skip to main content
Skip header Section
Software engineering risk analysis and managementDecember 1989
Publisher:
  • McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • Professional Book Group 11 West 19th Street New York, NY
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-07-010719-9
Published:01 December 1989
Pages:
325
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Bibliometrics
Abstract

No abstract available.

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Blumenthal R (2021). When voting, trust computer scientists, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 49:1, (25-25), Online publication date: 22-Jan-2021.
  2. Berghel H, Charette R, Happ E and King J (2020). It's On: COVID-19, Risk Ecology, and Preparedness Tips, Computer, 53:7, (80-87), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020.
  3. Kalliamvakou E, Bird C, Zimmermann T, Begel A, DeLine R and German D (2019). What Makes a Great Manager of Software Engineers?, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 45:1, (87-106), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.
  4. Menezes J, Gusmão C and Moura H (2019). Risk factors in software development projects: a systematic literature review, Software Quality Journal, 27:3, (1149-1174), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019.
  5. Poveda-Bautista R, Diego-Mas J, Leon-Medina D and Mateo J (2018). Measuring the Project Management Complexity, Complexity, 2018, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.
  6. Abraham C, Elayidom M and Santhanakrishnan T (2018). Towards Risk Based Effort Estimation, International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design, 9:4, (67-84), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.
  7. Nuijten A, Keil M, Pijl G and Commandeur H (2018). IT managers vs. IT auditors perceptions of risks, Information and Management, 55:1, (80-93), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.
  8. Ameyaw E and Chan A (2015). Evaluation and ranking of risk factors in public-private partnership water supply projects in developing countries using fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach, Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, 42:12, (5102-5116), Online publication date: 15-Jul-2015.
  9. ACM
    Chandra S, Sinha V, Sinha S and Ratakonda K Software services: a research roadmap Future of Software Engineering Proceedings, (40-54)
  10. Hu Y, Zhang X, Ngai E, Cai R and Liu M (2013). Software project risk analysis using Bayesian networks with causality constraints, Decision Support Systems, 56:C, (439-449), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013.
  11. Liu J, Chiang J, Yang M and Klein G (2011). Partnering effects on user-developer conflict and role ambiguity in information system projects, Information and Software Technology, 53:7, (722-729), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011.
  12. ACM
    Bhatia N and Kapoor N (2011). Fuzzy cognitive map based approach for software quality risk analysis, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 36:6, (1-9), Online publication date: 14-Nov-2011.
  13. Lee H and Lin L Fuzzy group evaluating the aggregative risk rate of software development Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems: Part II, (438-444)
  14. Arshad N, Mohamed A and Mansor R (2009). Organizational structural strategies in risk management implementation, WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 6:6, (885-894), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.
  15. Uwadia C, Ifinedo P, Nwamarah G, Eseyin E and Sawyerr A (2006). Risk factors in the collaborative development of management information systems for Nigerian universities, Information Technology for Development, 12:2, (91-111), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2006.
  16. ACM
    Boehm B A view of 20th and 21st century software engineering Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, (12-29)
  17. Reifer D, Baxi P, Hirata F, Schifman J and Tsao R Addressing malicious code in COTS Proceedings of the 4th international conference on COTS-Based Software Systems, (157-167)
  18. ACM
    Smith J, Bohner S and McCrickard D Project management for the 21st century Proceedings of the 43rd annual Southeast regional conference - Volume 2, (300-305)
  19. Wallace L, Keil M and Rai A (2004). Understanding software project risk, Information and Management, 42:1, (115-125), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.
  20. ACM
    Wallace L and Keil M (2004). Software project risks and their effect on outcomes, Communications of the ACM, 47:4, (68-73), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2004.
  21. Mursu A, Lyytinen K, Soriyan H and Korpela M (2003). Identifying software project risks in Nigeria, European Journal of Information Systems, 12:3, (182-194), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2003.
  22. Schmidt R, Lyytinen K, Keil M and Cule P (2001). Identifying Software Project Risks, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17:4, (5-36), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2001.
  23. ACM
    Freimut B, Hartkopf S, Kaiser P, Kontio J and Kobitzsch W (2001). An industrial case study of implementing software risk management, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 26:5, (277-287), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2001.
  24. ACM
    Freimut B, Hartkopf S, Kaiser P, Kontio J and Kobitzsch W An industrial case study of implementing software risk management Proceedings of the 8th European software engineering conference held jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (277-287)
  25. Keil M, Tan B, Wei K, Saarinen T, Tuunainen V and Wassenaar A (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects, MIS Quarterly, 24:2, (299-325), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000.
  26. ACM
    Sumner M Risk factors in enterprise wide information management systems projects Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, (180-187)
  27. Ropponen J and Lyytinen K (2000). Components of Software Development Risk, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26:2, (98-112), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2000.
  28. Jurison J (1999). Software project management, Communications of the AIS, 2:3es, (2-es), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1999.
  29. ACM
    Kontio J Risk management in software development Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, (679-680)
  30. ACM
    Kontio J, Getto G and Landes D (1998). Experiences in improving risk management processes using the concepts of the Riskit method, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 23:6, (163-174), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.
  31. ACM
    Kontio J, Getto G and Landes D Experiences in improving risk management processes using the concepts of the Riskit method Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (163-174)
  32. ACM
    Keil M, Cule P, Lyytinen K and Schmidt R (1998). A framework for identifying software project risks, Communications of the ACM, 41:11, (76-83), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.
  33. Conrow E and Shishido P (1997). Implementing Risk Management on Software Intensive Projects, IEEE Software, 14:3, (83-89), Online publication date: 1-May-1997.
  34. Williams R, Walker J and Dorofee A (1997). Putting Risk Management into Practice, IEEE Software, 14:3, (75-82), Online publication date: 1-May-1997.
  35. Känsälä K (1997). Integrating Risk Assessment with Cost Estimation, IEEE Software, 14:3, (61-67), Online publication date: 1-May-1997.
  36. Madachy R (1997). Heuristic Risk Assessment Using Cost Factors, IEEE Software, 14:3, (51-59), Online publication date: 1-May-1997.
  37. Charette R, Adams K and White M (1997). Managing Risk in Software Maintenance, IEEE Software, 14:3, (43-50), Online publication date: 1-May-1997.
  38. Bordoloi B, Mykytyn K and Mykytyn P (1996). A framework to limit systems developers' legal liabilities, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12:4, (161-185), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1996.
  39. Nidumolu S (1996). A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software-development projects, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13:2, (77-113), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1996.
  40. Keil M, Mixon R, Saarinen T and Tuunainen V (1994). Understanding runaway information technology projects, Journal of Management Information Systems, 11:3, (65-85), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1994.
  41. Barki H, Rivard S and Talbot J (1993). Toward an assessment of software development risk, Journal of Management Information Systems, 10:2, (203-225), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1993.
  42. ACM
    Charette R (1991). Inside risks, Communications of the ACM, 34:6, (106), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1991.
  43. Cárdenas-García S and Zelkowitz M (1991). A Management Tool for Evaluation of Software Design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17:9, (961-971), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1991.
Contributors

Recommendations

Reviews

Gordon B. Davis

This work is a professional book, not a textbook. It is not a methodology book that gives a single solution; instead, it presents a range of techniques that may be applicable within the process of risk analysis and management for software projects. Charette explains the reasons for the process and describes the techniques. The book has seven chapters. The Best Possible World A Guidebook Tour of Risk Analysis and Management Risk Analysis: Identification Risk Analysis: Estimation Risk Analysis: Evaluation Risk Management: Planning, Controlling, and Monitoring A Review Guide to the Mechanics of Risk Analysis and Management One important feature of the book is the motivation provided by the general discussion and examples of why risk analysis and management are important for large projects. It provides some exposure to a wide range of ideas and techniques. The disadvantage is that some techniques are not explained in enough detail to implement them. The brief coverage of many techniques may make it difficult for the reader to sort out which technique should be used in a given situation. A practitioner who is ready to be motivated and wants an overview of software project risk assessment and management may find the book a useful introduction; it is not intended as a ready-made solution.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.