Skip header Section
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural JusticeOctober 1995
- Author:
- Thomas F. Gordon
Abstract
No abstract available.
Cited By
Verheij B Formalizing arguments, rules and cases Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law, (199-208)- Nallur V, O'Toole E, Cardozo N and Clarke S Algorithm Diversity Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, (420-428)
- Pigozzi G, Tsoukiàs A and Viappiani P (2016). Preferences in artificial intelligence, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 77:3-4, (361-401), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.
- Wei B and Huang J Modelling dialogues in court using a gradual argumentation model Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, (138-147)
- Athan T, Boley H, Governatori G, Palmirani M, Paschke A and Wyner A OASIS LegalRuleML Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, (3-12)
- Rotolo A and van der Torre L Rules, agents and norms Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Rule-based reasoning, programming, and applications, (52-66)
- Palmirani M, Governatori G, Rotolo A, Tabet S, Boley H and Paschke A LegalRuleML Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Rule-based modeling and computing on the semantic web, (298-312)
- Ballnat S and Gordon T Goal Selection in Argumentation ProcessesA Formal Model of Abduction in Argument Evaluation Structures Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, (51-62)
- Gordon T and Walton D Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, (137-146)
- Black E and Hunter A (2009). An inquiry dialogue system, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 19:2, (173-209), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.
- Casanovas P Legal electronic institutions and ONTOMEDIA Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems: complex systems, the semantic web, ontologies, argumentation, and dialogue, (184-204)
- Abad-Ninet A Legal "neutral dialogue", implementing the work of Bruce Ackerman in the field of law Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems: complex systems, the semantic web, ontologies, argumentation, and dialogue, (217-228)
- Roth B, Riveret R, Rotolo A and Governatori G Strategic argumentation Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (81-90)
- Gordon T Constructing arguments with a computational model of an argumentation scheme for legal rules Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (117-121)
- Artikis A, Sergot M and Pitt J (2007). An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol, Artificial Intelligence, 171:10-15, (776-804), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.
- Gordon T, Prakken H and Walton D (2007). The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof, Artificial Intelligence, 171:10-15, (875-896), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.
- Coste-Marquis S, Devred C, Konieczny S, Lagasquie-Schiex M and Marquis P (2007). On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems, Artificial Intelligence, 171:10-15, (730-753), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.
- Bench-Capon T and Dunne P (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, 171:10-15, (619-641), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.
- Moens M (2007). Summarizing court decisions, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, 43:6, (1748-1764), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007.
- Suzuki Y Dialogue game tree with nondeterministic additive consolidation Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems, (115-133)
- Prakken H, Reed C and Walton D Dialogues about the burden of proof Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (115-124)
- Coste-Marquis S, Devred C, Konieczny S, Lagasquie-Schiex M and Marquis P Merging argumentation systems Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2, (614-619)
- Dunne P Prevarication in dispute protocols Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (12-21)
- Mommers L Application of a knowledge-based ontology of the legal domain in collaborative workspaces Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (70-76)
- Dunne P and McBurney P Optimal utterances in dialogue protocols Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, (608-615)
- Prakken H (2019). Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?, Fundamenta Informaticae, 48:2-3, (253-271), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2001.
- Prakken H (2019). Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?, Fundamenta Informaticae, 48:2-3, (253-271), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001.
- Verheij B Automated argument assistance for lawyers Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (43-52)
- Jakobovits H and Vermeir D Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (53-62)
- Nitta K, Shibasaki M, Yamazaki A and Yasumura Y A legal negotiation support system Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (132-133)
- Karacapilidis N and Papadias D (2018). A computational approach for argumentative discourse in multi‐agent decision making environments, AI Communications, 11:1, (21-33), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1998.
- Prakken H and Sartor G Reasoning with precedents in a dialogue game Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (1-9)
- Allen L and Saxon C Achieving fluency in modernized and formalized Hohfeld Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (19-28)
- Verheij B, Hage J and Lodder A Logical tools for legal argument Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (243-249)
- Gordon T The pleadings game Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, (10-19)
Recommendations
The Pleadings Game
The Pleadings Game is a normative formalization and computational model of civil pleading, founded in Roberty Alexy's discourse theory of legal argumentation. The consequences of arguments and counterarguments are modelled using Geffner and Pearl's ...
Game AI revisited
CF '12: Proceedings of the 9th conference on Computing FrontiersMore than a decade after the early research efforts on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in computer games and the establishment of a new AI domain the term ``game AI'' needs to be redefined. Traditionally, the tasks associated with game AI ...