skip to main content
Internet broadcasting
Publisher:
  • Stanford University
  • 408 Panama Mall, Suite 217
  • Stanford
  • CA
  • United States
Order Number:AAI8214556
Pages:
94
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

Broadcasting should be a standard addressing mode of all packet-switched computer networks. Further, when networks are interconnected to form an internet, a broadcast mechanism is also required.

Broadcasting is the delivery of a packet to all hosts in a network; unicasting is the delivery of a packet to one specific host. They are distinct forms of interprocess communication; functions that are simple to do with one are difficult to do using only the other.

A broadcast is used when you don't know whom specifically to address. There are two situations where this occurs: (1) when you are searching for some information but you don't know who to ask (for example, standing up in a theatre and saying "Is there a doctor in the house__ __"), and (2) when you possess some information of use to others but you don't know specifically who (for example, standing up in a theatre and yelling "Fire!").

A network should give its best efforts to deliver a copy of a broadcast packet to each host, but perfectly reliable delivery is not required. It is sufficient that most hosts receive a broadcast and that the same hosts not miss retransmissions. Just as with unicasting, higher-level protocols can be used to improve the reliability of the basic broadcast delivery mechanism, if required. Such an "unreliable" broadcast mechanism is straightforward to implement in all types of packet-switched networks.

In an internet composed of possibly thousands of networks and millions of hosts, a full internet-wide broadcast, the obvious internet analog to broadcasting in a single network, is seldom the right choice. A directed broadcast, delivery of a packet to all hosts on any single network in an internet, is simpler to implement, closer to what most users need, and sufficient to construct many forms of broadcast-based interprocess communication, including an internet-wide broadcast.

Cited By

  1. Gamer T, Scharf M and Schöller M Collaborative anomaly-based attack detection Proceedings of the Second international conference on Self-Organizing Systems, (280-287)
  2. ACM
    Guyton J and Schwartz M Locating nearby copies of replicated Internet servers Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, (288-298)
  3. ACM
    Guyton J and Schwartz M (2019). Locating nearby copies of replicated Internet servers, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 25:4, (288-298), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1995.
  4. ACM
    Deering S Multicast routing in internetworks and extended LANs Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures and protocols, (55-64)
  5. ACM
    Deering S (2019). Multicast routing in internetworks and extended LANs, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 18:4, (55-64), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1988.
  6. ACM
    Aguilar L, Garcia-Luna-Aceves J, Moran D, Craighill E and Brungardt R (1986). An architecture for a multimedia teleconferencing system, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 16:3, (126-136), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1986.
  7. ACM
    Aguilar L, Garcia-Luna-Aceves J, Moran D, Craighill E and Brungardt R An architecture for a multimedia teleconferencing system Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM conference on Communications architectures & protocols, (126-136)
  8. ACM
    Cheriton D and Deering S (1985). Host groups, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 15:4, (172-179), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1985.
  9. ACM
    Cheriton D and Deering S Host groups Proceedings of the ninth symposium on Data communications, (172-179)
  10. ACM
    Aguilar L Datagram routing for internet multicasting Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM symposium on Communications architectures and protocols: tutorials & symposium, (58-63)
  11. ACM
    Aguilar L (1984). Datagram routing for internet multicasting, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 14:2, (58-63), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1984.
  12. ACM
    Dalal Y and Printis R (2019). 48-bit absolute internet and Ethernet host numbers, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 11:4, (240-245), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1981.
  13. ACM
    Dalal Y and Printis R 48-bit absolute internet and Ethernet host numbers Proceedings of the seventh symposium on Data communications, (240-245)
Contributors
  • Hewlett-Packard Inc.

Recommendations