skip to main content
article
Free Access

World-wide computer

Published:01 February 1997Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

References

  1. AIA California Council. (2007). Integrated project delivery -- A working definition. McGraw Hill Construction. Retrieved July 25, 2013, from http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/ aias076695.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modelling (BIM), trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC Industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241-252. doi:10.1061/(ASCE) LM.1943-5630.0000127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bouchlaghem, D., Shang, H., Whyte, J., & Ganah, A. (2005). Visualisation in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC). Automation in Construction, 14(3), 287-295. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brodlie, K. (1995). Scientific visualisation - past, present and future. Nuclear Instrument and Methods in Physics Reserach A, 104-111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Buildingsmart. (2008). Industry foundation classess (IFC) data model. Buildingsmart.org. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.buildingsmart.org/ standard/ifcGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Business Watch. (2005). ICT and electronic business in the construction Industry, IT adoption and e-business activity in 2005. The European e-Business Market Watch. European Commission, Enterprise and Industry Directorate General.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chachere, J. M., Kunz, J., & Levitt, R. (2009). The role of reduced latency in integrated concurrent engineering. CIFE Working Paper #WP116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Delavari, N., Said, N. S., Ibrahim, R., & Abdullah, M. (2011). HCI to engage design team members in IT-integrated design collaboration process. WSEAS Transaction Information Science and Applications, 8(9), 341-355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fischer, M. (2006). Formalizing construction knowledge for concurrent performance-based design. In Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture (pp. 186-205). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/11888598_20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fischer, M., & Kunz, J. (2004). The scope and role of information technology in construction. CIFE Technical Report #156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Friendly, M., & Denis, D. J. (2001). Milestones in the history of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualisation. math.yorku.ca. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/ Gallery/milestone/milestone.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Froese, T. (2003). Future directions for IFC-based interoperability. ITcon: Special Issue IFC- Product Models for the AEC Arena, 8(April), 231-246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia, A. C. B., Kunz, J., & Fischer, M. (2003). Meeting details : Methods to instrument meetings and use agenda voting to make them more effective. CIFE technical Report #147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Goulding, J. S., & Rahimian, F. P. (2012). Industry preparedness: Advanced learning paradigms for exploitation. In A. Akintoye, J. S. Goulding, & G. Zawdie (Eds.), Construction innovation and process improvement (pp. 409-433). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118280294.ch18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gu, N., & London, K. (2010). Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 19, 988-999. doi:10.1016/j. autcon.2010.09.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Haymaker, J., Chachere, J. M., & Senescu, R. R. (2011). Measuring and improving rationale clarity in a university building design process. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 17(3), 97-11. doi:10.1061/ (ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Heesom, D., & Mahdjoubi, L. (2004). Trends of 4D CAD applications for construction planning, 22(2), 171-182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ho, P., Fischer, M., & Haymaker, J. (2009). Automated Identification of occupant interactions in renovations of occupied buildings. CIFE Working Paper #WP122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, P., Fischer, M., & Kam, C. (2009). Prospective validation of virtual design and construction methods: Framework, application, and implementation guidelines. CIFE Working Paper #WP123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Howard, R., & Bjork, B. (2008). Building information modelling - Experts' views on standardisation and industry deployment. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22, 271-280. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2007.03.001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ibrahim, M., Krawczyk, R., & Schipporeit, G. (2004). Two approaches to BIM: a comparative study. In eCAADe Conference (Vol. 22, pp. 610-616). College of Architecture: Illinois Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibrahim, R., & Paulson, B. C. (2008). Discontinuity in organisations: Identifying business environment affecting of knowledge flow in PLM. International Journal of Product Lifecycle management, 3(1), 21-36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibrahim, R., & Pour, F. (2010). Automation in construction comparison of CAD and manual sketching tools for teaching architectural design. Automation in Construction, 19(8), 978-987. doi:10.1016/j. autcon.2010.09.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Isikdag, U., & Underwood, J. (2010). A synopsis of the handbook of research on building information modeling. In Proceedings of CIB 2010 World Building Congress. Retrieved from http://www.cib2010.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jezernik, A., & Hren, G. (2003). A solution to integrate computer-aided design (CAD) and virtual reality (VR) databases in design and manufacturing processes. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 22(11-12), 768-774. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1604-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jin, Y., Levitt, R., Kunz, J., & Christiansen, T. R. (1995). The virtual design team : A computer simulation framework for studying organisational aspects of. Simulation, 64(3), 42-57. doi:10.1177/003754979506400304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kam, C., & Fischer, M. (2004). Capitalizing on early project decision-making opportunities to improve facility design, construction, and life-cycle performance -- POP, PM4D, and decision dashboard approaches. Automation in Construction, 13, 53-65. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kam, C., Fischer, M., Manager, G., Oy, O. G., Karjalainen, A., & Manager, C. et al. (2003). The product model and fourth dimension project. ITcon, 8, 137-166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamat, V. R., & Martinez, J. C. (2001). Visualizing simulated construction operations in 3D. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(4), 329-337. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:4(329).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Khanzode, A. (2010). An integrated, virtual design and construction and lean (IVL) method for coordination of MEP. CIFE Technical Report #TR187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Khanzode, A., Fischer, M., Reed, D., & Ballard, G. (2006). A guide to applying the principles of virtual design & construction (VDC) to the lean project delivery process. CIFE Working Paper #093.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Khuan, C. T., Abdul-rahman, A., & Zlatanova, S. (2008). 3D solids and their management In DBMS. In Advances in 3D Geoinformation Systems (pp. 279-311). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kiviniemi, A., Fischer, M., Bazjanac, V., & Paulson, B. (2004). PREMISS - Requirements management interface to building product models: Problem definition and research issues. CIFE Working Paper #092.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Koo, B., & Fischer, M. (2000). Feasibility study of 4D CAD in commercial construction. Journal of Construction and Management, 126(4), 251-260. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(251).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Kosara, R. (2007). Visualisation criticism - The missing link between information visualisation and art. In Proceedings of the 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV '07) (pp. 631-636). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Kunz, J., & Fischer, M. (2012). Virtual design and construction: Themes, case studies and implementation suggestions. CIFE Working Paper #097, 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, A., Marshall Pointing, A., Aouad, G., Tah, J., Cooper, R., & Fu, C. F. (2005). nD modelling- a driver or enabler for construction improvement? In RICS Research paper Series, University of Salford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Liston, K., Fischer, M., Kunz, J., & Dong, N. (2007). Observations of two MEP iRoom coordination meetings: An investigation of artifact use in AEC project meetings. CIFE Working Paper #WP106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Mckinney, K., & Fischer, M. (1998). Generating, evaluating and visualizing construction schedules with CAD tools. Automation in Construction, 7(6), 433-447. doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00053-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Popov, V., Mikalauskas, S., Migilinskas, D., & Vainiunas, P. (2006). Complex usage of 4d information modelling concept for building design, estimation, scheduling and determination of effective variant. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 12, 91-98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Pour Rahimian, F., Ibrahim, R., Wirza, R., Abdullah, M. T. B., & Jaafar, M. S. B. H. (2011). Mediating cognitive transformation with VR 3d sketching during conceptual architectural design process. Archnet-IJAR. International Journal of Architectural Research, 5(1), 99-113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahimian, F. P., & Ibrahim, R. (2011). Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers' spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design. Design Studies, 32(3), 255-291. doi:10.1016/j. destud.2010.10.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Rohrer, R., & Swing, E. (1997). Web-based information visualisation. IEEE, 17(4), 52-59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B. A., & Owen, R. (2010). Interaction of lean and building information modelling in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 968-980. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Schreyer, M., Scholar, V., Hartmann, T., Engineer, S., & Fischer, M. (2005). Supporting project meetings with concurrent interoperability in a construction information workspace. ITcon, 10, 153-167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Shumate, M., Ibrahim, R., & Levitt, R. (2010). Dynamic information retrieval and allocation flows in project teams with discontinuous membership. European Journal of International Management, 4(6), 556-575. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2010.035589.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Woo, J.-H., Clayton, M. J., Johnson, R. E., Flores, B. E., & Ellis, C. (2004). Dynamic knowledge map: reusing experts' tacit knowledge in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 13, 203-207. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.09.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Zamanian, M. K., & Pittman, J. H. (1999). A software industry perspective on AEC information models for distributed collaboration. Automation in Construction, 8(3), 237-248. doi:10.1016/S0926- 5805(98)00074-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. World-wide computer

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 40, Issue 2
          Feb. 1997
          130 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/253671
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1997 author

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 February 1997

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader