skip to main content
article

Permissive planning: extending classical planning to uncertain task domains

Published:15 January 1997Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

Index Terms

  1. Permissive planning: extending classical planning to uncertain task domains

              Recommendations

              Reviews

              D. Charles Hair

              The problem of automated planning in real-world settings is often complicated by the presence of uncertainty. This problem has been the subject of a number of research efforts in the AI community and has particular relevance in robotics, where real-time decisions must be made. The authors describe their development of a new approach that uses the idea of permissive planning. The approach is intended to achieve a balance between two potentially conflicting goals. One goal is to reach decisions in computationally reasonable amounts of time, where reaching that goal can lead to incorrect decisions because of a failure to account for real-world uncertainty. The other goal is to achieve correct results by reasoning about uncertainty, where achieving correct results can lead to unacceptably slow computations. The permissive planning approach uses a compromise approach in which reasoning about uncertainty is done during a separate learning phase. The separation of the learning phase from the planning phase means that the planning can be done efficiently in real-time settings. The paper presents an in-depth discussion of the permissive planning approach that includes theoretical justifications for the approach and an analysis of its correctness. In order to demonstrate the real-world usefulness of permissive planning, the authors also describe empirical work that was done with a robotic system called GRASPER. The paper is clearly written, includes a good list of references, and is highly technical. It should be of interest to anyone working in areas involved with planning, reasoning with uncertainty, and machine learning.

              Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

              Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access