skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357072acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We performed an empirical study to investigate whether the context of interruptions makes a difference. We found that context does not make a difference but surprisingly, people completed interrupted tasks in less time with no difference in quality. Our data suggests that people compensate for interruptions by working faster, but this comes at a price: experiencing more stress, higher frustration, time pressure and effort. Individual differences exist in the management of interruptions: personality measures of openness to experience and need for personal structure predict disruption costs of interruptions. We discuss implications for how system design can support interrupted work.

References

  1. Adamczyk P. D. & Bailey B. P. If not now, when? The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. Proceedings of CHI'04, (2004), 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Collani, G. Eine deutsche Skala zum Konstrukt Bedürfnis nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit (NFCC)/Persönliches Strukturbedürfnis (PNS). In A. Glöckner-Rist (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. Proceedings of CHI'04, (2004), 175--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E. and Horvitz, E., Instant messaging: Effects of relevance and timing. Proc. of HCI'00, British Computer Society (2000), 71--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gillie, T. & Broadbent, D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psych Research, 50, (1989), 243--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gonzáles, V. & Mark, G. Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres. Proceedings of CHI '04, (2004), 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, (1988), 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hudson, J.M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W.A. and Erickson, T. "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do:" Availability and interruption in research management. Proc. of CHI 2002, (2002), 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Iqbal, S.T. and E. Horvitz, Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: Field study, analysis, and directions, Proceedings of CHI 2007, 677--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mark, G., Gonzalez, V., and Harris, J. No Task Left Behind? Examining the Nature of Fragmented Work. Proceedings of CHI'05, (2005), 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ostendorf, F & Angleitner, A. NEO-Persöönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R). Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe, (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2008
          1870 pages
          ISBN:9781605580111
          DOI:10.1145/1357054

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 April 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader