skip to main content
research-article

How Much is Too Much?: Understanding the Information Needs of Parents of Young Children

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

While technologies exist that are designed for parents to monitor their toddlers and school-age children, the actual structure and underlying mechanisms of parents information needs have received only limited attention. A systematic understanding of these core components is crucial for designing appropriate solutions and reducing barriers to using this type of technology. Based on accumulated findings from a three-phase study, this paper (1) describes the structure of information that parents seek about their children, (2) explores parents' underlying motivations for seeking this information, (3) presents a classification of major uses of this information, and, (4) through a set of design recommendations, discusses the role that ubiquitous technology can play in addressing information needs and current obstacles to technologically mediated solutions.

References

  1. Denise Ante-Contreras. 2016. Distracted Parenting: How Social Media Affects Parent-Child Attachment. Ph.D. Dissertation. Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ingrid Arreola, Zan Morris, Matthew Francisco, Kay Connelly, Kelly Caine, and Ginger White. 2014. From Checking on to Checking in: Designing for Low Socio-economic Status Older Adults. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1933--1936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. et al. Bartholomew, Mitchell K. 2012. New parents' Facebook use at the transition to parenthood. Family relations 61, 3 (2012), 455--469.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shona M Bettany, Shona M Bettany, Ben Kerrane, and Ben Kerrane. 2016. The socio-materiality of parental style: negotiating the multiple affordances of parenting and child welfare within the new child surveillance technology market. European Journal of Marketing 50, 11 (2016), 2041--2066.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nela Brown and Tony Stockman. 2013. Examining the Use of Thematic Analysis As a Tool for Informing Design of New Family Communication Technologies. In Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (BCS-HCI '13). British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, UK, Article 21, 6 pages. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2578048.2578078 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jean Camp and Kay Connelly. 2008. Beyond consent: privacy in ubiquitous computing (Ubicomp). Digital privacy: Theory, technologies, and practices (2008), 327--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Statistics Canada. 2018. Education Indicators in Canada: An International Perspective. (2018). https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/81-604-x/2018001/ch/cha-eng.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N. Chesley. 2005. Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family 67, 5 (2005), 1237--1248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L.S. Clark. 2013. The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 19, 6 (1990), 418--427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. S. Russell D. H. Olson and D. H. Sprenkle. 1983. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Vl. Theoretical update. Family process 22, 1 (1983), 69--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Riley J. Dennis. 2016. What Are the Best Child Tracking Tools and Apps? (2016). http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/what-are-the-best-child-tracking-tools/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Paco Developers. 2016. The Paco Application. (2016). https://www.pacoapp.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Anind K Dey. 2001. Understanding and using context. Personal and ubiquitous computing 5, 1 (2001), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Anind K. Dey and Ed de Guzman. 2006. From awareness to connectedness: the design and deployment of presence displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lynsey Dubbeld. 2006. Telemonitoring of cardiac patients: User-centred research as input for surveillance theories. Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (2006), 182--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sean Follmer, Hayes Raffle, Janet Go, Rafael Ballagas, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. Video Play: Playful Interactions in Video Conferencing for Long-distance Families with Young Children. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Adam Fourney, Ryen W. White, and Eric Horvitz. 2015. Exploring Time-Dependent Concerns About Pregnancy and Childbirth from Search Logs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 737--746. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. David Frohlich, Allan Kuchinsky, Celine Pering, Abbe Don, and Steven Ariss. 2002. Requirements for photoware. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 166--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lorna Gibson and Vicki L. Hanson. 2013. Digital motherhood: How does technology help new mothers?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. E. Harmon and M. Mazmanian. 2013. Stories of the smartphone in everyday discourse: Conflict, tension and instability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). 1051--1060.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. Hertlein. 2012. Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations 61, 3 (2012), 374--387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sobel K. Suh H. Sung Y. C. Lee C. P. Kientz-J. A. Hiniker, A. 2015. Texting while Parenting: How adults use mobile phones while caring for children at the playground. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 727--736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. S. L. Hofferth and J. Sandberg. 2001. How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriageand the Family 63 (2001), 295--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Hughes and J. Hans. 2001. Computers, the internet and families: A review of the role new technology plays in family life. Journal of Family Issues 22, 6 (2001), 776--790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Cory A. Kildare and Wendy Middlemiss. 2017. Impact of Parents Mobile Device Use on Parent-Child Interaction: A Literature Review. Computers in Human Behavior (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Robert V Kozinets. 2002. The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of marketing research 39, 1 (2002), 61--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Reed Larson and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1983. The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science (1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Richard Harper Lindley, SiÃćn E. and Abigail Sellen. 2010. Designing a technological playground: a field study of the emergence of play in household messaging. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mascheroni G. Dreier M. Chaudron S. Livingstone, S. and K. Lagae. 2015. How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. BabyCenter LLC. 2017. Baby Center Blogs. (2017). https://blogs.babycenter.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. BabyCenter LLC. 2017. Baby Center Community. (2017). https://community.babycenter.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. et al. Markopoulos, Panos. 2004. Keeping in touch with the family: home and away with the ASTRA awareness system. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Gary Marx and Valerie Steeves. 2010. From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance. Surveillance & Society 7, 3/4 (2010), 192--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Olivier Morin Mascaro, Olivier and Dan Sperber. 2017. Optimistic expectations about communication explain children's difficulties in hiding, lying, and mistrusting liars. Journal of child language 44, 5 (2017), 1041--1064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Jim Rowan, Sarah Craighill, and Annie Jacobs. 2001. Digital Family Portraits: Supporting Peace of Mind for Extended Family Members. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Carman Neustaedter and A. J. Bernheim Brush. 2006. LINC-ing the family: the participatory design of an inkable family calendar. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kathryn Elliot Neustaedter, Carman and Saul Greenberg. 2006. Interpersonal awareness in the domestic realm. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Guardian News and Media Limited. 2017. The Guardian. (2017). https://www.theguardian.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. D. K. Orthner and J. A. Mancini. 1991. Benefits of leisure experiences for family bonding. In Benefits of leisure. State College, PA: Vantage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. L. Palen and A. Hughes. 2007. When home base is not a place: Parents use of mobile telephones. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 5 (2007), 339--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. J. Pascoe. 1998. Adding generic contextual capabilities to wearable computers. In Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No.98EX215). 92--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Kistin C. J. Zuckerman B. Nitzberg K. Gross J. Kaplan-Sanoff M. et al. Radesky, J. S. 2014. Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics 133, 4 (2014), 843--850.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Hayes Raffle, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Rafael Ballagas, Kyle Buza, Hiroshi Horii, Joseph Kaye, Kristin Cook, Natalie Freed, Janet Go, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2011. Hello, is Grandma There? Let's Read! StoryVisit: Family Video Chat and Connected e-Books. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1195--1204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Shanaka Ransiri and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2012. WatchMe: Wrist-worn Interface That Makes Remote Monitoring Seamless. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. reddit inc. 2017. Reddit FitBit. (2017). https://www.reddit.com/r/fitbit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. reddit inc. 2017. Reddit Parenting. (2017). https://www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Bolivar Reyes-Jaquez and Catharine H. Echols. 2015. Playing by the rules: Self-interest information influences children's trust and trustworthiness in the absence of feedback. Cognition 134 (2015), 140--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. et al. Romero, Natalia. 2007. Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 4 (2007), 299--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Jim Rowan and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2005. Digital Family Portrait Field Trial: Support for Aging in Place. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 521--530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Safewise. 2017. The 15 Best GPS Kids Trackers for Parents with Young Kids. (2017). https://www.safewise.com/blog/10-wearable-safety-gps-devices-kids/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. B. Schilit, N. Adams, and R. Want. 1994. Context-Aware Computing Applications. In Proceedings of the 1994 First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA '94). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 85--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Common Sense. 2017. Common Sense Media. (2017). https://www.commonsensemedia.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Kalpana Shankar, L Jean Camp, Kay Connelly, and Lesa Huber. 2012. Aging, privacy, and home-based computing: Developing a design framework. IEEE Pervasive Computing 11, 4 (2012), 46--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Simple Simon and Company. 2017. 25 Ways to ask your kids "so how was school today?" without asking them "so how was school today?". (2017). http://www.simplesimonandco.com/2014/08/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Beate Sodian. 1991. The development of deception in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9, 1 (1991), 173--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. HÃďkan Stattin and Margaret Kerr. 2000. Parental Monitoring: A Reinterpretation. Child Development 71, 4 (2000), 1072--1085.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. AJ Bernheim Brush Tee, Kimberly and Kori M. Inkpen. 2009. Exploring communication and sharing between extended families. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 2 (2009), 128--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Marie E. Vasek. 1986. Lying as a skill: The development of deception in children. Deception: Perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit (1986), 271--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Robert S Weiss. 1995. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. et al. Wong-Villacres, Marisol. 2017. Design Guidelines for Parent-School Technologies to Support the Ecology of Parental Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. et al. Yarosh, Svetlana. 2009. Developing a media space for remote synchronous parent-child interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Svetlana Yarosh. 2008. Supporting long-distance parent-child interaction in divorced families. In CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Svetlana Yarosh and Gregory D. Abowd. 2011. Mediated parent-child contact in work-separated families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Svetlana Yarosh, Anthony Tang, Sanika Mokashi, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2013. "Almost Touching": Parent-child Remote Communication Using the Sharetable System. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 181--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How Much is Too Much?: Understanding the Information Needs of Parents of Young Children

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 3, Issue 2
          June 2019
          802 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3341982
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2019
          • Accepted: 1 April 2019
          • Revised: 1 February 2019
          • Received: 1 February 2019
          Published in imwut Volume 3, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader