Robots And Racism

ABSTRACT

Most robots currently being sold or developed are either stylized with white material or have a metallic appearance. In this research we used the shooter bias paradigm and several questionnaires to investigate if people automatically identify robots as being racialized, such that we might say that some robots are 'White' while others are 'Asian', or 'Black'. To do so, we conducted an extended replication of the classic social psychological shooter bias paradigm using robot stimuli to explore whether effects known from human-human intergroup experiments would generalize to robots that were racialized as Black and White. Reaction-time based measures revealed that participants demonstrated 'shooter-bias' toward both Black people and robot racialized as Black. Participants were also willing to attribute a race to the robots depending on their racialization and demonstrated a high degree of inter-subject agreement when it came to these attributions.

References

1. Jasmin Bernotat, Friederike Eyssel, and Janik Sachse. 2017. Shape It -- The Influence of Robot Body Shape on Gender Perception in Robots. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 75--84.
2. Jean M Converse and Stanley Presser. 1986. Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Vol. 63. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
3. Joshua Correll, Sean M Hudson, Steffanie Guillermo, and Debbie S Ma. 2014. The police officer's dilemma: A decade of research on racial bias in the decision to shoot. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 8, 5 (2014), 201--213.
4. Joshua Correll, Bernadette Park, Charles M. Judd, and Bernd Wittenbrink. 2002. The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 6 (2002), 1314--1329.
5. Joshua Correll, Geoffrey R Urland, and Tiffany A Ito. 2006. Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42, 1 (2006), 120--128.
6. Nilanjana Dasgupta. 2004. Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research 17, 2 (2004), 143--169.
7. Nilanjana Dasgupta and Luis M Rivera. 2006. From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: the moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of personality and social psychology 91, 2 (2006), 268--280.
8. Thierry Devos and Debbie S Ma. 2013. How "American" is Barack Obama? The role of national identity in a historic bid for the White House. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43, 1 (2013), 214--226.
9. John F Dovidio, Kerry Kawakami, Craig Johnson, Brenda Johnson, and Adaiah Howard. 1997. On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of experimental social psychology 33, 5 (1997), 510--540.
10. Iniobong Essien, Marleen Stelter, Felix Kalbe, Andreas Koehler, Jana Mangels, and Stefanie Meliß. 2017. The shooter bias: Replicating the classic effect and introducing a novel paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70 (2017), 41--47.
11. Friederike Eyssel and Frank Hegel. 2012. (S)he's got the look: Gender-stereotyping of social robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42, 9 (2012), 2213--2230.
12. Friederike Eyssel and Dieta Kuchenbrandt. 2012. Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (2012), 724--731.
13. Friederike Eyssel and Steve Loughnan. 2013. "It don't matter if you're Black or White?" Effects of robot appearance and user prejudice on evaluations of a newly developed robot companion. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8239 (2013), 422--431.
14. Russell H Fazio, Joni R Jackson, Bridget C Dunton, and Carol J Williams. 1995. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline- Journal of personality and social psychology 69, 6 (1995), 1013--1027.
15. Susan T Fiske. 1998. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. McGraw Hill, Boston, MA, 357--411.
16. Alexander R Green, Dana R Carney, Daniel J Pallin, Long H Ngo, Kristal L Raymond, Lisa I Iezzoni, and Mahzarin R Banaji. 2007. Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. Journal of general internal medicine 22, 9 (2007), 1231--1238.
17. Anthony G Greenwald and Mahzarin R Banaji. 1995. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review 102, 1 (1995), 4--27.
18. Anthony G Greenwald, Colin Tucker Smith, N Sriram, Yoav Bar-Anan, and Brian A Nosek. 2009. Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 US presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 9, 1 (2009), 241-- 253.
19. Jerry Kang, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Kumar Yogeeswaran, and Gary Blasi. 2010. Are ideal litigators white? Measuring the myth of colorblindness. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7, 4 (2010), 886--915.
20. N. Mavridis, A. AlDhaheri, L. AlDhaheri, M. Khanii, and N. AlDarmaki. 2011. Transforming IbnSina into an advanced multilingual interactive android robot. In 2011 IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 120--123.
21. Yara Mekawi and Konrad Bresin. 2015. Is the evidence from racial bias shooting task studies a smoking gun? Results from a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 61, November 2015 (2015), 120--130.
22. Saul L Miller, Kate Zielaskowski, and E Ashby Plant. 2012. The basis of shooter biases: Beyond cultural stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38, 10 (2012), 1358--1366.
23. Jahna Otterbacher and Michael Talias. 2017. S/He's Too Warm/Agentic!: The Influence of Gender on Uncanny Reactions to Robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 214--223.
24. Eyal Peer, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70, May 2017 (2017), 153 -- 163.
25. Aaron Powers, Sara Kiesler, Susan Fussell, and Cristen Torrey. 2007. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on. ACM/IEEE, Arlington, USA, 145--152.
26. Juliane Reichenbach, Christoph Bartneck, and Julie Carpenter. 2006. Well done, Robot! The importance of praise and presence in human-robot collaboration. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, Hatfield, UK, 86--90.
27. Jennifer A Richeson, Abigail A Baird, Heather L Gordon, Todd F Heatherton, Carrie L Wyland, Sophie Trawalter, and J Nicole Shelton. 2003. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nature neuroscience 6, 12 (2003), 1323--1328.
28. Laurel D Riek and Don Howard. 2014. A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. In Proceedings of We Robot. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757805
29. Michael Root. 2000. How We Divide the World. Philosophy of Science 67 (2000), S628--S639.
30. Dan-Olof Rooth. 2010. Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Economics 17, 3 (2010), 523--534.
31. Astrid M Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nicole C Krämer, Laura Hoffmann, Sabrina Sobieraj, and Sabrina C Eimler. 2013. An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. International Journal of Social Robotics 5, 1 (2013), 17--34.
32. Timothy P Schofield, Timothy Deckman, Christopher P Garris, C Nathan DeWall, and Thomas F Denson. 2015. Brief report: Evidence of ingroup bias on the shooter task in a Saudi sample. SAGE Open 5, 1 (2015), 1--6.
33. M. Siegel, C. Breazeal, and M. I. Norton. 2009. Persuasive Robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, New York, 2563--2568.
34. Mel Slater, Angus Antley, Adam Davison, David Swapp, Christoph Guger, Chris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, and Maria V Sanchez-Vives. 2006. A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PloS one 1, 1 (2006), e39.
35. Robert Sparrow. 2017. Robots, Rape, and Representation. International Journal of Social Robotics 9, 4 (2017), 465--477.
36. Damian A Stanley, Peter Sokol-Hessner, Mahzarin R Banaji, and Elizabeth A Phelps. 2011. Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 19 (2011), 7710--7715.
37. Paul C Taylor. 2000. Appiah's uncompleted argument: WEB Du Bois and the reality of race. Social Theory and Practice 26, 1 (2000), 103--128.
38. Sam Thellman, Annika Silvervarg, Agneta Gulz, and Tom Ziemke. 2016. Physical vs. Virtual Agent Embodiment and Effects on Social Interaction. In Intelligent Virtual Agents: 16th International Conference, IVA 2016. Springer International Publishing, Los Angeles, USA, 412--415.
39. Christian Unkelbach, Joseph P. Forgas, and F. Denson, Thomas. 2008. The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008), 1409--1413.
40. Astrid Marieke von der Pütten and Nicole C. Krämer. 2012. A Survey on Robot Appearances. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 267--268.
41. Adam Waytz, John Caccioppo, and Nicholas Epley. 2014. Who Sees Human? The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism. Perspectives in Psychological Science 5, 3 (2014), 219--232.
42. Ricarda Wullenkord, Marlena R Fraune, Friederike Eyssel, and Selma Sabanović. 2016. Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, New York, USA, 980--985.
43. Kumar Yogeeswaran and Nilanjana Dasgupta. 2010. Will the 'real' American please stand up? The effect of implicit national prototypes on discriminatory behavior and judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36, 10 (2010), 1332--1345.
44. Kumar Yogeeswaran, Thierry Devos, and Kyle Nash. 2016. Understanding the Nature, Measurement, and Utility of Implicit Intergroup Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 241--266.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Empirical studies in HCI

    • HCI theory, concepts and models