation environment for iOS in which a learner programs a virtual robot to play soccer in a virtual space shared with her cohort. This work presents examples of secondary school students learning with IPRO. We then connect the examples to PSU design principles and evaluate those principles in terms of the examples.

References

  1. Beck, K., & Andres, C. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition ed.): Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Forte, A. & Guzdial, M. Computers for Communication, Not Calculation: Media as a Motivation and Context for Learning. In Proceedings of 37th Hawaiian International Conference of Systems Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fadjo, C. L., Lu, m., & Black, J. B. Instructional Embodiment and Video Game Programming in an After School Program. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, VA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Berland, M. & Lee, V. Collaborative Strategic Board Games as a Site for Distributed Computational Thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, (2010, in press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Papert, S. Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Berland, M., Martin, T., and Benton, T. Programming Standing Up: Embodied Computing with Constructionist Robotics. Proceedings of Constructionism 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Moher, T. Embedded Phenomena: Supporting Science Learning with Classroom-sized Distributed Simulations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 691--700, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Price, S., and Rogers, Y. Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education 43, 2004, 137--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xie, L., Antle, A., and Motamedi, N. Are Tangibles More Fun? Comparing Children's Enjoyment and Engagement Using Physical, Graphical, and Tangible User Interfaces. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction,191--198, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Baum, D. (2003). Definitive Guide to LEGO Mindstorms. New York: Apress. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Erwin, B., Cyr, M., and Rogers, C. Lego Engineering and Robolab: Teaching Engineering with LabView from Kindergarten to Graduate School. International Journal of Engineering Education, 16(2), 1--11, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wolz, U. Teaching Design and Project Management with LEGO Robots. Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 11--15, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sklar, E., and Parsons, S. RoboCupJunior: A vehicle for enhancing technical literacy. Proceedings of the AAAI-02 Mobile Robot Workshop, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. diSessa, A. Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Raffle, H., Parkes, A., and Ishii, H. Topobo: A Constructive Assembly System with Kinetic Memory. Proceedings of the ACM Conference for Computer-Human Interaction, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Oschuetz, L., Wessolek, D., and Sattler, W. Constructing with Movement Kinematics. Proceedings of the ACM Conference for Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 257--260, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fernaeus, Y., and Tholander, J. Finding Design Qualities in a Tangible Programming Space. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 447--456, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Fernaeus, Y., and Tholander, J. "Looking at the Computer but Doing It On Land": Children's Interactions in a Tangible Programming Space. People and Computers XIX: the bigger picture: Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction 2005, 3--18, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacob, R., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L., Horn, M., Shaer, O., Solovey, E., and Zigelbaum, J. Reality-Based Interaction: Unifying the Next Generation of Interactions Styles. CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 2465--2470, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Marks, H. M. Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153--184, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jonassen, D. Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. Patterns of Engagement in Authentic Online Learning Environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 1 (2003), 59--71Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Programming on the move: design lessons from IPRO

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader