skip to main content
Skip header Section
Quality-driven query answering for integrated information systemsJanuary 2002
Publisher:
  • Springer-Verlag
  • Berlin, Heidelberg
ISBN:978-3-540-43349-1
Published:01 January 2002
Pages:
157
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Bibliometrics
Abstract

No abstract available.

References

  1. Agha Iqbal Ali. Streamlined computation for data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 64:61-67, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. The AltaVista search engine. www.altavista.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. The AltaVista Money stock quote service. money.altavista.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S.F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers, and D.J. Lipman. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215:403-410, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Y. Arens, R. Hull, and R. King. Reference architecture for the intelligent integration of information; version 2.0 (draft). Technical report, DARPA - Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, August 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yigal Arens, Chung-Nan Hsu, and Craig A. Knoblock. Query processing in the SIMS information mediator. In Austin Tate, editor, Advanced Planning Technology, pages 61-6AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Reva Basch. Measuring the quality of the data: Report on the fourth annual SCOUG retreat. Database Searcher, 6(8):18-24, October 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and Shamkant B. Navathe. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4):323-364, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Richard E. Bellman. Dynamic programming and stochastic control processes. Information and Control, 1(3):228-239, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. Benayoun, B. Roy, and N. Sussman. Manual de reference du programme ELECTRE. In Note de Synthese et Formation, volume 17, Paris, 1966. Direction Scientifique SEMA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Krishna Bharat and Andrei Broder. A technique for measuring the relative size and overlap of public web search engines. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference, Brisbane, Australia, April 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mónica Bobrowski, Martina Marré, and Daniel Yankelevich. A homogeneous framework to measure data quality. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), pages 115-124, Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael J. Carey and Donald Kossmann. On saying "Enough already!" in SQL. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 219-230, Tucson, AZ, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ashok K. Chandra and Philip M. Merlin. Optimal implementation of conjunctive queries in relational databases. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 77-90, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jo-Mei Chang. A heuristic approach to distributed query processing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 54-61, Mexico City, Mexico, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2:429-444, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Abraham Charnes and William Cooper. Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9:181-185, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Abraham Charnes, William Cooper, Arie Y. Lewin, and Lawrence M. Seiford. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Surajit Chaudhuri. An overview of query optimisation in relational systems. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 34-43, Seattle, Washington, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Surajit Chaudhuri and Luis Gravano. Optimizing queries over multimedia repositories. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 91-102, Montreal, Canada, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Surajit Chaudhuri and Luis Gravano. Evaluating top-k selection queries. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 397-410, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Chawathe, H. Garcia-Molina, J. Hammer, K. Ireland, Y. Papakonstantinou, J. Ullman, and J. Widom. The TSIMMIS project: Integration of heterogeneous information sources. In Proceedings of IPSJ Conference, pages 7-18, Tokyo, Japan, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ying Chen, Qiang Zhu, and Nengbin Wang. Query processing with quality control in the World Wide Web. World Wide Web, 1(4):241-255, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Junghoo Cho, Narayanan Shivakumar, and Hector Garcia-Molina. Finding replicated web collections. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 355-366, Dallas, Texas, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Stavros Christodoulakis. Implications of certain assumptions in database performance evaluation. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 9(2):163-186, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. E.F. Codd. Extending the relational database model to capture more meaning. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 4(4):397-434, December 1979. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Francis S. Collins, Ari Patrinos, Elke Jordan, Aravinda Chakravarti, Raymond Gesteland, LeRoy Walters, the members of the DOE, and NIH planning groups. New goals for the US Human Genome Project: 1998-2003. Science, 282:682-689, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. G.B. Dantzig. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. C.J. Date. Relational Database (selected writings). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ana Maria de Carvalho Moura, Maria Luiza Machado Campos, and Cassia Maria Barreto. A survey on metadata for describing and retrieving internet resources. World Wide Web, pages 222-240, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Stefan Decker, Dieter Fensel, Frank van Harmelen, Ian Horrocks, Sergey Melnik, Michel R. Klein, and Jeen Broekstra. Knowledge representation on the web. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL), pages 89-97, Aachen, Germany, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. W.H. Delone and E.R. McLean. Informaton systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1):60-95, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rajiv M. Dewan, Marshall L. Freimer, and Abraham Seidmann. Internet service providers, proprietary content, and the battle for users' dollars. Communications of the ACM, 41(8):43-48, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Directory Interchange Format (DIF). http://gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/ difguide/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. http://purl.org/dc/index.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliver M. Duschka and Michael R. Genesereth. Answering recursive queries using views. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 109-116, Tucson, Arizona, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. James S. Dyer. Remarks on the analytical hierarchy process. Management Science, 36(3):249-258, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. R.G. Dyson, E. Thanassoulis, and A. Boussofiane. Tutorial Papers in Operational Research, chapter Data Envelopement Analysis. Operational Research Society, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe. Fundamentals of Database Systems. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Redwood City, edition, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. The e*trade stock trade service. www.etrade.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Daniela Florescu, Daphne Koller, and Alon Levy. Using probabilistic information in data integration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 216-225, Athens, Greece, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Helena Galhardas, Daniela Florescu, Dennis Shasha, and Eric Simon. An extensible framework for data cleaning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), page 312, San Diego, CA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. César Galindo-Legaria and Arnon Rosenthal. Outerjoin simplification and reordering for query optimization. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 22(1):43-74, March 1997. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sumit Ganguly, Waqar Hasan, and Ravi Krishnamurthy. Query optimization for parallel execution. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 9-18, San Diego, CA, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Danièle Gardy and Claude Puech. On the effects of join operations on relation sizes. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 14(4):574-603, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Michael R. Garey and David S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Global information locator service (GILS). http://www.gils.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. The Google search engine. www.google.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Goetz Graefe. Query evaluation techniques for large databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 25(2):73-170, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Luis Gravano, Chen-Chuan K. Chang, and Hector Garcia-Molina. STARTS: Stanford proposal for internet meta-searching. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 207-218, Tucson, Arizona, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Luis Gravano, Hector Garcia-Molina, and Anthony Tomasic. The effectiveness of GlOSS for the text database recovery problem. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 126-137, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Luis Gravano, Héctor García-Molina, and Anthony Tomasic. GlOSS: Textsource discovery over the internet. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Jean-Robert Gruser, Louiqa Raschid, Vladimir Zadorozhny, and Tao Zhan. Learning response time for websources using query feedback and application in query optimization. VLDB Journal, 9(1):18-37, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ashish Gupta. Some data integration and database issues in e-commerce (and world peace). Invited talk at the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Theo Härder, Günter Sauter, and Joachim Thomas. The intrinsic problems of structural heterogeneity and an approach to their solution. VLDB Journal, 8(1):25-43, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Mauricio A. Hernández and Salvatore J. Stolfo. Real-world data is dirty: Data cleansing and the merge/purge problem. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(1):9-37, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. The Hoovers Online company profile service. www.hoovers.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Richard Hull. Managing semantic heterogeneity in databases: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 51-61, Tuscon, Arizona, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Ching-Lai Hwang and Kwangsun Yoon. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Number 186 in Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. M. Jarke and Y. Vassiliou. Data warehouse quality design: A review of the DWQ project. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), Cambridge, MA, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. M.A. Jeusfeld, C. Quix, and M. Jarke. Design and analysis of quality information for data warehouses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER), pages 349-362, Singapore, November 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. William Kent. The breakdown of the information model in multidatabase systems. SIGMOD Record, 20(4):10-15, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. L.G. Khachian. A polynomial algorithm for linear programming. Soviet Math. Doklady, 20:191-194, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. W. Kim, I. Choi, S. Gala, and M. Scheevel. On resolving schematic heterogeneity in multidatabase systems. In W. Kim, editor, Modern Database Systems, chapter 26, pages 521-55ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Chung T. Kwok and Daniel S. Weld. Planning to gather information. In AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 32-39, Portland, Oregon, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. M. LaCroix and A. Pirotte. Generalized joins. SIGMOD Record, 8(3):14-15, September 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Mong-Li Lee, Tok Wang Ling, Hongjun Lu, and Yee Teng Ko. Cleansing data for mining and warehousing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), volume 1677 of LNCS, pages 751-760, Florence, Italy, 1999. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Ulf Leser. Combining heterogeneous data sources through query correspondence assertions. In Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, in conjunction with CIKM'98, pages 29-32, Washington, D.C., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Ulf Leser. Designing a global information resource for molecular biology. In Proceedings of the Conference Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft (BTW), pages 362-369, Freiburg, Germany, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Ulf Leser. Query Planning in Mediator Based Information Systems. PhD thesis, University of Technology, Berlin, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Ulf Leser and Felix Naumann. Query planning with information quality bounds. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS), Advances in Soft Computing, Warsaw, Poland, 2000. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Alon Y. Levy, Alberto O. Mendelzon, Yehoshua Sagiv, and Divesh Srivastava. Answering queries using views. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 95-104, San Jose, CA, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Alon Y. Levy, Anand Rajaraman, and Joann J. Ordille. Query-answering algorithms for information agents. In AAAI National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 40-47, Portland, Oregon, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Alon Y. Levy, Anand Rajaraman, and Joann J. Ordille. Querying heterogeneous information sources using source descriptions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 251-262, Bombay, India, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Alon Y. Levy, Divesh Srivastava, and Thomas Kirk. Data model and query evaluation in global information systems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems - Special Issue on Networked Information Discovery and Retrieval, 5(2):121-143, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Menchi Liu and Tok Wang Ling. A data model for semistructured data with partial and inconsistent information. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), pages 317-331, Konstanz, Germany, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. The London Stock Exchange stock quote server. www.londonstockexchange. com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. David Maier, Jeffrey D. Ullman, and Moshe Y. Vardi. On the foundations of the universal relation model. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 9(2):283-308, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Michael V. Mannino, Paicheng Chu, and Thomas Sager. Statistical profile estimation in database systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 20(3):191-221, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Weiyi Meng, King-Lup Liu, Clement T. Yu, Wensheng Wu, and Naphtali Rishe. Estimating the usefulness of search engines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 146-153, Sydney, Australia, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. The Merrill Lynch company profile service. www.ml.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. The MetaCrawler meta-search engine. www.metacrawler.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. MetaSpy, a search engine spying utility. www.metaspy.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. George A. Mihaila, Louiqa Raschid, and Maria-Esther Vidal. Using quality of data metadata for source selection and ranking. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Workshop on The Web and Databases (WebDB), pages 93-98, Dallas, Texas, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Steve Mohan and Mary Jane Willshire. DataBryte: A data warehouse cleansing framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), pages 77-88, Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Steve Mohan, Mary Jane Willshire, and Charles Schroeder. DataBryte: A proposed data warehouse cleansing framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), pages 283-291, Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Amihai Motro. Completeness information and its application to query processing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 170-178, Kyoto, August 1986. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Amihai Motro and Igor Rakov. Estimating the quality of databases. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS), pages 298-307, Roskilde, Denmark, May 1998. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Hubert Naacke, Georges Gardarin, and Anthony Tomasic. Leveraging mediator cost models with heterogeneous data sources. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 351-360, February 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Felix Naumann. Data fusion and data quality. In Proceedings of the New Techniques & Technologies for Statistics Seminar (NTTS), pages 147-154, Sorrento, Italy, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Felix Naumann and Johann Christoph Freytag. Completeness of information sources. Technical Report 135, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Informatik, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Felix Naumann, Johann Christoph Freytag, and Myra Spiliopoulou. Qualitydriven source selection using Data Envelopment Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), pages 137-152, Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Felix Naumann and Ulf Leser. Density scores for cooperative query answering. In Proceedings of the Workshop Föderierte Datenbanken, pages 103-116, Berlin, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Felix Naumann and Ulf Leser. Cooperative query answering with density scores. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (COMAD), Pune, India, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Felix Naumann, Ulf Leser, and Johann Christoph Freytag. Quality-driven integration of heterogenous information systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 447-458, Edinburgh, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Felix Naumann and Claudia Rolker. Do metadata models meet IQ requirements? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), pages 99-114, Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Felix Naumann and Claudia Rolker. Assessment methods for information quality criteria. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), Boston, MA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Mattis Neiling and Hans-Joachim Lenz. Data integration by means of object identification in information systems. In Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, Austria, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. The New York Stock Exchange stock quote server. www.nyse.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. H.B. Newcombe. Handbook of Record Linkage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Greg R. Notess. Search engine showdown, 2000. www.notess.com/search/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Frank Olken and Doron Rotem. Random sampling from database files: A survey. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM), pages 92-111, Charlotte, NC, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Ken Orr. Data quality and systems theory. Communications of the ACM, February 1998. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Tamer Özsu and Patrick Valduriez. Principles of Distributed Database Systems. Prentice Hall International Editions, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Yannis Papakonstantinou, Serge Abiteboul, and Hector Garcia-Molina. Object fusion in mediator systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 413-424, Bombay, India, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Yannis Papakonstantinou, Hector Garcia-Molina, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. Med-Maker: A mediation system based on declarative specifications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 132-141, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Elizabeth M. Pierce. Enumerating data errors - a survey of the counting literature. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Robert Pirsig. Zen and the Art of Motocycle Maintenance. Bantam Books, New York, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Rachel A. Pottinger and Alon Levy. A scalable algorithm for answering queries using views. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 484-495, Cairo, Egypt, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Xiaolei Qian. Query folding. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 48-55, New Orleans, LA, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Thomas C. Redman. Data Quality for the Information Age. Artech House, Boston, London, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Thomas C. Redman. The impact of poor data quality in the typical enterprise. Communications of the ACM, 41(2):79-82, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Arnon Rosenthal. Note on the expected size of a join. SIGMOD Record, 11(4):19-25, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Mary Tork Roth and Peter M. Schwarz. Don't scrap it, wrap it! A wrapper architecture for legacy data sources. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 266-275, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Thomas Lorie Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Arnaud Sahuguet and Fabien Azavant. Building light-weight wrappers for legacy web data-sources using W4F. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 738-741, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Gerard Salton and Michael J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. The SavvySearch meta-search engine. www.savvysearch.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. P.G. Selinger, M.M. Astrahan, D.D. Chamberlin, R.A. Lorie, and T.G. Price. Access path selection in a relational database management system. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 23-34, Boston, MA, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Amit P. Sheth and James A. Larson. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. In ACM Computing Surveys, volume 22(3), pages 183-236, September 1990. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Narayanan Shivakumar and Hector Garcia-Molina. Scam: A copy detection mechanism for digital documents. In Proceedings of International Conference in Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (DL), Austin, Texas, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Arun Swami and K. Bernhard Schiefer. On the estimation of join result sizes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), volume 779 of LNCS, pages 287-300, Cambridge, UK, 1994. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  123. K.L. Tan, C.H. Goh, and B.C. Ooi. On getting some answers quickly, and perhaps more later. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 32-39, Sydney, Australia, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Giri Kumar Tayi and Donald P. Ballou. Examining data quality. Communications of the ACM, 41(2):54-57, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. Dennis Tsichritzis and Anthony C. Klug. The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS framework. AFIPS Press, Arlington, VA, USA, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Jeffrey D. Ullman. Principles of database and knowledge-base systems, volume II. Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Richard Y. Wang. A product perspective on Total Data Quality Management. Communications of the ACM, 41(2):58-65, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Richard Y. Wang and Diane M. Strong. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal on Management of Information Systems, 12(4):5-34, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. Richard Y. Wang, Diane M. Strong, Beverly K. Kahn, and Yang W. Lee. An information quality assessment methodology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), pages 258-265, Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Web.de, a german search engine. www.web.de.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Inktomi WebMap. www.inktomi.com/webmap/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Gerhard Weikum. Towards guaranteed quality and dependability of information systems. In Proceedings of the Conference Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft (BTW), pages 379-409, Freiburg, Germany, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. Gio Wiederhold. Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Computer, 25(3):38-49, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. Gio Wiederhold. Trends for the information technology industry. Technical report, Stanford University under sponsorship of the Japan Trade Organization, October 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. The Yahoo finance pages. finance.yahoo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Ramana Yerneni, Felix Naumann, and Hector Garcia-Molina. Maximizing coverage of mediated web queries. Technical report, Stanford University, CA, 2000. http://www-db.stanford.edu/~yerneni/pubs/mcmwq.ps.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. C. Yu and W. Meng. Principles of database query processing for advanced applications. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Z39.50 Implementors Group and Z39.50 Maintenance Agency. Attribute Set BIB-1 (Z39.50-1995): Semantics. http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency/ defns/bib1.html, Sep 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Wojciech Ziarko. Discovery through rough set theory. Communications of the ACM, 42(11):54-57, November 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Harley K and Cooper R (2021). Information Integrity, ACM Computing Surveys, 54:2, (1-35), Online publication date: 31-Mar-2022.
  2. West N, Gries J, Brockmeier C, Göbel J and Deuse J Towards integrated Data Analysis Quality: Criteria for the application of Industrial Data Science 2021 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI), (131-138)
  3. ACM
    Piscopo A and Simperl E What we talk about when we talk about wikidata quality Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, (1-11)
  4. Schelter S, Lange D, Schmidt P, Celikel M, Biessmann F and Grafberger A (2018). Automating large-scale data quality verification, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 11:12, (1781-1794), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018.
  5. Abdellaoui S, Bellatreche L and Nader F A quality-driven approach for building heterogeneous distributed databases Proceedings of the 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing, (631-638)
  6. Karkouch A, Mousannif H, Al Moatassime H and Noel T (2016). Data quality in internet of things, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 73:C, (57-81), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.
  7. ACM
    Thakkar H, Endris K, Gimenez-Garcia J, Debattista J, Lange C and Auer S Are Linked Datasets fit for Open-domain Question Answering? A Quality Assessment Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, (1-12)
  8. ACM
    Cheah Y and Plale B (2014). Provenance Quality Assessment Methodology and Framework, Journal of Data and Information Quality, 5:3, (1-20), Online publication date: 2-Mar-2015.
  9. ACM
    Cappiello C, Matera M and Picozzi M (2015). A UI-Centric Approach for the End-User Development of Multidevice Mashups, ACM Transactions on the Web, 9:3, (1-40), Online publication date: 20-Jun-2015.
  10. ACM
    Beskales G, Das G, Elmagarmid A, Ilyas I, Naumann F, Ouzzani M, Papotti P, Quiane-Ruiz J and Tang N (2013). The data analytics group at the qatar computing research institute, ACM SIGMOD Record, 41:4, (33-38), Online publication date: 17-Jan-2013.
  11. ACM
    Booth P, Gaskell P and Hughes C The economics of data Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, (1309-1316)
  12. ACM
    Pattanaphanchai J, O'Hara K and Hall W Trustworthiness criteria for supporting users to assess the credibility of web information Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, (1123-1130)
  13. ACM
    Dustdar S, Pichler R, Savenkov V and Truong H (2012). Quality-aware service-oriented data integration, ACM SIGMOD Record, 41:1, (11-19), Online publication date: 25-Apr-2012.
  14. ACM
    Mendes P, Mühleisen H and Bizer C Sieve Proceedings of the 2012 Joint EDBT/ICDT Workshops, (116-123)
  15. ACM
    Lóscio B, Batista M, Souza D and Salgado A Using information quality for the identification of relevant web data sources Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services, (36-44)
  16. ACM
    Löser A, Nagel C, Pieper S and Boden C Self-supervised web search for any-k complete tuples Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Business intelligencE and the WEB, (4-11)
  17. ACM
    Gamble M and Goble C Quality, trust, and utility of scientific data on the web Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference, (1-8)
  18. Liu X, Dong X, Ooi B and Srivastava D (2020). Online data fusion, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 4:11, (932-943), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.
  19. ACM
    Yan Y and Li W Correlation aware synchronization for near real time decision support systems Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, (39-50)
  20. ACM
    Batini C, Cappiello C, Francalanci C and Maurino A (2009). Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41:3, (1-52), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009.
  21. ACM
    Embury S, Missier P, Sampaio S, Greenwood R and Preece A (2009). Incorporating Domain-Specific Information Quality Constraints into Database Queries, Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), 1:2, (1-31), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009.
  22. Kc M, Hagenbuchner M and Tsoi A Quality Information Retrieval for the World Wide Web Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01, (655-661)
  23. Hose K, Roth A, Zeitz A, Sattler K and Naumann F (2008). A research agenda for query processing in large-scale peer data management systems, Information Systems, 33:7-8, (597-610), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008.
  24. Cappiello C, Francalanci C and Pernici B A self-monitoring system to satisfy data quality requirements Proceedings of the 2005 OTM Confederated international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: CoopIS, COA, and ODBASE - Volume Part II, (1535-1552)
  25. ACM
    Pon R and Cárdenas A Data quality inference Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Information quality in information systems, (105-111)
  26. ACM
    Leser U and Freytag J Mining for patterns in contradictory data Proceedings of the 2004 international workshop on Information quality in information systems, (51-58)
  27. ACM
    Cappiello C, Francalanci C and Pernici B Data quality assessment from the user's perspective Proceedings of the 2004 international workshop on Information quality in information systems, (68-73)
  28. ACM
    Vidal M, Raschid L and Mestre J Challenges in selecting paths for navigational queries Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on the Web and Databases: colocated with ACM SIGMOD/PODS 2004, (61-66)
Contributors
  • Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering gGmbH

Recommendations