skip to main content
Skip header Section
Digital Divide?: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet WorldwideSeptember 2001
Publisher:
  • Cambridge University Press
  • 40 W. 20 St. New York, NY
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-521-00223-3
Published:01 September 2001
Pages:
312
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

From the Publisher:

Digital Divide examines access and use of the Internet in 179 nations world-wide. A global divide is evident between industrialized and developing societies. A social divide is apparent between rich and poor within each nation. Within the online community, evidence for a democratic divide is emerging between those who do and do not use Internet resources to engage and participate in public life. Part I outlines the theoretical debate between cyber-optimists who see the Internet as the great leveler. Part II examines the virtual political system and the way that representative institutions have responded to new opportunities on the Internet. Part III analyzes how the public has responded to these opportunities in Europe and the United States and develops the civic engagement model to explain patterns of participation via the Internet.

Cited By

  1. Yue L and Cui L (2024). A Self-Determination Perspective of Digital Inclusion, Journal of Global Information Management, 32:1, (1-21), Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024.
  2. Lin J and Tao J (2024). Digital resilience, Telematics and Informatics, 86:C, Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024.
  3. López R, Valarezo Á and Pérez-Amaral T (2023). Unleashing the potential of online learning in Spain, Telecommunications Policy, 47:6, Online publication date: 1-Jul-2023.
  4. ACM
    Christensen C, Ehrenberg N, Christiansson J, Grönvall E, Saad-Sulonen J and Keinonen T Volunteer-based IT Helpdesks as Ambiguous Quasi-Public Services - a Case Study from Two Nordic Countries Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, (1-12)
  5. Díaz C, Dodel M and Menese P (2022). Can one laptop per child reduce digital inequalities? ICT household access patterns under Plan Ceibal, Telecommunications Policy, 46:9, Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022.
  6. Wang T and Yu W (2022). Alternative sources use and misinformation exposure and susceptibility, Telematics and Informatics, 70:C, Online publication date: 1-May-2022.
  7. Martínez-Domínguez M and Fierros-González I (2022). Determinants of internet use by school-age children, Telecommunications Policy, 46:1, Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022.
  8. AlAwadhi S Trust Factors Affecting the Adoption of E-Government for Civic Engagement Electronic Government, (229-244)
  9. ACM
    Ruohonen J and Tuikka A Digital Divides and Online Media 2021 5th International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology, (157-163)
  10. ACM
    Steinfeld N, Lev-On A and Abu-Kishk H Measuring Digital Literacy with Eye Tracking: An examination of skills and performance based on user gaze Proceedings of the 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, (21-28)
  11. ACM
    Sin J, L. Franz R, Munteanu C and Barbosa Neves B Digital Design Marginalization: New Perspectives on Designing Inclusive Interfaces Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-11)
  12. Haq E, Braud T and Hui P Community matters more than anonymity Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, (94-98)
  13. Skaarup S The Role of Domain-Skills in Bureaucratic Service Encounters Electronic Government, (179-196)
  14. Romero-Rodríguez L, Ramírez-Montoya M and González J (2020). Incidence of Digital Competences in the Completion Rates of MOOCs: Case Study on Energy Sustainability Courses, IEEE Transactions on Education, 63:3, (183-189), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2020.
  15. Koiranen I, Keipi T, Koivula A and Räsänen P (2019). Changing patterns of social media use? A population-level study of Finland, Universal Access in the Information Society, 19:3, (603-617), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2020.
  16. ACM
    Baasanjav U Social Media and Credibility: Civil Society Organizations in Mongolia International Conference on Social Media and Society, (230-237)
  17. Chen X, Östlund B and Frennert S Digital Inclusion or Digital Divide for Older Immigrants? A Scoping Review Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology and Society, (176-190)
  18. Koivula A, Räsänen P, Koiranen I and Keipi T Online Gambling Activity in Finland 2006–2016 Social Computing and Social Media. Participation, User Experience, Consumer Experience, and Applications of Social Computing, (569-583)
  19. ACM
    Sung W and Kim S Can people with disabilities use the mobile Internet if they want to? The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, (147-154)
  20. Warkentin M and Orgeron C (2020). Using the security triad to assess blockchain technology in public sector applications, International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals, 52:C, Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020.
  21. ACM
    Escher N and Banovic N (2020). Exposing Error in Poverty Management Technology: A Method for Auditing Government Benefits Screening Tools, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4:CSCW1, (1-20), Online publication date: 28-May-2020.
  22. ACM
    Petro G, Gonzales A and Calarco J "Out of Luck": Socio-Economic Differences in Student Coping Responses to Technology Problems Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-10)
  23. Koiranen I, Koivula A, Saarinen A and Keipi T (2020). Ideological motives, digital divides, and political polarization, Telematics and Informatics, 46:C, Online publication date: 1-Mar-2020.
  24. Min S (2019). From algorithmic disengagement to algorithmic activism, Telematics and Informatics, 43:C, Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019.
  25. ACM
    Mahyar N, Nguyen D, Chan M, Zheng J and Dow S The Civic Data Deluge Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, (1171-1181)
  26. ACM
    Ylipulli J and Luusua A Without libraries what have we? Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities, (92-101)
  27. Barnidge M, Diehl T and Rojas H (2020). Second Screening for News and Digital Divides, Social Science Computer Review, 37:1, (55-72), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019.
  28. Lee M and Butler B (2018). How are information deserts created? A theory of local information landscapes, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70:2, (101-116), Online publication date: 4-Jan-2019.
  29. Clark B and Brudney J (2018). Citizen Representation in City Government-Driven Crowdsourcing, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 27:3-6, (1153-1180), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018.
  30. Vishkaie R, Shively K and Wessel Powell C (2020). Perceptions of Digital Tools and Creativity in the Classroom, International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 9:4, (1-18), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.
  31. Mahmood Q, Bhutta M and Haq M (2018). Effects of sociodemographic variables and Facebook group membership on students political participation, Education and Information Technologies, 23:5, (2235-2247), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.
  32. König R, Seifert A and Doh M (2018). Internet use among older Europeans, Universal Access in the Information Society, 17:3, (621-633), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018.
  33. Ma L (2018). Digital Divide and Citizen Use of E-Government in China's Municipalities, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 5:3, (16-31), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018.
  34. Falco E and Kleinhans R (2018). Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development, International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7:3, (52-79), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018.
  35. Falco E and Kleinhans R (2018). Beyond technology, International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals, 40:C, (17-20), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018.
  36. ACM
    Omar A, Sivarajah U and Weerakkody V Participatory budgeting Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, (1-6)
  37. ACM
    Azab N and ElSherif M A framework for using data analytics to measure trust in government through the social capital generated over governmental social media platforms Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, (1-9)
  38. ACM
    Thuermer G, Roth S, O'Hara K and Staab S Everybody Thinks Online Participation is Great - for Somebody Else Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, (287-296)
  39. ACM
    Nielsen M, Rohman I and Lopes N Empirical analysis of the current digital divides since 2010 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (616-625)
  40. ACM
    Renteria C Measuring the Digital Divide from an Elementary Microeconomics Point of View Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (588-592)
  41. Wiberg M and Wiberg C (2018). Digital Integration in the 3rd Wave of Mobile HCI, International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 10:2, (57-64), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018.
  42. Nam T (2017). A tool for liberty or oppression? A cross-national study of the Internets influence on democracy, Telematics and Informatics, 34:5, (538-549), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.
  43. ACM
    Hoffmann C, Lutz C, Müller S and Meckel M Facebook Escapism and Online Political Participation Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society, (1-6)
  44. ACM
    Hoffmann C and Lutz C Spiral of Silence 2.0 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society, (1-12)
  45. Zareei H, Mohd. Yusuff R, Mohd. Salit S, Norazizan S.A.R. S and Hussain Mohd. R (2017). Assessing the usability and ergonomic considerations on communication technology for older Malaysians, Universal Access in the Information Society, 16:2, (425-433), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017.
  46. Nemer D and Tsikerdekis M (2017). Political engagement and ICTs, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68:6, (1539-1550), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017.
  47. Weber I and State B Digital Demography Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, (935-939)
  48. Hansson K and Ekenberg L (2017). Embodiment and Gameplay in Networked Publics, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 4:2, (43-55), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017.
  49. ACM
    Wang J and Hejazi Moghadam S Diversity Barriers in K-12 Computer Science Education Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, (615-620)
  50. Lareki A, Martnez de Morentin J, Altuna J and Amenabar N (2017). Teenagers' perception of risk behaviors regarding digital technologies, Computers in Human Behavior, 68:C, (395-402), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.
  51. ACM
    Kocielnik R and Hsieh G Send Me a Different Message Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, (2193-2207)
  52. Brandtzaeg P (2017). Facebook is no źGreat equalizerź, Social Science Computer Review, 35:1, (103-125), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017.
  53. Zhang X (2017). Exploring the patterns and determinants of the global mobile divide, Telematics and Informatics, 34:1, (438-449), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017.
  54. ACM
    Bodrunova S, Litvinenko A and Blekanov I Influencers on the Russian Twitter Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, (212-222)
  55. Ma L (2016). What Drives the Adoption of Social Media Applications by the Public Sector?, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 3:4, (76-93), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.
  56. Yu L and Zhou W (2016). Information inequality in contemporary Chinese urban society, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67:9, (2246-2262), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.
  57. Seo H and Thorson S (2016). A mixture model of global internet capacity distributions, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67:8, (2032-2044), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.
  58. Sujarwoto S and Tampubolon G (2016). Spatial inequality and the Internet divide in Indonesia 2010-2012, Telecommunications Policy, 40:7, (602-616), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.
  59. Armey L and Hosman L (2016). The centrality of electricity to ICT use in low-income countries, Telecommunications Policy, 40:7, (617-627), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.
  60. ACM
    Dombrowski L, Harmon E and Fox S Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (656-671)
  61. Falco E (2016). Digital Community Planning, International Journal of E-Planning Research, 5:2, (1-22), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016.
  62. ACM
    Odongo A and Rono G Kenya Digital and Cultural Divide Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (85-94)
  63. ACM
    Salem F Brainstorming the Nation through Social Media Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (390-391)
  64. ACM
    Hrustek N, Musa A and Mekovec R The perception of e-democracy and e-participation at the individual level Proceedings of the 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, (36-43)
  65. Cucciniello M, Bellè N, Nasi G and Valotti G (2015). Assessing Public Preferences and the Level of Transparency in Government Using an Exploratory Approach, Social Science Computer Review, 33:5, (571-586), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015.
  66. Hansson K, Belkacem K and Ekenberg L (2015). Open Government and Democracy, Social Science Computer Review, 33:5, (540-555), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015.
  67. Kononova A and Chiang Y (2015). Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among Internet users in the United States and Taiwan, Computers in Human Behavior, 50:C, (31-41), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015.
  68. Sheikh J and Abbas A The Invisible User Proceedings, Part II, of the 4th International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability: Users and Interactions - Volume 9187, (243-251)
  69. ACM
    Wallace C, Vincent K, Luguzan C and Talbot H Community broadband initiatives Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, (109-117)
  70. ACM
    Choudrie J, Yates D and Gulati G Investigating mobile broadband affordability in developing countries Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, (1-4)
  71. Mack E and Maciejewski R (2015). A profile of visual analytical toolkits for understanding the spatio-temporal evolution of broadband provision, Telecommunications Policy, 39:3, (320-332), Online publication date: 1-May-2015.
  72. van Deursen A, van Dijk J and ten Klooster P (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online, Telematics and Informatics, 32:2, (259-272), Online publication date: 1-May-2015.
  73. Aladwani A (2015). Facilitators, characteristics, and impacts of Twitter use, International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals, 35:1, (15-25), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015.
  74. ACM
    DeLyser L Software engineering students in the city Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, (37-42)
  75. Lee H, Kwak N, Campbell S and Ling R (2014). Mobile communication and political participation in South Korea, Computers in Human Behavior, 38, (85-92), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2014.
  76. ACM
    Reisdorf B and Groselj D For what it's worth Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science, (263-264)
  77. Virkar S (2014). Public Administration and Information and Communication Technologies, International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 1:2, (43-64), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014.
  78. ACM
    Dombrowski L, Hayes G, Mazmanian M and Voida A (2014). E-government intermediaries and the challenges of access and trust, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 21:2, (1-22), Online publication date: 2-Feb-2014.
  79. Howardson G and Behrend T (2014). Using the Internet to recruit employees, Computers in Human Behavior, 31:C, (334-342), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014.
  80. Farina C, Epstein D, Heidt J and Newhart M (2014). Designing an Online Civic Engagement Platform, International Journal of E-Politics, 5:1, (16-40), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.
  81. Arns J, Copeland C, Jaeger P, Subramaniam M, Kawooya D and Martin M Information outsiders of the 21st century Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries, (1-4)
  82. Ruggiero D (2013). Persuasive Games as Social Action Agents, International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 5:4, (75-85), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013.
  83. Segaard S and Nielsen J (2013). Local election blogs, Information Polity, 18:4, (299-313), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013.
  84. Lidén G (2013). Supply of and demand for e-democracy, Information Polity, 18:3, (217-232), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013.
  85. Tengtrakul P and Peha J (2013). Does ICT in schools affect residential adoption and adult utilization outside schools?, Telecommunications Policy, 37:6-7, (540-562), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013.
  86. Zhang X (2013). Income disparity and digital divide, Telecommunications Policy, 37:6-7, (515-529), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013.
  87. Park C (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement, Computers in Human Behavior, 29:4, (1641-1648), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013.
  88. ACM
    Williams C, Gulati G and Yates D Predictors of on-line services and e-participation Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, (190-197)
  89. ACM
    Wicker S and Santoso S (2013). Access to the internet is a human right, Communications of the ACM, 56:6, (43-46), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013.
  90. Chen R and Liu I (2013). Research on the effectiveness of information technology in reducing the Rural-Urban Knowledge Divide, Computers & Education, 63, (437-445), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013.
  91. Li Y and Ranieri M (2013). Educational and social correlates of the digital divide for rural and urban children, Computers & Education, 60:1, (197-209), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013.
  92. ACM
    Dade-Robertson M, Taylor N, Marshall J and Olivier P The political sensorium Proceedings of the Media Architecture Biennale Conference: Participation, (47-50)
  93. ACM
    Kim B and Kleinschmit S A logistic multilevel model for civic engagement and community group impact in the digital age Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (34-37)
  94. Dunwell I Conducting ethical research with a game-based intervention for groups at risk of social exclusion Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Entertainment Computing, (594-599)
  95. Meijer A (2012). The Do It Yourself State, Information Polity, 17:3,4, (303-314), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012.
  96. ACM
    Halpern D, Rozaidi N and Ki S Towards a social network e-government agenda? Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, (223-231)
  97. ACM
    Müller C, Neufeldt C, Randall D and Wulf V ICT-development in residential care settings Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2639-2648)
  98. Grubesic T (2012). The U.S. National Broadband Map, Telecommunications Policy, 36:2, (113-126), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012.
  99. Shirazi F (2012). Information and communication technology and women empowerment in Iran, Telematics and Informatics, 29:1, (45-55), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012.
  100. ACM
    Ifinedo P (2012). Factors influencing e-government maturity in transition economies and developing countries, ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42:4, (98-116), Online publication date: 13-Jan-2012.
  101. Yu L (2011). The divided views of the information and digital divides, Journal of Information Science, 37:6, (660-679), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011.
  102. Ganuza J and Viecens M (2011). Deployment of high-speed broadband infrastructures during the economic crisis. The case of Xarxa Oberta, Telecommunications Policy, 35:9-10, (857-870), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.
  103. ACM
    Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt P, Taylor-Smith E and Kimpeler S Youth participation through distributed discussion Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (293-296)
  104. ACM
    Hall T and Owens J The digital divide and e-government services Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (37-44)
  105. Gong H, Lips M and Tate M Revisiting the conceptualisation of e-Campaigning Proceedings of the Third IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic participation, (192-203)
  106. ACM
    Spaiser V Young people's political participation on the internet in Germany Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, (307-316)
  107. Hsieh J, Rai A and Keil M (2011). Addressing Digital Inequality for the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Through Government Initiatives, Information Systems Research, 22:2, (233-253), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.
  108. Hara N and Huang B (2011). Online social movements, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45:1, (489-522), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  109. Nam T (2011). Whose e-democracy?, Information Polity, 16:2, (131-150), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  110. Grimmelikhuijsen S (2011). Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government, Information Polity, 16:1, (35-50), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  111. ACM
    Narayanan S Accountability and the new media Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, (1-10)
  112. Yang K, Park S, Yoon S and Kim J (2010). Measurement of the digital inequality in remote rural areas: case of South Korea, International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 9:2, (142-161), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.
  113. Şendağ S (2010). Pre-service teachers' perceptions about e-democracy, Computers & Education, 55:4, (1684-1693), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.
  114. ACM
    Chen N and Shen X Experience of foreign governments in dealing with the digital divide and its implication for China Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (383-384)
  115. ACM
    Nam T New voices or old voices in political talk? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (317-326)
  116. ACM
    Nam T Internet effects on political participation Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (307-316)
  117. Ferro E, Caroleo B, Cantamessa M and Leo M ICT diffusion in an aging society Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic government, (263-274)
  118. Van Deursen A and Van Dijk J Civil servants' internet skills Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic government, (132-143)
  119. ACM
    Weber I and Castillo C The demographics of web search Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, (523-530)
  120. Chung R, Li C and Chen C (2010). An comparative analysis of the current status of digital divide in Taiwan, WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 9:7, (748-757), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010.
  121. Harfouche A (2010). The Same Wine but in New Bottles. Public E-Services Divide and Low Citizens' Satisfaction, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6:3, (73-105), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010.
  122. Nam T Who are political users of the Internet? Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities, (89-98)
  123. Robertson S, Vatrapu R and Medina R (2010). Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. presidential election, Information Polity, 15:1,2, (11-31), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010.
  124. Azad B, Faraj S, Goh J and Feghali T (2010). What Shapes Global Diffusion of e-Government, Journal of Global Information Management, 18:2, (85-104), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010.
  125. Shirazi F, Ngwenyama O and Morawczynski O (2010). ICT expansion and the digital divide in democratic freedoms, Telematics and Informatics, 27:1, (21-31), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010.
  126. van Deursen A and van Dijk J (2009). Using the Internet, Interacting with Computers, 21:5-6, (393-402), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.
  127. ACM
    Muganda N Assessing alignment of an e-government project in the context of a developing country Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, (193-202)
  128. Hanafizadeh M, Saghaei A and Hanafizadeh P (2009). An index for cross-country analysis of ICT infrastructure and access, Telecommunications Policy, 33:7, (385-405), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009.
  129. Stodden V and Meier P A global empirical evaluation of new communication technology use and democratic tendency Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Information and communication technologies and development, (3-16)
  130. ACM
    Chen D and Lee C To reinforce or to mobilize? Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance, (394-401)
  131. ACM
    Obi T Current topics in the discussion on the relationship between e-governance and education Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance, (211-215)
  132. Aslanidou S and Menexes G (2008). Youth and the Internet, Computers & Education, 51:3, (1375-1391), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008.
  133. Jackson L, Zhao Y, Qiu W, Kolenic A, Fitzgerald H, Harold R and von Eye A (2008). Culture, gender and information technology use, Computers in Human Behavior, 24:6, (2817-2829), Online publication date: 17-Sep-2008.
  134. Hsieh J, Rai A and Keil M (2008). Understanding digital inequality, MIS Quarterly, 32:1, (97-126), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008.
  135. ACM
    Kim B, Kavanaugh A and Pérez-Quiñones M Toward a model of political participation among young adults Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance, (205-212)
  136. Medaglia R (2007). Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government, Information Polity, 12:4, (265-280), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007.
  137. Bavec C and Vintar M What matters in the development of the e-government in the EU? Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Electronic Government, (424-435)
  138. Ferro E, Gil-Garcia J and Helbig N The digital divide metaphor Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Electronic Government, (265-280)
  139. Warren M (2007). The digital vicious cycle, Telecommunications Policy, 31:6-7, (374-388), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.
  140. Gil-Garcia J, Helbig N and Ferro E Is it only about internet access? an empirical test of a multi-dimensional digital divide Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic Government, (139-149)
  141. Park H The impacts of digital government on civic engagement Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research, (440-441)
  142. Kavanaugh A, Zin T, Carroll J, Schmitz J, Pérez-Quiñones M and Isenhour P When opinion leaders blog Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research, (79-88)
  143. Edwards A (2006). ICT strategies of democratic intermediaries: A view on the political system in the digital age, Information Polity, 11:2, (163-176), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2006.
  144. Cohen J (2006). Citizen satisfaction with contacting government on the internet, Information Polity, 11:1, (51-65), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2006.
  145. van Os R (2005). Framing Europe online: French political parties and the European election of 2004, Information Polity, 10:3,4, (205-218), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005.
  146. ACM
    Minguez A New technologies as social fact Proceedings of the international symposium on Women and ICT: creating global transformation, (16-es)
  147. Kleine D (2005). Fairtrade.com versus Fairtrade.org-how Fairtrade organisations use the Internet, Interacting with Computers, 17:1, (57-83), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005.
  148. Mwesige P (2004). Cyber elites, Telematics and Informatics, 21:1, (83-101), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2004.
  149. Mandelli A Exploring the origins of new transaction costs in connected societies Trust in knowledge management and systems in organizations, (200-247)
  150. Breiter A (2003). Public Internet Usage Points in Schools for the Local Community – Concept, Implementation and Evaluation of a Project in Bremen, Germany, Education and Information Technologies, 8:2, (109-125), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2003.
  151. Tolbert C and Mossberger K The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government Proceedings of the 2003 annual national conference on Digital government research, (1-7)
Contributors

Recommendations