skip to main content
Skip header Section
Usability EngineeringNovember 1994
Publisher:
  • Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
  • 340 Pine Street, Sixth Floor
  • San Francisco
  • CA
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-08-052029-2
Published:11 November 1994
Pages:
362
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

Written by the author of the best-selling HyperText & HyperMedia, this book is an excellent guide to the methods of usability engineering. The book provides the tools needed to avoid usability surprises and improve product quality. Step-by-step information on which method to use at various stages during the development lifecycle are included, along with detailed information on how to run a usability test and the unique issues relating to international usability. * Emphasizes cost-effective methods that developers can implement immediately * Instructs readers about which methods to use when, throughout the development lifecycle, which ultimately helps in cost-benefit analysis. * Shows readers how to avoid the four most frequently listed reasons for delay in software projects. * Includes detailed information on how to run a usability test. * Covers unique issues of international usability. * Features an extensive bibliography allowing readers to find additional information. * Written by an internationally renowned expert in the field and the author of the best-selling HyperText & HyperMedia. Table of Contents Executive Summary. What is Usability Generations of User Interfaces. The Usability Engineering Lifecycle. Usability Heuristics. Usability Testing. Usability Assessment Methods Beyond Testing. Interface Standards. International User Interfaces. Future Developments. Appendix A: Exercises. Appendix B: Bibliography. Author Index. Subject Index.

References

  1. Abernethy, C. N. (1988). Human-computer interface standards: Origins, organizations and comment. In Oborne, D. J. (Ed.), International Review of Ergonomics 2 , 31-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Abowd, G. D., and Dix, A. J. (1992). Giving undo attention. Interacting with Computers 4, 3 (December), 317-342. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ACM SIGCHI (1992). Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY (ACM Order No. 608920). Also available for anonymous FTP downloading in rich text format (RTF) from archive.cis.ohio-state.edu [128.146.8.52] in the directory/pub/hci/CDG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alben, L., Faris, J., and Saddler, H. (1994). Making It Macintosh: Designing the message when the message is design. ACM interactions 1 , 1 (January), 10-20. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, R. B. (1984). Working paper on ethical issues for research on the use of computer services and interfaces. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 16 , 1 (July), 12-16. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. American Psychological Association (1982). Ethical Principles in the Conduct of Research with Human Participants. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersen, M. H., Nielsen, J., and Rasmussen, H. (1989). A similarity-based hypertext browser for reading the Unix network news. Hypermedia 1 , 3, 255-265. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Angiolillo, J. S., and Roberts, L. A. (1991). What makes a manual look easy to use? Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting , 222-224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Anonymous. (1990). Interface evolution: A collective timeline. In Laurel, B. (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 483.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Armstrong, J. S., and Lusk, E. J. (1988). Return postage in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 51 , 233-248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Aspray, W., and Beaver, D. (1986). Marketing the monster: Advertising computer technology. Annals of the History of Computing 8 , 2 (April), 127-143. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bachman, R. D. (1989). A methodology for comparing the software interfaces of competitive products. Proc. Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting , 1214-1217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Baecker, R. M. (1989). A vision of education in user-centered system and interface design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 20 , 3 (January), 10-13. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Baecker, R. M., Small, I., and Mander, R. (1991). Bringing icons to life. In Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 1-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Bailey, G. (1993). Iterative methodology and designer training in human-computer interface design. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 198-205. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bailey, R. W. (1991). Converting research into reality. Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting , 345-349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bailey, W. A., Knox, S. T., and Lynch, E. F. (1988). Effects of interface design upon user productivity. Proc. ACM CHI'88 Conf. (Washington, DC, 15-19 May), 207-212. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bainbridge, L. (1979). Verbal reports as evidence of the process operator's knowledge. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 11 , 411-436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Banning, J. (1984). Beyond the application program: A different approach to integrated software. BYTE 9 , 1 (January), 251-262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Barratt, M. (1991). A nice thing about Windows. Information Design Journal 6 , 3, 257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Becker, J. D. (1984). Multilingual word processing. Scientific American 251 , 1 (July), 82-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bellantone, C. E., and Lanzetta, T. M. (1991). 'Works as advertised:' Observations and benefits of prototyping. Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting , 324-327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Bellotti, V. (1988). Implications of current design practice for the use of HCI techniques. In Jones, D. M., and Winder, R. (Eds.), People and Computers IV. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 13-34. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Benel, D. C. R., Ottens, D., Jr., and Horst, R. (1991). Use of an eyetracking system in the usability laboratory. Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting , 461-465.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Bentley, J. (1985). Programming pearls: A spelling checker. Communications of the ACM 28 , 5 (May), 456-462. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Berg, J. L., and Schumny, H. (Eds.) (1990). An Analysis of the Information Technology Standardization Process. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Bernstein, M. (1988). The bookmark and the compass: Orientation tools for hypertext users. ACM SIGOIS Bulletin 9 , 4 (October), 34-45. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Berry, D. C., and Broadbent, D. E. (1990). The role of instruction and verbalization in improving performance on complex search tasks. Behaviour & Information Technology 9 , 3 (May-June), 175-190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Berry, R. E. (1988). Common User Access--A consistent and usable human-computer interface for the SAA environment. IBM Systems Journal 27 , 3, 281-300. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Bewley, W. L., Roberts, T. L, Schroit, D., and Verplank, W. L. (1983). Human factors testing in the design of Xerox's 8010 'Star' office workstation. Proc. ACM CHI'83 Conf. (Boston, MA, 12-15 December), 72-77. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Bias, R. (1991). Walkthroughs: Efficient collaborative testing. IEEE Software 8 , 5 (September), 94-95. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Bickel, M. A. (1987). Automatic correction to misspelled names: A fourth-generation language approach. Communications of the ACM 30 , 3 (March), 224-228. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Biocca, F. (1992). Virtual reality technology: A tutorial. Journal of Communication 42 , 4 (Autumn), 23-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Bisseret, A. (1983). Psychology for man computer cooperation in knowledge processing. Proc. IFIP 9th World Computer Congress (Paris, 19-23 September), 113-120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Bleser, T., and Foley, J. (1982). Towards specifying and evaluating the human factors of user-computer interfaces. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computer Systems (Gaithersburg, MD, 15-17 March), 309-314. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bleser, T. W., and Sibert, J. (1990). Toto: A tool for selecting interaction rules. Proc. ACM UIST'90 Third Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Snowbird, UT, 3-5 October), 135-142. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Bloom, C. P. (1987-88). Procedures for obtaining and testing user-selected terminologies. Human-Computer Interaction 3 , 2, 155-177. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Blumenthal, B. (1990). Strategies for automatically incorporating metaphoric attributes in interface designs. Proc. ACM UIST'90 Third Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Snowbird, UT, 3-5 October), 66-75. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Boies, S. J., Gould, J. D., Levy, S., Richards, J. T., and Schoonard, J. (1985). The 1984 Olympic Message System: A case study in system design. Research Report RC11138 , IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Booth, P. A. (1990). Identifying and interpreting design errors. Intl. J. Human-Computer Interaction 4 , 2, 307-332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Borenstein, Í. S. (1985). The design and evaluation of on-line help systems. Technical Report CMU-CS-85-151 , Department of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Bradford, J. H., Murray, W. D., and Carey, T. T. (1990). What kind of errors do Unix users make? Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 43-46. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Brigham, F. R. (1989). Statistical methods for testing the conformance of products to user performance standards. Behaviour & Information Technology 8 , 4, 279-283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Brooke, J., Bevan, N., Brigham, F. R., Harker, S., and Youmans, D. (1990). Usability assurance and standardization--work in progress in ISO. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 357-361. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Brooks, F. P. (1975). The Mythical Man-Month. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Brooks, F. P. (1987). No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Computer 20 , 4 (April), 10-19. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Brooks, R. (1993). The case for the specialized interface. IEEE Software 10 , 2 (March), 86-88. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Brothers, L., Hollan, J., Nielsen, J., Stornetta, S., Abney, S., Furnas, G., and Littman, M. (1992). Supporting informal communication via ephemeral interest groups. Proc. ACM CSCW'92 Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Toronto, Canada, 1-4 November), 84-90. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Brown, C. M. L. (1988). Human-Computer Interface Design Guidelines. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Brugger, C. (1990). Advances in the international standardization of public information symbols. Information Design Journal 6 , 1, 79-88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Byrne, J. G. (1989). Competitive evaluation in industry: Some comments. Proc. Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting , 423-425.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Caesar, G. J. (51 B.C.). De Bello Gallico. Manuscript, Roman Empire. Also available in several translations, including The Conquest of Gaul , translated by Handford, S. A., Penguin Books, London, U.K., 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Campbell, R. L. (1992). Will the real scenario please stand up? ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 24 , 2 (April), 6-8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Canadian Standards Association (1992). Canadian Alphanumeric Ordering Standard for Character Sets of CSA Standard CAN/CSA-Z243A. Standard Z243.4.1, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Caplan, S. (1990). Using focus groups methodology for ergonomie design. Ergonomics 33 , 5, 527-533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Card, S. K., and Henderson, D. A. (1987). Catalogues: A metaphor for computer application delivery. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'87 Second Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Stuttgart, Germany, 1-4 September), 959-964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Card, S. K., and Moran, T. P. (1988). User technology: From pointing to pondering. In Goldberg, A. (Ed.), A History of Personal Workstations. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 489-526. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Card, S. K., English, W. K., and Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of the mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21 , 601-613.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Card, S. K., Robertson, G. G., and Mackinlay, J. D. (1991). The information visualizer: An information workspace. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 181-188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Carey, T. (1989). Position paper: The basic HCI course for software engineers. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 20 , 3 (January), 14-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Carroll, J. M. (1990a). The Nürnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Carroll, J. M. (1990b). Infinite detail and emulation in an ontologically minimized HCI. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 321-327. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Carroll, J. M., and Campbell, R. L. (1986). Softening up hard science: Reply to Newell and Card. Human-Computer Interaction 2 , 3, 227-249. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Carroll, J. M., and Carrithers, C. (1984). Training wheels in a user interface. Communications of the ACM 27 , 8 (August), 800-806. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. (1987). Paradox of the active user. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 80-111. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. (1990). Human-computer interaction scenarios as a design representation. Proc. IEEE HICSS-23, 23rd Hawaii Intl. Conf. System Sciences (Hawaii, 2-6 January), Vol. II , 555-561.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. (1991). Deliberated evolution: Stalking the View Matcher in design space. Human-Computer Interaction 6 , 3 and 4, 281-318. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. (1992). Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 10 , 2 (April), 181-212. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Carroll, J. M., and Thomas, J. C. (1988). Fun. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 19 , 3 Oanuary), 21-24. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L., Lewis, C. H., Grischkowsky, N. L., and Robertson, S. R. (1985). Exploring exploring a word processor. Human-Computer Interaction 1 , 3, 283-307. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Carroll, J. M., Smith-Kerker, P. L., Ford, J. R., and Mazur-Rimetz, S. A. (1987- 88). The minimal manual. Human-Computer Interaction 3 , 2, 123-153. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L., and Kellogg, W. A. (1988). Interface metaphors and user interface design. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 67-85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Carroll, J. M., Kellogg, W. A., and Rosson, M. B. (1991). The task-artifact cycle. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 74-102. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Catrambone, R., and Carroll, J. M. (1987). Learning a word processing system with guided exploration and training wheels. Proc. ACM CHI+GI'87 Conf. (Toronto, Canada, 5-9 April), 169-174. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Chapanis, A. (1991). The business case for human factors in informatics. In Shackel, B., and Richardson, S. (Eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 21-37. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Chapanis, A., and Budurka, W. J. (1990). Specifying human-computer interface requirements. Behaviour & Information Technology 9 , 6, 479-492.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., and Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proc. ACM CHI'88 Conf. (Washington, DC, 15-19 May), 213-218. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Clarke, L. (1991). The use of scenarios by user interface designers. In Diaper, D., and Hammond, N. (Eds.), People and Computers VI , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 103-115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Coleman, W. D., Williges, R. C., and Wixon, D. R. (1985). Collecting detailed user evaluations of software interfaces. Proc. Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting , 240-244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Comstock, E. M., and Clemens, E. A. (1987). Perceptions of computer manuals: A view from the field. Proc. Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting , 139-143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Conklin, J., and Begeman, M. L. (1988). gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Trans. Office Information Systems 6 , 4 (October), 303-331. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Conklin, J. E., and Yakemovic, K. C. B. (1991). A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction 6 , 3 and 4, 357-391. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Connally, C. S., and Tullis, T. S. (1986). Evaluating the user interface: Videotaping without a camera. Proc. Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting , 1029-1033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Cool, C., Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., and Lowery, C. M. (1992). Iterative design of video communication systems. Proc. ACM CSCW'92 Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Toronto, Canada, 1-4 November), 25-32. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Cordes, R. E. (1993). The relationship between post-task and continuous-vicarious ratings of difficulty. Intl. J. Human-Computer Interaction 5 , 2, 115-127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Cordingley, E. (1989). Knowledge elicitation techniques for knowledge based systems. In Diaper, D. (Ed.), Knowledge Elicitation: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, U.K. 89-172. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Cotterman, W. W., and Kumar, K. (1989). User cube: A taxonomy of end users. Communications of the ACM 32 , 11 (November), 1313-1320. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Curtis, B. (1981). Substantiating programmer variability. Proceedings of the IEEE 69 , 7 (July), 846.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Czaja, S. J. (1988). Microcomputers and the elderly. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 581-598.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Czaja, S. J., Hammond, K., Blascovich, J. J., and Swede, H. (1989). Age related differences in learning to use a text-editing system. Behaviour & Information Technology 8 , 4, 309-319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Dale, E., and O'Rourke, J. (1981). The Living Word Vocabulary. World Book-Childcraft International, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Dayton, T., Barr, B., Burke, P. A., Cohill, A. M., Day, M. C., Dray, S., Ehrlich, K., Fitzsimmons, L. A., Henneman, R. L., Hornstein, S. B., Karat, J., Kliger, J., Löwgren, J., Rensch, J., Sellers, M., and Smith, M. R. (1993). Skills needed by user-centered design practitioners in real software development environments: Report on the CH'92 workshop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 25 , 3 (July), 16-31. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. de Baar, D., Foley, J., and Mullet, K. (1992). Coupling application design and user interface design. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 259-266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. de Souza, F., and Bevan, N. (1990). The use of guidelines in menu interface design. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 435-440. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Furnas, G. W., and Harshman, R. A. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the Society for Information Science 41 , 6, 391-407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. del Galdo, E. (1990). Internationalization and translation: Some guidelines for the design of human-computer interfaces. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Designing User Interfaces for International Use. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 71-102. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Denning, S., Hoiem, D., Simpson, M., and Sullivan, K. (1990). The value of thinking-aloud protocols in industry: A case study at Microsoft Corporation. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting , 1285-1289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Desurvire, H. W., Kondziela, J. M., and Atwood, M. E. (1992). What is gained and lost when using evaluation methods other than empirical testing. In Monk, A., Diaper, D., and Harrison, M. D. (Eds.), People and Computers VII , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 89-102. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Diaper, D. (Ed.) (1989a). Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, U.K. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Diaper, D. (1989b). Task observation for human-computer interaction. In Diaper, D. (Ed.), Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, U.K. 210-237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Diaper, D., and Johnson, P. (1989). Task analysis for knowledge descriptions: Theory and application in training. In Long, J., and Whitefield, A. (Eds.), Cognitive Ergonomics and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 191-224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. DIN (1988). Bildschirmarbeitsplätze: Grundsätze ergonomischer Dialoggestaltung ("VDU work stations: Principles of ergonomic dialogue design," in German), Deutsches Institut für Normung DIN 66234, Teil 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Doane, S. M., Pellegrino, J. W., and Klatzky, R. L. (1990). Expertise in a computer operating system: Conceptualization and performance. Human-Computer Interaction 5 , 2 and 3, 267-304. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Doane, S. M., McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, W., Poison, P. G., and Clawson, D. M. (1992). Prompt comprehension in UNIX command production. Memory & Cognition 20 , 4 (July), 327-343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Dourish, P., and Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 541-547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Doyle, J. R. (1990). Naive users and the Lotus interface: A field study Behaviour & Information Technology 9 , 1, 81-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Draper, S. W. (1984). The nature of expertise in Unix. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'84 First Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (London, U.K., 4-7 September), 465-471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Dreger, L., Grauman, A., Ho, T., Howlett, V., Lehmann, R., Malamud, M., Marceau, R., and Tobey, C. (1992). An object-oriented evolution of Windows: Information at your fingertips (videotape). ACM SIGGRAPH Video Review 78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Dubberly, H., and Mitsch, D. (1987). Knowledge Navigator (videotape). ACM SIGGRAPH Video Review 79 (anthology published 1992; tape made in 1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Duffy, T. M., Palmer, J. E., and Mehlenbacher, B. (1992). Online Help: Design and Evaluation. Ab lex, Norwood, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Duis, D., and Johnson, J. (1990). Improving user-interface responsiveness despite performance limitations. Proc. IEEE Computer Society Intl. Conference (February, San Francisco, CA), 380-386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Durham, I., Lamb, D. A., and Saxe, J. B. (1983). Spelling correction in user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 26 , 10 (October), 764-773. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Durrett, H. J. (Ed.) (1987). Color and the Computer. Academic Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Durrett, H. J., and Trezona, J. (1982). How to use color displays effectively. BYTE 7 , 4 (April), 50-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Dye, R., Arnott, J. L., Newell, A. F., Carter, K. E. P., and Cruikshank, G. (1990). Simulating the speech operated user interfaces of the future: The case of listening typewriters. In Life, M. A., Narborough-Hall, C. S., and Hamilton, W. I. (Eds.), Simulation and the User Interface. Taylor & Francis, London, U.K. 159-168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Dzida, W. (1989). The development of ergonomie standards. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 20 , 3 (January), 35-43. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Eberts, R. E., and MacMillan, A. G. (1987). Longitudinal study of a distributed system. Proc. Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting , 704-708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Edgerton, E. A., Draper, S. W., and Barton, S. B. (1993). Feature checklists in HCI: Some basic results. Adjunct Proceedings ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (24-29 April), 189-190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Edmonds, E. (1991). The Separable User Interface. Academic Press, London, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Edwards, A. D. N. (1988). The design of auditory interfaces for visually disabled users. Proc. ACM CHI'88 Conf. (Washington, DC, 15-19 May), 83-88. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Efe, K. (1987). A proposed solution to the problem of levels in error-message generation. Communications of the ACM 30 , 11 (November), 948-955. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Egan, D. E. (1988). Individual differences in human-computer interaction. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 543-568.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Egan, D. E., Remde, J. R., Gomez, L. M., Landauer, T. K., Eberhardt, J., and Lochbaum, C. C. (1989). Formative design-evaluation of SuperBook. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 7 , 1 (January), 30-57. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Egan, T. (1991). Oregon literacy test shows many lag in basics. The New York Times (April 24), p. A23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Egido, C., and Patterson, J. (1988). Pictures and category labels as navigational aids for catalog browsing. Proc. ACM CHI'88 Conf. (15-19 May, Washington, DC), 127-132. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Ehrenreich, S. L. (1985). Computer abbreviations: Evidence and synthesis. Human Factors 27 , 143-155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. Ehrlich, K., Butler, M. B., and Pernice, K. (1994). Getting the whole team into usability testing. IEEE Software 11 , 1 (January), 89-91. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Engelbart, D. (1988). The augmented knowledge workshop. In Goldberg, A. (Ed.), A History of Personal Workstations. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 185-236. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Farkas, D. K. (1993). The role of balloon help. ACM SIGDOC *The Journal of Computer Documentation 17 , 2 (May), 3-19. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Farrand, A. B., and Wolfe, S. J. (1992). On-line help: Are we tossing the users a lifesaver or an anchor? Digest of ACM CHI'92 Conf. Posters and Short Talks (Monterey, CA, 5 May), 21. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. Fath, J. L., and Bias, R. G. (1992). Taking the task out of task analysis. Proc. Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting , 379-383.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Feiner, S. K., and McKeown, K. R. (1990). Generating coordinated multimedia explanations. Proc. IEEE Conf. on AI Applications (Santa Barbara, CA, 5-9 March), 290-296. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Feiner, S. K., and McKeown, K. R. (1991). COMET: Generating coordinated multimedia explanations. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 449-450. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Fisher, D. L., Yungkurth, E. J., and Moss, S. M. (1990). Optimal menu hierarchy design: Syntax and semantics. Human Factors 32 , 6 (June), 655-683. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Fisher, P., and Sless, D. (1990). Information design methods and productivity in the insurance industry. Information Design Journal 6 , 2, 103-129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. Flohr, U. (1994). Teutonizing the Newton. BYTE 19 , 3 (March), 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Fowler, C. J. H., and Murray, D. (1987). Gender and cognitive style differences at the human-computer interface. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'87 Second Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Stuttgart, Germany, 1-4 September), 709-714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Frese, M., Brodbeck, F., Heinbokel, T., Mooser, C., Schleiffenbaum, E., and Thiemann, R (1991). Errors in training computer skills: On the positive function of errors. Human-Computer Interaction 6 , 1, 77-93. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Furnas, G. W. (1985). Experience with an adaptive indexing scheme. Proc. ACM CHI'85 Conf. (San Francisco, CA, 14-18 April), 131-135. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., and Dumais, S. T. (1987). The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM 30 , 11 (November), 964-971. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Gaines, B. R. (1984). From ergonomics to the fifth generation: 30 years of human-computer interaction studies. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'84 First Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (London, U.K., 4-7 September), 3-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Gaines, B. R., and Shaw, M. L. G. (1986a). From timesharing to the sixth generation: The development of human-computer interaction. Part I. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 24 , 1 January), 1-27. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. Gaines, B. R., and Shaw, M. L. G. (1986b). Foundations of dialog engineering: The development of human-computer interaction. Part II. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 24 , 2 (February), 101-123. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Gantt, M., and Nardi, B. A. (1992). Gardeners and gurus: Patterns of cooperation among CAD users. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 107-117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  147. Garber, S. R., and Grunes, M. B. (1992). The art of search: A study of art directors. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 157-163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  148. Gates, B. (1990). Information at Your Fingertips (videotape). Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  149. Gaver, W. W. (1989). The SonicFinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human-Computer Interaction 4 , 1, 67-94. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. Gaylin, K. B. (1986). How are windows used? Some notes on creating an empirically-based windowing benchmark task. Proc. ACM CHI'86 Conf. (Boston, MA, 13-17 April), 96-100. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. Gilmore, D. J. (1991). Visibility: A dimensional analysis. In Diaper, D., and Hammond, N. (Eds.), People and Computers VI , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 317-329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. Goldberg, A. (Ed.) (1988). A History of Personal Workstations. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. Goldman, A. E., and McDonald, S. S. (1987). The Group Depth Interview: Principles and Practice. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. Gomez, L. M., Egan, D. E., and Bowers, C. (1986). Learning to use a text editor: Some learner characteristics that predict success. Human-Computer Interaction 2 , 1, 1-23. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. Good, M. (1989). Developing the XUI style. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency , Academic Press, Boston, MA. 57-73. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  156. Good, M., Spine, T. M., Whiteside, J., and George, P. (1986). User-derived impact analysis as a tool for usability engineering. Proc. ACM CHI'86 Conf. (Boston, MA, 13-17 April), 241-246. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. Gould, J. D., and Lewis, C. H. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM 28 , 3 (March), 300-311. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. Gould, J. D., Conti, J., and Hovanyecz, T. (1983). Composing letters with a simulated listening typewriter. Communications of the ACM 26 , 4 (April), 295-308. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. Gould, J. D., Boies, S. J., Levy, S., Richards, J. T., and Schoonard, J. (1987). The 1984 Olympic Message System: A test of behavioral principles of system design. Communications of the ACM 30 , 9 (September), 758-769. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. Gould, J. D., Boies, S. J., and Lewis, C. (1991). Making usable, useful, productivity-enhancing computer applications. Communications of the ACM 34 , 1 (January), 74-85. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  161. Gray, B. G., Barfield, W., Haselkorn, M., Spyridakis, J., and Conquest, L. (1990). The design of a graphics-based traffic information system based on user requirements. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting , 603-606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  162. Gray, W. D., John, B. E., and Atwood, M. E. (1992). The precis of project Ernestine, or, an overview of a validation of GOMS. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 307-312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. Green, A. J. K., and Barnard, P. J. (1990). Iconic interfacing: The role of icon distinctiveness and fixed or variable screen locations. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 457-462. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. Greenbaum, T. L. (1988). The Practical Handbook and Guide to Focus Group Research. D. C. Heath & Co., Lexington, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. Greenbaum, T. L. (1993). The Handbook for Focus Group Research. Lexington Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  166. Greenberg, S. (1993). The Computer User as Toolsmith: The Use, Reuse, and Organization of Computer-Eased Tools. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. Greenberg, S., and Whitten, I. H. (1985). Adaptive personalized interfaces--A question of viability. Behaviour & Information Technology 4 , 1 (January), 31-45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. Greenberg, S., and Whitten, I. H. (1988). How users repeat their actions on computers: Principles for design of history mechanisms. Proc. ACM CHI'88 Conf. (Washington, DC, 15-19 May), 171-178. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. Greif, I. (1992). Designing group-enabled applications: A spreadsheet example. In Coleman, D. (Ed.), Groupware'92 , Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA. 515-525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. Greif, S. (1991). Organisational issues and task analysis. In Shackel, B., and Richardson, S. (Eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 247-266. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. Griffith, D. (1990). Computer access for persons who are blind or visually impaired: Human factors issues. Human Factors 32 , 4 (August), 467-475. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. Proc. ACM CSCW'88 Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Portland, OR, 26-28 September), 85-93. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  173. Grudin, J. (1989). The case against user interface consistency. Communications of the ACM 32 , 10 (October), 1164-1173. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. Grudin, J. (1990a). The computer reaches out: The historical continuity of interface design. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 261-268. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  175. Grudin, J. (1990b). Obstacles to user involvement in interface design in large product development organizations. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 219-224. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  176. Grudin, J. (1991a). Interactive systems: Bridging the gaps between developers and systems. IEEE Computer 24 , 4 (April), 59-69. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. Grudin, J. (1991b). Systematic sources of suboptimal interface design in large product development organizations. Human-Computer Interaction 6 , 2, 147-196. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. Grudin, J. (1992). Utility and usability: Research issues and development contexts. Interacting with Computers 4 , 2 (August), 209-217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  179. Grudin, J. (1993). Interface: An evolving concept. Communications of the ACM 36 , 4 (April), 110-119. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  180. Grudin, J., and Barnard, P. (1985). When does an abbreviation become a word? and related questions. Proc. ACM CHI'85 Conf. (San Francisco, CA, 14-18 April), 121-125. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  181. Grudin, J., Ehrlich, S. F., and Shriner, R. (1987). Positioning human factors in the user interface development chain. Proc. ACM CHI+GI'87 Conf. (Toronto, Canada, 5-9 April), 125-131. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. Hackman, G. S., and Biers, D. W. (1992). Team usability testing: Are two heads better than one? Proc. Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting , 1205-1209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. Hakiel, S. R., and Easterby, R. S. (1987). Methods for the design and evaluation of icons for human-computer interfaces. Proc. IEE 2nd Intl. Conf. Command, Control, Communications and Management Information Systems (Bournemouth, U.K., 1-3 April), 48-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. Halasz, F., and Moran, T. P. (1982). Analogy considered harmful. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computer Systems (Gaithersburg, MD, 15-17 March), 383-386. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. Halstead-Nussloch, R. (1989). The design of phone-based interfaces for consumers. Proc. ACM CHI'89 Conf. (Austin, TX, 30 April-4 May), 347-352. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  186. Happ, A. J. (1994). Usability foresight: Strategic usability planning. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 26 , 1 (January), 17-21. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  187. Harris, D. H. (1984). Human factors success stories. Proc. Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting , 1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  188. Hartson, H. R., and Hix, D. (1989). Human-computer interface development: Concepts and systems for its management. ACM Computing Surveys 21 , 1 (March), 5-93. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  189. Hartson, H. R., and Smith, E. C. (1991). Rapid prototyping in human-computer interface development. Interacting with Computers 3 , 1, 51-91. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. Hartson, H. R., Siochi, A. C., and Hix, D. (1990). The UAN: A user-oriented representation for direct manipulation interface. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 8 , 3 (July), 181-203. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  191. Henderson, D. A., and Card, S. K. (1986). Rooms: The use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface. ACM Transactions on Graphics 5 , 3, 211-243. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  192. Hewett, T. T., and Scott, S. (1987). The use of thinking-out-loud and protocol analysis in development of a process model of interactive database searching. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'87 Second Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Stuttgart, Germany, 1-4 September), 51-56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  193. Hill, W. C., and Hollan, J. D. (1992). Edit wear and read wear. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 3-9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  194. Hix, D. (1990). Generations of user-interface management systems. IEEE Software 7 , 5 (September), 77-87. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  195. Hix, D., and Schulman, R. S. (1991). Human-computer interface development tools: A methodology for their evaluation. Communications of the ACM 34 , 3 (March), 74-87. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  196. Hodges, M. E., Davis, B. H., and Sasnett, R. M. (1989). Investigations in multimedia design documentation. In Barrett, E. (Ed.), The Society of Text: Hypertext, Hypermedia, and the Social Construction of Information. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 79-89. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  197. Hoffberg, L. I. (1991). Designing user interface guidelines for time-shift programming on a video cassette recorder (VCR). Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting , 501-504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  198. Hoiem, D. E., and Sullivan, K. D. (1994). Designing and using integrated data collection and analysis tools: Challenges and considerations. Behaviour & Information Technology 13 , 1&2 (January-April), 160-170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  199. Holdaway, K., and Bevan, N. (1989). User system interaction standards. Computer Communications 12 , 2 (April), 97-102. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  200. Hollan, J., and Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 119-125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  201. Holleran, P. A. (1991). A methodological note on pitfalls in usability testing. Behaviour & Information Technology 10 , 5 (September-October 1991), 345-357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  202. Horton, W. K. (1990). Designing and Writing Online Documentation: Help Files to Hypertext. Wiley, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  203. Houde, S. (1992). Iterative design of an interface for easy 3-D direct manipulation. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 135-142. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  204. Houghton, R. C., Jr. (1984). Online help systems: A conspectus. Communications of the ACM 27 , 2 (February), 126-133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  205. House, C. H., and Price, R. L. (1991). The return map: Tracking product teams. Harvard Business Review (January-February), 92-100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  206. Ishii, H. (1990). Cross-cultural communication and computer-supported cooperative work. Whole Earth Review , No. 69 (Winter 1990), 48-52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  207. Jacob, R. J. K. (1991). The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: What you look at is what you get. ACM Trans. Information Systems 9, 2 (April), 152-169. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  208. Jeffries, R., Miller, J. R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K. M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 119-124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  209. John, B. E., Miller, P. L., Myers, B. A., Neuwirth, C. M., and Shafer, S. A. (1992). Human-computer interaction in the School of Computer Science. Technical Report CMU-CS-92-193 , Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Available by anonymous FTP from reports.adm.cs.emu.edu [128.2.218.42] as/1992/CMU-CS-92-193.ps Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  210. Johnson, C. W. (1991). Applying temporal logic to support the specification and prototyping of concurrent multi-user interfaces. In Diaper, D., and Hammond, N. (Eds.), People and Computers VI , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 145-156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  211. Johnson, J. A., Nardi, B. A., Zarmer, C. L., and Miller, J. R. (1993). ACE: Building interactive graphical applications. Communications of the ACM 36 , 4 (April), 41-55. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  212. Johnson, H., and Johnson, P. (1990). Designers-identified requirements for tools to support task analysis. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 259-264. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  213. Johnson, P. (1992). Human Computer Interaction: Psychology, Task Analysis and Software Engineering. McGraw-Hill, London, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  214. Johnson, W., Jellinek, H. D., Klotz, L., Rao, R., and Card, S. K. (1993). Bridging the paper and electronic worlds: The paper user interface. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 507-512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  215. Jordan, D. S., Russell, D. M., Jensen, A.-M. S., and Rogers, R. A. (1989). Facilitating the development of representations in hypertext with IDE. Proc. ACM Hypertext'89 Conf. (Pittsburgh, PA, 5-8 November), 93-104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  216. Jørgensen, A. H. (1989). Using the thinking-aloud method in system development. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M. J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. 743-750. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  217. Jørgensen, A. H., and Sauer, A. (1990). The personal touch: A study of users' customization practice. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 549-554. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  218. Kacmar, C. J., and Carey, J. M. (1991). Assessing the usability of icons in user interfaces. Behaviour & Information Technology 10 , 6, 443-457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  219. Kain, H., and Nielsen, J. (1991). Estimating the market diffusion curve for hypertext. Impact Assessment Bulletin 9 , 1-2 (Spring), 145-157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  220. Karat, C. (1990). Cost-benefit analysis of iterative usability testing. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 351-356. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  221. Karat, C., and Karat, J. (Eds.) (1992). Some dialogue on scenarios. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 24 , 4 (October), 7-17. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  222. Karat, C., Campbell, R., and Fiegel, T. (1992). Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, California, 3-7 May), 397-404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  223. Karat, J., and Bennett, J. L. (1990). Supporting effective and efficient design meetings. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 365-370. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  224. Karat, J., and Bennett, J. L. (1991a). Using scenarios in design meetings--A case study example. In Karat, J. (Ed.), Taking Software Design Seriously: Practical Techniques for Human-Computer Interaction Design. Academic Press, Boston, MA. 63-94. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  225. Karat, J., and Bennett, J. (1991b). Working within the design process-- Supporting effective and efficient design. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human Computer Interface. Cambridge University Press, Boston, MA. 269-285. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  226. Karis, D., and Zeigler, B. L. (1989). Evaluation of mobile telecommunication systems. Proc. Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting , 205-209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  227. Karlin, J. E., and Klemmer, E. T. (1989). An interview. In Klemmer, E. T. (Ed.), Ergonomics: Harness the Power of Human Factors in Your Business. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 197-201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  228. Kato, T. (1986). What 'question-asking protocols' can say about the user interface. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 25 , 6 (December), 659-673. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  229. Kay, A., and Goldberg, A. (1977). Personal dynamic media. IEEE Computer 10 , 3 (March), 31-41. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  230. Kay, R. H. (1989). A practical and theoretical approach to assessing computer attitudes: The computer attitude measure (CAM). Journal on Research on Computing in Education , 456-463. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  231. Kearsley, G. (1988). Online Help Systems: Design and Implementation. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  232. Kellogg, W. A. (1987). Conceptual consistency in the user interface: Effects on user performance. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'87 Second Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Stuttgart, Germany, 1-4 September), 389-394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  233. Kellogg, W. A. (1989). The dimensions of consistency. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency. Academic Press, Boston, MA. 9-20. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  234. Kellogg, W. A. (1990). Qualitative artifact analysis. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 193-198. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  235. Kennedy, S. (1989). Using video in the BNR usability lab. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 21 , 2 (October), 92-95. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  236. Kensing, F., and Munk-Madsen, A. (1993). PD: Structure in the toolbox. Communications of the ACM 36 , 4 (April), 78-85. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  237. Kim, W. C., and Foley, J. D. (1990). DON: User interface presentation design assistant. Proc. ACM UIST'90 Third Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Snowbird, UT, 3-5 October), 10-20. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  238. Kincaid, J. P., Thomas, M., Strain, K., Couret, I., and Bryden, K. (1990). Controlled English for international technical communication. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting , 815-819.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  239. Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In Pearson, P. D. (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research. Longman, New York, NY. 681-744.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  240. Kurlander, D., and Feiner, S. (1992). A history-based macro by example system. Proc. ACM UIST'92 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Monterey, CA, 15-18 November), 99-106. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  241. Kurtenbach, G., and Hulteen, E. A. (1990). Gestures in human-computer communication. In Laurel, B. (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design , Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 309-317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  242. LaLomia, M. J., and Sidowski, J. B. (1990). Measurements of computer satisfaction, literacy, and aptitudes: A review. Intl. J. Human-Computer Interaction 2 , 3, 231-253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  243. LaLomia, M. J., and Sidowski, J. B. (1991). Measurements of computer attitudes: A review. Intl. J. Human-Computer Interaction 3 , 2, 171-197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  244. Lamb, J. (1988). Computer crashes and stranded travellers--air traffic control in Britain. New Scientist (8 September), 65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  245. Landauer, T. K. (1988a). Relations between cognitive psychology and computer system design. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1-25. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  246. Landauer, T. K. (1988b). Research methods in human-computer interaction. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 905-928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  247. Landauer, T. K. (1994). The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability and Productivity. Book under preparation. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  248. Landauer, T. K., and Nachbar, D. W. (1985). Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: Breadth, depth and width. Proc. ACM CHI'85 Conf. (San Francisco, CA, 14-18 April), 73-78. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  249. Lederer, A. L., and Prasad, J. (1992). Nine management guidelines for better cost estimating. Communications of the ACM 35 , 2 (February), 51-59. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  250. Lee, A. (1992). User support: Considerations, features, and issues. In Hartson, H. R., and Hix, D. (Eds.), Advances in Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 3 , Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 184-228. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  251. Lee, J. A. N., McCarthy, J., and Licklider, J. C. R. (1992). Time-sharing at MIT. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 14 , 1, 13-32. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  252. Lee, M. P., Darling, M. W. M., Peacock, D., and Jeffreys, S. (1990). Simulating user interfaces with dBase III+. In Life, M. A., Narborough-Hall, C. S., and Hamilton, W. I. (Eds.), Simulation and the User Interface. Taylor & Francis, London, U.K. 181-195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  253. LeFevre, J.-A., and Dixon, P. (1986). Do written instructions need examples? Cognition and Instruction 3 , 1 , 1-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  254. Lehmann, E. L., and D'Abrera, H. J. M. (1975). Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Holden-Day Inc., San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  255. Lewis, C. (1982). Using the 'thinking-aloud' method in cognitive interface design. Research Report RC9265 , IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  256. Lewis, C., Hair, D., and Schoenberg, V. (1989). Generalization, consistency, and control. Proc. ACM CHI'89 Conf. (Austin, TX, 30 April-4 May), 1-5. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  257. Lewis, C., Poison, P., Wharton, C., and Rieman, J. (1990). Testing a walk-through methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 235-241. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  258. Lewis, J. R. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of the post-study system usability questionnaire: The PSSUQ. Proc. Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting , 1259-1263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  259. Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Trans. Human Factors in Electronics 1 , 1 (March), 4-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  260. Life, M. A., Narborough-Hall, C. S., and Hamilton, W I. (Eds.) (1990). Simulation and the User Interface. Taylor & Francis, London, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  261. Lindgaard, G. (1991). Impressions from HUSAT. CHISIG Newsletter (Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of the Ergonomics Society of Australia) (August), 1-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  262. Lindgaard, G., Chessari, J., and Hisen, E. (1987). Icons in telecommunications: What makes pictorial information comprehensible to the user? Australian Telecommunication Research 21 , 2, 17-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  263. Lodding, K. N. (1983). Iconic interfacing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 3 , 2 (March-April), 11-20. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  264. Loshe, G., Walker, N., Biolsi, K., and Rueter, H. (1991). Classifying graphical information. Behaviour & Information Technology 10 , 5, 419-436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  265. Löwgren, J., and Nordqvist, T. (1992). Knowledge-based evaluation as design support for graphical user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 181-188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  266. Lund, A. M. (1994). Ameritech's usability laboratory: From prototype to final design. Behaviour & Information Technology 13 , 1&2 (January-April), 67-80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  267. Lunde, K. (1993). Understanding Japanese Information Processing. O'Reilly and Associates, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  268. Mack, R. L., and Burdett, J. M. (1992). When novices elicit knowledge: Question-asking in designing, evaluating and learning to use software. In Hoffman, R. (Ed.), The Psychology of Expertise: Cognitive Research and Empirical AI . Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 245-268. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  269. Mack, R. L., and Nielsen, J. (1987). Software integration in the professional work environment: Observations on requirements, usage, and interface issues. Research Report RC12677 , IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  270. Mack, R. L., and Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability inspection methods. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 25 , 1 (January), 28-33. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  271. Mack, R. L., Lewis, C. H., and Carroll, J. M. (1983). Learning to use word processors: Problems and prospects. ACM Trans. Office Information Systems 1 , 3 (July), 254-271. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  272. Mackay, W. E., and Tatar, D. G. (1989). Introduction to this special issue on video as a research and design tool. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 21 , 2 (October), 48-50. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  273. Mackinlay, J. (1988). Applying a theory of graphical presentation to the graphic design of user interfaces. Proc. ACM UIST'88 First Symposium User Interface Software and Technology (Banff, Canada, 17-19 October), 179-189. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  274. MacLean, A., Young, R. M., and Moran, T. P. (1989). Design rationale: The argument behind the artifact. Proc. ACM CHI'89 Conf. (Austin, TX, 30 April-4 May), 247-252. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  275. MacLean, A., Bellotti, V, Young, R. M., and Moran, T. P. (1991a). Reaching through analogy: A design rationale perspective. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 167-172. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  276. MacLean, A., Bellotti, V, and Moran, T. P. (1991b). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 6 , 3 and 4, 201-250. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  277. Magyar, R. L. (1990). Assessing the icon appropriateness and icon discriminability with a paired-comparison testing procedure. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting , 1204-1208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  278. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., and Srivastava, R. K. (1990). Determination of adopter categories by using innovation diffusion models. Journal of Marketing Research 27 , 1 (February), 37-50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  279. Mantei, M. M. (1989). An HCI continuing education curriculum for industry. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 20 , 3 (January), 16-18. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  280. Mantei, M. M. (1990). The Strauss mouse (videotape). SIGGRAPH Video Review 56 , Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  281. Mantei, M. M., and Teorey, T. J. (1988). Cost/benefit analysis for incorporating human factors in the software lifecycle. Communications of the ACM 31 , 4 (April), 428-439. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  282. Mantei, M. M., Hewett, T., Eason, K., and Preece, J. (1991). Report on the INTERACT'90 workshop on education in HCI: Transcending disciplinary and national boundaries. Interacting with Computers 3 , 2, 232-240. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  283. Marchionini, G. (1989). Making the transition from print to electronic encyclopedia: Adaptation of mental models. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 30 , 6 (June), 591-618. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  284. Marcus, A. (1992). Graphic Design for Electronic Documents and User Interfaces. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  285. Margono, S., and Shneiderman, B. (1987). A study of hie manipulation by novices using commands vs. direct manipulation. Proc. ACM D.C. Chapter 6th Annual Technical Symposium (Washington, DC, 11 June).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  286. Marshall, C., Nelson, C., and Gardiner, M. M. (1987). Design guidelines. In Gardiner, M. M., and Christie, B. (Eds.), Applying Cognitive Psychology to User-Interface Design. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K. 221-278. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  287. Maulsby, D., Greenberg, S., and Mander, R. (1993). Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 277-284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  288. Mayes, J. T., Draper, S. W., McGregor, A. M., and Oatley, K. (1988). Information flow in a user interface: The effect of experience and context on the recall of MacWrite screens. In Jones, D. M., and Winder, R. (Eds.), People and Computers IV. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 275-289. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  289. Mayhew, D. J. (1992). Principles and Guidelines in Software User Interface Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  290. McClelland, I. L., and Brigham, F. R. (1990). Marketing ergonomics--how should ergonomics be packaged? Ergonomics 33 , 5, 519-526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  291. McCrobie, D. (1989). Human factors design considerations for military trains. Proc. Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting , 536-540.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  292. McDonald, J. E., and Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1988). The application of user knowledge to interface design. In Guindon, R. (Ed.), Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction , Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 289-338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  293. McDonald, J. E., Molander, M. E., and Noel, R. W. (1988). Color-coding categories in menus. Proc. ACM CHI'88 Conf. (Washington, DC, 15-19 May), 101-106. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  294. Mercurio, P. J., and Erickson, T. D. (1990). Interactive scientific visualization: An assessment of a virtual reality system. Proc. INTERACT'90 Third IFIP Conference Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 741-745. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  295. Merwin, D. H., Dyre, B. P., Humphrey, D. G , Grimes, J., and Larish, J. F. (1990). The impact of icons and visual effects on learning computer databases. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (Orlando, FL, 8-12 October), 424-428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  296. Miller, R. B. (1968). Response time in man-computer conversational transactions. Proc. AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference Vol. 33 , 267-277. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  297. Mirel, B. (1991). Critical review of experimental research on the usability of hard copy documentation. IEEE Trans. Professional Communication 34 , 2 (June), 109-122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  298. Molich, R., and Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM 33 , 3 (March), 338-348. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  299. Monk, A. (1986). Mode errors: A user-centered analysis and some preventative measures using keying-contingent sounds. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 24 , 4 (April), 313-327. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  300. Monk, A. (1989). The personal browser: A tool for directed navigation in hypertext systems. Interacting with Computers 1 , 2 (August), 190-196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  301. Monmonier, M. (1991). How to Lie with Maps. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  302. Moran, T. P., and Carroll, J. M. (Eds.) (1994). Design Rationale. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  303. Mosier, J. N., and Smith, S. L. (1986). Application of guidelines for designing user interface software. Behaviour & Information Technology 5 , 1 (January-March), 39-46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  304. Mrazek, D., and Rafeld, M. (1992). Integrating human factors on a large scale: 'Product usability champions.' Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 565-570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  305. Muller, M. J. (1991). PICTIVE--An exploration in participatory design. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, La, 28 April-2 May), 225-231. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  306. Muller, M. J. (1992). Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 455-462. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  307. Mulligan, R. M., Altom, M. W., and Simkin, D. K. (1991). User interface design in the trenches: Some tips on shooting from the hips. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 232-236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  308. Mulligan, R. M., Dieli, M., Nielsen, J., Poltrock, S., Rosenberg, D., and Rudman, S. E. (1992). Designing usable systems under real-world constraints: A practitioners forum. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 149- 152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  309. Mullins, P. M., and Treu, S. (1991). Measurement of stress to gauge user satisfaction with features of the computer interface. Behaviour & Information Technology 10 , 4 (July-August), 325-343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  310. Myers, B. A. (1985). The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'85 Conf. (San Francisco, CA, 14- 18 April), 11-17. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  311. Myers, B. A. (1989). User-interface tools: Introduction and survey. IEEE Software 6 , 1 (January), 15-23. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  312. Myers, B. A., and Rosson, M. B. (1992). Survey on user interface programming. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 195-202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  313. Mynatt, E. D., and Edwards, W. K. (1992). Mapping GUIs to auditory interfaces. Proc. ACM UIST'92 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Monterey, CA, 15-18 November), 61-70. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  314. Nagel, D. C. (1988). Human error in aviation operations. In Weiner, E. L., and Nagel, D. C. (Eds.), Human Factors in Aviation. Academic Press, Boston, MA. 263-303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  315. Nardi, B. A., and Miller, J. R. (1991). Twinkling lights and nested loops: Distributed problem solving and spreadsheet development. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 34 , 2 (February), 161-184. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  316. Neal, A. S., and Simons, R. M. (1983). Playback: A method for evaluating the usability of software and its documentation. Proc. ACM CHI'83 Conf. (Boston, MA, 12-15 December), 78-82. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  317. Neal, A. S., and Simons, R. M. (1984). Playback: A method for evaluating the usability of software and its documentation. IBM Systems Journal 23 , 1, 82-96. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  318. Neumann, P. G. (1991). Inside RISKS: Putting on your best interface. Communications of the ACM 34 , 3 (March), 138. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  319. Newell, A. F. (1993). Interfaces for the ordinary and beyond. IEEE Software 10 , 5 (September), 76-78. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  320. Nicol, A. (1990). Interfaces for learning: What do good teachers know that we don't? In Laurel, B. (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 113-122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  321. Nielsen, J. (1986). A virtual protocol model for computer-human interaction. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 24 , 3, 301-312. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  322. Nielsen, J. (1987a). Using scenarios to develop user friendly videotex systems. Proc. NordDATA'87 Joint Scandinavian Computer Conference (Trondheim, Norway, 15-18 June), 133-138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  323. Nielsen, J. (1987b). A user interface case study of the Macintosh. In Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Cognitive Engineering in the Design of Human-Computer Interaction and Expert Systems , Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. 241-248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  324. Nielsen, J. (1987c). Classification of dialog techniques. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 19 , 2 (October), 30-35. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  325. Nielsen, J. (1989a). Prototyping user interfaces using an object-oriented hypertext programming system. Proc. NordDATA'89 Joint Scandinavian Computer Conference (Copenhagen, Denmark, 19-22 June), 485-490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  326. Nielsen, J. (1989b). Usability engineering at a discount. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M. J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 394-401. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  327. Nielsen, J. (1989c). Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency. Academic Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  328. Nielsen, J. (1989d). The matters that really matter for hypertext usability. Proc. ACM Hypertext'89 Conf. (Pittsburgh, PA, 5-8 November), 239-248. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  329. Nielsen, J. (1989e). What do users really want? Intl. J. Human-Computer Interaction 1 , 2, 137-147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  330. Nielsen, J. (1990a). Hypertext and Hypermedia. Academic Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  331. Nielsen, J. (1990b). Big paybacks from 'discount' usability engineering. IEEE Software 7, 3 (May), 107-108. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  332. Nielsen, J. (1990c). A meta-model for interacting with computers. Interacting with Computers 2 , 2 (August), 147-160. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  333. Nielsen, J. (1990d). Paper versus computer implementations as mockup scenarios for heuristic evaluation. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 315-320. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  334. Nielsen, J. (1990e). Traditional dialogue design applied to modern user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 33 , 10 (October), 109-118. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  335. Nielsen, J. (1990f). Designing User Interfaces for International Use. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  336. Nielsen, J. (1990g). Miniatures versus icons as a visual cache for videotex browsing. Behaviour & Information Technology 9 , 6 (Nov.-Dec), 441-449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  337. Nielsen, J. (1990h). International user interfaces: An exercise. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 21 , 4 (April), 50-51. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  338. Nielsen, J. (1990i). The art of navigating through hypertext. Communications of the ACM 33 , 3 (March), 296-310. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  339. Nielsen, J. (1992a). Evaluating the thinking aloud technique for use by computer scientists. In Hartson, H. R., and Hix, D. (Eds.), Advances in Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 3 , Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 69-82. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  340. Nielsen, J. (1992b). The usability engineering life cycle. IEEE Computer 25 , 3 (March), 12-22. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  341. Nielsen, J. (1992c). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 373-380. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  342. Nielsen, J. (1993a). Noncommand user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 36 , 4 (April), 83-99. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  343. Nielsen, J. (1993b). Iterative user interface design. IEEE Computer 26 , 11 (November), 32-41. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  344. Nielsen, J. (1994a). Usability laboratories. Behaviour & Information Technology 13 , 1&2 (January-April), 3-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  345. Nielsen, J. (1994b). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. 25-62. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  346. Nielsen, J. (1994c). Guerrilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. In Bias, R. G., and Mayhew, D. J. (Eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability Academic Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  347. Nielsen, J. (1994d). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proc. ACM CHI'94 Conf. (Boston, MA, April 24-28). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  348. Nielsen, J., and Landauer, T. K. (1993): A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 206-213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  349. Nielsen, J., and Levy, J. (1994). Measuring usability--preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM 37 , 4 (April). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  350. Nielsen, J., and Lyngbaek, U. (1990). Two field studies of hypermedia usability. In McAleese, R., and Green, C. (Eds.), Hypertext: State of the Art. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 64-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  351. Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  352. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1989). Teaching user interface design based on usability engineering. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 21 , 1 (July), 45-48. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  353. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 249-256. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  354. Nielsen, J., and Phillips, V. L. (1993). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: Heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 214-221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  355. Nielsen, J., and Richards, J. T. (1989). The experience of learning and using Smalltalk. IEEE Software 6 , 3 (May), 73-77. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  356. Nielsen, J., and Schaefer, L. (1993). Sound effects as an interface element for older users. Behaviour & Information Technology 12 , 4 (July-August), 208-215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  357. Nielsen, J., Mack, R. L., Bergendorff, K. H., and Grischkowsky, N. L. (1986). Integrated software in the professional work environment: Evidence from questionnaires and interviews. Proc. ACM CHI'86 Conf. (Boston, MA, 13-17 April), 162-167. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  358. Nielsen, J., Frehr, I., and Nymand, H. O. (1991). The learnability of HyperCard as an object-oriented programming system. Behaviour & Information Technology 10 , 2 (March-April), 111-120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  359. Nielsen, J., Bush, R. M., Dayton, T., Mond, N. E., Muller, M. J., and Root, R. W. (1992). Teaching experienced developers to design graphical user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 557-564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  360. Nielsen, J., Desurvire, H., Kerr, R., Rosenberg, D., Salomon, G., Molich, R., and Stewart, T. (1993). Comparative design review: An exercise in parallel design. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 414-417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  361. Nielsen, J., Fernandes, T., Wagner, A., Wolf, R., and Ehrlich, K. (1994). Diversified parallel design: Contrasting design aproaches. ACM CHI'94 Conference Companion (Boston, MA, April 24-28). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  362. Nolan, P. R. (1989). Designing screen icons: Ranking and matching studies. Proc. Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting , 380-384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  363. Nolan, P. R. (1991). The design of keyboard templates. Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting , 486-490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  364. Norman, D. A. (1983). Design rules based on analyses of human error. Communications of the ACM 26 , 4 (April), 254-258. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  365. Nussbaum, B., and Neff, R. (1991). I can't work this thing. Business Week (29 April), 58-66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  366. Nyce, J. M., and Kahn, P. (Eds.) (1991). From Memex to Hypertext: Vannevar Bush and the Mind's Machine. Academic Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  367. Nygren, E., Lind, M., Johnson, M., and Sandblad, B. (1992). The art of the obvious. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 235-239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  368. O'Donnell, P. J., Scobie, G., and Baxter, I. (1991). The use of focus groups as an evaluation technique in HCI. In Diaper, D., and Hammond, N. (Eds.), People and Computers VI. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 211-224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  369. Olsen, D. R. (1990). Propositional production systems for dialog description. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 57-63. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  370. Olsen, D. R. (1991). User Interface Management Systems: Models and Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  371. Olsen, D. R. (1992). Bookmarks: An enhanced scroll bar. ACM Trans. Graphics 11 , 3 (July), 291-295. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  372. Olsen, D. R., and Haiversen, B. W. (1988). Interface usage measurements in a user interface management system. Proc. ACM UIST'88 First Symposium User Interface Software and Technology (Banff, Canada, 17-19 October), 102-108. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  373. Olson, J. R., and Nilsen, E. (1987-88). Analysis of the cognition involved in spreadsheet software interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 3 , 4, 309-349. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  374. Olson, J. R., and Olson, G. M. (1990). The growth of cognitive modeling in human-computer interaction since GOMS. Human-Computer Interaction 5 , 2 and 3, 221-265. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  375. O'Malley, C. E., Draper, S. W., and Riley, M. S. (1984). Constructive interaction: A method for studying human-computer-human interaction. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'84 First Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (London, U.K., 4-7 September), 269-274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  376. Paap, K. R., and Roske-Hofstrand, R. J. (1988). Design of menus. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 205-235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  377. Pausch, R. (1991). Virtual reality on five dollars a day. In Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 265-270. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  378. Payne, S. J., and Green, T. R. G. (1986). Task-action grammars: A model of the mental representation of task languages. Human-Computer Interaction 2 , 2, 93-133. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  379. Payne, S. J., and Green, T. R. G. (1989). The structure of command languages: An experiment on task-action grammar. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 30 , 2, 213-234. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  380. Pedhazur, E. J., and Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  381. Perlman, G. (1988). Teaching user interface development to software engineers. Proc. Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting , 391-394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  382. Perlman, G. (1989). Coordinating consistency of user interfaces, code, online help, and documentation with multilingual/multitarget software specification. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency , Academic Press, Boston, MA. 35-55. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  383. Perlman, G. (1990). Teaching user-interface development. IEEE Software 7, 6 (November), 85-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  384. Perlman, G. (1991). The HCI bibliography project, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 23 , 3 (July), 15-20. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  385. Perratore, E., Thompson, T., Udell, J., and Malloy, R. (1993). Fighting fatware. BYTE 18 , 4 (April), 98-108. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  386. Perry, T. S., and Voelcker, J. (1989). Of mice and menus: Designing the user-friendly interface. IEEE Spectrum 29 , 9 (September), 46-51. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  387. Peterson, J. L. (1980). Computer programs for detecting and correcting spelling errors. Communications of the ACM 23 , 12 (December), 676-687. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  388. Polson, P. G. (1988). The consequences of consistent and inconsistent user interfaces. In Guindon, R. (Ed.), Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction , Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 59-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  389. Poison, P. G., Muncher, E., and Engelbeck, G. (1986). A test of a common elements theory of transfer. Proc. ACM CHI'86 Conf. (Boston, MA, 13-17 April), 78-83. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  390. Poltrock, S. E. (1994). Participant-observer studies of user interface design and development. In Rudisill, M., McKay, T., Lewis, C., and Poison, P. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interface Design: Success Cases, Emerging Methods, and Real-World Context , Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  391. Potosnak, K. M., Hayes, P. J., Rosson, M. B., Schneider, M. L., and Whiteside, J. A. (1986). Classifying users: A hard look at some controversial issues. Proc. ACM CHI'86 Conf. (Boston, MA, 13-17 April), 84-88. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  392. Potter, S. S., Cook, R. I., Woods, D. D., and McDonald, J. S. (1990). The role of human factors guidelines in designing usable systems: A case study of operating room equipment. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (Orlando, FL, 8-12 October), 392-395.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  393. Preece, J., and Keller, L. S. (1990). Why, what and how? Issues in the development of an HCI training course. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 3-7. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  394. Preece, J., and Keller, L. S. (1991). Teaching the practitioners: Developing a distance learning postgraduate HCI course. Interacting with Computers 3 , 1, 92-118. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  395. Ramsey, H. R., and Grimes, J. D. (1983). Human factors in interactive computer dialog. In Williams, M. E. (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 18 , American Society for Information Science, 29-59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  396. Rappaport, A. S., and Halevi, S. (1991). The computerless computer company. Harvard Business Review 69 , 4 (July-August), 69-80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  397. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 13 , 3 (May/June), 257-266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  398. Rauterberg, M. (1992). An empirical comparison of menu-selection (CUI) and desktop (GUI) computer programs carried out by beginners and experts. Behaviour & Information Technology 11 , 4 (July-August), 227-236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  399. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  400. Reed, S. (1992). Who defines usability? You do! PC/Computing 5 , 12 (December), 220-232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  401. Reisner, P. (1981). Formal grammar and human factors design of an interactive graphics system. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering SE-7 , 2, 229-240. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  402. Reisner, P. (1990). What is inconsistency? Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 175-181. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  403. Reitman, P. (1988). Streamlining your documentation using quick references. IEEE Trans. Professional Communication 31 , 2 (June), 75-83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  404. Rettig, M. (1991). Nobody reads documentation. Communications of the ACM 34 , 7 (July), 19-24. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  405. Rheingold, H. (1985). Tools for Thought: The People and Ideas Behind the Next Computer Revolution. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  406. Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual Reality. Summit Books, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  407. Rhyne, J. R., and Wolf, C. G. (1993). Recognition-based user interfaces. In Hartson, H. R., and Hix, D. (Eds.), Advances in Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 4. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 191-250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  408. Rice, J. F. (1991). Display color coding: 10 rules of thumb. IEEE Software 8 , 1 (January), 86-88. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  409. Rideout, T. (1991). Changing your methods from the inside. IEEE Software 8 , 3 (May), 99-100, 111. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  410. Roach, J. W., and Nickson, M. (1983). Formal specifications for modeling and developing human/computer interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'83 Conf. (Boston, MA, 12-15 December), 35-39. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  411. Robertson, G. G , Card, S. K., and Mackinlay, J. D. (1993). Information visualization using 3D interactive animation. Communications of the ACM 36 , 4 (April), 57-71. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  412. Rock, I., and Palmer, S. (1990). The legacy of gestalt psychology. Scientific American 263 , 6 (December), 84-90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  413. Rogers, Y. (1986). Evaluating the meaningfulness of icon sets to represent command operations. In Harrison, M. D., and Monk, A. F. (Eds.), People and Computers: Designing for Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 586-603. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  414. Rogers, Y (1989). Icons at the interface: Their usefulness. Interacting with Computers 1 , 1 (April), 105-117. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  415. Root, R. W., and Draper, S. (1983). Questionnaires as a software evaluation tool. Proc. ACM CHI'83 Conf. (Boston, MA, 12-15 December), 83-87. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  416. Rosenberg, D. (1989). A cost benefit analysis for corporate user interface standards: What price to pay for a consistent 'look and feel'? In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency. Academic Press, Boston, MA. 21-34. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  417. Rosenberg, J. K., and Moran, T. P. (1984). Generic commands. In Proc. INTERACT'84 First IFIP Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (London, U.K., 4-7 September), 245-249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  418. Rosson, M. B. (1984). Effects of experience on learning, using, and evaluating a text-editor. Human Factors 26 , 4 (August), 463-475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  419. Rowley, D. E., and Rhoades, D. G. (1992). The cognitive jogthrough: A fast-paced user interface evaluation procedure. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 389-395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  420. Russo, P., and Boor, S. (1993). How fluent is your interface? Designing for international users. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 342-347. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  421. Salasoo, A. (1990). Towards usable icon sets: A case study from telecommunications engineering. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting , 203-207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  422. Sandewall, E. (1978). Programming in the interactive environment: The LISP experience. ACM Computing Surveys 10 , 1 (March), 35-71. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  423. Sassone, P. G. (1987). Cost-benefit methodology for office systems. ACM Trans. Office Information Systems 5 , 3 (July), 273-289. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  424. Schiele, F., and Green, T. (1990). HCI formalisms and cognitive psychology: The case of task-action grammar. In Harrison, M., and Thimbleby, H. (Eds.), Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 9-62. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  425. Schleifer, L. M. (1990). System response time and method of pay: Cardiovascular stress effects in computer-based tasks. Ergonomics 33 , 1495-1509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  426. Schmidt, K. (1988). Functional analysis instrument. In Schaefer, G., Hirschheim, R., Harper, M., Hansjee, R., Domke, M., and Bjorn-Andersen, N. (Eds.), Functional Analysis of Office Requirements: A Multiperspective Approach. Wiley, Chichester, U.K. 261-289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  427. Schrier, J. R. (1992). Reducing stress associated with participating in a usability test. Proc. Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting , 1210-1214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  428. Sculley, J. (1992). Interview. Forbes ASAP Magazine (December 7), 93-100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  429. Sein, M. K., and Bostrom, R. P. (1989). Individual differences and conceptual models in training novice users. Human-Computer Interaction 4 , 3, 197-229. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  430. Seligmann, D. D., and Feiner, S. (1991). Automated generation of intent-based 3D illustrations. Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH'91 Conf. (Las Vegas, NV, 28 July-2 August), 123-132. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  431. Sellen, A., and Nicol, A. (1990). Building user-centered online help. In Laurel, B. (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design , Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 143-153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  432. Sellen, A. J., Kurtenbach, G. P., and Buxton, W. A. S. (1990). The role of visual and kinesthetic feedback in the prevention of mode errors. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 667-673. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  433. Senay, H., and Stabler, E. P. (1987). Online help system usage: An empirical investigation. Abridged Proceedings 2nd Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Honolulu, HI, 10-14 August), 244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  434. Senders, J. W., and Moray, N. P. (1991). Human Error: Cause, Prediction, and Reduction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  435. Shackel, B. (1971). Human factors in the P.L.A. meat handling automation scheme. A case study and some conclusions. Intl. J. Prod. Res. 9 , 1, 95-121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  436. Shackel, B. (1991). Usability-Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In Shackel, B., and Richardson, S. (Eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 21-37. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  437. Shackel, B., Alty, J. L., and Reid, P. (1992) HILITES-The information service for the world HCI community. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 24 , 3 (July), 40-49. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  438. Sheldon, K. M. (1991). ASCII goes global. BYTE 16 , 7 (July), 108-116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  439. Shneiderman, B. (1982). Designing computer system messages. Communications of the ACM 25 , 9 (September), 610-611. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  440. Shneiderman, B. (1983). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer 16 , 8 (August), 57-69. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  441. Shneiderman, B. (1991). A taxonomy and rule base for the selection of interaction styles. In Shackel, B., and Richardson, S. (Eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 325-342. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  442. Shneiderman, B. (1993). Beyond intelligent machines: Just do it! IEEE Software 10 , 1 (January), 100-103. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  443. Silverstein, L. D. (1987). Human factors for color display systems: Concepts, methods, and research. In Durrett, H. J. (Ed.), Color and the Computer , Academic Press, Boston, MA. 27-61. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  444. Simonelli, N. M. (1989). Product design and human factors diversity: What you see is where you came from. In Klemmer, E. T. (Ed.), Ergonomics: Harness the Power of Human Factors in Your Business. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 88-122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  445. Siochi, A. C., and Ehrich, R. W. (1991). Computer analysis of user interfaces based on repetition in transcripts of user sessions. ACM Trans. Information Systems 9 , 4 (October), 309-335. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  446. Sless, D. (1991). Designing a new bill for Telecom Australia. Information Design Journal 6 , 3, 255-257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  447. Smith, S. L., and Mosier, J. N. (1986). Design Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software. Technical Report MTR-10090, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA 01730, USA. See page 301 for information on downloading this report over the network.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  448. Smith, W. (1988). Standardizing colors for computer screens. Proc. Human Factors Society's 32nd Annual Meeting , 1381-1385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  449. Søndergaard, G. (1987). Oversigt over efternavne i Danmark ("Survey of family names in Denmark"; in Danish), Nordic Institute, Odense University, Odense, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  450. Springer, C. J. (1987). Retrieval of information from complex alphanumeric displays: Screen formatting variables' effect on target identification time. In Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Cognitive Engineering in the Design of Human-Computer Interaction and Expert Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 375-382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  451. Sprung, R. C. (1990). Two faces of America: Polyglot and tongue-tied. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Designing User Interfaces for International Use. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. 71-102. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  452. Stammers, R. B., and Hoffman, J. (1991). Transfer between icon sets and ratings of icon concreteness and appropriateness. Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting , 354-258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  453. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42 , 4 (Autumn), 73-93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  454. Stewart, T. (1990). SIOIS--Standard interfaces or interface standards. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), xxix-xxxiv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  455. Stotts, P. D., and Furuta, R. (1989). Petri-net-based hypertext: Document structure with browsing semantics. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 7 , 1 (January), 3-29. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  456. Streeter, L. A., Ackroff, J. M., and Taylor, G. A. (1983). On abbreviating command names. The Bell System Technical Journal 62 , 1807-1828.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  457. Strong, G. W. (1989). Introductory course in human computer interaction. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 20 , 3 (January), 19-21. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  458. Sukaviriya, P., and Foley, J. D. (1990). Coupling a UI framework with automatic generation of context-sensitive animated help. Proc. ACM UIST'90 Third Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Snowbird, UT, 3-5 October), 21-30. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  459. Sukaviriya, P., and Moran, L. (1990). User interface for Asia. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Designing User Interfaces for International Use. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. 71-102. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  460. Sutherland, I. E. (1963). Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system. Proc. AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference , 329-346. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  461. Tanaka, T., Eberts, R. E., and Salvendy, G. (1990). Derivation and validation of a quantitative method for the analysis of consistency for interface design. Proc. Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting , 329-333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  462. Teasley, B., Leventhal, L., Blumenthal, B., Instone, K., and Stone, D. (1994). Cultural diversity in user interface design: Are intuitions enough? ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 26 , 1 (January), 36-40. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  463. Teitelman, W. (1972). Do what I mean: The programmer's assistant. Computers and Automation 21 (April), 8-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  464. Teitelman, W. (1986). Ten years of window systems: A retrospective view. In Hopgood, F. R. A., Duce, D. A., Fielding, E. V. C., Robinson, K., and Williams, A. S. (Eds.), Methodology of Window Management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 35-46. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  465. Telles, M. (1990). Updating an older interface. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 243-247. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  466. Tesler, L. (1981). The Smalltalk environment. BYTE 6 , 8 (August), 90-147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  467. Tesler, L. G. (1991). Networked computing in the 1990s. Scientific American 265 , 3 (September), 86-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  468. Tetzlaff, L., and Schwartz, D. R. (1991). The use of guidelines in interface design. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 329-333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  469. Thomas, J. C., and Stuart, R. (1992). Virtual reality and human factors. Proc. Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting , 207-210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  470. Thompson, D. A., McEvers, D. C., and Olson, C. H. (1986). Case study in data entry system design. Proc. Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, 744-748. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  471. Thovtrup, H., and Nielsen, J. (1991). Assessing the usability of a user interface standard. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May), 335-341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  472. Tognazzini, B. (1989). Achieving consistency for the Macintosh. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency , Academic Press, Boston, MA. 57-73. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  473. Tognazzini, B. (1990). User testing on the cheap. Apple Direct 2 , 6 (March), 21- 27. Also available as Chapter 14 of Tognazzini, B. (1992), Tog on Interface , Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  474. Tombaugh, J., Lickorish, A., and Wright, P. (1987). Multi-window displays for readers of lengthy texts. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 26 , 5 (May), 597-615. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  475. Tousséa-Oulaï, A., and Ura, S. (1991). Information technology transfer: Problems facing African developing nations. Intl. J. Human-Computer Interaction 3 , 1, 79-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  476. Travis, D. (1991). Effective Color Displays: Theory and Practice. Academic Press, London, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  477. Tucker, P., and Jones, D. M. (1991). Voice as interface: An overview. Intl. J. Human-Computer Interaction 3 , 2, 145-170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  478. Tullis, T. S. (1985). Designing a menu-based interface to an operating system. Proc. ACM CHI'85 Conf. (San Francisco, CA, 14-18 April), 79-84. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  479. van der Veer, G. C., and White, T. N. (1990). University education on human-computer interaction-The Dutch situation. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 9-13. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  480. van Nes, F. L., and van Itegem, J. P. M. (1990). Hidden functionality: How an advanced car radio is really used. In IPO Annual Progress Report 25 , Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 101-112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  481. Vander Zanden, B., and Myers, B. A. (1990). Automatic, look-and-feel independent dialog creation for graphical user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 27-34. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  482. Vertelney, L. (1989). Using video to prototype user interfaces. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 21 , 2 (October), 57-61. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  483. Vincente, K. J., and Williges, R. C. (1988). Accommodating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 29 , 6, 647-668. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  484. Virzi, R. A. (1989). What can you learn from a low-fidelity prototype? Proc. Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (Denver, CO, 16-20 October), 224-228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  485. Virzi, R. A. (1991). A preference evaluation of three dialing plans for a residential, phone-based information service. Proc. Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (San Francisco, CA, 2-6 September).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  486. Voltaire, F. M. A. (1764). Dictionnaire Philosophique. English translation published in 1765 as Philosophical Dictionary. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  487. von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  488. Walker, J. H. (1987). Issues and strategies for online documentation. IEEE Trans. Professional Communication 30 , 4 (December), 235-248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  489. Want, R., Hopper, A., Falcâo, V., and Gibbons, J. (1992). The active badge location system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 10 , 1 (January), 91-102. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  490. Wasserman, A. S. (1989). Redesigning Xerox: A design strategy based on operability. In Klemmer, E. T. (Ed.), Ergonomics: Harness the Power of Human Factors in Your Business , Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 7-44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  491. Wastell, D. (1990). Mental effort and task performance: Towards a psychophysiology of human computer interaction. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 107-112. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  492. Weiler, P., Cordes, R., Hammontree, M., Hoiem, D., and Thompson, M. (1993). Software for the usability lab: A sampling of current tools. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April), 57-60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  493. Wellner, P. D. (1989). Statemaster: A UIMS based on Statecharts for prototyping and target implementation. Proc. ACM CHI'89 Conf. (Austin, TX, 30 April-4 May), 177-182. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  494. Wharton, C., Bradford, J., Jeffries, R., and Franzke, M. (1992). Applying cognitive walkthroughs to more complex user interfaces: Experiences, issues, and recommendations. Proc. ACM CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 381-388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  495. Whitefield, A., Wilson, F., and Dowell, J. (1991). A framework for human factors evaluation. Behaviour & Information Technology 10 , 1 (January-February), 65-79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  496. Whiteside, J., and Wixon, D. (1987). The dialectic of usability engineering. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'87 Conf. (Stuttgart, Germany, 1-4 September), 17-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  497. Whiteside, J., Jones, S., Levy, P. S., and Wixon, D. (1985). User performance with command, menu, and iconic interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'85 Conf. (San Francisco, CA, 14-18 April), 185-191. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  498. Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., and Holtzblatt, K. (1988). Usability engineering: Our experience and evolution. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , North-Holland, Amsterdam. 791-817.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  499. Wichansky, A. M., Abernethy, C. N., Antonelli, D. C., Kotsonis, M. E., and Mitchell, P. P. (1988). Selling ease of use: Human factors partnerships with marketing. Proc. Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting , 598-602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  500. Wiecha, C., and Boies, S. J. (1990). Generating user interfaces: Principles and use of ITS style rules. Proc. ACM UIST'90 Third Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Snowbird, UT, 3-5 October), 21-30. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  501. Wiecha, C. and Henrion, M. (1987). Linking multiple program views using a visual cache. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'87 Second Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Stuttgart, Germany, 1-4 September), 689-694.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  502. Wiecha, C., Bennett, W., Boies, S., and Gould, J. (1989). Tools for generating consistent user interfaces. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency , Academic Press, Boston, MA. 107-130. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  503. Wiggins, B. (1991). DTI Usability Now! programme. Talk presented at the British Computer Society's HCI'91 conference (Edinburgh, U.K., 20-23 August).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  504. Winograd, T. (1990). What can we teach about human-computer interaction. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 443-449. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  505. Wixon, D., and Jones, S. (1994). Usability for fun and profit: A case study of the re-design of the VAX RALLY. In Rudisill, M., McKay, T., Lewis, C., and Poison, P. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interface Design: Success Cases, Emerging Methods, and Real-World Context , Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  506. Wixon, D., Jones, S., Tse, L., and Casaday, G. (1994). Inspections and design reviews: Framework, history, and reflection. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  507. Wolf, R. (1989). Consistency as process. In Nielsen, J. (Ed.), Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency , Academic Press, Boston, MA. 89-92. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  508. Wozny, L. A. (1989). The application of metaphor, analogy, and conceptual models in computer systems. Interacting with Computers 1 , 3, 273-283. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  509. Wright, P. (1983). Manual dexterity: A user-oriented approach to creating computer documentation. Proc. ACM CHI'83 Conf. (Boston, MA, 12-15 December), 11-18. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  510. Wright, P. (1991). Designing and evaluating documentation for I.T. users. In Shackel, B., and Richardson, S. (Eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 343-358. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  511. Wright, P. C., and Monk, A. F. (1991). A cost-effective evaluation method for use by designers. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 35 , 6 (December), 891-912. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  512. Wright, R. B., and Converse, S. A. (1992). Method bias and concurrent verbal protocol in software usability testing. Proc. Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting , 1220-1224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  513. Yang, Y. (1990). Interface usability engineering under practical constraints: A case study in the design of undo support. Proc. IFIP INTERACT'90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August), 549-554. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  514. Yang, Y. (1992). Motivation, practice, and guidelines for 'undoing.' Interacting with Computers 4 , 1 (April), 23-40. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  515. Young, D., Lansdale, M. W., and Bass, C. A. (1990). Using HyperTalk as a specification tool and a simulation vehicle in the development of a personal data base system. In Life, M. A., Narborough-Hall, C. S., and Hamilton, W. I. (Eds.), Simulation and the User Interface. Taylor & Francis, London, U.K. 169-180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  516. Ziegler, J. E., Hoppe, H. U., and Fähnrich, K. P. (1986). Learning and transfer for text and graphics editing with a direct manipulation interface. Proc. ACM CHI'86 Conf. (Boston, MA, 13-17 April), 72-77. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  517. Zwaga, H. J. (1989). Comprehensibility estimates of public information symbols: Their validity and use. Proc. Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting , 979-983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Franz R, Junuzovic S and Mott M (2024). A Virtual Reality Scene Taxonomy: Identifying and Designing Accessible Scene-Viewing Techniques, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31:2, (1-44), Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024.
  2. ACM
    Liu G, Zhao L, Li Y, Duan Z, Chen S, Hu Y, Su Z and Qu W FUYAO: DPU-enabled Direct Data Transfer for Serverless Computing Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 3, (431-447)
  3. Wang Y, Tian Y, Liu F, Zhou H and Zhang Y (2024). Mixed reality prototyping for usability evaluation in product design: a case study of a handheld printer, Virtual Reality, 28:1, Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024.
  4. Xing Y, Dondi C, Borgo R and Abdul-Rahman A (2024). Visualizing Historical Book Trade Data: An Iterative Design Study with Close Collaboration with Domain Experts, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30:1, (540-550), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024.
  5. ACM
    Zhang T, Han D, Vinayakarao V, Irsan I, Xu B, Thung F, Lo D and Jiang L (2023). Duplicate Bug Report Detection: How Far Are We?, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32:4, (1-32), Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023.
  6. Wiesmayr B, Zoitl A and Rabiser R (2023). Assessing the usefulness of a visual programming IDE for large-scale automation software, Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM), 22:5, (1619-1643), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023.
  7. Adler R, Paley A, Li Zhao A, Pack H, Servantez S, Pah A, Hammond K and Consortium S (2023). A user-centered approach to developing an AI system analyzing U.S. federal court data, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31:3, (547-570), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023.
  8. Lin H, Huang K and Lin W A Preliminary Study on Primary School Teachers’ User Experiences in Distance Learning Cross-Cultural Design, (241-254)
  9. Kanaoka A (I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction: On the Existence of Satisfaction as a Component of Usable Security and Privacy HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust, (78-89)
  10. Saha S, Senapati A and Maity R (2023). An approach to predict the task efficiency of web pages, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82:16, (25217-25233), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2023.
  11. Wang L, Huang M, Yang R, Liang H, Han J and Sun Y (2023). Survey of Movement Reproduction in Immersive Virtual Rehabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29:4, (2184-2202), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023.
  12. ACM
    Wareham T, de Haan R, Vardy A and van Rooij I (2022). Swarm Control for Distributed Construction: A Computational Complexity Perspective, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 12:1, (1-45), Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023.
  13. Mkaouar H, Blouin D and Borde E (2023). A benchmark of incremental model transformation tools based on an industrial case study with AADL, Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM), 22:1, (175-201), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023.
  14. ACM
    Aziz N, Stockman T and Stewart R (2022). Planning Your Journey in Audio: Design and Evaluation of Auditory Route Overviews, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 15:4, (1-48), Online publication date: 31-Dec-2022.
  15. Borges L, Naves E and Sa A (2022). Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking, Universal Access in the Information Society, 21:4, (1013-1022), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022.
  16. Ivanchikj A, Serbout S and Pautasso C (2022). Live process modeling with the BPMN Sketch Miner, Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM), 21:5, (1877-1906), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022.
  17. Mariani J, Han Y and Xiao L Co-Cache: Inertial-Driven Infrastructure-less Collaborative Approximate Caching 2022 19th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), (46-54)
  18. ACM
    Bergström J, Knibbe J, Pohl H and Hornbæk K (2022). Sense of Agency and User Experience: Is There a Link?, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29:4, (1-22), Online publication date: 31-Aug-2022.
  19. Marion O, Stéphanie R, Dimitri V and Jean-Gabriel G Contributions of user tests in a Living Lab in the co-design process of human robot interaction 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), (864-869)
  20. Ishaq K, Rosdi F, Zin N and Abid A (2022). Serious game design model for language learning in the cultural context, Education and Information Technologies, 27:7, (9317-9355), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022.
  21. Degen H, Budnik C, Conte G, Lintereur A and Weber S How to Explain It to Energy Engineers? HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Papers: Interacting with eXtended Reality and Artificial Intelligence, (262-284)
  22. Wu J and Duffy V Mobile Applications Usability Evaluation: Systematic Review and Reappraisal HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Design, User Experience and Interaction, (499-516)
  23. Quinby F, Pollanen M, Burr W and Reynolds M Do Mathematical Typesetting Applications Affect User Manipulation of Fractions? Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Experiment Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, (97-107)
  24. Moreno de Oliveira G, Nascimento Carvalho A, Lamego B, Monteiro I, Gonçalves E and Basilio A Reporting the Application of User Experience Tools and Proxy Users in an Industrial Process Based on Double Diamond Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research, Design, and Assessment, (57-74)
  25. Castro J, Garnica I and Rojas L Automated Tools for Usability Evaluation: A Systematic Mapping Study Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact, (28-46)
  26. Kazhura M Exploring New Depths: How Could Passengers Interact with Future In-Car Holographic 3D Displays? HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems, (35-61)
  27. Karimov J, Ozbayoglu M, Tavli B and Dogdu E (2022). Menu Optimization for Multi-Profile Customer Systems on Large Scale Data, Computational Economics, 60:1, (221-242), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022.
  28. ACM
    Son H and Lee D (2021). An Efficient Interaction Protocol Inference Scheme for Incompatible Updates in IoT Environments, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 22:2, (1-25), Online publication date: 31-May-2022.
  29. ACM
    Camilli M, Guerriero A, Janes A, Russo B and Russo S Microservices integrated performance and reliability testing Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test, (29-39)
  30. Hartstein A, Verkuyl M, Zimney K, Yockey J and Berg-Poppe P (2022). Virtual Reality Instructional Design in Orthopedic Physical Therapy Education, Simulation and Gaming, 53:2, (111-134), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022.
  31. Bedjaoui M, Elouali N, Benslimane S and Şengel E (2021). Suggestion pattern on online social networks: between intensity, effectiveness and user’s satisfaction, The Visual Computer: International Journal of Computer Graphics, 38:4, (1331-1343), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022.
  32. Camilli M and Russo B (2022). Modeling Performance of Microservices Systems with Growth Theory, Empirical Software Engineering, 27:2, Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022.
  33. Zhou Q, Pandey O and Ye F (2022). An Approach for Multi-Level Visibility Scoping of IoT Services in Enterprise Environments, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 21:2, (408-420), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022.
  34. Guerino G, de Assumpção M, José da Silva T, Hokkanen L, Balancieri R, Lapasini Leal G and Troussas C (2022). User Experience Practices in Software Startups, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.
  35. Havard V, Baudry D, Jeanne B, Louis A and Savatier X (2021). A use case study comparing augmented reality (AR) and electronic document-based maintenance instructions considering tasks complexity and operator competency level, Virtual Reality, 25:4, (999-1014), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021.
  36. Perrier M, Louw T and Carsten O (2021). User-centred design evaluation of symbols for adaptive cruise control (ACC) and lane-keeping assistance (LKA), Cognition, Technology and Work, 23:4, (685-703), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021.
  37. Sarthou G, Buisan G, Clodic A and Alami R Extending Referring Expression Generation through shared knowledge about past Human-Robot collaborative activity 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), (1879-1886)
  38. Obrezkov D, Sohr K and Malaka R A Category-Based Framework for Privacy-Aware Collaborative Access Control Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business, (126-139)
  39. Arm J, Fiedler P and Bastan O Offline Access to a Vehicle via PKI-Based Authentication Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2021 Workshops, (76-88)
  40. Parviainen J and Coeckelbergh M (2021). The political choreography of the Sophia robot: beyond robot rights and citizenship to political performances for the social robotics market, AI & Society, 36:3, (715-724), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021.
  41. Palanque P POISE: A Framework for Designing Perfect Interactive Systems with and for Imperfect People Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021, (39-59)
  42. Plöger S, Meier M and Smith M A qualitative usability evaluation of the clang static analyzer and libFuzzer with CS students and CTF players Proceedings of the Seventeenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security, (553-572)
  43. Jia X and Chen C A Study on the Usability of Different Age Groups to the Interface of Smart Bands Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Techniques and Novel Applications, (402-414)
  44. Huang D, Li M and Liu Z User Experience Design Study of Museum Website Based on TRIZ Theory: A Case of Heyuan Dinosaur Museum Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design for Contemporary Technological Environments, (467-482)
  45. Palomino F, Paz F and Moquillaza A Web Analytics for User Experience: A Systematic Literature Review Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research and Design, (312-326)
  46. Dutra T, Felipe D, Gasparini I and Maschio E A Systematic Mapping of Guidelines for the Development of Accessible Digital Games to People with Disabilities Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User Experience, (53-70)
  47. Medel D and Sánchez J Educational Video Game Design for Teaching and Learning Musical Harmony Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Games and Virtual Environments for Learning, (65-83)
  48. Gonçalves J, Villela M, Santos C and Guelpeli M Investigating the User Experience in the Process of Text Mining in Online Social Networks Social Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis , (268-283)
  49. Jo J, L’Yi S, Lee B and Seo J (2021). ProReveal: Progressive Visual Analytics With Safeguards, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27:7, (3109-3122), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021.
  50. Parnell K, Banks V, Allison C, Plant K, Beecroft P and Stanton N (2021). Designing flight deck applications: combining insight from end-users and ergonomists, Cognition, Technology and Work, 23:2, (353-365), Online publication date: 1-May-2021.
  51. Fogli D, Arenghi A and Gentilin F (2019). A universal design approach to wayfinding and navigation, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79:45-46, (33577-33601), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020.
  52. Chazette L and Schneider K (2020). Explainability as a non-functional requirement: challenges and recommendations, Requirements Engineering, 25:4, (493-514), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020.
  53. Georg J, Putz E and Diermeyer F Longtime Effects of Videoquality, Videocanvases and Displays on Situation Awareness during Teleoperation of Automated Vehicles* 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), (248-255)
  54. Ishikawa N, Kashima H and Okazaki T Development of a Maneuvering Support System for Ships without Dynamic Positioning Systems 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), (1785-1790)
  55. Gu Z and Wei J Wearable Services Adoption Study from a Perspective of Usability Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications, (16-22)
  56. Wang M and Liu S Study on Innovative Gestures Applicable to the Elderly Cross-Cultural Design. User Experience of Products, Services, and Intelligent Environments, (200-211)
  57. Tian Y and Liu Z Usability Design Study of University Website: A Case of Normal University in China Design, User Experience, and Usability. Case Studies in Public and Personal Interactive Systems, (533-551)
  58. Díaz J and Ancán O An Agile Product Design in a Smart City Context: A Use Case for Air Pollution Awareness Social Computing and Social Media. Participation, User Experience, Consumer Experience, and Applications of Social Computing, (483-500)
  59. Sales A, Costa Aguiar Y and Maritan U. de Araujo T Participatory Design Workshops for Adapting a Form for Deaf Respondents Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Practice, (120-131)
  60. Mallas A, Xenos M and Rigou M Evaluating a Mouse-Based and a Tangible Interface Used for Operator Intervention on Two Autonomous Robots Human-Computer Interaction. Multimodal and Natural Interaction, (668-678)
  61. Wan C, Santriaji M, Rogers E, Hoffmann H, Maire M and Lu S ALERT Proceedings of the 2020 USENIX Conference on Usenix Annual Technical Conference, (353-369)
  62. ACM
    Koelle M, Ananthanarayan S and Boll S Social Acceptability in HCI: A Survey of Methods, Measures, and Design Strategies Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-19)
  63. Lisena P, Meroño-Peñuela A, Kuhn T and Troncy R Easy Web API Development with SPARQL Transformer The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019, (454-470)
  64. Meixner S, Schall D, Li F, Karagiannis V, Schulte S and Plakidas K Automatic Application Placement and Adaptation in Cloud-Edge Environments 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), (1001-1008)
  65. Bouzekri E, Canny A, Martinie C and Palanque P Characterizing Sets of Systems: Representation and Analysis of Across-Systems Properties Beyond Interactions, (84-96)
  66. Koelle M, George C, Schwind V, Perry D, Sakamoto Y, Hasan K, Mitchell R and Olsson T #SociallyAcceptableHCI: Social Acceptability of Emerging Technologies and Novel Interaction Paradigms Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019, (741-746)
  67. Germanakos P and Fichte L A Method and Tool for Analyzing Usability Testing Data in the Business Sector Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019, (584-588)
  68. Zeier A, Wiesmaier A and Heinemann A API Usability of Stateful Signature Schemes Advances in Information and Computer Security, (221-240)
  69. Rodríguez-Sedano F, Conde M, Ponsa P, Muñoz L and Fernández-Llamas C (2019). Design and evaluation of a graphical user interface for facilitating expert knowledge transfer: a teleoperation case study, Universal Access in the Information Society, 18:3, (431-442), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.
  70. Keates S Universal Access: The Challenges Ahead Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools, (100-112)
  71. Darin T, Coelho B and Borges B Which Instrument Should I Use? Supporting Decision-Making About the Evaluation of User Experience Design, User Experience, and Usability. Practice and Case Studies, (49-67)
  72. Chiou W, Lai S and Huang D Usability Testing of a Mobile Application for Alleviating Postpartum Emotional Disorders: A Case of We’ll Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Healthcare Applications, (23-40)
  73. Fioravanti M, Oliveira R, Avellar G, de Oliveira C and Barbosa E An Analysis of ProjectEdu: A Mobile Learning Application for Software Project Management Education Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments for Learning and Collaboration, (37-54)
  74. Yanez-Gomez R, Font J, Cascado-Caballero D and Sevillano J (2019). Heuristic usability evaluation on games, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78:4, (4937-4964), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019.
  75. Heikkilä T, Seppälä T, Kuula T and Karvonen H (2019). Remote Robot-Sensor Calibration Service, International Journal of Mobile Devices, Wearable Technology, and Flexible Electronics, 10:1, (15-36), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.
  76. Oh J, Lee U, Lee K and Maiorana E (2019). Usability Evaluation Model for Biometric System considering Privacy Concern Based on MCDM Model, Security and Communication Networks, 2019, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.
  77. Almeida L, Silva D, Theodório D, Silva W, Rodrigues S, Scardovelli T, Silva A, Bissaco M and Arya A (2019). ALTRIRAS, International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2019, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.
  78. Zhang X, Wang X and Kang Y (2018). Trustworthiness requirement‐oriented software process modeling, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30:12, Online publication date: 12-Dec-2018.
  79. Pitt J, Milanovic K, Coupland A, Allan T, Davies A, Lane T, Malagoni A, Thapar A and Shalhoub J A Collective Adaptive Socio-Technical System for Remote- and Self-supervised Exercise in the Treatment of Intermittent Claudication Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Distributed Systems, (63-78)
  80. Navarrete R and Luján-Mora S (2018). Bridging the accessibility gap in Open Educational Resources, Universal Access in the Information Society, 17:4, (755-774), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018.
  81. Heath S, Ramirez-Brinez C, Arnold J, Olsson O, Taufatofua J, Pounds P, Wiles J, Leonardis E, Gygi E, Leija E, Quinn L and Chiba A PiRat: An Autonomous Framework for Studying Social Behaviour in Rats and Robots 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), (7601-7608)
  82. Kreijns K and Kirschner P Extending the SIPS-Model: A Research Framework for Online Collaborative Learning Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning, (277-290)
  83. Canny A, Bouzekri E, Martinie C and Palanque P Rationalizing the Need of Architecture-Driven Testing of Interactive Systems Human-Centered Software Engineering, (164-186)
  84. Keates S When Universal Access Does not Go to Plan: Lessons to Be Learned Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Methods, Technologies, and Users, (75-90)
  85. Espinoza J, Loarte P, Espinoza C, Paz F and Arenas J A New Software Development Model: Innovation Through Mobile Application with UCD Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice, (673-692)
  86. Peng Q, Martens J and Tian X Improving Value-Awareness Through Storytelling in User Experience Design Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice, (141-152)
  87. Qiu S, Du L, Han T and Hu J Flavor Explore: Rapid Prototyping and Evaluation of User Interfaces Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions: Understanding Humans, (114-123)
  88. Busch B, Maeda G, Mollard Y, Demangeat M and Lopes M Postural optimization for an ergonomic human-robot interaction 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), (2778-2785)
  89. Wijayarathna C, Arachchilage N and Slay J A Generic Cognitive Dimensions Questionnaire to Evaluate the Usability of Security APIs Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust, (160-173)
  90. ACM
    Al-Maani D and Salameh H A generic model for evaluating the usability of learning management systems Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing, (1-5)
  91. Soro A, Ambe A, Brereton M and Patrono L (2017). Minding the Gap, Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing, 2017, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.
  92. ACM
    Martin-Rodilla P and Gonzalez-Perez C Understanding user behavior in textual analysis Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, (269-276)
  93. ACM
    Keidel S, Pfeiffer W and Erdweg S The IDE portability problem and its solution in Monto Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering, (152-162)
  94. ACM
    Morin R, Léger P, Senecal S, Bastarache-Roberge M, Lefèbrve M and Fredette M The Effect of Game Tutorial Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, (229-237)
  95. Oulasvirta A and Abowd G (2016). User Interface Design in the 21st Century, Computer, 49:7, (11-13), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.
  96. ACM
    Schneider H, Frison K, Wagner J and Butz A CrowdUX Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (415-426)
  97. ACM
    Pan X and Back G Rich cloud-based web applications with CloudBrowser 2.0 Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, (758-765)
  98. Wyeld T and Williams B A Non-domain Specific Spatial Ability Test for Gamers Using Drawing and a Mental Rotation Task Computer-Human Interaction. Cognitive Effects of Spatial Interaction, Learning, and Ability, (114-132)
  99. Alonso O (2013). Implementing crowdsourcing-based relevance experimentation: an industrial perspective, Information Retrieval, 16:2, (101-120), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013.
  100. ACM
    Rabiser R, Grünbacher P and Lehofer M A qualitative study on user guidance capabilities in product configuration tools Proceedings of the 27th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, (110-119)
  101. Meixner G, Thiels N and Klein U SmartTransplantation - Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as a Model for a Medical Expert System HCI and Usability for Medicine and Health Care, (303-314)
  102. Bredeweg B and Forbus K (2003). Qualitative Modeling in Education, AI Magazine, 24:4, (35-46), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003.
  103. Félix I, Souza L, Ferreira B and Brandão L A study to build a new Visual Programming system: Fixed or contextual menu? 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), (1-8)
  104. Yeh M, Toshtzar A, Guertin L and Yu Yan Using spaced repetition and gamification to enhance K-12 student science literacy with on-demand mobile short reads 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), (1-4)
  105. Savva A, Petrie H and Power C Comparing Concurrent and Retrospective Verbal Protocols for Blind and Sighted Users Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015, (55-71)
Contributors

Recommendations