skip to main content
Proving that computer programs terminate cleanly.
Publisher:
  • Stanford University
  • 408 Panama Mall, Suite 217
  • Stanford
  • CA
  • United States
Order Number:AAI7427116
Pages:
145
Bibliometrics
Abstract

No abstract available.

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Méry D and Singh N Automatic code generation from event-B models Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, (179-188)
  2. Barnett M, Leino K and Schulte W The spec# programming system Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on Construction and Analysis of Safe, Secure, and Interoperable Smart Devices, (49-69)
  3. ACM
    Maurer W The modification index method of generating verification conditions Proceedings of the 15th annual Southeast regional conference, (426-440)
  4. ACM
    Rosen B (1977). High-level data flow analysis, Communications of the ACM, 20:10, (712-724), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1977.
  5. ACM
    Cousot P and Cousot R Abstract interpretation Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages, (238-252)
  6. ACM
    Katz S and Manna Z (1976). Logical analysis of programs, Communications of the ACM, 19:4, (188-206), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1976.
  7. ACM
    Wegbreit B (1975). Mechanical program analysis, Communications of the ACM, 18:9, (528-539), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1975.
  8. ACM
    King J (1975). A new approach to program testing, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 10:6, (228-233), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1975.
  9. ACM
    London R (2019). A view of program verification, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 10:6, (534-545), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1975.
  10. ACM
    King J A new approach to program testing Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software, (228-233)
  11. ACM
    London R A view of program verification Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software, (534-545)
Contributors
  • Hewlett-Packard Inc.

Recommendations