Flora Ramírez Bustamante
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a grammar and style checker demonstrator for Spanish and Greek native writers developed within the project GramCheck. Besides a brief grammar error typology for Spanish, a linguistically motivated approach to detection and diagnosis is presented, based on the generalized use of PROLOG exteusions to highly typed unification-based grammars. The demonstrator, currently including full coverage for agreement errors and certain head-argument relation issues, also provides correction by means of an analysis-transfer-synthesis cycle. Finally, future extensions to the current system are discussed.
- Adriaens G. 1994. The LRE SECC Project: Simplified English Grammar and Style Correction in an MT Framework, in Proceedings of Linguistic Engineering Convention, Paris.Google Scholar
- Bolioli A., L, Dini, G. Malnati. 1992. JDH: Parsing Italian with a Robust Coustraint Grammar, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-92): 1003--1007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carbonell J. and P. Hayes. 1983. Recovery strategies for parsing extragrammatical language, in American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3-4):123--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charniak E. 1983. A parser with something from everyone, in M. King (ed.), Parsing Natural Language, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Crouch R. 1994. A prototype. ALEP Constraint Solver, SRI International, Cambridge Research Center.Google Scholar
- Pulman, S. G. (ed.). 1991. EUROTRA ET6/1: Rule Formalism and Virtual Machine Design Study, SRI International, Cambridge Computer Science Research Centre, ©Commission of European Communities.Google Scholar
- Genthial D., J. Courtin et al., 1992. From Detection/Correction to Computer Aided Writing, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-92):1013--1018. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Genthial D., J. Courtin, J. Ménézo. 1994. Towards a more user-friendly correction, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-94), Kyoto, Japan. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Granger R. 1983. The NOMASD system: expectation-based detection and correction of errors during understanding of syntactically and semantically illformed text, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3-4):188--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hayes P. and G. Mouradian. 1981. Flexible Parsing, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 7(4):232--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heidorn G. E., K. Jensen, L. A. Miller, R. J. Byrd and M. S. Chodorow. 1982. Devoloping a Natural Language Interface to Complex Data, ACM Trans. on Database Sys., 3(2):105--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hendrix G. G., E. D. Sacerdoti, D. Sagalowicz and J. Slocun. 1977. Developing a Natural Language Interface to Complex Data, ACM Trans. On Database Sys., 9(2): 105--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jensen K., G. E. Heidorn, L. A. Miller, Y. Rabin. 1983. Parse fitting and prose fixing: getting a hold on ill-formedness, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3-4):147--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson T. 1985. Natural Language Computing: The Commercial Applications, Ovum, London.Google Scholar
- Kwasny S. and N. Sondheimer. 1981. Relaxation techniques for parsing grammatically ill-formed input in natural language understanding systems, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 7(2):99--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parkinson R. C, K. M. Colby and W. S. Faught. 1977. Conversational Language Comprehension Using Integrated Pattern-Matching and Parsing, in Artificial Intelligence, 9:111--134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruessink H. 1994. Manual to the RGR extensions for ALEP, STT/OTS. preliminary version.Google Scholar
- Simpkins N. K. 1994. An Open Architecture for Language Engineering: The Advanced Language Engineering Platform (ALEP). Proceedings of LE2, Paris.Google Scholar
- Thurmair G. 1990. Parsing for grammar and style checking, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-90) :365--370. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Translator's Workbench. 1992. Final Report of the Esprit Project 2315.Google Scholar
- Veronis J. 1988. Morphosyntactic correction in natural languages interfaces, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-88) :708--713. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vosse, T. 1992. Detecting and Correcting Morphosyntactic Errors in Real Texts, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ACL-92) :111--118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weischedel R. and J. Black. 1980. Responding intelligently to unparseable inputs, in American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 6(2):97--109. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weischedel R. and N. Sondheimer. 1983. Metarules as a basis for processing ill-formed input, in American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3-4):161--177. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weischedel R. and L. A. Ramshaw. 1987. Reflections on Knowledge needed to process ill-formed language. In S. Nirenburg (ed.) Machine Translation. Theoretical and Metholodogical Issues, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 155--337.Google Scholar
- GramCheck: a grammar and style checker
Recommendations
Arabic GramCheck: a grammar checker for Arabic: Research Articles
Arabic is a Semitic language that is rich in its morphology and syntax. The very numerous and complex grammar rules of the language may be confusing for the average user of a word processor. In this paper, we report our attempt at developing a grammar ...
LLLR parsing
SAC '13: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied ComputingThe idea of an LLLR parsing is presented. An LLLR(k) parser can be constructed for any LR(k) grammar but it produces the left parse of the input string in linear time (in respect to the length of the derivation) without backtracking. If used as a basis ...
Comments