skip to main content
RFC3768: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)2004 RFC
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

This memo defines the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP). VRRP specifies an election protocol that dynamically assigns responsibility for a virtual router to one of the VRRP routers on a LAN. The VRRP router controlling the IP address(es) associated with a virtual router is called the Master, and forwards packets sent to these IP addresses. The election process provides dynamic fail over in the forwarding responsibility should the Master become unavailable. This allows any of the virtual router IP addresses on the LAN to be used as the default first hop router by end-hosts. The advantage gained from using VRRP is a higher availability default path without requiring configuration of dynamic routing or router discovery protocols on every end-host.

RFC Downloads

Cited By

  1. Abdou A, van Oorschot P and Wan T (2018). Comparative Analysis of Control Plane Security of SDN and Conventional Networks, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20:4, (3542-3559), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.
  2. Yuan X, Min G, Yang L, Ding Y and Fang Q (2017). A game theory-based dynamic resource allocation strategy in Geo-distributed Datacenter Clouds, Future Generation Computer Systems, 76:C, (63-72), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017.
  3. ACM
    Govindan R, Minei I, Kallahalla M, Koley B and Vahdat A Evolve or Die Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference, (58-72)
  4. Galán-Jiménez J and Gazo-Cervero A (2015). Designing energy-efficient link aggregation groups, Ad Hoc Networks, 25:PB, (595-605), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015.
  5. ACM
    Sirisutthidecha S and Maichalernnukul K Reliable Virtual Channels over VPN for Cloud Proceedings of the Eighth International C* Conference on Computer Science & Software Engineering, (133-137)
  6. ACM
    Palomares D, Migault D, Hendrik H, Laurent M and Pujolle G Elastic virtual private cloud Proceedings of the 10th ACM symposium on QoS and security for wireless and mobile networks, (127-131)
  7. ACM
    Tanwer A, Mehta R and Azam T High capacity service provider design using GPMLS for IP next generation networks Proceedings of the CUBE International Information Technology Conference, (186-191)
  8. ACM
    Tanwer A, Mehta R and Azam T Scaling service provider backbone using BGP confederations for next generation networks Proceedings of the CUBE International Information Technology Conference, (216-221)
  9. ACM
    Keller E, Yu M, Caesar M and Rexford J Virtually eliminating router bugs Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies, (13-24)
  10. ACM
    Caesar M and Rexford J Building bug-tolerant routers with virtualization Proceedings of the ACM workshop on Programmable routers for extensible services of tomorrow, (51-56)
  11. ACM
    Greenberg A, Lahiri P, Maltz D, Patel P and Sengupta S Towards a next generation data center architecture Proceedings of the ACM workshop on Programmable routers for extensible services of tomorrow, (57-62)
  12. ACM
    Kim C, Caesar M and Rexford J (2008). Floodless in seattle, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38:4, (3-14), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008.
  13. ACM
    Kim C, Caesar M and Rexford J Floodless in seattle Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on Data communication, (3-14)
  14. ACM
    Greenberg A, Hamilton J, Maltz D and Patel P (2008). The cost of a cloud, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39:1, (68-73), Online publication date: 31-Dec-2009.
  15. ACM
    Fritsche W and Guardini I Deploying home agent load sharing in operational mobile IPv6 networks Proceedings of first ACM/IEEE international workshop on Mobility in the evolving internet architecture, (31-36)
Contributors

Recommendations