skip to main content
VLSI testing for high reliability: mixing IDDQ and logic testing
  • Author:
  • Suntae Hwang
Publisher:
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Computer Engineering and Science 10900 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH
  • United States
Order Number:UMI Order No. GAX94-06255
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

Recently, it has been recognized that logic testing does not detect many physical defects such as bridging and open faults. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of combined logic and Iddq testing to detect stuck-at and bridging faults. The stuck-at faults are detected by logic testing by voltage measurement and Iddq testing detects bridging faults.

Near-minimal stuck-at test sets are used for this combined logic and Iddq test environment. These near-minimal stuck-at test sets are generated using standard test programs, while using collapsed fault lists. We examined ISCAS '85 and ISCAS '89 benchmark circuits. A comparison is given for the fault coverage obtained under this combined test environment with other studies based on pure logic test and Iddq test. Also, the results of Iddq-based test sets (vectors generated specifically for Iddq testing) are compared with those of stuck-at test sets. To save the test effort, we also examine the bridging fault coverage in Iddq testing when partial stuck-at test sets are used. We present a case study on a microprogrammed processor using a functional test set in the combined test environment to detect logic and bridging faults.

Based upon results obtained during this study, we established a relationship between stuck-at test sets and bridging fault coverage in Iddq testing, and finally, we suggest a guideline on the use of stuck-at test sets in Iddq environment.

Contributors
  • Case Western Reserve University

Recommendations