skip to main content
Skip header Section
Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and InteractionAugust 2002
Publisher:
  • MIT Press
  • 55 Hayward St.
  • Cambridge
  • MA
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-262-11269-7
Published:01 August 2002
Pages:
304
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

From the Publisher:

Drawing on nationally representative telephone surveys conducted from 1995 to 2000, James Katz and Ronald Rice offer a rich and nuanced picture of Internet use in America. Using quantitative data, as well as case studies of Web sites, they explore the impact of the Internet on society from three perspectives: access to Internet technology (the digital divide), involvement with groups and communities through the Internet (social capital), and use of the Internet for social interaction and expression (identity). To provide a more comprehensive account of Internet use, the authors draw comparisons across media and include Internet nonusers and former users in their research.

The authors call their research the Syntopia Project to convey the Internet's role as one among a host of communication technologies as well as the synergy between people's online activities and their real-world lives. Their major finding is that Americans use the Internet as an extension and enhancement of their daily routines. Contrary to media sensationalism, the Internet is neither a utopia, liberating people to form a global egalitarian community, nor a dystopia-producing armies of disembodied, lonely individuals. Like any form of communication, it is as helpful or harmful as those who use it.

Cited By

  1. Kim K and Hwang J (2022). Factors affecting smartphone online activity use in South Korea: with a focus on the moderating effect of disability status, Universal Access in the Information Society, 21:1, (109-119), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022.
  2. Koivula A, Räsänen P, Koiranen I and Keipi T Online Gambling Activity in Finland 2006–2016 Social Computing and Social Media. Participation, User Experience, Consumer Experience, and Applications of Social Computing, (569-583)
  3. Nam T (2017). A tool for liberty or oppression? A cross-national study of the Internets influence on democracy, Telematics and Informatics, 34:5, (538-549), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.
  4. Park Y and Yang G (2017). Personal network on the Internet, Telematics and Informatics, 34:1, (1-10), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017.
  5. ACM
    Buccoliero L and Bellio E Marketing and Citizen Web Empowerment Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (17-26)
  6. ACM
    Kraut R and Burke M (2015). Internet use and psychological well-being, Communications of the ACM, 58:12, (94-100), Online publication date: 23-Nov-2015.
  7. Meng J, Williams D and Shen C (2015). Channels matter, Computers in Human Behavior, 52:C, (190-199), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015.
  8. ACM
    Sayaf R, Clarke D and Rule J The other side of privacy Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference, (184-192)
  9. van Deursen A, van Dijk J and ten Klooster P (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online, Telematics and Informatics, 32:2, (259-272), Online publication date: 1-May-2015.
  10. Ghobadi S and Clegg S (2015). “These days will never be forgotten ...”, Information and Organization, 25:1, (52-71), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015.
  11. Hilbert M (2014). Technological information inequality as an incessantly moving target, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65:4, (821-835), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014.
  12. Ogawa Y, Miyata K, Yamamoto H and Ikeda K Association between Selective Exposure and Attitude on Twitter Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 03, (122-125)
  13. ACM
    Kim B and Kleinschmit S A logistic multilevel model for civic engagement and community group impact in the digital age Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (34-37)
  14. ACM
    Sofia R, Mendes P, Damásio M, Henriques S, Giglietto F, Giambitto E and Bogliolo A (2012). Moving towards a socially-driven internet architectural design, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 42:3, (39-46), Online publication date: 26-Jun-2012.
  15. ACM
    Halpern D and Katz J From e-government to social network government Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, (119-127)
  16. ACM
    González-Zabala M and Sánchez-Torres J Analysis of proposals for evaluation of e-inclusion Proceedings of the 6th Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems, (387-390)
  17. ACM
    Pearce K ICT diffusion in the Republic of Armenia Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, (326-337)
  18. Faraj S and Johnson S (2011). Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities, Organization Science, 22:6, (1464-1480), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011.
  19. Zhao L, Lu Y, Huang W and Wang Q (2010). Internet inequality, Computers & Education, 55:4, (1405-1423), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.
  20. Chung R, Li C and Chen C (2010). An comparative analysis of the current status of digital divide in Taiwan, WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 9:7, (748-757), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010.
  21. ACM
    Katz J and Rice R (2009). Technical opinionFalling into the net, Communications of the ACM, 52:9, (149-150), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009.
  22. ACM
    Iriberri A and Leroy G (2009). A life-cycle perspective on online community success, ACM Computing Surveys, 41:2, (1-29), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2009.
  23. Sun S (2008). An examination of disposition, motivation, and involvement in the new technology context computers in human behavior, Computers in Human Behavior, 24:6, (2723-2740), Online publication date: 17-Sep-2008.
  24. Rice R and Katz J (2008). Assessing new cell phone text and video services, Telecommunications Policy, 32:7, (455-467), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008.
  25. ACM
    Chung K, Hossain L and Davis J Individual performance in knowledge intensive work through social networks Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on Computer personnel research: The global information technology workforce, (159-167)
  26. Kavanaugh A, Zin T, Carroll J, Schmitz J, Pérez-Quiñones M and Isenhour P When opinion leaders blog Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research, (79-88)
  27. Zimmerman H A case study of a family's digital technology use Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences, (646-646)
  28. ACM
    Preece J (2004). Etiquette online, Communications of the ACM, 47:4, (56-61), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2004.
Contributors
  • Boston University
  • University of California, Santa Barbara

Recommendations

Reviews

Shrisha Rao

The information age offers promises, as well as challenges, that are as significant as those arising from the industrial revolution of past centuries. Many important social issues must be understood and confronted, for example, the digital divide, a disparity of Internet access between the haves and the have-nots that contemporary thinkers suggest is of the utmost importance. This monograph, by two pioneers in sociological research concerning the Internet, is a welcome foray into the study of these kinds of social issues. The authors discuss basic issues, and also consider the Internet as a tool of social interaction and communal action. The book, which follows the pattern of standard studies in sociology in its approach to the Internet, unfortunately falls short in many critical areas. For example, there is no mention of issues arising out of bandwidth disparity (granting that all who have access to the Internet are equal, those who have high-speed access to the Internet are, in an Orwellian sense, more equal than those relying on phone modems). Spam, also known as junk email, possibly the single biggest nuisance on the Internet in the present day (and likely to so remain, much to everyone's annoyance), is not discussed at all, except for the authors' casual and rather questionable claim that "spam and pyramid marketing can be seen as computer-enhanced extensions of ongoing activities in everyday life" (p. 200). No mention is made of the recent landmark antitrust case brought against Microsoft Corporation. for its anticompetitive practices, especially as seen in its bundling of its Internet Explorer browser with its Windows operating system. (The guilty verdict against the defendant, and the settlement reached, has perhaps had as wide-ranging social consequences as anything considered in the book). File sharing, especially of music, is all the rage since Napster, as every teenager on the 'Net knows, but you wouldn't know it by reading this book. Mention is made of Web sites by and about Rudolph Guiliani and other social figures, with no direct bearing on the Internet, but not of Tim Berners-Lee, or of other Internet pioneers. Possibly because of the authors' lack of training in, and lack of appreciation of, technical issues, there are other glaring errors and omissions in the text as well, of the kind that no one in the computer science community would make. There is no discussion of the open-source/free software movement [1], GNU, gcc, Emacs, and so on. Linux is very briefly, and not-too-accurately, dealt with in a couple of paragraphs, without further mention of the thousands of other artifacts that are also similarly created. These matters are probably par for the course, considering that most sociologists, as well as other scholars in the humanities, have little depth of understanding in the computing sciences, and computer scientists, in turn, are not known for their scholarship in the humanities. Writings that bridge these disciplines are thus liable to fall short in one respect or the other. The old question, "If writers can't program and programmers can't write, who's writing user documentation__?__" [2] takes on a whole new meaning. A thorough study of the topic of this book should have also included carefully chosen readings of authors with a more informed perspective on the computing sciences and technology. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.