skip to main content
10.1145/3025171.3025210acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

CQAVis: Visual Text Analytics for Community Question Answering

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Community question answering (CQA) forums can provide effective means for sharing information and addressing a user's information needs about particular topics. However, many such online forums are not moderated, resulting in many low quality and redundant comments, which makes it very challenging for users to find the appropriate answers to their questions. In this paper, we apply a user-centered design approach to develop a system, CQAVis, which supports users in identifying high quality comments and get their questions answered. Informed by the user's requirements, the system combines both text analytics and interactive visualization techniques together in a synergistic way. Given a new question posed by the user, the text analytic module automatically finds relevant answers by exploring existing related questions and the comments within their threads. Then the visualization module presents the search results to the user and supports the exploration of related comments. We have evaluated the system in the wild by deploying it within a CQA forum among thousands of real users. Through the online study, we gained deeper insights about the potential utility of the system, as well as learned generalizable lessons for designing visual text analytics systems for the domain of CQA forums.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

iuifp0306-file3.mp4

mp4

38.8 MB

References

  1. 2016. Colorbrewer. (2016). http://colorbrewer2.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberto Barrón-Cedeño, Simone Filice, Giovanni Da San Martino, Shafiq Joty, Lluís Màrquez, Preslav Nakov, and Alessandro Moschitti. 2015. Thread-Level Information for Comment Classification in Community Question Answering. In Proc. ACL-IJCNLP.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sheelagh Carpendale. 2008. Evaluating information visualizations. In Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives. Springer, 19--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andy Cockburn, Amy Karlson, and Benjamin B Bederson. 2008. A review of overview+ detail, zooming, and focus+ context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 41, 1 (2008), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michael Collins and Nigel Duffy. 2002. Convolution Kernels for Natural Language. In Advances in NIPS, T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani (Eds.). MIT Press, 625--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kushal Dave, Martin Wattenberg, and Michael Muller. 2004. Flash forums and forumReader: navigating a new kind of large-scale online discussion. In Proc. ACM Conf. on CSCW. 232--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Park Deokgun, Sachar Simranjit, Diakopoulos Nicholas, and Elmqvist Niklas. 2016. Supporting Comment Moderators in Identifying High Quality Online News Comments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 769--778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cicero dos Santos, Luciano Barbosa, Dasha Bogdanova, and Bianca Zadrozny. 2015. Learning Hybrid Representations to Retrieve Semantically Equivalent Questions. In Proc. 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers). 694--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nicole B Ellison, Rebecca Gray, Jessica Vitak, Cliff Lampe, and Andrew T Fiore. 2013. Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook.. In Proceedings of the ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Minwei Feng, Bing Xiang, Michael R Glass, Lidan Wang, and Bowen Zhou. 2015. Applying deep learning to answer selection: A study and an open task. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.01585 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Maxwell Harper, Daphne Raban, Sheizaf Rafaeli, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2008. Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). 865--874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Marti A. Hearst. 2011. Natural Search User Interfaces. Commun. ACM 54, 11 (Nov. 2011), 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Enamul Hoque and Giuseppe Carenini. 2014. ConVis: A Visual Text Analytic System for Exploring Blog Conversations. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EuroVis) 33, 3 (2014), 221--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Enamul Hoque and Giuseppe Carenini. 2015. ConVisIT: Interactive Topic Modeling for Exploring Asynchronous Online Conversations. In Proc. ACM conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Enamul Hoque and Giuseppe Carenini. 2016a. Interactive Topic Modeling for Exploring Asynchronous Online Conversations: Design and Evaluation of ConVisIT. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 6, 1 (Feb. 2016), 7:1--7:24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Enamul Hoque and Giuseppe Carenini. 2016b. MultiConVis: A Visual Text Analytics System for Exploring a Collection of Online Conversations. In Proc. ACM IUI. 96--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Damon Horowitz and Sepandar D Kamvar. 2010. The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 431--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gary Hsieh and Scott Counts. 2009. mimir: A market-based real-time question and answer service. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 769--778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jiwoon Jeon, W. Bruce Croft, and Joon Ho Lee. 2005. Finding Similar Questions in Large Question and Answer Archives. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '05). 84--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Bernard Kerr. 2003. Thread arcs: An email thread visualization. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. 211--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Lam. 2008. A Framework of Interaction Costs in Information Visualization. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics 14, 6 (2008), 1149--1156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Lam, E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. 2012. Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics 18, 9 (2012), 1520--1536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Qiaoling Liu, Tomasz Jurczyk, Jinho Choi, and Eugene Agichtein. 2015. Real-Time Community Question Answering: Exploring Content Recommendation and User Notification Strategies. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '15). 50--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, and Katrina Panovich. 2010. What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why?: A Survey Study of Status Message Q&A Behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). 1739--1748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Efficient Convolution Kernels for Dependency and Constituent Syntactic Trees. In Machine Learning: ECML 2006, Johannes Fürnkranz, Tobias Scheffer, and Myra Spiliopoulou (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4212. 318--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tamara Munzner. 2014. Visualization Analysis and Design. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez, Walid Magdy, Alessandro Moschitti, Jim Glass, and Bilal Randeree. 2015. SemEval-2015 Task 3: Answer Selection in Community Question Answering. In Proc. Workshop SemEval. 269--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez, Alessandro Moschitti, Walid Magdy, Hamdy Mubarak, Abed Alhakim Freihat, Jim Glass, and Bilal Randeree. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 3: Community Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval '16). Association for Computational Linguistics, San Diego, California.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Massimo Nicosia, Simone Filice, Alberto Barrón-Cedeño, Iman Saleh, Hamdy Mubarak, Wei Gao, Preslav Nakov, Giovanni Da San Martino, Alessandro Moschitti, Kareem Darwish, Lluís Màrquez, Shafiq Joty, and Walid Magdy. 2015. QCRI: Answer Selection for Community Question Answering - Experiments for Arabic and English. In Proc. Workshop SemEval.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Vıctor Pascual-Cid and Andreas Kaltenbrunner. 2009. Exploring asynchronous online discussions through hierarchical visualisation. In IEEE Conf. on Information Visualization. 191--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Xipeng Qiu and Xuanjing Huang. 2015. Convolutional Neural Tensor Network Architecture for Community-based Question Answering. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. D Raban and F Harper. 2008. Motivations for answering questions online. New media and innovative technologies 73 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Warren Sack. 2000. Conversation map: an interface for very-large-scale conversations. Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 3 (2000), 73--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Michael Sedlmair, Miriah Meyer, and Tamara Munzner. 2012. Design study methodology: reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics 18, 12 (2012), 2431--2440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Aliaksei Severyn and Alessandro Moschitti. 2012. Structural Relationships for Large-scale Learning of Answer Re-ranking. In Proc. SIGIR. 741--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Aliaksei Severyn and Alessandro Moschitti. 2015. Learning to rank short text pairs with convolutional deep neural networks. In Proc. SIGIR. 373--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yikang Shen, Wenge Rong, Zhiwei Sun, Yuanxin Ouyang, and Zhang Xiong. 2015. Question/Answer Matching for CQA System via Combining Lexical and Sequential Information.. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2015). 275--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ming Tan, Bing Xiang, and Bowen Zhou. 2015. LSTM-based Deep Learning Models for non-factoid answer selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.04108 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Gina Danielle Venolia and Carman Neustaedter. 2003. Understanding sequence and reply relationships within email conversations: a mixed-model visualization. In Proc. Conf. CHI. 361--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Fernanda B Viégas, Scott Golder, and Judith Donath. 2006. Visualizing email content: portraying relationships from conversational histories. In Proc. Conf. CHI. 979--988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Di Wang and Eric Nyberg. 2015. A Long Short-Term Memory Model for Answer Sentence Selection in Question Answering. In ACL. 707--712.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Martin Wattenberg and David Millen. 2003. Conversation thumbnails for large-scale discussions. In extended abstracts on CHI. 742--743. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Furu Wei, Shixia Liu, Yangqiu Song, Shimei Pan, Michelle X Zhou, Weihong Qian, Lei Shi, Li Tan, and Qiang Zhang. 2010. Tiara: a visual exploratory text analytic system. In Proc. ACM Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jian Zhao, C. Collins, F. Chevalier, and R. Balakrishnan. 2013. Interactive Exploration of Implicit and Explicit Relations in Faceted Datasets. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2080--2089. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Guangyou Zhou, Tingting He, Jun Zhao, and Po Hu. 2015a. Learning Continuous Word Embedding with Metadata for Question Retrieval in Community Question Answering. In Proc. 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 250--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Xiaoqiang Zhou, Baotian Hu, Qingcai Chen, Buzhou Tang, and Xiaolong Wang. 2015b. Answer Sequence Learning with Neural Networks for Answer Selection in Community Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers). 713--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. CQAVis: Visual Text Analytics for Community Question Answering

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IUI '17: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
        March 2017
        654 pages
        ISBN:9781450343480
        DOI:10.1145/3025171

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 March 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        IUI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate63of272submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader