Congruence and tension among activity systems in a tripartite partnership for systemic reform

ABSTRACT

Systemic reform often involves partnerships between multiple communities of practice (CoP). In order to understand the strengths and challenges of a partnership, it is necessary to examine the objectives and practices of the constituent communities and the forces that shape these practices. This paper presents an activity theory analysis of relationships between three CoPs in a systemic reform effort, Hawai'i Networked Learning Communities. Essential tensions between the activity systems of the CoPs are analyzed to understand key issues encountered in the implementation, particularly with respect to the role of technology in mediating systemic reform.

References

1. Barab, S. A., Schatz, S., Scheckler, R. (2004). Using Activity Theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize Activity Theory. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 11(1), 25--47.
2. Cole, M. & Engeströöm, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.) Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1--46.
3. Engeström, Y. (2001) Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14(1): 133--156.
4. Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Harris, E. (2005). Key Strategies to Improve Schools: How to Apply Them Contextually. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
6. Hildreth, P. & Kimble, C. (2004). Knowledge Networks: Innovation Through Communities of Practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publications.
7. Huffman, J. & Hipp, K. (2003). Reculturing Schools as Professional Learning Communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
8. Osterman, K. F. & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993). Reflective Practice for Educators: Improving Schooling through Professional Development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Resnick, P. (2002). Beyond Bowling Together: Socio Technical Capital. In J. Carroll (Ed.) HCI in the New Millenium. (pp. 647--672.) New York: Adddison-Wesley.
10. Schlager, M. S. & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional develoment: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
12. Suthers, D., Harada, V., Doane, W., Yukawa, J., Harris, B. & Lid, V. (2004). Technology-Supported Systemic Reform: An Initial Evaluation and Reassessment. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Santa Monica, CA - June 22-26, 2004. pp. 537--544.
13. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1930.)
14. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Wiggens, G. & McTighe, J. (2001). Understanding by Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. York-Barr, J. et al. 2001. Reflective Practice to Improve Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.