skip to main content
10.1145/1378600.1378603acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Brimon: a sensor network system for railway bridge monitoring

Published:17 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Railway systems are critical in many regions, and can consist of several tens of thousands of bridges, being used over several decades. It is critical to have a system to monitor the health of these bridges and report when and where maintenance operations are needed. This paper presents BriMon, a wireless sensor network based system for such monitoring. The design of BriMon is driven by two important factors: application requirements, and detailed measurement studies of several pieces of the architecture. In comparison with prior bridge monitoring systems and sensor network prototypes, our contributions are three-fold. First, we have designed a novel event detection mechanism that triggers data collection in response to an oncoming train. Next, BriMon employs a simple yet effective multi-channel data transfer mechanism to transfer the collected data onto a sink located on the moving train. Third, the BriMon architecture is designed with careful consideration of the interaction between the multiple requisite functionalities such as time synchronization, event detection, routing, and data transfer. Based on a prototype implementation, this paper also presents several measurement studies to show that our design choices are indeed quite effective.

References

  1. George Iype. Weak, distressed, accident-prone. http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/jun/25spec.htm, 25 Jun 2001. The Rediff Special.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alan Mainwaring, Joseph Polastre, Robert Szewczyk, David Culler, and John Anderson. Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Monitoring. In ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gilman Tolle, Joseph Polastre, Robert Szewczyk, David Culler, Neil Turner, Kevin Tu, Stephen Burgess, Todd Dawson, Phil Buonadonna, David Gay, and Wei Hong. A Macroscope in the Redwoods. In SenSys, Nov 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Geoffrey Werner-Allen, Konrad Lorincz, Matt Welsh, Omar Marcillo, Jeff Johnson, Mario Ruiz, and Jonathan Lees. Deploying a Wireless Sensor Network on an Active Volcano. IEEE Internet Computing, Mar/Apr 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lakshman Krishnamurthy, Robert Adler, Phil Buonadonna, Jasmeet Chhabra, Mick Flanigan, Nandakishore Kushalnagar, Lama Nachman, and Mark Yarvis. Design and Deployment of Industrial Sensor Networks: Experiences from a Semiconductor Plant and the North Sea. In SenSys, Nov 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sukun Kim. Wireless Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring. Master's thesis, U.C. Berkeley, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeongyeup Paek, Krishna Chintalapudi, John Cafferey, Ramesh Govindan, and Sami Masri. A Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Health Monitoring: Performance and Experience. In EmNetS-II, May 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Manuel E. Ruiz-Sandoval. Smart Sensors for Civil Infrastructure Systems. PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Pei Zhang, Christopher M. Sadler, Stephen A. Lyon, and Margaret Martonosi. Hardware Design Experiences in ZebraNet. In SenSys, Nov 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alex Pentland, Richard Fletcher, and Amir Hasson. DakNet: Rethinking Connectivity in Developing Nations. IEEE Computer, Jan 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bhaskaran Raman, Kameswari Chebrolu, Naveen Madabhushi, Dattatraya Y. Gokhale, Phani K. Valiveti, and Dheeraj Jain. Implications of Link Range and (In)Stability on Sensor Network Architecture. In WiNTECH, Sep 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Exploration of Sensor Network Field deployment on a large Highway Bridge and condition assessment. http://healthmonitoring.ucsd.edu/documentation/public/Vincent_Thomas_Testing.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miklos Maroti, Branislav Kusy, Gyula Simon, and Akos Ledeczi. The Flooding Time Synchronization Protocol. In SenSys, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hoi-Sheung Wilson So, Giang Nguyen, and Jean Walrand. Practical Synchronization Techniques for Multi-Channel MAC. In MOBICOM, Sep 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jerry Zhao and Ramesh Govindan. Understanding Packet Delivery Performance in Dense Wireless Sensor Networks. In SenSys, Nov 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Alec Woo, Terence Tong, and David Culler. Taming the Underlying Challenges of Reliable Multihop Routing in Sensor Networks. In SenSys, Nov 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nilesh Mishra, Kameswari Chebrolu, Bhaskaran Raman, and Abhinav Pathak. Wake-on-WLAN. In The 15th Annual Interntional World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2006), May 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dennis Cox, Emil Jovanov, and Aleksandar Milenkovic. Time Synchronization for ZigBee Networks. In SSST, Mar 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Chipcon. Chipcon AS SmartRF(R) CC2420 Preliminary Datasheet (rev 1.2), Jun 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wei Ye, Fabio Silva, and John Heidemann. Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling. In SenSys, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ning Xu, Sumit Rangwala, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Deepak Ganesan, Alan Broad, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. A Wireless Sensor Network For Structural Monitoring. In SenSys, Nov 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Joseph Polastre, Jason Hill, and David Culler. Versatile Low Power Media Access for Wireless Sensor Networks. In SenSys, Nov 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nithya Ramanathan, Mark Yarvis, Jasmeet Chhabra, Nandakishore Kushalnagar, Lakshman Krishnamurthy, and Deborah Estrin. A Stream-Oriented Power Management Protocol for Low Duty Cycle Sensor Network Applications. In EmNetS-II, May 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Vladimir Bychkovsky, Bret Hull, Allen Miu, Hari Balakrishnan, and Samuel Madden. A Measurement Study of Vehicular Internet Access Using In Situ Wi-Fi Networks. In MOBICOM, Sep 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Richard Gass, James Scott, and Christophe Diot. Measurements of In-Motion 802.11 Networking. In WMCSA, Apr 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Michael I. Brownfield and Nathaniel J. Davis IV. Symbiotic Highway Sensor Network. In Vehicular Technology Conference, Sep 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sensor Network Testbed Proposed. http://www.calit2.net/newsroom/article.php?id=28. CalIT2 Newsroom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Brimon: a sensor network system for railway bridge monitoring

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiSys '08: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
          June 2008
          304 pages
          ISBN:9781605581392
          DOI:10.1145/1378600

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 17 June 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate274of1,679submissions,16%

          Upcoming Conference

          MOBISYS '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader