skip to main content
10.1145/3171221.3171254acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Fribo: A Social Networking Robot for Increasing Social Connectedness through Sharing Daily Home Activities from Living Noise Data

Published:26 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rapid increase in the number of young adults living alone gives rise to a demand for the resolution of social isolation problems. Social robot technologies play a substantial role for this purpose. However, existing technologies try to solve the problem only through one-to-one interaction with robots, which in turn fails to utilize the real-world social relationships. Privacy concern is an additional issue since most social robots rely on the visual information for the interactions. To this end, we propose 'Fribo', auditory information centered social robot that recognizes user's activity by analyzing occupants' living noise and shares the activity information with close friends. A four-week field study with the first prototype of Fribo confirms that activity sharing through the use of anonymized living noise promises a virtual cohabiting experience that triggers more frequent real-world social interactions with less feeling of privacy intrusion. Based on this finding and the further qualitative analysis, we suggest a design principle of sound-based social networking robots and its associated new interactions, then present the second prototype of Fribo inspired by the implications from the field study.

References

  1. Adalgeirsson, S. O., &Breazeal, C. 2010, March. MeBot: a robotic platform for socially embodied presence. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 15--22). IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adams, R. G. (1986). Emotional closeness and physical distance between friends: Implications for elderly women living in age-segregated and age-integrated settings. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 22(1), 55--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks, M. R., Willoughby, L. M., &Banks, W. A. 2008. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 9(3), 173--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B.G. Glaser and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonaccorsi, M., Fiorini, L., Cavallo, F., Saffiotti, A., &Dario, P. 2016. A cloud robotics solution to improve social assistive robots for active and healthy aging. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(3), 393--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bonner, R. L.,&Rich, A. R. 1988. A prospective investigation of suicidal ideation in college students: A test of a model. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 18(3), 245--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, D. J., Huang, J., Roesner, F., & Cakmak, M. 2015, March. The privacy-utility tradeoff for remotely teleoperated robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 27--34). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cloutier-Fisher, D., Kobayashi, K., & Smith, A. 2011. The subjective dimension of social isolation: A qualitative investigation of older adults' experiences in small social support networks. Journal of aging studies, 25(4), 407--414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dautenhahn, K. 1999, August. Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. In Proc. CT99, The Third International Cognitive Technology Conference, August, San Francisco (Vol. 359, p. 374).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinev, T., & Hart, P. 2006. An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61--80. 9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dzhambov, A., & Dimitrova, D. 2014. Neighborhood noise pollution as a determinant of displaced aggression: a pilot study. Noise and health, 16(69), 95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujiwara, T., & Kawachi, I. 2008. A prospective study of individual-level social capital and major depression in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(7), 627--633.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Goines, L., & Hagler, L. 2007. Noise pollution: a modern plague. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL-BIRMINGHAM ALABAMA-, 100(3), 287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Graf, B., Hans, M., & Schraft, R. D. 2004. Care-O-bot II-Development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Autonomous robots, 16(2), 193--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gunawardena, C. N. 1995. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International journal of educational telecommunications, 1(2), 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. 2008, March. Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (pp. 113--120). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kalafat, J., & Elias, M. J. 1995. Suicide prevention in an educational context: Broad and narrow foci. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 25(1), 123--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Laput, G., Zhang, Y., & Harrison, C. 2017, May. Synthetic Sensors: Towards General-Purpose Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3986--3999). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lennie, T. A., & Hall, L. A. 2015. The Relationships of Coping, Negative 6Thinking, Life Satisfaction, Social Support, and Selected Demographics With Anxiety of Young Adult College Students.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pantofaru, C., Takayama, L., Foote, T., & Soto, B. 2012, March. Exploring the role of robots in home organization. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 327--334). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Russell, D. W. 1996. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of personality assessment, 66(1), 20--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Šabanović, S., Chang, W. L., Bennett, C. C., Piatt, J. A., & Hakken, D. 2015, August. A robot of my own: participatory design of socially assistive robots for independently living older adults diagnosed with depression. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population(pp. 104--114). Springer International Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sinclair, V. G., & Dowdy, S. W. 2005. Development and validation of the Emotional Intimacy Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 13(3), 193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sinokki, M., Hinkka, K., Ahola, K., Koskinen, S., Kivimäki, M., Honkonen, T., ... & Virtanen, M. 2009. The association of social support at work and in private life with mental health and antidepressant use: the Health 2000 Study. Journal of affective disorders, 115(1), 36--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Snell, K. D. M. 2015. Agendas for the historical study of loneliness and lone living.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Stansfeld, S. A., & Matheson, M. P. 2003. Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. British medical bulletin, 68(1), 243--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Stiehl, W. D., Breazeal, C., Han, K. H., Lieberman, J., Lalla, L., Maymin, A., ... & Kishore, A. 2006, July. The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 emerging technologies (p. 15). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tacchi, J. A. 1997. Radio sound as material culture in the home (Doctoral dissertation, University of London).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Timothy Matthews, Andrea Danese, Jasmin Wertz, Candice L. Odgers, Antony Ambler, Terrie E. Moffitt, Louise Arseneault. 2016. Social isolation, loneliness and depression in young adulthood: a behavioural genetic analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 51, 339--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Victor, C., Scambler, S., Bond, J., & Bowling, A. 2000. Being alone in later life: loneliness, social isolation and living alone. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 10(4), 407--417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wada, K., & Shibata, T. 2007. Living with seal robots'its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972--980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yumak, Z., Ren, J., Thalmann, N. M., & Yuan, J. 2014, November. Tracking and fusion for multiparty interaction with a virtual character and a social robot. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Autonomous Virtual Humans and Social Robot for Telepresence (p. 3). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fribo: A Social Networking Robot for Increasing Social Connectedness through Sharing Daily Home Activities from Living Noise Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      February 2018
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781450349536
      DOI:10.1145/3171221

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate49of206submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader