skip to main content
Skip header Section
Robust Control: The Parametric ApproachMay 1995
Publisher:
  • Prentice Hall PTR
  • Upper Saddle River, NJ
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-13-781576-0
Published:01 May 1995
Pages:
672
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

From the Book: PREFACE: The subject of robust control began to receive worldwide attention in the late 1970's when it was found that Linear Quadratic Optimal Control (optimal control), state feedback through observers, and other prevailing methods of control system synthesis such as Adaptive Control, lacked any guarantees of stability or performance under uncertainty. Thus, the issue of robustness, prominent in Classical Control, took rebirth in a modern setting. Optimal control was proposed as a first approach to the solution of the robustness problem. This elegant approach, and its offshoots, such as theory, have been intensely developed over the past 12 years or so, and constitutes one of the triumphs of control theory. The theory provides a precise formulation and solution of the problem of synthesizing an output feedback compensator that minimizes the norm of a prescribed system transfer function. Many robust stabilization and performance problems can be cast in this formulation and there now exists effective, and fairly complete theory for control system synthesis subjected to perturbations, in the framework. The theory delivers an "optimal" feedback compensator for the system. Before such a compensator can be eployed in a physical (real-world) system it is natural to test its capabilities with regard to additional design criteria, not covered by the optimality criterion used. In particular the performance of any controller under real parameter uncertainty, as well as mixed parametric-unstructured uncertainty, is an issue which is vital to most control systems. However, optimal theory is incapable of providing a direct and nonconservative answer to thisimportantquestion. The problem of robustness under parametric uncertainty received a shot in the arm in the form of Kharitonov's Theorem for interval polynomials, which appeared in the mid-1980's in the Western literature. It was originally published in 1978 in a Russian journal. With this surprising theorem the entire field of robust control under real parametric uncertainty came alive and it can be said that Kharitonov's Theorem is the most important occurrence in this area after the development of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion. A significant development following Kharitonov's Theorem was the calculation, in 1985, by Soh, Berger and Dabke of the radius of the stability ball in the space of coefficients of a polynomial. From the mid-1980's rapid and spectacular developments have taken place in this field. As a result we now have a rigorous, coherent, and comprehensive theory to deal directly and effectively with real parameter uncertainty in control systems. This theory nicely complements the optimal theories as well as Classical Control and considerably extends the range of possibilities available to the control specialist. The main accomplishment of this theory is that it allows us to determine if a linear time invariant control system, containing several uncertain real parameters remains stable as the parameters vary over a set. This question can be answered in a precise manner, that is, nonconservatively, when the parameters appear linearly or multilinearly in the characteristic polynomial. In developing the solution to the above problem, several important control system design problems are answered. These are 1) the calculation of the real parametric stability margin, 2) the determination of stability and stability margins under mixed parametric and unstructured (norm-bounded or nonlinear) uncertainty 3) the evaluation of the worst case or robust performance measured in the norm, over a prescribed parametric uncertainty set and 4) the extension of classical design techniques involving Nyquist, Nichols and Bode plots and root-loci to systems containing several uncertain real parameters. These results are made possible because the theory developed provides built-in solutions to several extremal problems. It identifies apriori the critical subset of the uncertain parameter set over which stability or performance will be lost and thereby reduces to a very small set, usually points or lines, the parameters over which robustness must be verified. This built-in optimality of the parametric theory is its main strong point particularly from the point of view of applications. It allows us, for the first time, to devise methods to effectively carry out robust stability and performance analysis of control systems under parametric and mixed uncertainty. To balance this rather strong claim we point out that a significant deficiency of control theory at the present time is the lack of nonconservative synthesis methods to achieve robustness under parameter uncertainty. Nevertheless, even here the sharp analysis results obtained in the parametric framework can be exploited in conjunction with synthesis techniques developed in the framework to develop design techniques to partially cover this drawback. The objective of this book is to describe the parametric theory in a self-contained manner. The book is suitable for use as a graduate textbook and also for self-study. The entire subject matter of the book is developed from the single fundamental fact that the roots of a polynomial depend continuously on its coefficients. This fact is the basis of the Boundary Crossing Theorem developed in Chapter 1 and is repeatedly used throughout the book. Surprisingly enough this simple idea, used systematically is sufficient to derive even the most mathematically sophisticated results. This economy and transparency of concepts is another strength of the parametric theory. It makes the results accessible and appealing to a wide audience and allows for a unified and systematic development of the subject. The contents of the book can therefore be covered in one semester despite the size of the book. In accordance with our focus we do not develop any results in theory although some results from theory are used in the chapter on synthesis. In Chapter 0, which serves as an extension of this preface, we rapidly overview some basic aspects of control systems, uncertainty models and robustness issues. We also give a brief historical sketch of Control Theory, and then describe the contents of the rest of the chapters in some detail. The theory developed in the book is presented in mathematical language. The results described in these theorems and lemmas however are completely oriented towards control systems applications and in fact lead to effective algorithms and graphical displays for design and analysis. We have throughout included examples to illustrate the theory and indeed the reader who wants to avoid reading the proofs can understand the significance and utility of the results by reading through the examples. A MATLAB based software package, the Robust Parametric Control ToolBox, has been developed by the authors in collaboration with Samir Ahmad, our graduate student. It implements most of the theory presented in the book. In fact, all the examples and figures in this book have been generated by this ToolBox. We gratefully acknowledge Samir's dedication and help in the preparation of the numerical examples given in the book. A demonstration diskette illustrating this package is included with this book. S.P.B. would like to thank R. Kishan Baheti, Director of the Engineering Systems Program at the National Science Foundation, for supporting his research program. L.H.K. thanks Harry Frisch and Frank Bauer of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and Jer-Nan Juang of NASA Langley Research Center for their support of his research, and Mike Busby, Director of the Center of Excellence in Information Systems at Tennessee State University for his encouragement. It is a pleasure to express our gratitude to several colleagues and coworkers in this field. We thank Antonio Vicino, Alberto Tesi, Mario Milanese, Jo W. Howze, Aniruddha Datta, Mohammed Mansour, J. Boyd Pearson, Peter Dorato, Yakov Z. Tsypkin, Boris T. Polyak, Vladimir L. Kharitonov, Kris Hollot, Juergen Ackermann, Diedrich Hinrichsen, Tony Pritchard, Dragoslav D. Siljak, Charles A. Desoer, Soura Dasgupta, Suhada Jayasuriya, Rama K. Yedavalli, Bob R. Barmish, Mohammed Dahleh, and Biswa N. Datta for their, support, enthusiasm, ideas and friendship. In particular we thank Nirmal K. Bose, John A. Fleming and Bahram Shafai for thoroughly reviewing the manuscript and suggesting many improvements. We are indeed honored that Academician Ya. Z. Tsypkin, one of the leading control theorists of the world, has written a Foreword to our book. Professor Tsypkin's pioneering contributions range from the stability analysis of time-delay systems in the 1940's, learning control systems in the 1960's to robust control under parameter uncertainty in the 1980's and 1990's. His observations on the contents of the book and this subject based on this wide perspective are of great value. The first draft of this book was written in 1989. We have added new results of our own and others as we became aware of them. However, because of the rapid pace of developments of the subject and the sheer volume of literature that has been published in the last few years, it is possible that we have inadvertently omitted some results and references worthy of inclusion. We apologize in advance to any authors or readers who feel that we have not given credit where it is due. S. P. Bhattacharyya H. Chapellat L. H. Keel December 5, 1994.

Cited By

  1. Kim Y (2023). Remark on stability margin of Lur'e systems, Asian Journal of Control, 25:6, (4961-4967), Online publication date: 16-Nov-2023.
  2. Dincel E and Söylemez M (2022). Robust PID controller design via dominant pole assignment for systems with parametric uncertainties, Asian Journal of Control, 24:2, (834-844), Online publication date: 28-Mar-2022.
  3. Tremba A (2021). Mixed Robustness: Analysis of Systems with Uncertain Deterministic and Random Parameters by the Example of Linear Systems, Automation and Remote Control, 82:3, (410-432), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021.
  4. Mozzhechkov V (2021). Design of Simple Robust Controllers for Time-Invariant Dynamic Systems, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 60:3, (353-363), Online publication date: 1-May-2021.
  5. Lee S, Kim S, Johansson K and Kim H Robust acceleration control of a hexarotor UAV with a disturbance observer 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (4166-4171)
  6. Jetto L, Orsini V and Romagnoli R (2018). Simultaneous Achievement of Open and Closed Loop Diagonal Dominance Through Constant Feedback, Asian Journal of Control, 21:2, (686-701), Online publication date: 24-Mar-2019.
  7. ACM
    Hashemi B (2019). Enclosing Chebyshev Expansions in Linear Time, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 45:3, (1-33), Online publication date: 30-Sep-2019.
  8. Chestnov V and Samshorin N (2018). Controllers Design via Given Oscillation Index, Automation and Remote Control, 79:9, (1673-1686), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.
  9. Katal N, Narayan S and Perera R (2018). Design of Optimal QFT Controller and Prefilter for Buck Converter Using Metaheuristic Algorithms, Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2018, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.
  10. Matušů R, Şenol B, Pekař L and Elwakil A (2018). Robust Stability of Fractional-Order Linear Time-Invariant Systems, Complexity, 2018, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.
  11. Ashokkumar C, York G and Gruber S (2017). Fault Tolerant Margins for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Safety, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 88:2-4, (481-494), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017.
  12. Lai Y, Hsu Y, Chen G, Tsay D and Perng J Robust vision-based controller design for laser cladding processes 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), (1162-1167)
  13. Wan Y, Harinath E and Braatz R A piecewise polynomial chaos approach to stochastic linear quadratic regulation for systems with probabilistic parametric uncertainties 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (505-510)
  14. Hammouche M, Lutz P and Rakotondrabe M Robust feedback control for automated force/position control of piezoelectric tube based microgripper 2017 13th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), (598-604)
  15. Liang S and Dong Y (2016). Robust Stability and Stabilization of a Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Discrete-Time Stochastic Systems with Interval Time-Varying Delays, Journal of Control Science and Engineering, 2016, (7), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.
  16. Katal N and Narayan S (2016). QFT Based Robust Positioning Control of the PMSM Using Automatic Loop Shaping with Teaching Learning Optimization, Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2016, (7), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.
  17. Mulero-Martínez J (2016). Asymptote angles of polynomic root loci, Automatica (Journal of IFAC), 71:C, (314-317), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.
  18. Yılmaz Ş, Büyükköroğlu T and Dzhafarov V (2016). Random search of stable member in a matrix polytope, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 308:C, (59-68), Online publication date: 15-Dec-2016.
  19. Hallaji M and Zare A (2016). Stability Margin Determination of Linear Discrete-Time Systems Described By Fuzzy Convex Sets Uncertainty, Asian Journal of Control, 18:3, (954-963), Online publication date: 1-May-2016.
  20. Kallakuri P, Keel L and Bhattacharyya S (2016). A measurement-based approach to designing fault-tolerant controllers for multivariable systems, International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 30:8-10, (1355-1374), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.
  21. ACM
    Huang Z, Wang Y, Mitra S and Dullerud G Controller synthesis for linear dynamical systems with adversaries Proceedings of the Symposium and Bootcamp on the Science of Security, (53-62)
  22. ACM
    Zhang W, Rong Y, Wang J, Zhu T and Wang X Feedback Control of Real-Time Display Advertising Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, (407-416)
  23. Zheng X and Julien C Verification and validation in cyber physical systems Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems, (15-18)
  24. Ahn H (2013). An algorithm to determine linear independence of a set of interval vectors, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219:22, (10822-10830), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013.
  25. HušEk P (2013). Robust PI controller design with respect to fuzzy sensitivity margins, Applied Soft Computing, 13:4, (2037-2044), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013.
  26. Hušek P (2012). Modelling ellipsoidal uncertainty by multidimensional fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, 39:8, (6967-6971), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012.
  27. Matušů R, Závacká J, Prokop R and Bakošová M (2018). The Kronecker summation method for robust stabilization applied to a chemical reactor, Journal of Control Science and Engineering, 2011, (1-7), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  28. Maher R and Samir R (2018). Robust stability of a class of unstable systems under mixed uncertainty, Journal of Control Science and Engineering, 2011, (28-28), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  29. Matušů R, Prokop R and Pekař L Uncertainty modelling in time-delay systems Proceedings of the 13th WSEAS international conference on Automatic control, modelling & simulation, (310-313)
  30. Bozorg M and Termeh F (2011). Domains of PID controller coefficients which guarantee stability and performance for LTI time-delay systems, Automatica (Journal of IFAC), 47:9, (2122-2125), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011.
  31. Matušů R, Prokop R, Matejičková K and Bakošová M (2018). Robust stabilization of interval plants using Kronecker summation method, WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS, 9:9, (917-926), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010.
  32. Matušů R, Prokop R, Matejičková K and Bakošová M Application of Kronecker summation method in computation of robustly stabilizing PI controllers for interval plants Proceedings of the 14th WSEAS international conference on Systems: part of the 14th WSEAS CSCC multiconference - Volume I, (261-267)
  33. Hsu C, Shieh W and Gao C (2010). Digital redesign of uncertain interval systems based on extremal gain/phase margins via a hybrid particle swarm optimizer, Applied Soft Computing, 10:2, (602-612), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2010.
  34. Matusu R (2010). A software tool for algebraic design of interval systems control, International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 5:3/4, (262-268), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.
  35. Yedavalli R Robust stability of linear interval parameter matrix family problem revisited with accurate representation and solution Proceedings of the 2009 conference on American Control Conference, (3710-3717)
  36. ACM
    Sekigawa H The nearest polynomial with a zero in a given domain from a geometrical viewpoint Proceedings of the twenty-first international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation, (287-294)
  37. Hsu C, Lu T and Chen H (2008). Discrete Modelling of Continuous-Time Systems Having Interval Uncertainties Using Genetic Algorithms, IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, E91-A:1, (357-364), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008.
  38. Sekigawa H (2008). The nearest polynomial with a zero in a given domain, Theoretical Computer Science, 409:2, (282-291), Online publication date: 10-Dec-2008.
  39. ACM
    Sekigawa H The nearest polynomial with a zero in a given domain Proceedings of the 2007 international workshop on Symbolic-numeric computation, (190-196)
  40. Ahn H, Moore K and Chen Y (2007). Brief paper, Automatica (Journal of IFAC), 43:5, (892-902), Online publication date: 1-May-2007.
  41. Aweya J, Ouellette M, Montuno D and Felske K (2018). Rate-based proportional-integral control scheme for active queue management, International Journal of Network Management, 16:3, (203-231), Online publication date: 1-May-2006.
  42. Chen Y, Ahn H and Xue D (2006). Robust controllability of interval fractional order linear time invariant systems, Signal Processing, 86:10, (2794-2802), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2006.
  43. Sundarapandian V (2006). New results on the parametric stability of nonlinear systems, Mathematical and Computer Modelling: An International Journal, 43:1-2, (9-15), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2006.
  44. Lozgachev G and Tyutyunnikova L (2006). Constructing modal robust controllers using a transfer function of a closed system, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 45:4, (509-512), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2006.
  45. ACM
    Kosheleva O, Kreinovich V, Mayer G and Nguyen H Computing the cube of an interval matrix is NP-Hard Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing, (1449-1453)
  46. Lee D and Bae S Traffic control scheme of VCNs' gigabit ethernet using BP Proceedings of the First international conference on Embedded Software and Systems, (381-387)
  47. Hušek P and Pytelková R System modelling using fuzzy numbers Proceedings of the 10th international fuzzy systems association World Congress conference on Fuzzy sets and systems, (492-499)
  48. ACM
    Jeannerod C A reduced form for perturbed matrix polynomials Proceedings of the 2002 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation, (131-137)
  49. Tzafestas S, Rigatos G and Vagelatos G (2018). Design of fuzzy gain-scheduled robust controllers using Kharitonov's extremal gain margin theorem, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, 10:1, (39-56), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2001.
  50. Shieh L, Wang W and Chen G (1998). Discretization of cascaded continuous-time controllers and uncertain systems, Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 17:5, (591-611), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1998.
  51. Hedrich L and Barke E A formal approach to verification of linear analog circuits wth parameter tolerances Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, (649-655)
Contributors
  • College of Engineering

Recommendations