No abstract available.
Cited By
- Clements P, Escalona M, Inverardi P, Malavolta I and Marchetti E Exploiting software architecture to support requirements satisfaction testing Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering, (484-487)
- Lee E and Lee S Design opportunity tree for schedule management and evaluation by COQUALMO Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Computational Science and Its Applications - Volume Part IV, (1070-1080)
- Brykczynski B (2019). A survey of software inspection checklists, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 24:1, (82), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1999.
- Ocker R, Fjermestad J, Hiltz S and Johnson K (1998). Effects of four modes of group communication on the outcomes of software requirements determination, Journal of Management Information Systems, 15:1, (99-118), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998.
- Ocker R, Hiltz S, Turoff M and Fjermestad J (1995). The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12:3, (127-153), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1995.
- Brykczynski B and Wheeler D (1993). An annotated bibliography on software inspections, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 18:1, (81-88), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1993.
- Olson J, Olson G, Storrøsten M and Carter M How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, (91-98)
- Olson G, Olson J, Carter M and Storrøsten M (2018). Small group design meetings, Human-Computer Interaction, 7:4, (347-374), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1992.
- Guindon R (2018). Designing the design process, Human-Computer Interaction, 5:2, (305-344), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1990.
- Rosson M and Alpert S (2018). The cognitive consequences of object-oriented design, Human-Computer Interaction, 5:4, (345-379), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1990.
- Litecky C (1989). An expert system for Cobol program debugging, ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 20:1, (1-6), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1989.
- Nejmeh B (1988). NPATH: a measure of execution path complexity and its applications, Communications of the ACM, 31:2, (188-200), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1988.
- Gelperin D and Hetzel B (1988). The growth of software testing, Communications of the ACM, 31:6, (687-695), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1988.
- Drake D Reliability theory applied to software testing Proceedings of the 1987 Fall Joint Computer Conference on Exploring technology: today and tomorrow, (116-118)
- Skibbe R (2019). A practical approach to the evaluation of microcode systems, ACM SIGMICRO Newsletter, 16:4, (47-56), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1985.
- Skibbe R A practical approach to the evaluation of microcode systems Proceedings of the 18th annual workshop on Microprogramming, (47-56)
Index Terms
- Software defect removal
Recommendations
Improving Defect Removal Effectiveness for Software Development
CSMR '98: Proceedings of the 2nd Euromicro Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering ( CSMR'98)The paper first reviews the industry statistics on defects, presents a model of defect removal, then develops the relationships between the defect removal effectiveness of different defect removal phases. The defect removal effectiveness of an average ...
Influencing factors of defect removal: an empirical study based on industrial data
ESEM '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and MeasurementSoftware testing is an important process for software quality control, and it is also costly and time-consuming. It can easily take 50% of development time [1]. To gain high quality software, a frequently-adopted approach is to try to minimize the ...
Software defect-removal efficiency
Defect-removal efficiency-the percentage of bugs eliminated by software reviews, inspections and tests-is a powerful software quality metric that should be understood by everyone in the software business. Many top companies have used this metric since ...